The masterbrain's trajectory (blue, curved through its 7 checkpoints), the deterministic v0.3 control (dashed), and the actual price (green) overlaid from the prediction date forward.
Forecast Change+11.9% to $13.15
Predicted High$13.15at 6 months
Predicted Low$11.60at 1 month
Max Drawdown (predicted)-1.3%
Forecast
The masterbrain trajectory — 7 dated checkpoints. Short rungs (2w, 1m) show the typical range as the primary claim; point calls run from 2 months out. Every claim still gets graded.
Predicted Aug 4, 2026 2:46 am
Bull
DV trends higher to
$13.15
(+11.9% from $11.75)
by Feb 2027.
dip-then-recover
ThesisDV trades slightly below composite fair value with a mixed profile: negative value/sentiment signals but a bullish DCF and quality tilt. In a risk-on tape with no near-term earnings catalyst, expect a slow grind toward the $12-13 zone with modest overshoot as value gravity works, tempered by weak sentiment capping upside.
Invalidated ifA close below $9.25 or above $14.50 within 3 months, or a negative pre-announcement, would invalidate the drift-higher thesis.
Checkpointtime after the call
Datewhen it gets graded
Predictedthe claim: closing price
Current priceactual close — fills in over time
Predicted returnpredicted vs $11.75 at call
Conv.brain's confidence, 1–10
Driverwhy the brain put the point here
Prediction made
Aug 4, 2026
—
$11.75at call
—
—
The anchor — every point below is measured from this price and date.
2 weeks
Aug 18, 2026
$10.52–$12.98typical range · internal point $11.80
—
±10.4%
6/10
low-vol drift in quiet neutral tape
What actually happened:
closed $13.30
on Aug 17, 2026 = +13.2% vs the call
(predicted +0.4%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was up)
· off by 12.8 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· typical range ±10.4%:
OUTSIDE the band
· S&P +0.6%
over the same window — lagged it
1 month
Sep 4, 2026
$9.97–$13.53typical range · internal point $11.60
—
±15.1%
5/10
mild sentiment drag, no catalyst
What actually happened:
closed $13.35
on Sep 3, 2026 = +13.6% vs the call
(predicted -1.3%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was up)
· off by 14.9 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· typical range ±15.1%:
inside the band
· S&P -0.9%
over the same window — lagged it
2 months
Oct 4, 2026
$11.90
—
+1.3%
4/10
value gravity begins asserting toward fair value
What actually happened:
closed $13.49
on Oct 2, 2026 = +14.8% vs the call
(predicted +1.3%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was up)
· off by 13.5 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· S&P -0.2%
over the same window — beat it
Why ranges on the short rungs?
A 102-prediction trial (2026-07-21) showed 2-week point calls carry no information here —
three prompt formulations all lost to simply predicting zero — while the stock's own
volatility scale (σ×√t) described those windows well. So the short rungs claim what's
actually knowable: the typical travel, with earnings timing flagged where the variance
will come from. The internal point calls keep being generated and graded to map where
real skill begins. Full evidence: stocks/predictions/V0.5-DESIGN.md §8.
Deterministic control (v0.3 value line) targets
$13.33
(+13.5%)
— both lines get graded at every checkpoint, so the brain has to beat the formula, not just replace it.
Brain: claude-opus-4-7.
Weaknesses
No weaknesses recorded for this run.
All inputs present, no fallbacks used — nothing to flag.
Equation Inputs
Everything feeding the v0.6.0 model — value anchors, the stock's own price behaviour, and the tunable knobs.
Value anchors (from deep analysis)
Price at call
$11.75
Composite fair value
$12.06
Signal-adjusted fair value
$12.38
DCF fair value
$18.34
Anchored-PE fair value
$6.53
Buy-below (value lens)
$9.25
Value net score
-6
Value confidence
6 / 10
Quality net score
+33
Memo confidence
7 / 10
Deserved value (base)
—
Quality tilt
—
Deserved value (used)
—
Coherence (value × quality)
—
Price behaviour (trailing — shapes the realism line)