The masterbrain's trajectory (blue, curved through its 7 checkpoints), the deterministic v0.3 control (dashed), and the actual price (green) overlaid from the prediction date forward.
Forecast Change+21.2% to $142.00
Predicted High$142.00at 6 months
Predicted Low$113.00at 1 month
Max Drawdown (predicted)-3.5%
Forecast
The masterbrain trajectory — 7 dated checkpoints. Short rungs (2w, 1m) show the typical range as the primary claim; point calls run from 2 months out. Every claim still gets graded.
Predicted Aug 26, 2026 1:06 pm
Bull
LULU trends higher to
$142.00
(+21.2% from $117.12)
by Feb 2027.
dip-then-recover
ThesisLULU trades as a bruised fallen-angel with heavy sentiment overhang and a looming guide-down risk, but sits well below multiple fair-value anchors with a marquee value-investor endorsement providing a floor. Expect near-term chop and possibly a retest lower before value gravity pulls the stock toward the mid 140s as sentiment stabilizes into 2027.
Invalidated ifA close below $105 on guide-down confirmation, or failure to reclaim $125 within 3 months, would falsify the recovery path.
Checkpointtime after the call
Datewhen it gets graded
Predictedthe claim: closing price
Current priceactual close — fills in over time
Predicted returnpredicted vs $117.12 at call
Conv.brain's confidence, 1–10
Driverwhy the brain put the point here
Prediction made
Aug 26, 2026
—
$117.12at call
—
—
The anchor — every point below is measured from this price and date.
2 weeks
Sep 9, 2026
$107.44–$126.80typical range · internal point $115.50
—
±8.3%
6/10
Sentiment overhang and guide-down fear cap near-term bounce
What actually happened:
closed $103.19
on Sep 8, 2026 = -11.9% vs the call
(predicted -1.4%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was down)
· off by 10.5 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· typical range ±8.3%:
OUTSIDE the band
· S&P 0.0%
over the same window — beat it
1 month
Sep 26, 2026
$103.10–$131.14typical range · internal point $113.00
—
±12.0%
5/10
Fallen-angel narrative persists absent catalyst
What actually happened:
closed $101.30
on Sep 25, 2026 = -13.5% vs the call
(predicted -3.5%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was down)
· off by 10.0 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· typical range ±12.0%:
OUTSIDE the band
· S&P +0.9%
over the same window — beat it
2 months
Oct 26, 2026
$118.00
—
+0.8%
4/10
Value buyers step in near attractive-below threshold
3 months
Nov 26, 2026
$126.00
—
+7.6%
4/10
Risk-on regime and value endorsement lift multiple
4 months
Dec 26, 2026
$132.00
—
+12.7%
4/10
Holiday read-through and oversold mean reversion
5 months
Jan 26, 2027
$138.00
—
+17.8%
4/10
Value gravity toward composite fair value engages
6 months
Feb 26, 2027
$142.00
—
+21.2%
3/10
Convergence toward baseline as sentiment normalizes
Why ranges on the short rungs?
A 102-prediction trial (2026-07-21) showed 2-week point calls carry no information here —
three prompt formulations all lost to simply predicting zero — while the stock's own
volatility scale (σ×√t) described those windows well. So the short rungs claim what's
actually knowable: the typical travel, with earnings timing flagged where the variance
will come from. The internal point calls keep being generated and graded to map where
real skill begins. Full evidence: stocks/predictions/V0.5-DESIGN.md §8.
Deterministic control (v0.3 value line) targets
$144.10
(+23.0%)
— both lines get graded at every checkpoint, so the brain has to beat the formula, not just replace it.
Brain: claude-opus-4-7.