The masterbrain's trajectory (blue, curved through its 7 checkpoints), the deterministic v0.3 control (dashed), and the actual price (green) overlaid from the prediction date forward.
Forecast Change-11.7% to $448.00
Predicted High$502.00in 2 weeks
Predicted Low$448.00at 6 months
Max Drawdown (predicted)-11.7%
Forecast
The masterbrain trajectory — 7 dated checkpoints. Short rungs (2w, 1m) show the typical range as the primary claim; point calls run from 2 months out. Every claim still gets graded.
Predicted Aug 1, 2026 12:45 am
Bear
AMAT trends lower to
$448.00
(-11.7% from $507.64)
by Feb 2027.
ride-then-fade
ThesisAMAT is trading 4-5x any reasonable fair value on AI cap-ex euphoria, but strong quality, no near-term earnings catalyst, and a neutral regime mean gravity works slowly. Expect choppy consolidation with a gradual fade as the narrative gets tested and the prior miss (down 13% vs flat call) shows momentum is already cracking.
Invalidated ifA decisive break above $560 on renewed AI cap-ex upgrades, or conversely a break below $430 accelerating the mean-reversion thesis faster than modeled.
Checkpointtime after the call
Datewhen it gets graded
Predictedthe claim: closing price
Current priceactual close — fills in over time
Predicted returnpredicted vs $507.64 at call
Conv.brain's confidence, 1–10
Driverwhy the brain put the point here
Prediction made
Aug 1, 2026
—
$507.64at call
—
—
The anchor — every point below is measured from this price and date.
2 weeks
Aug 15, 2026
$422.70–$592.58typical range · internal point $502.00
—
±16.7%
6/10
Mild drift lower, high-beta consolidation post 49% run
What actually happened:
closed $507.11
on Aug 14, 2026 = -0.1% vs the call
(predicted -1.1%)
· direction HIT
(called flat, was flat)
· off by 1.0 pp
· accuracy 10/10
· typical range ±16.7%:
inside the band
· S&P +4.0%
over the same window — beat it
1 month
Sep 1, 2026
$384.55–$630.73typical range · internal point $495.00
—
±24.2%
5/10
No catalyst, sentiment cooling, regime neutral
What actually happened:
closed $441.85
on Sep 1, 2026 = -13.0% vs the call
(predicted -2.5%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was down)
· off by 10.5 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· typical range ±24.2%:
inside the band
· S&P +1.9%
over the same window — beat it
2 months
Oct 1, 2026
$483.00
—
-4.9%
5/10
Valuation gravity begins to bite, sector rotation risk
What actually happened:
closed $511.38
on Sep 30, 2026 = +0.7% vs the call
(predicted -4.9%)
· direction HIT
(called flat, was flat)
· off by 5.6 pp
· accuracy 8/10
· S&P +2.2%
over the same window — lagged it
3 months
Nov 1, 2026
$470.00
—
-7.4%
4/10
Earnings window approaches, positioning trims
4 months
Dec 1, 2026
$462.00
—
-9.0%
4/10
AI cap-ex narrative fatigue accelerates fade
5 months
Jan 1, 2027
$455.00
—
-10.4%
3/10
Year-end profit taking on high-beta winners
6 months
Feb 1, 2027
$448.00
—
-11.7%
3/10
Continued mean reversion toward deterministic anchor
Why ranges on the short rungs?
A 102-prediction trial (2026-07-21) showed 2-week point calls carry no information here —
three prompt formulations all lost to simply predicting zero — while the stock's own
volatility scale (σ×√t) described those windows well. So the short rungs claim what's
actually knowable: the typical travel, with earnings timing flagged where the variance
will come from. The internal point calls keep being generated and graded to map where
real skill begins. Full evidence: stocks/predictions/V0.5-DESIGN.md §8.
Deterministic control (v0.3 value line) targets
$435.45
(-14.2%)
— both lines get graded at every checkpoint, so the brain has to beat the formula, not just replace it.
Brain: claude-opus-4-7.
Weaknesses
No weaknesses recorded for this run.
All inputs present, no fallbacks used — nothing to flag.
Equation Inputs
Everything feeding the v0.6.0 model — value anchors, the stock's own price behaviour, and the tunable knobs.
Value anchors (from deep analysis)
Price at call
$507.64
Composite fair value
$108.92
Signal-adjusted fair value
$100.51
DCF fair value
$89.28
Anchored-PE fair value
$184.80
Buy-below (value lens)
$340.00
Value net score
-72
Value confidence
6 / 10
Quality net score
+87
Memo confidence
8 / 10
Deserved value (base)
—
Quality tilt
—
Deserved value (used)
—
Coherence (value × quality)
—
Price behaviour (trailing — shapes the realism line)