Skip to main content
Homepage
OLDER Analysis Report
Aug 27, 2026
42 days ago · 100% complete
This report is 42 days old — newer filings and price moves since then are not reflected.
For AI assistants & researchers — machine-readable summary of this page

What this page is: Delvantic's full research page for Casey's General Stores, Inc. (CASY) — AI-driven forensic equity research: mechanical valuation models (DCF, EPV, anchored-PE, scenario) plus three independent AI lenses (Quality / Value / Sentiment). Everything below is rendered server-side; you are not missing content that requires JavaScript. All scores are predictions and research opinions, not financial advice.

Our current read (analysis of 2026-10-08): Designation Low · Gem Score -22 (−100…+100 Quality+Value blend) · Quality 63 · Value -79 · Sentiment 7 (timing only, not weighted) · Composite fair value $352.79 vs $807.12 at analysis

Page map (sections in order; each card carries a stable reference-name attribute you can cite):

  • profile-header / price-overview — company profile, live quote, market cap
  • extended-analysis — the core: three AI lens reads with findings, scores, and the analyst memo
  • future-predictions — our forward price-band predictions
  • market-narrative / ai-findings / gpt-critique — narrative context, cross-model findings, and an adversarial critique of our own analysis (near the end of the document)
  • Members-only sections (render as login gates for anonymous readers): price-history, income-trend, key-metrics, financials (statement tables), insider-trading. The analysis above is public; the raw data tables require a free account.

More for machine readers: site briefing at /llms.txt · any ticker resolves at delvantic.com/stock/TICKER · raw inputs are public-company filings and market data (via licensed data feeds); every model, score, lens read, and prediction on this page is Delvantic's own analysis.

Casey's General Stores, Inc.

CASY NASDAQ
Consumer Cyclical · Specialty Retail
Ankeny, IA 50021, United States caseys.com Updated Aug 26, 8:16am
Price
$824.92
Market Cap
$30.5B
Employees
23,490
Beta
0.62
Avg Volume
288,058
Last Dividend
$2.36
CEO
Mr. Darren M. Rebelez

Casey's General Stores, Inc. is a convenience store and fuel retailer that operates a broad network of stores across the United States, with a strong presence in the Midwest and other underserved communities. Casey's General Stores focuses on everyday consumer needs through convenience merchandise, self-service gasoline, and a well-known prepared food offering that includes pizza, sandwiches, breakfast items, and beverages. The company also provides grocery staples, snacks, and household products, making its stores a regular stop for local shoppers and travelers. In addition to its retail locations, Casey's General Stores supports loyalty programs and food-service initiatives that help drive repeat visits and reinforce its role as a neighborhood-focused convenience chain. Headquartered in Ankeny, Iowa, Casey's General Stores plays an important role in the convenience retail market by combining fuel, food, and essentials in a single-format store model.

