The masterbrain's trajectory (blue, curved through its 7 checkpoints), the deterministic v0.3 control (dashed), and the actual price (green) overlaid from the prediction date forward.
Forecast Change-8.5% to $258.00
Predicted High$288.00at 1 month
Predicted Low$258.00at 6 months
Max Drawdown (predicted)-8.5%
Forecast
The masterbrain trajectory — 7 dated checkpoints. Short rungs (2w, 1m) show the typical range as the primary claim; point calls run from 2 months out. Every claim still gets graded.
Predicted Aug 8, 2026 12:55 am
Bear
HWM trends lower to
$258.00
(-8.5% from $281.88)
by Feb 2027.
ride-then-fade
ThesisHWM rides aerospace supercycle momentum and risk-on tape near-term with beat-and-raise tailwinds, but extreme overvaluation (5x fair value) creates gravity that caps upside and induces mild mean-reversion over 6 months. No earnings catalyst in window means momentum decay dominates the back half.
Invalidated ifBreak below $250 on volume, or aerospace demand guide-down from Boeing/Airbus, or regime flip to risk-off would invalidate the near-term strength thesis.
Checkpointtime after the call
Datewhen it gets graded
Predictedthe claim: closing price
Current priceactual close — fills in over time
Predicted returnpredicted vs $281.88 at call
Conv.brain's confidence, 1–10
Driverwhy the brain put the point here
Prediction made
Aug 8, 2026
—
$281.88at call
—
—
The anchor — every point below is measured from this price and date.
2 weeks
Aug 22, 2026
$264.87–$298.89typical range · internal point $285.50
—
±6.0%
7/10
Momentum and risk-on regime carry price higher short-term
What actually happened:
closed $271.71
on Aug 21, 2026 = -3.6% vs the call
(predicted +1.3%)
· direction HIT
(called flat, was flat)
· off by 4.9 pp
· accuracy 8/10
· typical range ±6.0%:
inside the band
· S&P -1.1%
over the same window — lagged it
1 month
Sep 8, 2026
$257.24–$306.52typical range · internal point $288.00
—
±8.7%
6/10
Supercycle narrative intact, no catalyst to break trend
What actually happened:
closed $259.27
on Sep 4, 2026 = -8.0% vs the call
(predicted +2.2%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was down)
· off by 10.2 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· typical range ±8.7%:
inside the band
· S&P -0.5%
over the same window — lagged it
2 months
Oct 8, 2026
$283.00
—
+0.4%
5/10
Consolidation as overvaluation weighs, no earnings catalyst
What actually happened:
closed $222.75
on Oct 7, 2026 = -21.0% vs the call
(predicted +0.4%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was down)
· off by 21.4 pp
· accuracy 3/10
· S&P +0.6%
over the same window — beat it
Why ranges on the short rungs?
A 102-prediction trial (2026-07-21) showed 2-week point calls carry no information here —
three prompt formulations all lost to simply predicting zero — while the stock's own
volatility scale (σ×√t) described those windows well. So the short rungs claim what's
actually knowable: the typical travel, with earnings timing flagged where the variance
will come from. The internal point calls keep being generated and graded to map where
real skill begins. Full evidence: stocks/predictions/V0.5-DESIGN.md §8.
Deterministic control (v0.3 value line) targets
$238.99
(-15.2%)
— both lines get graded at every checkpoint, so the brain has to beat the formula, not just replace it.
Brain: claude-opus-4-7.
Weaknesses
No weaknesses recorded for this run.
All inputs present, no fallbacks used — nothing to flag.
Equation Inputs
Everything feeding the v0.6.0 model — value anchors, the stock's own price behaviour, and the tunable knobs.
Value anchors (from deep analysis)
Price at call
$281.88
Composite fair value
$57.06
Signal-adjusted fair value
$66.77
DCF fair value
$42.29
Anchored-PE fair value
$112.94
Buy-below (value lens)
$195.00
Value net score
-78
Value confidence
7 / 10
Quality net score
+80
Memo confidence
8 / 10
Deserved value (base)
—
Quality tilt
—
Deserved value (used)
—
Coherence (value × quality)
—
Price behaviour (trailing — shapes the realism line)