The masterbrain's trajectory (blue, curved through its 7 checkpoints), the deterministic v0.3 control (dashed), and the actual price (green) overlaid from the prediction date forward.
Forecast Change+10.7% to $51.00
Predicted High$51.00at 6 months
Predicted Low$46.60in 2 weeks
Forecast
The masterbrain trajectory — 7 dated checkpoints. Short rungs (2w, 1m) show the typical range as the primary claim; point calls run from 2 months out. Every claim still gets graded.
Predicted Aug 27, 2026 1:13 pm
Bull
NVO trends higher to
$51.00
(+10.7% from $46.07)
by Feb 2027.
flat-then-break
ThesisNVO is caught between improving value gravity (fair value 48-53) and a persistent negative GLP-1 narrative where Lilly dominates mindshare. Expect a slow, uneven grind toward composite fair value as the risk-on regime and recent momentum help early, but sentiment drag and no near-term earnings catalyst cap upside. Endpoint lands near signal-adjusted fair value, slightly above the deterministic baseline.
Invalidated ifA break below $41.44 bear-case level on Lilly share-gain data, or a break above $54 on a positive trial or guidance surprise, would invalidate this trajectory.
Checkpointtime after the call
Datewhen it gets graded
Predictedthe claim: closing price
Current priceactual close — fills in over time
Predicted returnpredicted vs $46.07 at call
Conv.brain's confidence, 1–10
Driverwhy the brain put the point here
Prediction made
Aug 27, 2026
—
$46.07at call
—
—
The anchor — every point below is measured from this price and date.
2 weeks
Sep 10, 2026
$42.47–$49.67typical range · internal point $46.60
—
±7.8%
7/10
Risk-on regime and momentum carry into early September
What actually happened:
closed $44.56
on Sep 9, 2026 = -3.3% vs the call
(predicted +1.2%)
· direction HIT
(called flat, was flat)
· off by 4.4 pp
· accuracy 8/10
· typical range ±7.8%:
inside the band
· S&P -1.2%
over the same window — lagged it
1 month
Sep 27, 2026
$40.85–$51.29typical range · internal point $47.20
—
±11.3%
6/10
Drift toward fair value, low beta dampens moves
What actually happened:
closed $38.80
on Sep 25, 2026 = -15.8% vs the call
(predicted +2.5%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was down)
· off by 18.2 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· typical range ±11.3%:
OUTSIDE the band
· S&P +0.2%
over the same window — lagged it
2 months
Oct 27, 2026
$47.80
—
+3.8%
5/10
Sentiment drag offsets value pull, choppy consolidation
Approaches signal-adjusted fair value, narrative still heavy
Why ranges on the short rungs?
A 102-prediction trial (2026-07-21) showed 2-week point calls carry no information here —
three prompt formulations all lost to simply predicting zero — while the stock's own
volatility scale (σ×√t) described those windows well. So the short rungs claim what's
actually knowable: the typical travel, with earnings timing flagged where the variance
will come from. The internal point calls keep being generated and graded to map where
real skill begins. Full evidence: stocks/predictions/V0.5-DESIGN.md §8.
Deterministic control (v0.3 value line) targets
$49.93
(+8.4%)
— both lines get graded at every checkpoint, so the brain has to beat the formula, not just replace it.
Brain: claude-opus-4-7.