Runs with full report Generated: Aug 27, 2026 1:40am
Price Overview
Price at report time
$807.12
as of Aug 27, 1:30am (42d ago)
Change · Aug 27
-17.80 (-2.16%)
Day Range
$806.50 – $827.63
52-Week Range
$490.00 – $927.85
50-Day MA
$836.76
200-Day MA
$719.34
Volume
224,298.00
Right now · live
Log in to get the live feed
Members see the real-time price and the move since this report (over 42d).
Share Structure
Outstanding 36,904,285.00
Float 36,746,250.00
Free Float 99.6%
High free float — 99.6% of shares trade freely, ~0.4% held by insiders/institutions
Very liquid — most shares trade freely. Low insider ownership can mean less management alignment, but makes large position sizing straightforward.
Price History (1 Year)
Last updated: Aug 27, 2026 1:59am (42d ago)
Revenue & Net Income Trend
The directional story — useful even when net income is negative.
Last updated: Aug 27, 2026 1:59am (42d ago)
Revenue
The top line — total sales before any costs or taxes are subtracted. A measure of how much business the company is doing.
Net Income
The bottom line — profit left after subtracting all expenses, interest, and taxes from revenue. Reflects accounting profitability, but includes non-cash items like depreciation, so it isn't the same as cash earned.
Operating Cash Flow
The real cash generated by the day-to-day business — selling products, paying suppliers, collecting from customers. Calculated from net income by adding back non-cash items and adjusting for timing (unpaid bills, unsold inventory). When OCF consistently lags net income, the reported profit may not be converting to real money.
Period Revenue Net Income Net Margin YoY/QoQ
Key Metrics
TD Twelve Data statement HEX SEC filing
Industry comparison last run: Aug 27, 2026 1:38am
P/E · trailing (TTM) (Price per dollar of earnings over the past year — not a run-rate or forward P/E)
HEX
Stock Price / EPS (Diluted)
43.05
Stock Price: $824.92
EPS (Diluted): 19.16
P/B Ratio (Price vs net asset value)
HEX
Stock Price / Book Value Per Share
7.78
Stock Price: $824.92
Total Equity: $3.95B
Shares: 37,281,653
EV/EBITDA (Total value vs operating profit)
HEX
Enterprise Value / EBITDA
16.80
Market Cap: $30.53B
Total Debt: $2.43B
Cash: $522.99M
EBITDA: $1.93B
Enterprise Value (Takeover price (cap + debt - cash))
HEX
Market Cap + Total Debt - Cash
$32.5B
Market Cap: $30.53B
Total Debt: $2.43B
Cash: $522.99M
Gross Margin (Revenue left after direct costs)
HEX
Gross Profit / Revenue
24.6%
Gross Profit: $4.32B
Revenue: $17.56B
Operating Margin (Revenue left after all operations)
HEX
Operating Income / Revenue
8.4%
Operating Income: $1.48B
Revenue: $17.56B
Net Margin (Revenue left as actual profit)
HEX
Net Income / Revenue
4.1%
Net Income: $714.45M
Revenue: $17.56B
ROE (Profit from shareholder equity)
HEX
Net Income / Total Equity
18.1%
Net Income: $714.45M
Total Equity: $3.95B
ROIC (Profit from all invested capital)
HEX
NOPAT / Invested Capital
19.3%
Operating Income: $1.48B
Tax Rate: 23.8%
Equity: $3.95B
Total Debt: $2.43B
Cash: $522.99M
Current Ratio (Can it pay short-term bills)
HEX
Current Assets / Current Liabilities
1.01
Current Assets: $1.36B
Current Liabilities: $1.35B
Debt/Equity (Leverage — debt vs equity)
HEX
Total Debt / Total Equity
0.62
Short-Term Debt: $101.36M
Long-Term Debt: $2.33B
Total Debt: $2.43B
Total Equity: $3.95B
Rev/Share (Top-line per share)
HEX
Revenue / Shares Outstanding
$471.04
Revenue: $17.56B
Shares: 37,281,653
Book Value/Share (Net assets per share)
HEX
(Total Assets - Total Liabilities) / Shares
$106.00
Total Equity: $3.95B
Shares: 37,281,653
FCF/Share (Real cash generated per share)
HEX
(Operating Cash Flow + CapEx) / Shares
$19.36
Operating CF: $1.38B
CapEx: -$655.92M
Shares: 37,281,653
CapEx is negative (outflow) — added to OCF to get FCF
Div Yield (Annual income from holding)
TD
Last Annual Dividend / Stock Price
0.3%
Last Dividend: $2.36
Stock Price: $824.92
Payout Ratio (Earnings paid out as dividends)
HEX
Dividends Paid / Net Income
11.6%
Dividends Paid: -$83.14M
Net Income: $714.45M
Industry Benchmarks
Last run: Aug 27, 2026 1:38am
Compares CASY against LLM-researched typical ranges for its industry. One research call per industry, cached indefinitely — every stock in the same industry reuses the same baseline.
Income Statement (Annual)
Last updated: Aug 27, 2026 1:59am (42d ago)
Metric 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Revenue $13.0B $15.1B $14.9B $15.9B $17.6B
Cost of Revenue $10.2B $12.0B $11.5B $12.2B $13.2B
Gross Profit $2.8B $3.1B $3.3B $3.8B $4.3B
Operating Expenses $2.0B $2.1B $2.3B $2.6B $2.8B
Operating Income $801.2M $952.5M $1.1B $1.2B $1.5B
Net Income $339.8M $446.7M $502.0M $546.5M $714.4M
EBITDA $1.1B $1.3B $1.4B $1.6B $1.9B
