The masterbrain's trajectory (blue, curved through its 7 checkpoints), the deterministic v0.3 control (dashed), and the actual price (green) overlaid from the prediction date forward.
Forecast Change-12.2% to $322.00
Predicted High$374.00at 1 month
Predicted Low$322.00at 6 months
Max Drawdown (predicted)-12.2%
Forecast
The masterbrain trajectory — 7 dated checkpoints. Short rungs (2w, 1m) show the typical range as the primary claim; point calls run from 2 months out. Every claim still gets graded.
Predicted Sep 1, 2026 1:04 pm
Bear
TPL trends lower to
$322.00
(-12.2% from $366.73)
by Mar 2027.
ride-then-fade
ThesisTPL is deeply overvalued versus every anchor (fair value ~$100, anchored PE ~$122), but the platform-royalty narrative and low-beta character keep it sticky. Risk-on tape and no earnings catalyst mean drift, not collapse: mild bounce near-term as the 6m -29.5% drawdown consolidates, then gradual value gravity reasserts toward the deterministic $319 endpoint.
Invalidated ifA decisive break above $410 on Permian royalty upside or water-services reacceleration, or conversely a flush below $300 on oil-price shock, would invalidate this measured drift.
Checkpointtime after the call
Datewhen it gets graded
Predictedthe claim: closing price
Current priceactual close — fills in over time
Predicted returnpredicted vs $366.73 at call
Conv.brain's confidence, 1–10
Driverwhy the brain put the point here
Prediction made
Sep 1, 2026
—
$366.73at call
—
—
The anchor — every point below is measured from this price and date.
2 weeks
Sep 15, 2026
$332.09–$401.37typical range · internal point $371.50
—
±9.4%
6/10
Risk-on tape and oversold bounce lift low-beta name
What actually happened:
closed $365.27
on Sep 14, 2026 = -0.4% vs the call
(predicted +1.3%)
· direction HIT
(called flat, was flat)
· off by 1.7 pp
· accuracy 10/10
· typical range ±9.4%:
inside the band
· S&P -0.2%
over the same window — lagged it
1 month
Oct 1, 2026
$316.53–$416.93typical range · internal point $374.00
—
±13.7%
5/10
No catalyst, sentiment mildly supportive, drift higher
What actually happened:
closed $325.83
on Sep 30, 2026 = -11.2% vs the call
(predicted +2.0%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was down)
· off by 13.1 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· typical range ±13.7%:
inside the band
· S&P +0.3%
over the same window — lagged it
2 months
Nov 1, 2026
$362.00
—
-1.3%
5/10
Valuation gravity begins as narrative fatigue sets in
3 months
Dec 1, 2026
$350.00
—
-4.6%
5/10
Year-end positioning trims stretched multiples
4 months
Jan 1, 2027
$340.00
—
-7.3%
4/10
January reset, quality premium erodes toward anchors
5 months
Feb 1, 2027
$328.00
—
-10.6%
4/10
Pre-earnings drift as fair-value gap dominates
6 months
Mar 1, 2027
$322.00
—
-12.2%
4/10
Converges near deterministic baseline endpoint
Why ranges on the short rungs?
A 102-prediction trial (2026-07-21) showed 2-week point calls carry no information here —
three prompt formulations all lost to simply predicting zero — while the stock's own
volatility scale (σ×√t) described those windows well. So the short rungs claim what's
actually knowable: the typical travel, with earnings timing flagged where the variance
will come from. The internal point calls keep being generated and graded to map where
real skill begins. Full evidence: stocks/predictions/V0.5-DESIGN.md §8.
Deterministic control (v0.3 value line) targets
$319.08
(-13.0%)
— both lines get graded at every checkpoint, so the brain has to beat the formula, not just replace it.
Brain: claude-opus-4-7.