Communication Services · Internet Content & Information
Made onAug 25, 2026
Price at call$8.58
6-month call Bull +15.5%
Target by Feb 2027$9.90
Great value below$7.25
Modelv0.6.0
Projection vs Actual
(6M history + forecast)
The masterbrain's trajectory (blue, curved through its 7 checkpoints), the deterministic v0.3 control (dashed), and the actual price (green) overlaid from the prediction date forward.
Forecast Change+15.5% to $9.90
Predicted High$9.90at 6 months
Predicted Low$8.35at 1 month
Max Drawdown (predicted)-2.6%
Forecast
The masterbrain trajectory — 7 dated checkpoints. Short rungs (2w, 1m) show the typical range as the primary claim; point calls run from 2 months out. Every claim still gets graded.
Predicted Aug 25, 2026 1:04 pm
Bull
UPWK trends higher to
$9.90
(+15.5% from $8.58)
by Feb 2027.
dip-then-recover
ThesisUPWK trades well below fair value anchors but faces heavy sentiment drag from the AI-disruption narrative and fading gig-economy story. Expect a slow grind higher toward the anchored-PE zone as beat-heavy earnings history reasserts itself, but the path is choppy with early weakness before value gravity pulls it up.
Invalidated ifA break below $7.25 on rising volume, or a materially weak print signaling AI-driven revenue compression, would falsify the recovery.
Checkpointtime after the call
Datewhen it gets graded
Predictedthe claim: closing price
Current priceactual close — fills in over time
Predicted returnpredicted vs $8.58 at call
Conv.brain's confidence, 1–10
Driverwhy the brain put the point here
Prediction made
Aug 25, 2026
—
$8.58at call
—
—
The anchor — every point below is measured from this price and date.
2 weeks
Sep 8, 2026
$7.61–$9.55typical range · internal point $8.45
—
±11.3%
6/10
Sentiment overhang and weak momentum persist near-term
What actually happened:
closed $8.79
on Sep 4, 2026 = +2.5% vs the call
(predicted -1.5%)
· direction HIT
(called flat, was flat)
· off by 4.0 pp
· accuracy 9/10
· typical range ±11.3%:
inside the band
· S&P +0.5%
over the same window — lagged it
1 month
Sep 25, 2026
$7.18–$9.98typical range · internal point $8.35
—
±16.4%
5/10
AI-disruption narrative keeps buyers cautious
What actually happened:
closed $8.07
on Sep 24, 2026 = -5.9% vs the call
(predicted -2.7%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was down)
· off by 3.3 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· typical range ±16.4%:
inside the band
· S&P +0.4%
over the same window — beat it
2 months
Oct 25, 2026
$8.70
—
+1.5%
4/10
Stabilization as oversold conditions attract value bids
3 months
Nov 25, 2026
$9.20
—
+7.3%
5/10
Q3 print likely another beat, sentiment thaws
4 months
Dec 25, 2026
$9.50
—
+10.8%
4/10
Value gravity toward anchored-PE zone
5 months
Jan 25, 2027
$9.75
—
+13.7%
4/10
Continued drift toward signal-adjusted fair value
6 months
Feb 25, 2027
$9.90
—
+15.5%
3/10
Approaches fair value band but AI overhang caps upside
Why ranges on the short rungs?
A 102-prediction trial (2026-07-21) showed 2-week point calls carry no information here —
three prompt formulations all lost to simply predicting zero — while the stock's own
volatility scale (σ×√t) described those windows well. So the short rungs claim what's
actually knowable: the typical travel, with earnings timing flagged where the variance
will come from. The internal point calls keep being generated and graded to map where
real skill begins. Full evidence: stocks/predictions/V0.5-DESIGN.md §8.
Deterministic control (v0.3 value line) targets
$10.29
(+20.0%)
— both lines get graded at every checkpoint, so the brain has to beat the formula, not just replace it.
Brain: claude-opus-4-7.
Weaknesses
No weaknesses recorded for this run.
All inputs present, no fallbacks used — nothing to flag.
Equation Inputs
Everything feeding the v0.6.0 model — value anchors, the stock's own price behaviour, and the tunable knobs.
Value anchors (from deep analysis)
Price at call
$8.58
Composite fair value
$10.84
Signal-adjusted fair value
$9.78
DCF fair value
$14.64
Anchored-PE fair value
$9.94
Buy-below (value lens)
$7.25
Value net score
+8
Value confidence
6 / 10
Quality net score
+33
Memo confidence
6 / 10
Deserved value (base)
—
Quality tilt
—
Deserved value (used)
—
Coherence (value × quality)
—
Price behaviour (trailing — shapes the realism line)