Made on
Aug 8, 2026
Price at call
$300.27
6-month call
Bear -5.1%
Target by Feb 2027
$285.00
Great value below
$190.00
Model
v0.6.0
Projection vs Actual (6M history + forecast)
Forecast Change
-5.1% to $285.00
Predicted High
$325.00
at 2 months
Predicted Low
$285.00
at 6 months
Max Drawdown (predicted)
-5.1%
Forecast
The masterbrain trajectory — 7 dated checkpoints. Short rungs (2w, 1m) show the typical range as the primary claim; point calls run from 2 months out. Every claim still gets graded. Predicted Aug 8, 2026 1:03 am
Bear
NET trends lower to
$285.00
(-5.1% from $300.27)
by Feb 2027.
ride-then-fade
ThesisNET is riding a powerful risk-on tape with dovish repricing and earnings momentum, but trades at a huge premium to any value anchor (attractive only below 190). Near-term momentum likely carries it higher into fall, then gravity and profit-taking bleed the move as the year turns and rate optimism matures.
Invalidated ifA regime flip to risk-off, break below the 50-day (~275), or a soft print with guide-down would invalidate the melt-up leg.
| Checkpointtime after the call | Datewhen it gets graded | Predictedthe claim: closing price | Current priceactual close — fills in over time | Predicted returnpredicted vs $300.27 at call | Conv.brain's confidence, 1–10 | Driverwhy the brain put the point here |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prediction made | Aug 8, 2026 | — | $300.27 at call | — | — | The anchor — every point below is measured from this price and date. |
| 2 weeks | Aug 22, 2026 | $254.00–$346.54 typical range · internal point $310.00 | — | ±15.4% | 7/10 | Momentum and risk-on regime extend recent breakout |
| What actually happened: closed $293.05 on Aug 21, 2026 = -2.4% vs the call (predicted +3.2%) · direction HIT (called flat, was flat) · off by 5.6 pp · accuracy 8/10 · typical range ±15.4%: inside the band · S&P -1.1% over the same window — lagged it | ||||||
| 1 month | Sep 8, 2026 | $233.22–$367.32 typical range · internal point $318.00 | — | ±22.3% | 6/10 | Platform narrative and dovish tape keep bid firm |
| What actually happened: closed $278.92 on Sep 4, 2026 = -7.1% vs the call (predicted +5.9%) · direction MISS (called up, was down) · off by 13.0 pp · accuracy 4/10 · typical range ±22.3%: inside the band · S&P -0.5% over the same window — lagged it | ||||||
| 2 months | Oct 8, 2026 | $325.00 | — | +8.2% | 5/10 | Pre-earnings drift higher on beat streak expectations |
Matured — awaiting scoring. This checkpoint's date has passed; the next scorer run
(score-outcomes.php) records what actually happened.
|
||||||
| 3 months | Nov 8, 2026 | $315.00 | — | +4.9% | 4/10 | Post-print digestion, valuation fatigue begins |
| 4 months | Dec 8, 2026 | $305.00 | — | +1.6% | 4/10 | Year-end profit-taking on 80 percent YTD winner |
| 5 months | Jan 8, 2027 | $290.00 | — | -3.4% | 4/10 | January rotation out of high-multiple growth |
| 6 months | Feb 8, 2027 | $285.00 | — | -5.1% | 3/10 | Value gravity pulls toward mid-cycle multiple compression |
Why ranges on the short rungs?
A 102-prediction trial (2026-07-21) showed 2-week point calls carry no information here —
three prompt formulations all lost to simply predicting zero — while the stock's own
volatility scale (σ×√t) described those windows well. So the short rungs claim what's
actually knowable: the typical travel, with earnings timing flagged where the variance
will come from. The internal point calls keep being generated and graded to map where
real skill begins. Full evidence: stocks/predictions/V0.5-DESIGN.md §8.
Deterministic control (v0.3 value line) targets $0.00 (+0.0%) — both lines get graded at every checkpoint, so the brain has to beat the formula, not just replace it. Brain: claude-opus-4-7.
Weaknesses
0 blocking · 1 degraded · 7 notes — follow the chain top-down (cause → effect).-
Degraded
No usable fair-value anchor — brain-only (anchorless) mode: no v0.3 control line, prediction reasons from lenses/sentiment/regime/price behaviour.
-
Note
Traditional FCF-based DCF produces misleading results — company reinvests aggressively
-
Note
EPV is meaningless — the entire value proposition is future growth/optionality
-
Note
PE-based peer comparisons may fail — market values this outside its nominal industry
-
Note
Valuation anchor absent: composite_fair_value.
