Financial Services · Financial Data & Stock Exchanges
Made onSep 1, 2026
Price at call$284.79
6-month call Bear -5.2%
Target by Mar 2027$270.00
Great value below$225.00
Modelv0.6.0
Projection vs Actual
(6M history + forecast)
The masterbrain's trajectory (blue, curved through its 7 checkpoints), the deterministic v0.3 control (dashed), and the actual price (green) overlaid from the prediction date forward.
Forecast Change-5.2% to $270.00
Predicted High$283.50in 2 weeks
Predicted Low$270.00at 6 months
Max Drawdown (predicted)-5.2%
Forecast
The masterbrain trajectory — 7 dated checkpoints. Short rungs (2w, 1m) show the typical range as the primary claim; point calls run from 2 months out. Every claim still gets graded.
Predicted Sep 1, 2026 1:00 pm
Bear
CME trends lower to
$270.00
(-5.2% from $284.79)
by Mar 2027.
decay
ThesisCME trades well above every fair-value anchor with weak sentiment and a risk-on tape rewarding higher-beta names, so I expect a modest drift lower toward the anchored-PE zone near $270, not a collapse toward DCF given the fortress quality and low beta.
Invalidated ifA sustained break above $295 or an equity risk-off shock that bids low-beta exchanges would invalidate the drift-lower path.
Checkpointtime after the call
Datewhen it gets graded
Predictedthe claim: closing price
Current priceactual close — fills in over time
Predicted returnpredicted vs $284.79 at call
Conv.brain's confidence, 1–10
Driverwhy the brain put the point here
Prediction made
Sep 1, 2026
—
$284.79at call
—
—
The anchor — every point below is measured from this price and date.
2 weeks
Sep 15, 2026
$268.43–$301.15typical range · internal point $283.50
—
±5.7%
6/10
Low-vol drift, no catalyst, risk-on tape caps upside
What actually happened:
closed $280.46
on Sep 14, 2026 = -1.5% vs the call
(predicted -0.5%)
· direction HIT
(called flat, was flat)
· off by 1.1 pp
· accuracy 10/10
· typical range ±5.7%:
inside the band
· S&P -0.2%
over the same window — beat it
1 month
Oct 1, 2026
$261.09–$308.49typical range · internal point $281.00
—
±8.3%
6/10
Rotation away from defensives continues gradually
What actually happened:
closed $261.98
on Sep 30, 2026 = -8.0% vs the call
(predicted -1.3%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was down)
· off by 6.7 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· typical range ±8.3%:
inside the band
· S&P +0.3%
over the same window — beat it
2 months
Nov 1, 2026
$278.00
—
-2.4%
5/10
Q3 print approaches, valuation gravity begins
3 months
Dec 1, 2026
$275.50
—
-3.3%
5/10
Earnings likely in-line, sentiment stays tepid
4 months
Jan 1, 2027
$273.00
—
-4.1%
4/10
Year-end positioning trims richly-valued utility name
5 months
Feb 1, 2027
$271.00
—
-4.8%
4/10
Converges toward anchored-PE fair value zone
6 months
Mar 1, 2027
$270.00
—
-5.2%
4/10
Settles near anchored-PE, quality floor prevents deeper slide
Why ranges on the short rungs?
A 102-prediction trial (2026-07-21) showed 2-week point calls carry no information here —
three prompt formulations all lost to simply predicting zero — while the stock's own
volatility scale (σ×√t) described those windows well. So the short rungs claim what's
actually knowable: the typical travel, with earnings timing flagged where the variance
will come from. The internal point calls keep being generated and graded to map where
real skill begins. Full evidence: stocks/predictions/V0.5-DESIGN.md §8.
Deterministic control (v0.3 value line) targets
$274.76
(-3.5%)
— both lines get graded at every checkpoint, so the brain has to beat the formula, not just replace it.
Brain: claude-opus-4-7.
Weaknesses
No weaknesses recorded for this run.
All inputs present, no fallbacks used — nothing to flag.
Equation Inputs
Everything feeding the v0.6.0 model — value anchors, the stock's own price behaviour, and the tunable knobs.
Value anchors (from deep analysis)
Price at call
$284.79
Composite fair value
$192.76
Signal-adjusted fair value
$226.01
DCF fair value
$197.83
Anchored-PE fair value
$270.05
Buy-below (value lens)
$225.00
Value net score
-69
Value confidence
7 / 10
Quality net score
+90
Memo confidence
7 / 10
Deserved value (base)
—
Quality tilt
—
Deserved value (used)
—
Coherence (value × quality)
—
Price behaviour (trailing — shapes the realism line)