The masterbrain's trajectory (blue, curved through its 7 checkpoints), the deterministic v0.3 control (dashed), and the actual price (green) overlaid from the prediction date forward.
Forecast Change+17.4% to $118.00
Predicted High$118.00at 6 months
Predicted Low$100.90in 2 weeks
Forecast
The masterbrain trajectory — 7 dated checkpoints. Short rungs (2w, 1m) show the typical range as the primary claim; point calls run from 2 months out. Every claim still gets graded.
Predicted Aug 5, 2026 2:41 am
Bull
TW trends higher to
$118.00
(+17.4% from $100.48)
by Feb 2027.
flat-then-break
ThesisTW trades near composite fair value with strong quality and consistent earnings beats supporting gradual multiple expansion, but weak sentiment and mildly negative momentum cap near-term upside. Path drifts sideways early then grinds higher toward signal-adjusted fair value as quality reasserts in a risk-on tape.
Invalidated ifA break below $88 on volume or a missed quarter would invalidate the quality-led rerating thesis.
Checkpointtime after the call
Datewhen it gets graded
Predictedthe claim: closing price
Current priceactual close — fills in over time
Predicted returnpredicted vs $100.48 at call
Conv.brain's confidence, 1–10
Driverwhy the brain put the point here
Prediction made
Aug 5, 2026
—
$100.48at call
—
—
The anchor — every point below is measured from this price and date.
2 weeks
Aug 19, 2026
$92.72–$108.24typical range · internal point $100.90
—
±7.7%
6/10
Neutral tape, low vol, drift near fair value
What actually happened:
closed $106.13
on Aug 19, 2026 = +5.6% vs the call
(predicted +0.4%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was up)
· off by 5.2 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· typical range ±7.7%:
inside the band
· S&P +0.2%
over the same window — beat it
1 month
Sep 5, 2026
$89.24–$111.72typical range · internal point $101.80
—
±11.2%
6/10
Risk-on regime supports mild positive drift
What actually happened:
closed $106.18
on Sep 4, 2026 = +5.7% vs the call
(predicted +1.3%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was up)
· off by 4.4 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· typical range ±11.2%:
inside the band
· S&P -0.1%
over the same window — beat it
2 months
Oct 5, 2026
$104.50
—
+4.0%
5/10
Earnings anticipation as quality name in beat streak
What actually happened:
closed $102.22
on Oct 2, 2026 = +1.7% vs the call
(predicted +4.0%)
· direction HIT
(called flat, was flat)
· off by 2.3 pp
· accuracy 9/10
· S&P 0.0%
over the same window — lagged it
3 months
Nov 5, 2026
$108.00
—
+7.5%
5/10
Likely Q3 beat reinforces quality premium
4 months
Dec 5, 2026
$112.00
—
+11.5%
4/10
Post-earnings drift, year-end quality rotation
5 months
Jan 5, 2027
$115.50
—
+14.9%
4/10
Gradual convergence toward signal-adjusted value
6 months
Feb 5, 2027
$118.00
—
+17.4%
3/10
Approaching deterministic baseline as rerating matures
Why ranges on the short rungs?
A 102-prediction trial (2026-07-21) showed 2-week point calls carry no information here —
three prompt formulations all lost to simply predicting zero — while the stock's own
volatility scale (σ×√t) described those windows well. So the short rungs claim what's
actually knowable: the typical travel, with earnings timing flagged where the variance
will come from. The internal point calls keep being generated and graded to map where
real skill begins. Full evidence: stocks/predictions/V0.5-DESIGN.md §8.
Deterministic control (v0.3 value line) targets
$119.39
(+18.8%)
— both lines get graded at every checkpoint, so the brain has to beat the formula, not just replace it.
Brain: claude-opus-4-7.
Weaknesses
No weaknesses recorded for this run.
All inputs present, no fallbacks used — nothing to flag.
Equation Inputs
Everything feeding the v0.6.0 model — value anchors, the stock's own price behaviour, and the tunable knobs.
Value anchors (from deep analysis)
Price at call
$100.48
Composite fair value
$100.07
Signal-adjusted fair value
$146.01
DCF fair value
$159.29
Anchored-PE fair value
$41.50
Buy-below (value lens)
$78.00
Value net score
-52
Value confidence
7 / 10
Quality net score
+85
Memo confidence
7 / 10
Deserved value (base)
—
Quality tilt
—
Deserved value (used)
—
Coherence (value × quality)
—
Price behaviour (trailing — shapes the realism line)