Consumer Defensive · Household & Personal Products
Made onAug 25, 2026
Price at call$14.09
6-month call Bull +32.0%
Target by Feb 2027$18.60
Great value below$16.00
Modelv0.6.0
Projection vs Actual
(6M history + forecast)
The masterbrain's trajectory (blue, curved through its 7 checkpoints), the deterministic v0.3 control (dashed), and the actual price (green) overlaid from the prediction date forward.
Forecast Change+32.0% to $18.60
Predicted High$18.60at 6 months
Predicted Low$13.40at 1 month
Max Drawdown (predicted)-4.9%
Forecast
The masterbrain trajectory — 7 dated checkpoints. Short rungs (2w, 1m) show the typical range as the primary claim; point calls run from 2 months out. Every claim still gets graded.
Predicted Aug 25, 2026 1:07 pm
Bull
ODD trends higher to
$18.60
(+32.0% from $14.09)
by Feb 2027.
dip-then-recover
ThesisODD trades near bear-scenario value with deep sentiment damage and high beta, so near-term drift stays soft as fallen-angel selling lingers. Over months, the wide gap to composite fair value ($37) and value-lens attractiveness below $16 pulls the price higher, though the neutral regime and fragile narrative cap the recovery well short of the deterministic $21.82 endpoint.
Invalidated ifA close below $12 on heavy volume or a guide-down/miss confirming structural demand loss would falsify the recovery path.
Checkpointtime after the call
Datewhen it gets graded
Predictedthe claim: closing price
Current priceactual close — fills in over time
Predicted returnpredicted vs $14.09 at call
Conv.brain's confidence, 1–10
Driverwhy the brain put the point here
Prediction made
Aug 25, 2026
—
$14.09at call
—
—
The anchor — every point below is measured from this price and date.
2 weeks
Sep 8, 2026
$10.94–$17.24typical range · internal point $13.70
—
±22.4%
6/10
High beta and negative sentiment keep early drift soft
What actually happened:
closed $13.75
on Sep 4, 2026 = -2.4% vs the call
(predicted -2.8%)
· direction HIT
(called flat, was flat)
· off by 0.4 pp
· accuracy 10/10
· typical range ±22.4%:
inside the band
· S&P +0.5%
over the same window — beat it
1 month
Sep 25, 2026
$9.52–$18.66typical range · internal point $13.40
—
±32.4%
5/10
Fallen-angel tape pressure extends into month one
What actually happened:
closed $18.07
on Sep 24, 2026 = +28.3% vs the call
(predicted -4.9%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was up)
· off by 33.1 pp
· accuracy 2/10
· typical range ±32.4%:
inside the band
· S&P +0.4%
over the same window — lagged it
2 months
Oct 25, 2026
$14.20
—
+0.8%
4/10
Value buyers step in near bear-scenario floor
3 months
Nov 25, 2026
$15.60
—
+10.7%
4/10
Mean reversion as oversold conditions unwind
4 months
Dec 25, 2026
$16.80
—
+19.2%
4/10
Year-end positioning and value gravity build
5 months
Jan 25, 2027
$17.90
—
+27.0%
3/10
Continued convergence toward DCF anchor
6 months
Feb 25, 2027
$18.60
—
+32.0%
3/10
Partial reprice toward composite fair value
Why ranges on the short rungs?
A 102-prediction trial (2026-07-21) showed 2-week point calls carry no information here —
three prompt formulations all lost to simply predicting zero — while the stock's own
volatility scale (σ×√t) described those windows well. So the short rungs claim what's
actually knowable: the typical travel, with earnings timing flagged where the variance
will come from. The internal point calls keep being generated and graded to map where
real skill begins. Full evidence: stocks/predictions/V0.5-DESIGN.md §8.
Deterministic control (v0.3 value line) targets
$21.82
(+54.8%)
— both lines get graded at every checkpoint, so the brain has to beat the formula, not just replace it.
Brain: claude-opus-4-7.
Weaknesses
No weaknesses recorded for this run.
All inputs present, no fallbacks used — nothing to flag.
Equation Inputs
Everything feeding the v0.6.0 model — value anchors, the stock's own price behaviour, and the tunable knobs.
Value anchors (from deep analysis)
Price at call
$14.09
Composite fair value
$37.37
Signal-adjusted fair value
$39.40
DCF fair value
$26.32
Anchored-PE fair value
$80.28
Buy-below (value lens)
$16.00
Value net score
+54
Value confidence
7 / 10
Quality net score
+50
Memo confidence
7 / 10
Deserved value (base)
—
Quality tilt
—
Deserved value (used)
—
Coherence (value × quality)
—
Price behaviour (trailing — shapes the realism line)