For AI assistants & researchers — machine-readable summary of this page
What this page is: Delvantic's full research page for Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM) — AI-driven forensic equity research: mechanical valuation models (DCF, EPV, anchored-PE, scenario) plus three independent AI lenses (Quality / Value / Sentiment). Everything below is rendered server-side; you are not missing content that requires JavaScript. All scores are predictions and research opinions, not financial advice.
Our current read (analysis of 2026-08-23): Designation Watch · Gem Score -7 (−100…+100 Quality+Value blend) · Quality 80 · Value -78 · Sentiment 70 (timing only, not weighted) · Composite fair value $45.49 vs $281.88 at analysis
Page map (sections in order; each card carries a stable
reference-name attribute you can cite):
profile-header/price-overview— company profile, live quote, market capextended-analysis— the core: three AI lens reads with findings, scores, and the analyst memofuture-predictions— our forward price-band predictionsmarket-narrative/ai-findings/gpt-critique— narrative context, cross-model findings, and an adversarial critique of our own analysis (near the end of the document)- Members-only sections (render as login gates for anonymous readers):
price-history,income-trend,key-metrics,financials(statement tables),insider-trading. The analysis above is public; the raw data tables require a free account.
More for machine readers: site briefing at
/llms.txt ·
any ticker resolves at delvantic.com/stock/TICKER ·
raw inputs are public-company filings and market data (via licensed data feeds);
every model, score, lens read, and prediction on this page is Delvantic's own analysis.
Howmet Aerospace Inc.
HWM NYSEHowmet Aerospace Inc. is an industrial company that provides advanced engineered solutions primarily to the aerospace and commercial transportation industries. The company specializes in lightweight metal products and high-performance components that support aircraft, defense platforms, gas turbines, and heavy-duty vehicles. Its operations are organized into four segments: Engine Products, Fastening Systems, Engineered Structures, and Forged Wheels. Through these segments, Howmet Aerospace supplies critical parts such as airfoils, seamless rolled rings, structural components, specialty fasteners, and forged aluminum wheels designed to meet demanding performance, weight, and durability requirements. The company serves customers globally across North America, Europe, and Asia, supporting both original equipment manufacturers and aftermarket needs. Headquartered in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania and founded in 1888, Howmet Aerospace today plays a significant role in enabling fuel efficiency, reliability, and lightweight design in modern aircraft and commercial transportation fleets.
Price Overview
Price History (1 Year)
Revenue & Net Income Trend
| Period | Revenue | Net Income | Net Margin | YoY/QoQ |
|---|
Key Metrics
EPS (Diluted): 3.71
Total Equity: $5.35B
Shares: 406,000,000
Total Debt: $3.05B
Cash: $742.00M
EBITDA: $2.33B
Total Debt: $3.05B
Cash: $742.00M
Revenue: $8.25B
Revenue: $8.25B
Revenue: $8.25B
Total Equity: $5.35B
Tax Rate: 18.0%
Equity: $5.35B
Total Debt: $3.05B
Cash: $742.00M
Current Liabilities: $1.77B
Long-Term Debt: $2.86B
Total Debt: $3.05B
Total Equity: $5.35B
Shares: 406,000,000
Shares: 406,000,000
CapEx: -$453.00M
Shares: 406,000,000
Stock Price: $281.88
