The masterbrain's trajectory (blue, curved through its 7 checkpoints), the deterministic v0.3 control (dashed), and the actual price (green) overlaid from the prediction date forward.
Forecast Change-1.7% to $568.00
Predicted High$585.00at 1 month
Predicted Low$568.00at 6 months
Max Drawdown (predicted)-1.7%
Forecast
The masterbrain trajectory — 7 dated checkpoints. Short rungs (2w, 1m) show the typical range as the primary claim; point calls run from 2 months out. Every claim still gets graded.
Predicted Aug 6, 2026 1:12 am
Neutral
LMT trends range-bound to
$568.00
(-1.7% from $577.60)
by Feb 2027.
ride-then-fade
ThesisLMT sits above fair value but sentiment tailwinds from defense narrative and contract flow, plus consistent EPS beats, keep it firm near-term. Value gravity slowly reasserts over 6 months, dragging price modestly lower toward the deterministic baseline as the narrative premium fades.
Invalidated ifA close below $520 or above $625, or a major contract cancellation/geopolitical de-escalation flipping the sentiment lens negative.
Checkpointtime after the call
Datewhen it gets graded
Predictedthe claim: closing price
Current priceactual close — fills in over time
Predicted returnpredicted vs $577.60 at call
Conv.brain's confidence, 1–10
Driverwhy the brain put the point here
Prediction made
Aug 6, 2026
—
$577.60at call
—
—
The anchor — every point below is measured from this price and date.
2 weeks
Aug 20, 2026
$540.29–$614.91typical range · internal point $582.50
—
±6.5%
7/10
Sentiment tailwind and low beta support near-term drift up
What actually happened:
closed $589.15
on Aug 19, 2026 = +2.0% vs the call
(predicted +0.9%)
· direction HIT
(called flat, was flat)
· off by 1.2 pp
· accuracy 10/10
· typical range ±6.5%:
inside the band
· S&P 0.0%
over the same window — beat it
1 month
Sep 6, 2026
$523.53–$631.67typical range · internal point $585.00
—
±9.4%
6/10
Defense narrative and contract flow sustain modest bid
What actually happened:
closed $525.28
on Sep 4, 2026 = -9.1% vs the call
(predicted +1.3%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was down)
· off by 10.3 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· typical range ±9.4%:
inside the band
· S&P +0.1%
over the same window — lagged it
2 months
Oct 6, 2026
$582.00
—
+0.8%
5/10
Momentum plateaus as valuation pressure begins to weigh
What actually happened:
closed $506.63
on Oct 5, 2026 = -12.3% vs the call
(predicted +0.8%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was down)
· off by 13.1 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· S&P +0.8%
over the same window — beat it
Why ranges on the short rungs?
A 102-prediction trial (2026-07-21) showed 2-week point calls carry no information here —
three prompt formulations all lost to simply predicting zero — while the stock's own
volatility scale (σ×√t) described those windows well. So the short rungs claim what's
actually knowable: the typical travel, with earnings timing flagged where the variance
will come from. The internal point calls keep being generated and graded to map where
real skill begins. Full evidence: stocks/predictions/V0.5-DESIGN.md §8.
Deterministic control (v0.3 value line) targets
$570.37
(-1.3%)
— both lines get graded at every checkpoint, so the brain has to beat the formula, not just replace it.
Brain: claude-opus-4-7.
Weaknesses
No weaknesses recorded for this run.
All inputs present, no fallbacks used — nothing to flag.
Equation Inputs
Everything feeding the v0.6.0 model — value anchors, the stock's own price behaviour, and the tunable knobs.
Value anchors (from deep analysis)
Price at call
$577.60
Composite fair value
$465.89
Signal-adjusted fair value
$524.62
DCF fair value
$563.58
Anchored-PE fair value
$368.49
Buy-below (value lens)
$470.00
Value net score
-66
Value confidence
7 / 10
Quality net score
+23
Memo confidence
7 / 10
Deserved value (base)
—
Quality tilt
—
Deserved value (used)
—
Coherence (value × quality)
—
Price behaviour (trailing — shapes the realism line)