The masterbrain's trajectory (blue, curved through its 7 checkpoints), the deterministic v0.3 control (dashed), and the actual price (green) overlaid from the prediction date forward.
Forecast Change+47.9% to $7.60
Predicted High$7.60at 6 months
Predicted Low$5.45in 2 weeks
Forecast
The masterbrain trajectory — 7 dated checkpoints. Short rungs (2w, 1m) show the typical range as the primary claim; point calls run from 2 months out. Every claim still gets graded.
Predicted Jul 31, 2026 2:06 am
Bull
VRRM trends higher to
$7.60
(+47.9% from $5.14)
by Jan 2027.
dip-then-recover
ThesisVRRM has crashed 74% in six months and trades far below fair value anchors, but quality is weak and the tape is neutral. A fresh Avis contract reset provides near-term relief that lifts the stock modestly, then value gravity does slow work over months while sentiment on the fallen-angel story stabilizes.
Invalidated ifA break below $4.50 on further contract losses or guidance cut, or failure to reclaim $6 within two months, would invalidate the recovery path.
Checkpointtime after the call
Datewhen it gets graded
Predictedthe claim: closing price
Current priceactual close — fills in over time
Predicted returnpredicted vs $5.14 at call
Conv.brain's confidence, 1–10
Driverwhy the brain put the point here
Prediction made
Jul 31, 2026
—
$5.14at call
—
—
The anchor — every point below is measured from this price and date.
2 weeks
Aug 14, 2026
$2.53–$7.75typical range · internal point $5.45
—
±50.7%
6/10
Avis reset relief bounce off oversold levels
What actually happened:
closed $4.81
on Aug 13, 2026 = -6.4% vs the call
(predicted +6.0%)
· direction MISS
(called up, was down)
· off by 12.5 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· typical range ±50.7%:
inside the band
· S&P +4.1%
over the same window — lagged it
1 month
Aug 31, 2026
$1.36–$8.92typical range · internal point $5.70
—
±73.5%
5/10
Short-covering and sentiment repair continue modestly
2 months
Oct 1, 2026
$6.10
—
+18.7%
5/10
Value buyers accumulate below $6.50 threshold
3 months
Oct 31, 2026
$6.40
—
+24.5%
4/10
Q3 print potential; beat history supports drift up
Why ranges on the short rungs?
A 102-prediction trial (2026-07-21) showed 2-week point calls carry no information here —
three prompt formulations all lost to simply predicting zero — while the stock's own
volatility scale (σ×√t) described those windows well. So the short rungs claim what's
actually knowable: the typical travel, with earnings timing flagged where the variance
will come from. The internal point calls keep being generated and graded to map where
real skill begins. Full evidence: stocks/predictions/V0.5-DESIGN.md §8.
Deterministic control (v0.3 value line) targets
$7.94
(+54.4%)
— both lines get graded at every checkpoint, so the brain has to beat the formula, not just replace it.
Brain: claude-opus-4-7.
Weaknesses
No weaknesses recorded for this run.
All inputs present, no fallbacks used — nothing to flag.
Equation Inputs
Everything feeding the v0.6.0 model — value anchors, the stock's own price behaviour, and the tunable knobs.
Value anchors (from deep analysis)
Price at call
$5.14
Composite fair value
$17.77
Signal-adjusted fair value
$18.99
DCF fair value
$27.10
Anchored-PE fair value
$7.86
Buy-below (value lens)
$6.50
Value net score
+24
Value confidence
6 / 10
Quality net score
-21
Memo confidence
6 / 10
Deserved value (base)
—
Quality tilt
—
Deserved value (used)
—
Coherence (value × quality)
—
Price behaviour (trailing — shapes the realism line)
Realized volatility (annualized)
1m 81.8% 3m 254.7% 6m 182.6%
Daily σ (realism noise)
16.0%
Beta vs S&P 500
1m -2.49 3m -0.58 5m 0.05
Trailing 6-month return
-74.1%
Knobs (equation params)
ladder
Array
llm_model
claude-opus-4-7
max_tokens
3000
control_knobs
Array
Neutral band (%)
5
earnings_brief
v1
prompt_version
p1
control_version
v0.3.0
Version & Tech Chain
What produced this prediction — stamped on the record so versions can be compared by success rate later.
Modelv0.6.0#271041f8fcd5
Tech composition (what this version is built from)
#
Process
Kind
Group
1
Synthesisvaluation-synthesis
deterministic
final
2
Scenario Analysisscenario-valuation
deterministic
valuation
3
Valuation / Mispricingext-lens-value
llm
extended
4
Company Qualityext-lens-quality
llm
extended
5
Forensic Memo (combiner)ext-forensic-memo
llm
extended
6
Classificationcompany-classification
llm
foundation
7
Live Quotefmp-quote
data
market-data
Inputs used (the runs that fed this prediction)
Upstream process
Ran
Lag
Run id
company-classification
Jul 30, 2026
freshest
VRRM-20260730-194009-8092
ext-forensic-memo
Jul 30, 2026
freshest
ext-VRRM-20260730-222113-0fec
ext-lens-quality
Jul 30, 2026
freshest
ext-VRRM-20260730-222113-0fec
ext-lens-sentiment
Jul 30, 2026
freshest
ext-VRRM-20260730-222113-0fec
ext-lens-value
Jul 30, 2026
freshest
ext-VRRM-20260730-222113-0fec
scenario-valuation
Jul 30, 2026
freshest
VRRM-20260730-215444-e8a9
valuation-synthesis
Jul 30, 2026
freshest
VRRM-20260730-215444-e8a9
Inputs flagged 7d+ behind the freshest one may be stale relative to the rest of the analysis.
Saved History
1 frozen snapshot — the record we score once predictions mature.
Made
Model
Call
At call
Target
Exp.
Eval due
Jul 31, 2026
v0.6.0
Bull
$5.14
$7.60
+47.9%
Jan 2027
viewing
Not Yet Modeled
What this v0.6.0 forecast deliberately ignores — the work ahead, in plain sight.
Scenario probabilities — one path, no bull/bear split (base_prob = 1.0).
Intraday / sub-2-week behaviour — the first claim is at 14 days by design (EOD product).
Position sizing / portfolio context — the path is a price claim only.