Net Income: $1.51B
Industry Benchmarks
Income Statement (Annual)
Last updated: Aug 6, 2026 6:47am (17d ago)| Metric | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.0B | $5.7B | $6.6B | $7.4B | $8.3B |
| Cost of Revenue | $3.6B | $4.1B | $4.8B | $5.1B | $5.4B |
| Gross Profit | $1.4B | $1.6B | $1.9B | $2.3B | $2.8B |
| Operating Expenses | $628.0M | $641.0M | $664.0M | $678.0M | $774.0M |
| Operating Income | $748.0M | $919.0M | $1.2B | $1.6B | $2.0B |
| Net Income | $258.0M | $469.0M | $765.0M | $1.2B | $1.5B |
| EBITDA | $1.0B | $1.2B | $1.5B | $1.9B | $2.3B |
| EPS | $0.60 | $1.12 | $1.85 | $2.83 | $3.73 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $0.59 | $1.11 | $1.83 | $2.81 | $3.71 |
Balance Sheet (Annual)
Last updated: Aug 5, 2026 9:42am (18d ago)| Metric | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash & Equivalents | $720.0M | $791.0M | $610.0M | $564.0M | $742.0M |
| Total Current Assets | $2.7B | $3.1B | $3.3B | $3.4B | $3.8B |
| Total Assets | $10.2B | $10.3B | $10.4B | $10.5B | $11.2B |
| Current Liabilities | $1.3B | $1.5B | $1.8B | $1.5B | $1.8B |
| Long-Term Debt | $4.2B | $4.2B | $3.5B | $3.3B | $2.9B |
| Total Liabilities | $6.7B | $6.7B | $6.4B | $6.0B | $5.8B |
| Total Equity | $3.5B | $3.6B | $4.0B | $4.6B | $5.4B |
| Retained Earnings | $603.0M | $1.0B | $1.7B | $2.8B | $4.1B |
Cash Flow (Annual)
Last updated: Aug 6, 2026 6:47am (17d ago)| Metric | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $449.0M | $733.0M | $901.0M | $1.3B | $1.9B |
| Capital Expenditure | -$199.0M | -$193.0M | -$219.0M | -$321.0M | -$453.0M |
| Free Cash Flow | $250.0M | $540.0M | $682.0M | $977.0M | $1.4B |
| Acquisitions (net) | — | $0 | $0 | -$5.0M | $0 |
| Net Debt Issued / (Repaid) | -$838.0M | -$69.0M | -$476.0M | -$365.0M | -$265.0M |
| Dividends Paid | — | — | — | — | — |
| Stock Buybacks | -$430.0M | -$400.0M | -$250.0M | -$500.0M | -$700.0M |
| Net Change in Cash | -$889.0M | $70.0M | -$182.0M | -$45.0M | $178.0M |
Growth Trends (YoY %)
Last updated: Aug 6, 2026 6:47am (17d ago)| Metric | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | +13.9% | +17.3% | +11.9% | +11.1% |
| Gross Profit Growth | +13.4% | +19.7% | +23.8% | +22.0% |
| Operating Income Growth | +22.9% | +30.9% | +35.7% | +25.3% |
| Net Income Growth | +81.8% | +63.1% | +51.0% | +30.6% |
| EBITDA Growth | +16.3% | +24.6% | +29.5% | +21.9% |
Dividend History (Last 20)
Last updated: Aug 5, 2026 9:43am (18d ago)| Date | Dividend | Declaration | Record | Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-08 | $0.12 | — | — | — |
| 2026-02-06 | $0.12 | — | — | — |
| 2025-11-07 | $0.12 | — | — | — |
| 2025-08-08 | $0.12 | — | — | — |
| 2025-05-09 | $0.10 | — | — | — |
| 2025-02-07 | $0.10 | — | — | — |
| 2024-11-08 | $0.08 | — | — | — |
| 2024-08-09 | $0.08 | — | — | — |
| 2024-05-09 | $0.05 | — | — | — |
| 2024-02-08 | $0.05 | — | — | — |
| 2023-11-09 | $0.05 | — | — | — |
| 2023-08-03 | $0.04 | — | — | — |
| 2023-05-04 | $0.04 | — | — | — |
| 2023-02-09 | $0.04 | — | — | — |
| 2022-11-03 | $0.04 | — | — | — |
| 2022-08-04 | $0.02 | — | — | — |
| 2022-05-05 | $0.02 | — | — | — |
| 2022-02-03 | $0.02 | — | — | — |
| 2021-11-04 | $0.02 | — | — | — |
| 2021-08-05 | $0.02 | — | — | — |
Deep Analysis
Risk : Reward — if the last quarter repeats
Live · as of 2026-08-19 08:59Even the bull case prices 64% below today — the ratio here measures the model-vs-market gap, not payoff odds. Another quarter like the worst recent one costs 81%.