EPS $9.14 $11.99 $13.51 $14.72 $19.28
EPS (Diluted) $9.10 $11.91 $13.43 $14.64 $19.16
Balance Sheet (Annual)
Last updated: Aug 27, 2026 1:30am (42d ago)
Metric 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Cash & Equivalents $158.9M $378.9M $206.5M $326.7M $523.0M
Total Current Assets $725.0M $921.0M $829.9M $1.0B $1.4B
Total Assets $5.5B $5.9B $6.3B $8.2B $8.9B
Current Liabilities $904.7M $927.1M $953.5M $1.1B $1.4B
Long-Term Debt $1.7B $1.6B $1.6B $2.4B $2.3B
Total Liabilities $3.3B $3.3B $3.3B $4.7B $5.0B
Total Equity $2.2B $2.7B $3.0B $3.5B $4.0B
Retained Earnings $2.2B $2.6B $3.0B $3.5B $4.0B
Cash Flow (Annual)
Last updated: Aug 27, 2026 1:59am (42d ago)
Metric 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Operating Cash Flow $788.7M $882.0M $893.0M $1.1B $1.4B
Capital Expenditure -$326.5M -$476.6M -$522.0M -$506.2M -$655.9M
Free Cash Flow $462.3M $405.4M $370.9M $584.6M $721.6M
Acquisitions (net) -$901.6M -$85.6M -$330.0M -$1.2B -$141.6M
Net Debt Issued / (Repaid) $261.5M -$41.0M -$53.7M $860.5M -$94.9M
Dividends Paid -$51.2M -$55.6M -$62.9M -$72.3M -$83.1M
Stock Buybacks $0 $0 -$104.9M $-734,000 -$200.5M
Net Change in Cash -$177.7M $220.0M -$172.4M $120.2M $196.3M
Growth Trends (YoY %)
Last updated: Aug 27, 2026 1:59am (42d ago)
Metric 2023 2024 2025 2026
Revenue Growth +16.5% -1.5% +7.3% +10.2%
Gross Profit Growth +11.2% +9.0% +12.1% +15.2%
Operating Income Growth +18.9% +11.2% +13.3% +23.6%
Net Income Growth +31.5% +12.4% +8.9% +30.7%
EBITDA Growth +14.6% +11.3% +13.8% +20.6%
Dividend History (Last 20)
Last updated: Aug 26, 2026 8:17am (42d ago)
Date Dividend Declaration Record Payment
2026-07-31 $0.65 — — —
2026-05-01 $0.57 — — —
2026-01-30 $0.57 — — —
2025-10-31 $0.57 — — —
2025-08-01 $0.57 — — —
2025-05-01 $0.50 — — —
2025-02-03 $0.50 — — —
2024-11-01 $0.50 — — —
2024-08-01 $0.50 — — —
2024-04-30 $0.43 — — —
2024-01-31 $0.43 — — —
2023-10-31 $0.43 — — —
2023-07-31 $0.43 — — —
2023-04-28 $0.38 — — —
2023-01-31 $0.38 — — —
2022-10-31 $0.38 — — —
2022-07-29 $0.38 — — —
2022-04-29 $0.35 — — —
2022-01-31 $0.35 — — —
2021-10-29 $0.35 — — —
0Company Classification 1Industry Landscape 2Company Momentum 3Forward Projection 4aDCF Valuation 4bEarnings Power Value 4cAnchored PE 4dReverse DCF 4eRevenue-Based DCF 4fAnchored P/S 4gScenario Analysis 4hDividend Discount Model 4iBook Value Analysis 4jInsider Activity 4fCash Flow Quality 4gDebt Maturity Risk 4hMacro Environment 4iSector Intelligence 4jRevenue Confidence 4kSensitivity Analysis 4lSector Demand Cycle 5AI Investigation 5bThesis Evaluation 6Valuation Synthesis
computed not applicable 18 computed · 6 not applicable
Risk : Reward — upside vs downside from this company's own quarters
Computed 2026-10-05 02:01
-0.5 : 1 +1σ upside vs −1σ downside, from this company's own quarterly history
A +1σ run of quarters pays -34%; a −1σ run costs 67%. Ratio -0.5:1 (μ 11.9%, σ 9.6% , 16 pairs).
Older method (repeat-worst-quarter): 1.9 : 1
CaseGrowthMarginFair valuevs price ($807.12)
Bull — recovery +19% 17.3% $1,815.85 +125%
Base — stabilizes +13% 15.0% $1,291.08 +60%
Bear — keeps slipping +6% 12.8% $891.22 +10%
Stress — last quarter repeats +0% 4.6% $274.10 -66%
Upside — a +1σ run of quarters (v2) +22% 4.6% $536.74 -34%
Stress — a −1σ run of quarters (v2) +2% 4.0% $262.51 -67%
The next quarters keep the trajectory of the worst recent matched quarter (ending 2026-01-31) — growth stays at 0.3% and margins bend by the same profit-vs-revenue ratio (×1.10). Stress is a trajectory, not a prediction — it answers "what if the ship's current heading simply continues," which history says is the case to respect.
Why this is appearing: this company files quarterly, so its recent trajectory could be measured rather than assumed — the engine matched Jul 2026 against the same quarter one year earlier and found revenue +24.3% · operating income +17.1% · net income +27.1% year-over-year. That measured heading is what the stress case extends forward. Of those, the stress case extends the worst matched quarter — the one ending Jan 31, 2026 (revenue +0.3%, operating income +27.5% YoY) — not the average. Data measured through Jul 31, 2026 — this card recalculates automatically when the next quarterly filing is ingested. Companies without quarterly filings (many foreign listings) never show this card: with no measured trajectory, there is nothing honest to repeat.
Narrative Economics
The story the market is telling about this stock — the intangible X-factor (founder mythology, cult dynamics, TAM-of-imagination) that moves price beyond what cash flows alone explain. After Shiller, Narrative Economics.
No narrative profile yet for CASY — it's generated by the pipeline (market-narrative step).
Growth Outlook
Analyzed 2026-08-27 02:12

