The masterbrain's trajectory (blue, curved through its 7 checkpoints), the deterministic v0.3 control (dashed), and the actual price (green) overlaid from the prediction date forward.
Forecast Change-7.2% to $157.50
Predicted High$169.90in 2 weeks
Predicted Low$157.50at 6 months
Max Drawdown (predicted)-7.2%
Forecast
The masterbrain trajectory — 7 dated checkpoints. Short rungs (2w, 1m) show the typical range as the primary claim; point calls run from 2 months out. Every claim still gets graded.
Predicted Aug 2, 2026 12:41 am
Bear
AZN trends lower to
$157.50
(-7.2% from $169.64)
by Feb 2027.
decay
ThesisAZN trades meaningfully above composite fair value ($132) with a negative value net and weak recent momentum, but a defensive low-beta profile, mild sentiment tailwind from EU oncology approval, and no near-term earnings catalyst suggest gradual value gravity rather than a sharp de-rate. Expect a slow drift lower toward the DCF/anchored-PE band over 6 months.
Invalidated ifA break above $178 on positive pipeline news, or a break below $150 signaling faster mean-reversion to fair value
Checkpointtime after the call
Datewhen it gets graded
Predictedthe claim: closing price
Current priceactual close — fills in over time
Predicted returnpredicted vs $169.64 at call
Conv.brain's confidence, 1–10
Driverwhy the brain put the point here
Prediction made
Aug 2, 2026
—
$169.64at call
—
—
The anchor — every point below is measured from this price and date.
2 weeks
Aug 16, 2026
$159.16–$180.12typical range · internal point $169.90
—
±6.2%
6/10
Low-beta drift in neutral tape, no catalyst
What actually happened:
closed $156.45
on Aug 14, 2026 = -7.8% vs the call
(predicted +0.2%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was down)
· off by 7.9 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· typical range ±6.2%:
OUTSIDE the band
· S&P +4.7%
over the same window — beat it
1 month
Sep 2, 2026
$154.46–$184.82typical range · internal point $168.50
—
±8.9%
5/10
Sentiment tailwind fades, mild value gravity begins
What actually happened:
closed $162.47
on Sep 1, 2026 = -4.2% vs the call
(predicted -0.7%)
· direction HIT
(called flat, was flat)
· off by 3.6 pp
· accuracy 9/10
· typical range ±8.9%:
inside the band
· S&P +1.9%
over the same window — beat it
2 months
Oct 2, 2026
$165.80
—
-2.3%
5/10
Overvaluation pressure builds without new catalyst
What actually happened:
closed $157.70
on Oct 1, 2026 = -7.0% vs the call
(predicted -2.3%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was down)
· off by 4.8 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· S&P +2.4%
over the same window — beat it
3 months
Nov 2, 2026
$163.00
—
-3.9%
4/10
Slow convergence toward DCF anchor near 154
4 months
Dec 2, 2026
$161.50
—
-4.8%
4/10
Defensive bid cushions decline into year-end
5 months
Jan 2, 2027
$159.00
—
-6.3%
4/10
Post-holiday repositioning, value lens still negative
6 months
Feb 2, 2027
$157.50
—
-7.2%
3/10
Approaches anchored-PE band as fair value asserts
Why ranges on the short rungs?
A 102-prediction trial (2026-07-21) showed 2-week point calls carry no information here —
three prompt formulations all lost to simply predicting zero — while the stock's own
volatility scale (σ×√t) described those windows well. So the short rungs claim what's
actually knowable: the typical travel, with earnings timing flagged where the variance
will come from. The internal point calls keep being generated and graded to map where
real skill begins. Full evidence: stocks/predictions/V0.5-DESIGN.md §8.
Deterministic control (v0.3 value line) targets
$167.67
(-1.2%)
— both lines get graded at every checkpoint, so the brain has to beat the formula, not just replace it.
Brain: claude-opus-4-7.
Weaknesses
No weaknesses recorded for this run.
All inputs present, no fallbacks used — nothing to flag.
Equation Inputs
Everything feeding the v0.6.0 model — value anchors, the stock's own price behaviour, and the tunable knobs.
Value anchors (from deep analysis)
Price at call
$169.64
Composite fair value
$132.40
Signal-adjusted fair value
$136.62
DCF fair value
$154.03
Anchored-PE fair value
$148.32
Buy-below (value lens)
$145.00
Value net score
-69
Value confidence
7 / 10
Quality net score
+55
Memo confidence
7 / 10
Deserved value (base)
—
Quality tilt
—
Deserved value (used)
—
Coherence (value × quality)
—
Price behaviour (trailing — shapes the realism line)