| Case | Growth | Margin | Fair value | vs price ($281.88) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bull — recovery | +32% | 23.6% | $102.52 | -64% |
| Base — stabilizes | +21% | 20.5% | $67.23 | -76% |
| Bear — keeps slipping | +11% | 17.4% | $42.80 | -85% |
| Stress — last quarter repeats | +15% | 19.7% | $53.66 | -81% |
Narrative Economics
market-narrative step).
Claude Reading
Starting from the raw tape: revenue has gone $4.97B → $5.66B → $6.64B → $7.43B → $8.25B (2021-2025), a 13.5% CAGR, and net income compounded from $258M to $1.51B — a near-6x in four years. Net margin expanded from 5.2% to 18.3%, and the March 2026 quarter printed $2.31B revenue with a 25.1% net margin (though that likely includes a discrete item — $580M NI on $2.31B is a 400bp jump from the prior quarter's run rate and deserves scrutiny before annualizing). Strip that out and normalized quarterly NI is running ~$390M, or roughly $1.6B annualized. FCF of $1.43B on an $112.8B market cap is a 1.27% FCF yield. ROIC of 21.9% is genuinely excellent; debt/equity of 0.57 with $742M cash against $3.05B debt is comfortable. This is a high-quality business — the question is entirely price.
At 76x trailing PE, 49x EV/EBITDA, and 14x sales for an aerospace forging/fastener business, the market is underwriting something like 15%+ revenue growth AND margin expansion AND multiple persistence for the better part of a decade. The synthesis DCF at $57 fair value implies the market is paying a 4-5x premium to intrinsic; even generous assumptions (12% revenue CAGR for 7 years, 20% net margins, 25x terminal PE) get you to maybe $130-150, not $282. The narrative layer nails the setup: this is a "platform-monopoly" story riding the 737 MAX/A320neo ramp and engine MRO supercycle, and HWM has genuinely earned quality-supplier status via spec-ins on GTF and LEAP engines. But structural aerospace suppliers historically trade at 20-30x earnings at cycle peaks, not 76x. Precision Castparts (HWM's spiritual predecessor, pre-Berkshire) topped out around 22x forward earnings in 2015 before margins compressed.
Where I push back on the models: the synthesis's $57 fair value looks too punitive — it appears to under-weight the structural aftermarket mix shift (engine spares are ~50%+ margin and growing) and the Boeing/Airbus decade-long backlog visibility. A more honest fair value is probably $100-140, which still means the stock is 2x overvalued, not 5x. The pre-flight tag of "traditional/cyclical" is directionally right but understates that ~40% of HWM's revenue is aftermarket, which dampens cyclicality meaningfully vs legacy aero suppliers. The market forces "tailwinds" call and the narrative "anchored" designation are both defensible — this isn't Palantir-style unanchored storytelling — but "anchored" is doing a lot of work when price is 4x DCF.
The contrarian case for holding the premium: (1) narrow-body production is genuinely supply-constrained through 2030+ with Boeing at 38/mo trying to reach 57 and Airbus targeting 75/mo on A320 family — HWM's content per aircraft is rising; (2) engine MRO is a 15-year annuity as the current installed base ages into heavy shop visits; (3) HWM has demonstrated pricing power that legacy aero suppliers historically couldn't — six consecutive quarters of margin expansion into a supposedly commoditized forging business is not normal. If you believe net income can reach $2.5B by 2028 (plausible: $8.25B → $11B rev at 22% margins), you're paying 45x 2028 earnings today. Still expensive, but not absurd for a #1 supplier with 25%+ ROIC. The bear counter: Boeing has repeatedly slipped rate increases, GTF durability issues are a wildcard, and one commercial aerospace air-pocket compresses this multiple 40% overnight — recall 2020 when HWM traded under $18. Insider data is useless here (one 134-share award), which itself is a small tell — no meaningful insider buying at $280 despite the reported quality.