-
Note
Valuation anchor absent: dcf.
-
Note
Valuation anchor absent: anchored_pe.
-
Note
Valuation anchor absent: signal_adjusted.
Equation Inputs
Everything feeding the v0.6.0 model — value anchors, the stock's own price behaviour, and the tunable knobs.Value anchors (from deep analysis)
| Price at call | $300.27 |
| Composite fair value | — |
| Signal-adjusted fair value | — |
| DCF fair value | — |
| Anchored-PE fair value | — |
| Buy-below (value lens) | — |
| Value net score | -79 |
| Value confidence | 8 / 10 |
| Quality net score | +26 |
| Memo confidence | — / 10 |
| Deserved value (base) | — |
| Quality tilt | — |
| Deserved value (used) | — |
| Coherence (value × quality) | — |
Price behaviour (trailing — shapes the realism line)
| Realized volatility (annualized) | 1m 45.1% 3m 77.4% 6m 73.0% |
| Daily σ (realism noise) | 4.9% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1m 1.29 3m 1.28 5m 1.10 |
| Trailing 6-month return | 84.2% |
Knobs (equation params)
| ladder | ["w2","m1","m2","m3","m4","m5","m6"] |
| llm_model | claude-opus-4-7 |
| max_tokens | 3000 |
| control_knobs | {"w_dcf":0.5,"k_qual":0.200000000000000011102230246251565404236316680908203125,"reach_6m":0.450000000000000011102230246251565404236316680908203125,"coh_floor":0.5,"conf_gain":0.059999999999999997779553950749686919152736663818359375,"noise_phi":0.84999999999999997779553950749686919152736663818359375,"conf_floor":0.40000000000000002220446049250313080847263336181640625,"w_composite":0.5,"noise_window":"3m","flat_band_pct":5,"horizon_months":6,"noise_sigma_fallback":0.01499999999999999944488848768742172978818416595458984375} |
| Neutral band (%) | 5 |
| earnings_brief | v1 |
| prompt_version | p1 |
| control_version | v0.3.0 |
Version & Tech Chain
What produced this prediction — stamped on the record so versions can be compared by success rate later.
Model
v0.6.0
#8eb3df85c300 Tech composition (what this version is built from)
| # | Process | Kind | Group |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Synthesis valuation-synthesis |
deterministic | final |
| 2 | Scenario Analysis scenario-valuation |
deterministic | valuation |
| 3 | Valuation / Mispricing ext-lens-value |
llm | extended |
| 4 | Company Quality ext-lens-quality |
llm | extended |
| 5 | Forensic Memo (combiner) ext-forensic-memo |
llm | extended |
| 6 | Classification company-classification |
llm | foundation |
| 7 | Live Quote fmp-quote |
data | market-data |
Inputs used (the runs that fed this prediction)
| Upstream process | Ran | Lag | Run id |
|---|---|---|---|
company-classification |
Aug 8, 2026 | freshest | NET-20260808-002315-cb58 |
ext-forensic-memo |
Aug 8, 2026 | freshest | ext-NET-20260808-005245-399c |
ext-lens-quality |
Aug 8, 2026 | freshest | ext-NET-20260808-005245-399c |
ext-lens-sentiment |
Aug 8, 2026 | freshest | ext-NET-20260808-005245-399c |
ext-lens-value |
Aug 8, 2026 | freshest | ext-NET-20260808-005245-399c |
scenario-valuation |
Aug 8, 2026 | freshest | NET-20260808-002315-cb58 |
valuation-synthesis |
Aug 8, 2026 | freshest | NET-20260808-002315-cb58 |
Inputs flagged 7d+ behind the freshest one may be stale relative to the rest of the analysis.
Saved History
2 frozen snapshots — the record we score once predictions mature.| Made | Model | Call | At call | Target | Exp. | Eval due | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2026 | v0.6.0 | Bear | $300.27 | $285.00 | -5.1% | Feb 2027 | viewing |
| Jul 10, 2026 | v0.3.0 | — | — | — | — | — | view |
Not Yet Modeled
What this v0.6.0 forecast deliberately ignores — the work ahead, in plain sight.- Scenario probabilities — one path, no bull/bear split (base_prob = 1.0).
- Intraday / sub-2-week behaviour — the first claim is at 14 days by design (EOD product).
- Position sizing / portfolio context — the path is a price claim only.