The masterbrain's trajectory (blue, curved through its 7 checkpoints), the deterministic v0.3 control (dashed), and the actual price (green) overlaid from the prediction date forward.
Forecast Change+8.5% to $48.40
Predicted High$48.40at 6 months
Predicted Low$43.80at 1 month
Max Drawdown (predicted)-1.8%
Forecast
The masterbrain trajectory — 7 dated checkpoints. Short rungs (2w, 1m) show the typical range as the primary claim; point calls run from 2 months out. Every claim still gets graded.
Predicted Aug 1, 2026 1:00 am
Bull
CART trends higher to
$48.40
(+8.5% from $44.60)
by Feb 2027.
dip-then-recover
ThesisCART sits slightly above composite fair value but well below DCF and signal-adjusted anchors, with quiet quality/sentiment tailwinds and low beta in a neutral tape. Path drifts modestly higher toward the deterministic baseline as value gravity pulls toward the mid-50s deserved zone, though absent a catalyst the ascent is gradual with mid-window chop.
Invalidated ifA close below $40 on deteriorating volume, or a break above $52 confirming re-rate toward DCF anchor
Checkpointtime after the call
Datewhen it gets graded
Predictedthe claim: closing price
Current priceactual close — fills in over time
Predicted returnpredicted vs $44.60 at call
Conv.brain's confidence, 1–10
Driverwhy the brain put the point here
Prediction made
Aug 1, 2026
—
$44.60at call
—
—
The anchor — every point below is measured from this price and date.
2 weeks
Aug 15, 2026
$40.58–$48.62typical range · internal point $44.30
—
±9.0%
6/10
Neutral tape, low beta, mean-revert near current
What actually happened:
closed $48.88
on Aug 14, 2026 = +9.6% vs the call
(predicted -0.7%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was up)
· off by 10.3 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· typical range ±9.0%:
OUTSIDE the band
· S&P +4.0%
over the same window — lagged it
1 month
Sep 1, 2026
$38.77–$50.43typical range · internal point $43.80
—
±13.1%
5/10
Mild risk-off drift, no catalyst, value slightly rich
What actually happened:
closed $50.05
on Sep 1, 2026 = +12.2% vs the call
(predicted -1.8%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was up)
· off by 14.0 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· typical range ±13.1%:
inside the band
· S&P +1.9%
over the same window — lagged it
2 months
Oct 1, 2026
$44.90
—
+0.7%
5/10
Stabilizes near composite fair value zone
What actually happened:
closed $43.12
on Sep 30, 2026 = -3.3% vs the call
(predicted +0.7%)
· direction HIT
(called flat, was flat)
· off by 4.0 pp
· accuracy 9/10
· S&P +2.2%
over the same window — beat it
3 months
Nov 1, 2026
$46.20
—
+3.6%
5/10
Earnings-season lift, quality signals reassert
4 months
Dec 1, 2026
$47.00
—
+5.4%
4/10
Grinding toward deterministic baseline endpoint
5 months
Jan 1, 2027
$47.80
—
+7.2%
4/10
Year-end positioning, DCF gap slowly narrows
6 months
Feb 1, 2027
$48.40
—
+8.5%
3/10
Slow convergence toward deserved value, no story engine
Why ranges on the short rungs?
A 102-prediction trial (2026-07-21) showed 2-week point calls carry no information here —
three prompt formulations all lost to simply predicting zero — while the stock's own
volatility scale (σ×√t) described those windows well. So the short rungs claim what's
actually knowable: the typical travel, with earnings timing flagged where the variance
will come from. The internal point calls keep being generated and graded to map where
real skill begins. Full evidence: stocks/predictions/V0.5-DESIGN.md §8.
Deterministic control (v0.3 value line) targets
$47.36
(+6.2%)
— both lines get graded at every checkpoint, so the brain has to beat the formula, not just replace it.
Brain: claude-opus-4-7.
Weaknesses
No weaknesses recorded for this run.
All inputs present, no fallbacks used — nothing to flag.
Equation Inputs
Everything feeding the v0.6.0 model — value anchors, the stock's own price behaviour, and the tunable knobs.
Value anchors (from deep analysis)
Price at call
$44.60
Composite fair value
$40.71
Signal-adjusted fair value
$61.90
DCF fair value
$61.56
Anchored-PE fair value
$51.22
Buy-below (value lens)
$40.00
Value net score
-2
Value confidence
6 / 10
Quality net score
+15
Memo confidence
6 / 10
Deserved value (base)
—
Quality tilt
—
Deserved value (used)
—
Coherence (value × quality)
—
Price behaviour (trailing — shapes the realism line)