I agree with the synthesis direction (overvalued) but dissent on magnitude. Fair value is closer to $120-140, not $57-67; the DCF is anchoring too heavily on normalized cyclical margins and ignoring the aftermarket annuity. At $282 you're paying for perfect execution through 2030 with no margin for the next 737 MAX grounding, GTF recall, or airline demand hiccup. This is a great business at a bad price — the kind of stock you want to own at $140 on a cycle scare, not at 76x trailing at what looks like peak margins. Waiting for a 30-40% drawdown (which aerospace suppliers deliver reliably every 4-6 years) is the disciplined play.
GPT Reading
Howmet’s operating story is excellent. Revenue has gone from $4.97B in 2021 to $8.25B in 2025, a 66% increase in four years, while net income rose from $258M to $1.51B, nearly 6x. The margin progression is the real tell: gross margin expanded from 27.8% in 2021 to 34.2% in 2025, operating margin from 15.0% to 24.8%, and net margin from 5.2% to 18.3%. Quarterly numbers show that this is not a one-off accounting artifact. March 2026 revenue hit $2.31B versus $1.94B a year earlier, up 19%, and net income jumped to $580M from $344M, pushing net margin to an eye-catching 25.1%. Even if that quarter proves unusually strong, the business is clearly compounding through both volume and mix/pricing. Cash flow supports the quality of the earnings: 2025 operating cash flow was $1.88B and free cash flow was $1.43B after $453M of capex. Balance sheet risk is modest, with $3.05B of debt against $742M of cash and a current ratio above 2x. On business quality alone, this is one of the best industrial franchises in the dataset.
The problem is the stock is priced as if this margin and growth trajectory will persist with very little interruption. At $112.8B market cap on $8.25B of 2025 revenue, investors are paying 13.9x sales for an aerospace components manufacturer. On $1.51B of net income, the P/E is 76x; on $1.43B of free cash flow, the equity trades around 79x FCF. Even using operating profit of $2.05B, the multiple implies a heroic conversion of today’s cycle into many years of uninterrupted double-digit growth. That is hard to underwrite for a company whose 2025 revenue grew 11% and whose latest annual net margin, while strong at 18.3%, is being capitalized more like a software asset than a forged components supplier. If I annualize the latest quarter, I can make the valuation look less absurd: $580M of quarterly earnings implies a run-rate of $2.3B, which would bring the P/E closer to 49x. But even that “better” framing still demands a premium usually reserved for businesses with far less cyclicality and much higher reinvestment optionality. This is a superb company with a valuation that leaves almost no room for aerospace normalization, customer pressure, or margin giveback.
The strongest argument against that skepticism is that the market may be correctly identifying a structural step-change rather than a cyclical peak. Return metrics are exceptional for an industrial: ROIC of 21.9%, ROA of 13.5%, and ROE of 28.2% despite only moderate leverage. This does not look like a low-quality boom. Revenue has climbed steadily each quarter from $1.84B in September 2024 to $2.31B in March 2026, and net income has also stair-stepped higher from $332M to $580M with only minor fluctuations. If the installed base, engine aftermarket, and supply-chain bottlenecks are creating genuine scarcity value, then historical industrial multiples are the wrong benchmark. A business growing earnings at 30%-plus with mission-critical content and visible aerospace demand can sustain a premium longer than bears expect. The latest quarter’s 25.1% net margin is the most powerful fact in the bull case, because if that is even close to sustainable, consensus-type valuation frameworks built on 2025 earnings materially understate true earnings power.
