Made on
Aug 26, 2026
Price at call
$96.13
6-month call
Bull +13.4%
Target by Feb 2027
$109.00
Great value below
$82.00
Model
v0.6.0
Projection vs Actual (6M history + forecast)
Forecast Change
+13.4% to $109.00
Predicted High
$109.00
at 6 months
Predicted Low
$94.00
at 1 month
Max Drawdown (predicted)
-2.2%
Forecast
The masterbrain trajectory — 7 dated checkpoints. Short rungs (2w, 1m) show the typical range as the primary claim; point calls run from 2 months out. Every claim still gets graded. Predicted Aug 26, 2026 1:00 pm
Bull
GDDY trends higher to
$109.00
(+13.4% from $96.13)
by Feb 2027.
dip-then-recover
ThesisGDDY trades below composite fair value with a bearish sentiment overhang from AI-disruption narrative and shareholder litigation, but a risk-on regime and prior beat history support gradual mean reversion toward fair value. Near-term drift stays soft as sentiment digests, then value gravity pulls toward $105-110 over months.
Invalidated ifBreak below $82 on litigation escalation or an AI-related customer churn disclosure invalidates the recovery path.
| Checkpointtime after the call | Datewhen it gets graded | Predictedthe claim: closing price | Current priceactual close — fills in over time | Predicted returnpredicted vs $96.13 at call | Conv.brain's confidence, 1–10 | Driverwhy the brain put the point here |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prediction made | Aug 26, 2026 | — | $96.13 at call | — | — | The anchor — every point below is measured from this price and date. |
| 2 weeks | Sep 9, 2026 | $83.48–$108.78 typical range · internal point $95.20 | — | ±13.2% | 6/10 | Sentiment overhang and litigation headlines keep pressure |
| What actually happened: closed $92.88 on Sep 8, 2026 = -3.4% vs the call (predicted -1.0%) · direction HIT (called flat, was flat) · off by 2.4 pp · accuracy 9/10 · typical range ±13.2%: inside the band · S&P 0.0% over the same window — beat it | ||||||
| 1 month | Sep 26, 2026 | $77.80–$114.46 typical range · internal point $94.00 | — | ±19.1% | 5/10 | AI-disruption narrative lingers, no catalyst yet |
| What actually happened: closed $97.14 on Sep 25, 2026 = +1.1% vs the call (predicted -2.2%) · direction HIT (called flat, was flat) · off by 3.3 pp · accuracy 9/10 · typical range ±19.1%: inside the band · S&P +0.9% over the same window — lagged it | ||||||
| 2 months | Oct 26, 2026 | $97.50 | — | +1.4% | 5/10 | Q3 print approaches, beat history supports drift up |
| 3 months | Nov 26, 2026 | $102.00 | — | +6.1% | 5/10 | Earnings beat likely, valuation gap begins closing |
| 4 months | Dec 26, 2026 | $105.50 | — | +9.8% | 4/10 | Value gravity toward composite fair value $108 |
| 5 months | Jan 26, 2027 | $107.00 | — | +11.3% | 4/10 | Continued mean reversion, risk-on regime tailwind |
| 6 months | Feb 26, 2027 | $109.00 | — | +13.4% | 3/10 | Approaches fair value; endpoint near baseline |
Why ranges on the short rungs?
A 102-prediction trial (2026-07-21) showed 2-week point calls carry no information here —
three prompt formulations all lost to simply predicting zero — while the stock's own
volatility scale (σ×√t) described those windows well. So the short rungs claim what's
actually knowable: the typical travel, with earnings timing flagged where the variance
will come from. The internal point calls keep being generated and graded to map where
real skill begins. Full evidence: stocks/predictions/V0.5-DESIGN.md §8.
Deterministic control (v0.3 value line) targets $113.03 (+17.6%) — both lines get graded at every checkpoint, so the brain has to beat the formula, not just replace it. Brain: claude-opus-4-7.
Weaknesses
No weaknesses recorded for this run.All inputs present, no fallbacks used — nothing to flag.