The question every valuation on this page silently assumes: is this company likely to grow? Judged forward — the business, its category, the world — against what's already printed.

Growing A consolidator with real unit-growth runway and a food-margin engine: revenue +10% and earnings +31% YoY are driven by store additions and inside-store mix, so the business grows for years — just nowhere near the ~38% the price embeds. conf 7/10
Share gain Category shrinking · Industry aggregate revenue is contracting at roughly -10% CAGR with earnings -13%, and the category's median recent growth is -8.4%; a large portion of that is fuel-price deflation plus attrition among sub-scale independent operators. Casey's grew revenue +10.2% and earnings +30.7% over the same window — a ~23-point gap — because it is literally absorbing the shrinking part of the category (buying independents) while shifting mix toward food.
Next 2 quarters
Growing
Acquired-store contribution and remodel conversions annualize into the next two prints, inside-store margin mix keeps rising, and fuel gross profit per gallon has been running above conservative modeling. Same-store traffic is the soft spot but inside gross profit growth should more than cover it.
↑ above expectations
Year 1
Growing
Full-year shape is unit growth plus inside-sales mix plus normalized fuel margin, which supports high-single-digit revenue and low-to-mid-teens EBITDA/EPS growth. Revenue optics could look softer than profit if fuel prices fall.
≈ inline with expectations
Years 2–3
Growing
The structural engine — buying fragmented independents and re-platforming them onto a higher-margin food model — has years of runway and does not require same-store heroics. Earnings power should compound at a low-to-mid-teens rate, faster than revenue, as mix improves. It is durable growth, not acceleration: acquisition pace is capex- and integration-constrained, gallons slowly erode, and the rural consumer caps same-store upside.
↓ below expectations
The creme: each rung's call measured against what's already printed (vs analyst estimates · vs guidance / FY consensus · vs price-implied growth) — expectations in print are already in the price, so only the variant margin can pay. Hover a rung's chip for the margin read.
Growth drivers
69 Unit growth via acquisition of fragmented independents — Roughly half of US c-stores are single- or few-store operators lacking scale in fuel procurement, food supply chain and loyalty. Casey's has been buying and converting these (including large multi-hundred-store deals) and rebranding to its prepared-food model, which lifts inside sales per store well above the acquired base. This is a mechanical, repeatable revenue and EBITDA adder independent of same-store traffic, and it is the single clearest explanation of the +22.6pt growth gap versus a shrinking industry aggregate.
63 Prepared food / private label mix shift — Pizza, bakery and dispensed beverages carry far higher gross margin than fuel or packaged grocery, and are effectively non-replicable in small-town markets where no national QSR competes at Casey's density. Growing food's share of inside sales raises blended margin faster than revenue, which is exactly the shape of the record: earnings CAGR 19.3% on revenue CAGR 8.7%, and recent earnings +30.7% on revenue +10.2%.
45 Structurally higher fuel margins (CPG) — Industry fuel cents-per-gallon has reset materially above pre-2020 levels as sub-scale operators need wider margins to survive and consumers have proven fuel-price-inelastic at the pump. Casey's scale in procurement and its ability to monetize the fuel stop through the store means gallons can be flat while fuel gross profit still grows. This is the main reason estimate beats have been so persistent.
31 Loyalty and low-competition geography — Sparse rural/small-town footprint means little head-to-head convenience competition and sticky commuter routines; a large digital loyalty base supports traffic and targeted promotion without broad discounting. Supports same-store resilience even with a stretched consumer.
Growth risks
43 Fuel-linked revenue optics and gallon demand decay — A large share of reported revenue is fuel dollars, so falling crude mechanically deflates the top line (a big part of why the industry aggregate prints -10% CAGR). Longer term, improving fleet efficiency and EV adoption slowly erode gallons. Casey's offsets via CPG and inside mix, but revenue growth optics can turn negative in a low-oil year even while profit grows.
53 Price already assumes ~38% growth — The reverse-DCF requires growth roughly five times the mechanical projection of 7.7%. Even a bullish, fully-executed unit-growth-plus-food-mix plan lands in the high-single to low-teens revenue and low-to-mid-teens EBITDA range. That is a structural expectations gap, not a business-quality gap.
31 Low-income Midwest consumer squeeze — Core customer is exposed to food inflation, benefits changes and soft rural wage growth; trade-down from prepared food to packaged grocery would hit the highest-margin line first. Cigarette/nicotine volume decline is a persistent inside-sales drag only partly offset by alternative nicotine.
26 Integration and leverage on large deals — Growth increasingly depends on digesting big acquisitions: remodel capex, food-service rollout timing and personnel constraints can push synergy realization out several quarters, and debt taken on at a 4.6% 10-year raises the bar on incremental deal returns.
19 Competitive encroachment — Dollar stores in small towns, expanding large-format c-store chains and grocery delivery nibble at trip frequency. Slow-moving rather than acute given rural density economics, but it caps long-run same-store upside.
Two forces dominate. First, consolidation: the US convenience channel is still overwhelmingly small operators who cannot fund food programs, loyalty tech or fuel-supply scale, and rising cost/regulatory burden keeps pushing them to sell — a multi-year acquisition runway for the few scaled buyers. Second, fuel's changing role: gallons are flat-to-slowly-declining while cents-per-gallon has structurally reset higher, so the pump is becoming a traffic driver rather than a profit center, and profit migrates inside the store to food. Macro is a headwind at the margin — a 4.64% 10-year raises the cost of debt-funded M&A, and rural consumers are stretched — but convenience demand is habitual and defensive, so volume risk is modest. Net: the world is shrinking the number of operators while growing the profit pool per surviving store, which favors Casey's.
Growth position composite +26
ShrinkingStallingHoldingGrowingAccelerating
70Next 2 quarters · Growing
70Year 1 · Growing
70Years 2–3 · Growing
+26Composite (−100…+100)
A research prediction, not advice. Forward-graded: each rung is scored against the prints that follow it. Not an input to the GEM designation — track record first.
Claude Reading
Independent analyst synthesis · claude-opus-4-7 · generated 2026-08-27 01:58:40
Verdict Overvalued but high-quality — fair value $550-620 vs current $825; wait for a same-store or margin disappointment to build a position, don't chase here.