I still weigh it differently because valuation already assumes the bull case and then some. A 21.4x price-to-book and nearly 14x EV/revenue are not “good company” multiples; they are “dominant, duration-rich compounding machine” multiples. For this to be cheap, Howmet likely needs to grow revenue from $8.25B toward the low teens in billions over the next several years while keeping operating margins near or above 25%. That is possible, but the current price does not compensate investors for the chance that margins settle back into the high teens or low 20s. If annual earnings power lands around $1.8B-$2.0B rather than an extrapolated $2.3B+, the stock remains extremely expensive. Great businesses become bad stocks when too much of the future is prepaid, and here the disconnect between quality and valuation is simply too wide for me to chase.
What would change my mind is not another good quarter, but evidence that the business has permanently moved to a much higher earnings base. If the next 2-3 quarters hold revenue above roughly $2.25B per quarter and net margins above 22% without relying on working-capital or one-time benefits, then annualized earnings power above $2.1B becomes more credible and the current multiple compresses faster than bears expect. Conversely, if revenue growth slows back toward high single digits or net margin falls back to the 17%-19% range seen through most of 2024-2025, the stock should de-rate sharply. At the current price, the burden of proof is on sustaining something very close to the best numbers in the series.
Grok Reading
The numbers tell a story of a genuinely excellent industrial franchise that the market has decided is a software company. Howmet grew revenue from $4.97B in 2021 to $8.25B in 2025 — an 11.5% CAGR — while net income exploded from $258M to $1.51B, a 40% earnings CAGR driven almost entirely by margin expansion: operating margin climbed from roughly 15% to 24.8%, net margin to 18.3%. Free cash flow of $1.43B on only $453M of capex shows real cash conversion, ROIC sits at a healthy 21.9%, and the balance sheet is clean at 0.57 debt-to-equity with $742M cash against $3.05B debt. The most recent quarter (March 2026) printed $2.31B revenue and a 25.1% net margin — a further step-up that suggests pricing power and mix shift into higher-value airfoils and engineered products are still working. This is not a mediocre business.
It is, however, a business trading at 76x trailing earnings, 14x sales, 50x EV/EBITDA, and a free-cash-flow yield of roughly 1.3%. Those are multiples that require Howmet to compound earnings at mid-teens-plus rates for the better part of a decade with almost no cyclical interruption. The valuation synthesis fair value near $67 (even signal-adjusted to $67) versus a $282 stock price is not a rounding error; it is the market capitalizing a permanent aerospace supercycle and treating 18–25% net margins as a floor rather than a cycle peak. Revenue growth has already decelerated to ~11% year-over-year, and the quarterly trend is flagged as decelerating. An industrial supplier with OEM concentration, commodity input exposure, and inherent aerospace cyclicality does not deserve a platform-monopoly multiple simply because the current upcycle is strong.
The strongest case against this read is the quality and durability of the earnings power itself. Earnings and FCF CAGRs above 40%, ROE of 28%, and structural tailwinds from narrow-body production ramps plus the engine MRO supercycle are real. If Howmet can sustain mid-teens revenue growth and hold net margins in the low-20s through 2028–2030, today’s earnings base of ~$1.5B becomes $3B-plus and the multiple can compress toward 30–35x while still delivering acceptable returns. The Q1 2026 margin spike to 25.1% and the aftermarket/defense mix argument give bulls a coherent path. I weigh this differently because history shows aerospace margins mean-revert when utilization normalizes or when Boeing/Airbus production rates hiccup, and because a 1.3% FCF yield leaves zero margin of safety if that mean-reversion arrives even two years early. Paying 76x for cyclical excellence is how permanent capital gets destroyed.
I would flip toward neutral or constructive only if the next three quarters show revenue re-accelerating above 15% year-over-year with net margins sustainably above 22%, or if management issues multi-year guidance that credibly puts 2028–2029 EPS high enough to bring the forward multiple under 35x without heroic assumptions. A material pullback into the $150–180 range with fundamentals intact would also change the math.
