The masterbrain's trajectory (blue, curved through its 7 checkpoints), the deterministic v0.3 control (dashed), and the actual price (green) overlaid from the prediction date forward.
Forecast Change-7.6% to $183.50
Predicted High$201.50at 1 month
Predicted Low$183.50at 6 months
Max Drawdown (predicted)-7.6%
Forecast
The masterbrain trajectory — 7 dated checkpoints. Short rungs (2w, 1m) show the typical range as the primary claim; point calls run from 2 months out. Every claim still gets graded.
Predicted Aug 30, 2026 1:02 pm
Bear
DOV trends lower to
$183.50
(-7.6% from $198.68)
by Mar 2027.
ride-then-fade
ThesisDOV trades well above every fundamental anchor with a mildly supportive risk-on tape offsetting a stretched compounder narrative. Near-term drift is roughly flat with a mild positive tilt from regime, then value gravity reasserts as the multiple digests toward the anchored-PE fair value near 219 fails to hold and DCF pulls lower. Path drifts modestly down over six months, converging near the deterministic baseline.
Invalidated ifA decisive break above 210 on strong volume or a print-free rally past 215 would invalidate the fade thesis; conversely a break below 180 accelerates it.
Checkpointtime after the call
Datewhen it gets graded
Predictedthe claim: closing price
Current priceactual close — fills in over time
Predicted returnpredicted vs $198.68 at call
Conv.brain's confidence, 1–10
Driverwhy the brain put the point here
Prediction made
Aug 30, 2026
—
$198.68at call
—
—
The anchor — every point below is measured from this price and date.
2 weeks
Sep 13, 2026
$187.32–$210.04typical range · internal point $200.10
—
±5.7%
7/10
Risk-on tape and low vol support mild drift up
What actually happened:
closed $189.05
on Sep 11, 2026 = -4.9% vs the call
(predicted +0.7%)
· direction HIT
(called flat, was flat)
· off by 5.6 pp
· accuracy 8/10
· typical range ±5.7%:
inside the band
· S&P -0.7%
over the same window — lagged it
1 month
Sep 30, 2026
$182.22–$215.14typical range · internal point $201.50
—
±8.3%
6/10
Momentum holds without catalyst, sentiment neutral
What actually happened:
closed $189.70
on Sep 29, 2026 = -4.5% vs the call
(predicted +1.4%)
· direction HIT
(called flat, was flat)
· off by 5.9 pp
· accuracy 8/10
· typical range ±8.3%:
inside the band
· S&P -0.5%
over the same window — lagged it
Why ranges on the short rungs?
A 102-prediction trial (2026-07-21) showed 2-week point calls carry no information here —
three prompt formulations all lost to simply predicting zero — while the stock's own
volatility scale (σ×√t) described those windows well. So the short rungs claim what's
actually knowable: the typical travel, with earnings timing flagged where the variance
will come from. The internal point calls keep being generated and graded to map where
real skill begins. Full evidence: stocks/predictions/V0.5-DESIGN.md §8.
Deterministic control (v0.3 value line) targets
$183.80
(-7.5%)
— both lines get graded at every checkpoint, so the brain has to beat the formula, not just replace it.
Brain: claude-opus-4-7.