Looking at the raw numbers first: Casey's did $17.56B revenue FY26 with $714M net income (4.1% net margin), growing revenue 10.2% YoY and earnings ~31%. The quarterly cadence is seasonally driven — Q1 (May-Jul) and Q2 (Aug-Oct) print ~$200M NI while Q3-Q4 winter quarters print $87-163M. So the "decelerating quarterly trend" signal is partly noise from seasonality; comparing Q4'26 ($162.7M) to Q4'25 ($98.3M) is +66% YoY, and Q3'26 vs Q3'25 is +49%. That's not deceleration, that's the strongest YoY comps in the file. The synthesis model's DCF composite at $446 and thesis-eval's "37.9% FCF CAGR embedded" both need to grapple with the fact that trailing earnings growth is 30%+ and FCF CAGR is genuinely 39.5% over the measured window — the market isn't extrapolating from nothing.

That said, the bear case has real teeth. FCF of $722M against a $30.5B market cap is a 2.4% FCF yield; you're paying 42x GAAP earnings for a 4% net margin fuel-and-pizza retailer with $2.43B of debt and only $523M cash. ROIC of 19% is genuinely good, but the incremental growth is coming from M&A (Fikes/CEFCO acquisition explains a lot of the FY26 revenue jump and the FCF composition), not pure same-store leverage. Capex ran $656M — as store count grows, maintenance capex compounds, and lease renewals at rural locations that Casey's owns cheaply today reprice at market eventually. The market-forces model's "hidden lease renewal margin compression" is a legitimate long-duration concern the bulls hand-wave. Insider activity is unambiguous: ten sales in early July 2026, zero buys shown — the "Net Insider Buying" secondary signal appears to contradict the transaction list and should be disregarded as a data error.

Where I disagree with the prior stack: the synthesis $446 fair value is too punitive — it treats a business compounding earnings 19% over five years and FCF near 40% as if it should trade at a retail-average 15-18x multiple, ignoring that Casey's has demonstrably outexecuted the c-store peer group (Murphy USA trades at ~19x, but has less prepared-food mix and lower ROIC). A defensible fair-value band using 25-28x normalized $750-800M earnings is $500-600, not $446 and not $825. The thesis-eval's "-17" and the market-forces "melting ice cube" framing both underweight that Casey's prepared food is now ~$1.5B+ revenue at ~58%+ gross margins — that segment alone is not a fuel-declining business, it's a rural QSR with captive traffic. But at $825 you're paying for that story to keep compounding through 2030 with no fuel-EV drag, no acquisition integration hiccup, and no consumer trade-down — a stacked ask.

Net: I partially agree with the "overvalued" synthesis verdict but reject its magnitude. Fair value is roughly $550-620 (25-28x normalized ~$800M NI, or ~20x EV/EBITDA on run-rate ~$1.5B); current $825 embeds ~35-50% narrative premium, not 90%. This is not a short — the business quality, ROIC, and rural moat are real and the momentum is intact — but it's a "wait for a 20-25% drawdown" name, not a buy here. Insider selling clusters at these levels are consistent with management sharing my read. The Q4/Q1 fiscal print (August-ish 2026) is the key catalyst; a same-store traffic miss or prepared-food margin dip would compress the multiple fast given how much growth is priced in. Contrarian counter: if Casey's announces another accretive acquisition at these multiples or prepared food comps accelerate past 8%, the multiple holds and I'm wrong on timing — but the asymmetry from $825 still favors patience.