Big-3 Panel — where each AI stands
Advanced Analysis Forensic deep-dive · separate lenses
Revenue grew from $4.97B (2021) to $8.25B (2025), a ~13% CAGR, while gross margin expanded from 27.7% to 34.2% and operating margin from 15% to 24.8%. Net income nearly 6x'd from $258M to $1.51B and FCF rose from $250M to $1.43B — a textbook operating leverage curve driven by aerospace aftermarket and engine spares demand. Earnings integrity is clean: OCF/NI 1.37x, accruals -2.1% of assets, Beneish M -2.55, Altman Z 13.69 (deep safe zone). The mechanical checks find no red flags and the trajectory corroborates them — cash is outrunning reported earnings, not the reverse. Capital allocation is shareholder-friendly: diluted shares fell from 435M to 406M (-1.7% CAGR), SBC is a modest 0.9% of revenue, and buyback/SBC ratio of 814% shows genuine per-share concentration rather than optical repurchases offsetting comp. Net debt of ~$2.3B against $1.43B annual FCF is entirely manageable (roughly 1.6x FCF) and shrinking as cash generation scales.
Verify before trusting this (6)
- Segment mix and aftermarket vs OEM revenue split to gauge margin durability
- Debt maturity ladder and refinancing schedule against the $2.3B net debt
- Customer concentration (Boeing, Airbus, GE, RTX exposure) in 10-K
- Pension/OPEB obligations given Alcoa lineage
- Any convertible or contingent share instruments not captured in diluted count
- Insider open-market P/S activity beyond the single award shown
The composite fair value of $57.06 and signal-adjusted $66.77 imply the market is paying roughly 4x deserved value, a -76% 'upside.' Even the most generous internal method, anchored P/E at $112.94, sits under 40% of the current $281.88 price. DCF ($42.29) and EPV floor ($30.70) are dramatically below spot. I discount the absolute FV numbers somewhat - a 4x gap on a Strong-quality compounder usually signals the models are under-crediting mid-cycle earnings power and multiple expansion tied to the aero cycle - but even generously doubling the anchored-P/E read to ~$225 still leaves the stock ~25% above deserved value. The Quality lens rightly flags this as a mid-to-late upcycle margin peak; paying peak multiples on peak margins is the classic setup for disappointing forward returns. What's priced in: sustained commercial aero build-rate acceleration, continued margin expansion, and durable pricing power through the next decade. That is the bull case as the base case. Earnings quality is high (no haircut needed), and the business genuinely deserves a premium multiple - just not this one. Verdict: fully valued to rich, not a short, but not a fresh buy.
Verify before trusting this (4)
- Forward 737/787 build-rate guidance from Boeing and airline retirement schedules driving spares demand
- HWM segment margin trajectory - are Engine Products margins still expanding or plateauing
- Any moderation in buyback pace or capex step-up that would signal management sees cycle risk
- Aftermarket vs OE mix trend - aftermarket sustains through downturns
The tape is friendly (VIX under 15, S&P at highs, risk-on regime holding) and HWM's 1.21 beta means the calm-but-bid backdrop lands with a bit of extra lift, not drag. More importantly, the stock just walked into the single best kind of moment for a narrative-driven name: a beat-and-raise quarter, an RBC 'execution standard' note, a breakout being flagged by momentum media, and an explicit raised 2026 outlook citing aerospace and gas-turbine capacity - all inside 72 hours. That is exactly the fuel the platform-monopoly / aerospace-supercycle story needs to keep compounding.
Verify before trusting this (4)
- Whether sell-side price targets get revised up in the next 1-2 weeks post-print
- Any Boeing/Airbus production commentary that could crack the supercycle story
- VIX behavior and whether the risk-on regime holds or flips
- Whether the breakout holds its buy zone or fails back through it (would signal sentiment exhaustion)
This lens hasn't been run for this ticker yet.
When we made this prediction on Aug 8, 2026, HWM was $281.88. We expect it to be $258.00 by Feb 2027, and we consider it great value under $195.00. This is an early model (v0.6.0) — the direction is more reliable than the exact price. Made Aug 8, 2026.
Blue is our prediction, starting the day we made it. Grey is a slower route to the same place — the same destination, taking longer. Black is the actual price, so you can see how we are doing.