The masterbrain's trajectory (blue, curved through its 7 checkpoints), the deterministic v0.3 control (dashed), and the actual price (green) overlaid from the prediction date forward.
Forecast Change-12.4% to $61.00
Predicted High$71.50at 1 month
Predicted Low$61.00at 6 months
Max Drawdown (predicted)-12.4%
Forecast
The masterbrain trajectory — 7 dated checkpoints. Short rungs (2w, 1m) show the typical range as the primary claim; point calls run from 2 months out. Every claim still gets graded.
Predicted Aug 9, 2026 1:01 am
Bear
FCX trends lower to
$61.00
(-12.4% from $69.62)
by Feb 2027.
ride-then-fade
ThesisCopper-green-metal narrative and critical-minerals tailwind plus risk-on tape keep FCX bid near-term, but stretched valuation and value gravity slowly pull the price lower over the 6-month window. Expect a mild ride-then-fade rather than a sharp reversion given no earnings catalyst.
Invalidated ifA break above $76 on copper strength or below $60 on regime flip to risk-off would invalidate this drift path.
Checkpointtime after the call
Datewhen it gets graded
Predictedthe claim: closing price
Current priceactual close — fills in over time
Predicted returnpredicted vs $69.62 at call
Conv.brain's confidence, 1–10
Driverwhy the brain put the point here
Prediction made
Aug 9, 2026
—
$69.62at call
—
—
The anchor — every point below is measured from this price and date.
2 weeks
Aug 23, 2026
$62.41–$76.83typical range · internal point $70.80
—
±10.4%
7/10
Risk-on tape and copper narrative sustain near-term bid
What actually happened:
closed $76.66
on Aug 21, 2026 = +10.1% vs the call
(predicted +1.7%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was up)
· off by 8.4 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· typical range ±10.4%:
inside the band
· S&P -1.1%
over the same window — beat it
1 month
Sep 9, 2026
$59.17–$80.07typical range · internal point $71.50
—
±15.0%
6/10
Momentum plus critical-minerals policy chatter extends grind higher
What actually happened:
closed $76.62
on Sep 8, 2026 = +10.1% vs the call
(predicted +2.7%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was up)
· off by 7.4 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· typical range ±15.0%:
inside the band
· S&P -1.1%
over the same window — beat it
Drift toward baseline as premium compresses modestly
Why ranges on the short rungs?
A 102-prediction trial (2026-07-21) showed 2-week point calls carry no information here —
three prompt formulations all lost to simply predicting zero — while the stock's own
volatility scale (σ×√t) described those windows well. So the short rungs claim what's
actually knowable: the typical travel, with earnings timing flagged where the variance
will come from. The internal point calls keep being generated and graded to map where
real skill begins. Full evidence: stocks/predictions/V0.5-DESIGN.md §8.
Deterministic control (v0.3 value line) targets
$60.15
(-13.6%)
— both lines get graded at every checkpoint, so the brain has to beat the formula, not just replace it.
Brain: claude-opus-4-7.
Weaknesses
No weaknesses recorded for this run.
All inputs present, no fallbacks used — nothing to flag.
Equation Inputs
Everything feeding the v0.6.0 model — value anchors, the stock's own price behaviour, and the tunable knobs.
Value anchors (from deep analysis)
Price at call
$69.62
Composite fair value
$22.25
Signal-adjusted fair value
$21.72
DCF fair value
$10.33
Anchored-PE fair value
$42.06
Buy-below (value lens)
$38.00
Value net score
-78
Value confidence
6 / 10
Quality net score
+2
Memo confidence
7 / 10
Deserved value (base)
—
Quality tilt
—
Deserved value (used)
—
Coherence (value × quality)
—
Price behaviour (trailing — shapes the realism line)