GPT Reading
Independent reading · gpt-5.4 · generated 2026-08-27 01:58:57
Verdict Overvalued at $825 — outstanding operator, but the market is capitalizing a low-margin retailer as if 20%+ earnings growth and further margin gains are durable; fair value is closer to $600.

At $825, the market is paying an elite multiple for a business that is excellent operationally but still structurally a low-margin convenience retailer. The raw numbers show why investors like it: revenue rose from $12.95B in FY2022 to $17.56B in FY2026, operating income from $801M to $1.48B, and net income from $340M to $714M. That is not financial engineering; margins genuinely improved, with gross margin up from 21.3% to 24.6% and operating margin from 6.2% to 8.5%. Return metrics are strong too, with ROIC at 19.3% and ROE at 18.1%. Free cash flow of $722M against $655.9M of capex says the growth is being funded from a real earnings base. This is a high-quality operator, and the recent quarterly cadence is also healthy: the latest quarter posted $4.57B of revenue and $162.7M of net income, up from $3.99B and $98.3M in the year-ago quarter. That is 14% revenue growth and roughly 66% earnings growth in a business category where most peers struggle to separate from commodity fuel economics.

But the stock price assumes this improvement phase can continue at something close to its recent pace, and that is where I part ways with the market. Even after all the progress, Casey’s still earned just $714M on $17.56B of sales, a 4.1% net margin. The latest four quarters annualize to about $714M as well, so there is no hidden acceleration beyond what the annuals already show. Against a $30.5B market cap, that is 43x earnings and roughly 42x free cash flow. EV/EBITDA at 16.8x is rich for almost any brick-and-mortar retail format, let alone one with a current ratio barely above 1.0 and a business model tied partly to fuel volumes and consumer traffic. To justify this, I think you need years of double-digit EPS growth plus further margin expansion from already-improved levels. That is a demanding setup for a company whose quarterly net margins still swing from 2.2%-2.5% in weaker quarters to 4.6%-4.7% in stronger ones. The business is good enough to deserve a premium; it is not good enough to deserve a software-like certainty premium.

The key story in the numbers is that Casey’s has become more productive, not that it has become transformed. Revenue grew 10% in FY2026, but operating income grew 23% because the company extracted better mix and efficiency. That is exactly the kind of improvement that drives a re-rating — once. The problem is that margin expansion gets harder as you move from 6.4% operating margin in FY2025 to 8.5% in FY2026. If FY2026 is closer to a new plateau than the midpoint of a long runway, the multiple is plainly too high. Debt is manageable at $2.43B versus $523M cash and $1.38B operating cash flow, so balance-sheet risk is not the issue. The issue is paying 7.8x book and 1.75x sales for a company whose long-run economics, however admirable, are still tethered to convenience retail realities. On my read, fair value needs a materially lower entry point, likely in the $550-$650 range, where you are paying for quality and unit growth without assuming near-perfect continuation of the margin story.

The strongest case against my view is straightforward: Casey’s may be one of the few convenience chains actually earning a widening moat. If prepared food and beverage continue to lift mix, then gross margin can keep climbing even if fuel remains volatile, and the earnings power could scale faster than revenue for several more years. The quarter-to-quarter data support that argument more than bears admit: FY2026 net income of $714M was up 31% from FY2025’s $547M on only 10% revenue growth, and the latest quarter’s $162.7M versus $98.3M a year earlier suggests the operating model still has room. If that persists, today’s 43x trailing P/E may compress quickly on forward numbers. A smart bull would also point out that ROIC near 19% is not normal retail mediocrity; businesses that can reinvest at those returns often look expensive before they grow into the valuation. I weigh that evidence less heavily because the stock already discounts a long duration of exceptional execution, and retail concepts rarely get the luxury of one bad year when starting from this valuation.

What would change my mind is not another good quarter; it would be evidence that FY2026 was not a peak-margin year but the start of a sustainably higher earnings regime. Specifically, if Casey’s can put up another year of 9%-10% revenue growth while keeping operating margin near or above 8.5%, pushing net income toward $850M-$900M and free cash flow toward $900M without leverage stepping up meaningfully, then the premium deserves more respect. Conversely, if quarterly margins slip back toward the FY2025 range — especially if revenue keeps growing but net income stalls around the current $700M run-rate — the stock’s valuation support should erode quickly.

