The masterbrain's trajectory (blue, curved through its 7 checkpoints), the deterministic v0.3 control (dashed), and the actual price (green) overlaid from the prediction date forward.
Forecast Change-7.6% to $80.00
Predicted High$86.90in 2 weeks
Predicted Low$80.00at 6 months
Max Drawdown (predicted)-7.6%
Forecast
The masterbrain trajectory — 7 dated checkpoints. Short rungs (2w, 1m) show the typical range as the primary claim; point calls run from 2 months out. Every claim still gets graded.
Predicted Aug 4, 2026 1:34 am
Bear
NEE trends lower to
$80.00
(-7.6% from $86.55)
by Feb 2027.
flat-then-break
ThesisNEE trades well above composite fair value near $57, and value gravity should pull it lower over months, but a risk-on regime and energy-transition sentiment support the near term. Expect a modest early drift, then gradual erosion as rate pressure on utilities and rich valuation reassert.
Invalidated ifA decisive break above $92 on rate-cut catalysts, or forensic/quality re-rating higher, would invalidate the downward drift.
Checkpointtime after the call
Datewhen it gets graded
Predictedthe claim: closing price
Current priceactual close — fills in over time
Predicted returnpredicted vs $86.55 at call
Conv.brain's confidence, 1–10
Driverwhy the brain put the point here
Prediction made
Aug 4, 2026
—
$86.55at call
—
—
The anchor — every point below is measured from this price and date.
2 weeks
Aug 18, 2026
$82.90–$90.20typical range · internal point $86.90
—
±4.2%
6/10
risk-on tape and transition narrative steady near term
What actually happened:
closed $86.22
on Aug 17, 2026 = -0.4% vs the call
(predicted +0.4%)
· direction HIT
(called flat, was flat)
· off by 0.8 pp
· accuracy 10/10
· typical range ±4.2%:
inside the band
· S&P +0.6%
over the same window — beat it
1 month
Sep 4, 2026
$81.27–$91.83typical range · internal point $86.20
continued mean reversion toward anchored-PE fair value
Why ranges on the short rungs?
A 102-prediction trial (2026-07-21) showed 2-week point calls carry no information here —
three prompt formulations all lost to simply predicting zero — while the stock's own
volatility scale (σ×√t) described those windows well. So the short rungs claim what's
actually knowable: the typical travel, with earnings timing flagged where the variance
will come from. The internal point calls keep being generated and graded to map where
real skill begins. Full evidence: stocks/predictions/V0.5-DESIGN.md §8.
Deterministic control (v0.3 value line) targets
$81.12
(-6.3%)
— both lines get graded at every checkpoint, so the brain has to beat the formula, not just replace it.
Brain: claude-opus-4-7.