The masterbrain's trajectory (blue, curved through its 7 checkpoints), the deterministic v0.3 control (dashed), and the actual price (green) overlaid from the prediction date forward.
Forecast Change-6.8% to $200.50
Predicted High$220.00at 2 months
Predicted Low$200.50at 6 months
Max Drawdown (predicted)-6.8%
Forecast
The masterbrain trajectory — 7 dated checkpoints. Short rungs (2w, 1m) show the typical range as the primary claim; point calls run from 2 months out. Every claim still gets graded.
Predicted Aug 2, 2026 12:40 am
Bear
RTX trends lower to
$200.50
(-6.8% from $215.22)
by Feb 2027.
ride-then-fade
ThesisRTX trades far above every fundamental anchor, but defense-spending tailwinds, record backlog, and a four-quarter EPS beat streak keep sentiment firmly bid. Expect modest near-term drift higher into the October print, then gradual value gravity pulling shares lower toward the deterministic baseline as the narrative matures.
Invalidated ifA sustained break above $230 on defense-budget upside or below $195 on backlog/margin disappointment invalidates the fade path.
Checkpointtime after the call
Datewhen it gets graded
Predictedthe claim: closing price
Current priceactual close — fills in over time
Predicted returnpredicted vs $215.22 at call
Conv.brain's confidence, 1–10
Driverwhy the brain put the point here
Prediction made
Aug 2, 2026
—
$215.22at call
—
—
The anchor — every point below is measured from this price and date.
2 weeks
Aug 16, 2026
$202.83–$227.61typical range · internal point $216.80
—
±5.8%
7/10
Sentiment and momentum carry near-term drift higher
What actually happened:
closed $222.97
on Aug 14, 2026 = +3.6% vs the call
(predicted +0.7%)
· direction HIT
(called flat, was flat)
· off by 2.9 pp
· accuracy 9/10
· typical range ±5.8%:
inside the band
· S&P +4.7%
over the same window — lagged it
1 month
Sep 2, 2026
$197.26–$233.18typical range · internal point $218.50
—
±8.3%
6/10
Backlog narrative and defense flows sustain bid
What actually happened:
closed $205.16
on Sep 1, 2026 = -4.7% vs the call
(predicted +1.5%)
· direction HIT
(called flat, was flat)
· off by 6.2 pp
· accuracy 8/10
· typical range ±8.3%:
inside the band
· S&P +1.9%
over the same window — beat it
2 months
Oct 2, 2026
$220.00
—
+2.2%
5/10
Pre-earnings positioning firms into October print
What actually happened:
closed $185.01
on Oct 1, 2026 = -14.0% vs the call
(predicted +2.2%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was down)
· off by 16.3 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· S&P +2.4%
over the same window — beat it
3 months
Nov 2, 2026
$217.00
—
+0.8%
4/10
Q3 beat likely but guide-driven post-print digestion
4 months
Dec 2, 2026
$211.00
—
-2.0%
4/10
Value gravity begins asserting against rich multiple
5 months
Jan 2, 2027
$205.00
—
-4.7%
4/10
Year-end rotation trims extended defense winners
6 months
Feb 2, 2027
$200.50
—
-6.8%
5/10
Convergence toward deterministic baseline as narrative fatigues
Why ranges on the short rungs?
A 102-prediction trial (2026-07-21) showed 2-week point calls carry no information here —
three prompt formulations all lost to simply predicting zero — while the stock's own
volatility scale (σ×√t) described those windows well. So the short rungs claim what's
actually knowable: the typical travel, with earnings timing flagged where the variance
will come from. The internal point calls keep being generated and graded to map where
real skill begins. Full evidence: stocks/predictions/V0.5-DESIGN.md §8.
Deterministic control (v0.3 value line) targets
$199.54
(-7.3%)
— both lines get graded at every checkpoint, so the brain has to beat the formula, not just replace it.
Brain: claude-opus-4-7.
Weaknesses
No weaknesses recorded for this run.
All inputs present, no fallbacks used — nothing to flag.
Equation Inputs
Everything feeding the v0.6.0 model — value anchors, the stock's own price behaviour, and the tunable knobs.
Value anchors (from deep analysis)
Price at call
$215.22
Composite fair value
$108.29
Signal-adjusted fair value
$111.26
DCF fair value
$118.10
Anchored-PE fair value
$141.34
Buy-below (value lens)
$150.00
Value net score
-74
Value confidence
6 / 10
Quality net score
+61
Memo confidence
7 / 10
Deserved value (base)
—
Quality tilt
—
Deserved value (used)
—
Coherence (value × quality)
—
Price behaviour (trailing — shapes the realism line)