Grok Reading
Independent reading · grok-4.5 · generated 2026-08-27 01:59:19
Verdict Overvalued quality compounder at $825; fair value closer to $450–550 on mid-teens earnings multiple and normalized FCF

The raw numbers on Casey's describe a genuinely well-run mature retailer that has earned a quality premium and then some. Fiscal 2026 revenue hit $17.56B with net income of $714.4M, up from $15.94B and $546.5M the prior year, producing a 30.7% earnings jump on 10.2% top-line growth and lifting net margin to 4.1% from 3.4%. Operating income climbed to $1.48B from $1.20B as gross profit expanded to $4.32B, confirming the prepared-food mix is doing real work rather than mere narrative. Free cash flow of $721.6M after $656M of capex is clean, ROIC sits at 19.3%, and the balance sheet is unremarkable leverage at 0.62 debt-to-equity with $2.43B of debt against $523M cash. Quarterly cadence shows the usual seasonal fuel swing—Q1 and Q2 FY26 delivered $215M and $206M of NI at 4.6–4.7% margins before winter compressed to 3.3–3.6%—but the year-over-year step-up from the soft FY25 winter quarters is unmistakable. The story the data tell is steady mid-single-digit unit and same-store compounding plus margin accretion, not a growth platform; revenue CAGR over five years is 8.7%, not 20%.

That reality collides with a 43x trailing P/E, 7.8x book, 16.8x EV/EBITDA and a sub-2.4% FCF yield on a $30.5B enterprise. At $825 the market is paying roughly twice a normalized mid-teens multiple for a specialty retailer whose own history never sustained the 30–40% FCF growth the current multiple embeds for half a decade. Insider prints in early July 2026 are uniformly sales—more than 15k shares across ten tickets—which directly contradicts the secondary “net buying” flag and undercuts the quiet-quality narrative at the margin. The valuation synthesis fair value near $426–447 is directionally correct even if the precise DCF inputs are debatable; an 89% premium to that anchor requires perpetual pricing power in rural c-stores and flawless prepared-food scaling that no peer at this absolute scale has delivered.

The strongest opposing case is that Casey’s is simply the best operator left in a consolidating industry, the small-town density moat is widening, and the food mix (pizza especially) is a structural profit inflection still early innings. Bulls will correctly note earnings CAGR of 19.3%, FCF CAGR of 39.5% off a lower base, ROE of 18%, and operating margin expansion from roughly 6% five years ago to 8.5% today. They will argue EV/EBITDA of 16.8x is not outrageous for a compounder with visible white-space stores and sticky traffic, and that the 43x P/E compresses quickly if NI keeps compounding at mid-teens. I weigh that evidence as real but already fully discounted: the multiple assumes the inflection continues at the recent accelerated rate rather than mean-reverting toward the 8–9% revenue trajectory the store base can actually support, and it leaves no room for fuel-margin volatility, wage pressure, or competitive encroachment from dollar stores and delivery.

I would flip to neutral or constructive only on two concrete developments: either trailing NTM P/E compressing below 25x via a material price drawdown while FCF holds above $700M, or two consecutive quarters of same-store inside-sales growth above 6% with food-margin expansion that lifts full-year operating margin sustainably through 9.5% without a collapse in fuel contribution. Absent that, the stock remains a high-quality operator priced for perfection that history does not support.

Big-3 Panel — where each AI stands
Each AI above independently stated a direction (undervalued, fairly valued, or overvalued) and how strongly it believes it (conviction, 0–5). We combine those into a Bull-Bear Index on a 0–10 scale: 5 is neutral, 10 is maximum bullish (undervalued at full conviction), 0 is maximum bearish. We compute the score ourselves with the same arithmetic for every seat — the models never grade their own bullishness — so the three are directly comparable. Δ shows how far each seat sits from the panel average of 1.3; a large Δ marks the dissenting voice, usually the one worth reading.
Claude claude-opus-4-7 2.0
overvalued · conviction 3/5 · Δ +0.7 vs panel · self: 3.0
GPT gpt-5.4 1.0
overvalued · conviction 4/5 · Δ -0.3 vs panel · self: 3.0
Grok grok-4.5 1.0
overvalued · conviction 4/5 · Δ -0.3 vs panel · self: 3.0
Advanced Analysis Forensic deep-dive · separate lenses
Separate reads — Company Quality (is it a great business?), Valuation (is it mispriced?), and General Sentiment (how macro + narrative are pushing it), kept deliberately apart · 2026-08-27 02:13:19
Delvantic - Cairn AI
Quality - wait for a dip 8/10
Casey's is a genuine quality compounder trading roughly 45% above deserved value — great business, wrong price.
The cruxWhether the prepared-food margin expansion and mid-teens earnings growth can persist long enough to let $807 grow into fair value, or whether one soft comp re-rates the multiple.
Forensic checks Derived mechanically from CASY's filed financials — not from the AI lenses
Liquidity & RunwaySelf-Funding
DilutionStable Share Count
Earnings QualityHigh Earnings Quality
The four lensesswitch a tab for its full read — score + evidence
Company Quality
+63
Strong
edge √Σ 121 · risk √Σ 47 · conf 8/10