Equation Inputs
Everything feeding the v0.6.0 model — value anchors, the stock's own price behaviour, and the tunable knobs.Value anchors (from deep analysis)
| Price at call | $96.13 |
| Composite fair value | $108.13 |
| Signal-adjusted fair value | $96.66 |
| DCF fair value | $150.88 |
| Anchored-PE fair value | $89.21 |
| Buy-below (value lens) | $82.00 |
| Value net score | -34 |
| Value confidence | 7 / 10 |
| Quality net score | +48 |
| Memo confidence | 7 / 10 |
| Deserved value (base) | — |
| Quality tilt | — |
| Deserved value (used) | — |
| Coherence (value × quality) | — |
Price behaviour (trailing — shapes the realism line)
| Realized volatility (annualized) | 1m 86.5% 3m 66.0% 6m 59.2% |
| Daily σ (realism noise) | 4.2% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1m -0.72 3m -0.25 5m -0.24 |
| Trailing 6-month return | 8.1% |
Knobs (equation params)
| ladder | ["w2","m1","m2","m3","m4","m5","m6"] |
| llm_model | claude-opus-4-7 |
| max_tokens | 3000 |
| control_knobs | {"w_dcf":0.5,"k_qual":0.200000000000000011102230246251565404236316680908203125,"reach_6m":0.450000000000000011102230246251565404236316680908203125,"coh_floor":0.5,"conf_gain":0.059999999999999997779553950749686919152736663818359375,"noise_phi":0.84999999999999997779553950749686919152736663818359375,"conf_floor":0.40000000000000002220446049250313080847263336181640625,"w_composite":0.5,"noise_window":"3m","flat_band_pct":5,"horizon_months":6,"noise_sigma_fallback":0.01499999999999999944488848768742172978818416595458984375} |
| Neutral band (%) | 5 |
| earnings_brief | v1 |
| prompt_version | p1 |
| control_version | v0.3.0 |
Version & Tech Chain
What produced this prediction — stamped on the record so versions can be compared by success rate later.
Model
v0.6.0
#271041f8fcd5 Tech composition (what this version is built from)
| # | Process | Kind | Group |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Synthesis valuation-synthesis |
deterministic | final |
| 2 | Scenario Analysis scenario-valuation |
deterministic | valuation |
| 3 | Valuation / Mispricing ext-lens-value |
llm | extended |
| 4 | Company Quality ext-lens-quality |
llm | extended |
| 5 | Forensic Memo (combiner) ext-forensic-memo |
llm | extended |
| 6 | Classification company-classification |
llm | foundation |
| 7 | Live Quote fmp-quote |
data | market-data |
Inputs used (the runs that fed this prediction)
| Upstream process | Ran | Lag | Run id |
|---|---|---|---|
company-classification |
Aug 2, 2026 | 23d behind | GDDY-20260802-134302-a0c5 |
ext-forensic-memo |
Aug 25, 2026 | freshest | ext-GDDY-20260825-180237-54d1 |
ext-lens-quality |
Aug 25, 2026 | freshest | ext-GDDY-20260825-180237-54d1 |
ext-lens-sentiment |
Aug 25, 2026 | freshest | ext-GDDY-20260825-180237-54d1 |
ext-lens-value |
Aug 25, 2026 | freshest | ext-GDDY-20260825-180237-54d1 |
scenario-valuation |
Aug 25, 2026 | freshest | GDDY-20260823-230001-6c70 |
valuation-synthesis |
Aug 25, 2026 | freshest | GDDY-20260823-230001-6c70 |
Inputs flagged 7d+ behind the freshest one may be stale relative to the rest of the analysis.
Saved History
3 frozen snapshots — the record we score once predictions mature.Not Yet Modeled
What this v0.6.0 forecast deliberately ignores — the work ahead, in plain sight.- Scenario probabilities — one path, no bull/bear split (base_prob = 1.0).
- Intraday / sub-2-week behaviour — the first claim is at 14 days by design (EOD product).
- Position sizing / portfolio context — the path is a price claim only.