The masterbrain's trajectory (blue, curved through its 7 checkpoints), the deterministic v0.3 control (dashed), and the actual price (green) overlaid from the prediction date forward.
Forecast Change-18.0% to $37.00
Predicted High$44.60in 2 weeks
Predicted Low$37.00at 6 months
Max Drawdown (predicted)-18.0%
Forecast
The masterbrain trajectory — 7 dated checkpoints. Short rungs (2w, 1m) show the typical range as the primary claim; point calls run from 2 months out. Every claim still gets graded.
Predicted Aug 1, 2026 1:02 am
Bear
BILL trends lower to
$37.00
(-18.0% from $45.13)
by Feb 2027.
decay
ThesisBILL trades well above composite fair value ($29) with negative sentiment and a cracking platform narrative, but strong earnings execution and low realized beta cushion the descent. Expect a gradual grind lower toward the mid-30s as value gravity asserts itself over months, not a violent repricing absent a catalyst.
Invalidated ifA reclaim above $52 on volume, or a sentiment reversal via a large customer/platform win, would invalidate the drift-lower thesis.
Checkpointtime after the call
Datewhen it gets graded
Predictedthe claim: closing price
Current priceactual close — fills in over time
Predicted returnpredicted vs $45.13 at call
Conv.brain's confidence, 1–10
Driverwhy the brain put the point here
Prediction made
Aug 1, 2026
—
$45.13at call
—
—
The anchor — every point below is measured from this price and date.
2 weeks
Aug 15, 2026
$40.03–$50.23typical range · internal point $44.60
—
±11.3%
6/10
Neutral tape, mild drift as narrative pressure persists
What actually happened:
closed $49.78
on Aug 14, 2026 = +10.3% vs the call
(predicted -1.2%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was up)
· off by 11.5 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· typical range ±11.3%:
inside the band
· S&P +4.0%
over the same window — lagged it
1 month
Sep 1, 2026
$37.73–$52.53typical range · internal point $43.80
—
±16.4%
6/10
No catalyst, sentiment overhang continues bleeding tape
What actually happened:
closed $47.62
on Sep 1, 2026 = +5.5% vs the call
(predicted -3.0%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was up)
· off by 8.5 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· typical range ±16.4%:
inside the band
· S&P +1.9%
over the same window — lagged it
2 months
Oct 1, 2026
$42.50
—
-5.8%
5/10
Value gravity begins pulling toward composite fair value
Post-print digestion, drift toward deserved value zone
5 months
Jan 1, 2027
$38.20
—
-15.4%
4/10
Year-end repositioning away from rich SaaS narratives
6 months
Feb 1, 2027
$37.00
—
-18.0%
3/10
Convergence toward mid-30s deserved-value band
Why ranges on the short rungs?
A 102-prediction trial (2026-07-21) showed 2-week point calls carry no information here —
three prompt formulations all lost to simply predicting zero — while the stock's own
volatility scale (σ×√t) described those windows well. So the short rungs claim what's
actually knowable: the typical travel, with earnings timing flagged where the variance
will come from. The internal point calls keep being generated and graded to map where
real skill begins. Full evidence: stocks/predictions/V0.5-DESIGN.md §8.
Deterministic control (v0.3 value line) targets
$44.21
(-2.0%)
— both lines get graded at every checkpoint, so the brain has to beat the formula, not just replace it.
Brain: claude-opus-4-7.