Revenue has climbed from $12.95B (2022) to $17.56B (2026), a roughly 8% CAGR, while gross margin expanded from 21.3% to 24.6% and operating margin from 6.2% to 8.4% — a genuine operating-leverage story, not a cost-cut mirage. Net income grew from $339.8M to $714.4M (roughly doubling in four years), and FCF stepped up to $721.6M with OCF/NI around 2x and accruals at -7.1% of assets, which points to real, cash-backed earnings. Altman Z of 6.81 puts the balance sheet in the safe zone despite $1.91B net debt. Dilution is a non-issue: diluted shares actually shrank slightly (37.4M to 37.3M), SBC is just 0.4% of revenue, and buybacks exceed SBC by 129%. The business self-funds capex and still generates surplus cash. The main soft spot is the balance sheet: liquid cash is only $523M against $1.91B net debt, so leverage (likely tied to the Fikes/store acquisitions that drove the revenue step-up) is a real constraint rather than a cushion, though FCF easily services it. Insider tape is mixed-to-negative in signal terms — 27 sells versus 1 small buy, with CEO Rebelez unloading a large cluster on 2026-07-07. That is typical post-run executive monetization at a mature retailer, not a distress tell, but it is not the confirming buy pattern the summary blurb suggests.

Strengths 4
m70
Margin expansion is real and sustained
Gross margin rose 21.3% to 24.6% and operating margin 6.2% to 8.4% over four years while revenue grew ~36%, indicating genuine operating leverage in a low-margin industry.
m65
High earnings quality
OCF/NI ~2x, accruals -7.1% of assets, Altman Z 6.81; FCF of $721.6M actually exceeds net income of $714.4M in 2026 — earnings are cash-backed.
m55
Disciplined share count
Diluted shares essentially flat at ~37.3-37.4M over four years, SBC only 0.4% of revenue, buybacks 129% of SBC — per-share value is protected.
m50
Self-funding compounder
FCF grew from $462M to $722M; company funds growth and acquisitions from operations, not dilution.
Concerns 2
m40
Net debt of $1.91B vs $523M cash
Balance sheet carries real leverage (likely acquisition-related); it is a constraint, though FCF/net-debt of ~0.38x is manageable and Altman Z remains safe.
m25
Heavy insider selling cluster
CEO Rebelez executed a large multi-lot sale on 2026-07-07 totaling roughly $12M+, and 27 sells vs 1 tiny buy in 12 months. Not distress, but not the confirming signal the context blurb implied.
This is a well-run, mature specialty retailer executing a credible mix shift toward higher-margin prepared foods and inside-store sales, and the numbers back the narrative — cash actually exceeds reported earnings, share count is flat, and every margin line is moving the right way. The leverage is the one thing keeping me from calling it a fortress; it is not dangerous, but it is not a cushion either. The insider selling is loud but looks like normal executive monetization at a mature-earner, not a red flag. I read the business as Strong, sitting comfortably in the mid-70s on the frame.
Verify before trusting this (5)
  • Composition and maturity schedule of the $1.91B net debt (Fikes acquisition financing?)
  • Same-store sales trends vs acquisition-driven growth in the 2025-2026 revenue jump
  • Whether inside-store margin gains reflect mix shift (prepared foods) or fuel-margin windfall
  • 10b5-1 plan disclosures behind the July 2026 CEO sale cluster
  • Capex intensity and unit economics of new/acquired stores
Valuation / Mispricing
-79
Rich
edge √Σ 20 · risk √Σ 127 · conf 7/10
Price $807 vs deserved ~$425-450, roughly 45-47% above fair - a rich premium, not a bargain. attractive below $520.00

The composite fair value of $446.80 and signal-adjusted $425.93 sit roughly 47% below the $807.12 price. Even the most generous input, an anchored P/E of $856.74, only barely justifies today's quote, while the DCF ($330.84) and EPV floor ($268.77) suggest the market is capitalizing prepared-food momentum well into perpetuity. Earnings quality is high so no haircut is warranted, but that only firms up the deserved number, not the price.

Cheap signals 1
m20
Quality and clean earnings raise deserved value
Strong quality score (63), cash exceeds earnings, flat share count - these justify a premium to raw DCF but not a 90%+ premium.
Rich / priced-in 4
m78
Composite FV ~47% below price
Signal-adjusted FV $425.93 vs $807.12 implies the market is paying nearly 2x deserved value on the blended methods.
m70
DCF and EPV both far below price
DCF $330.84 and EPV floor $268.77 - two independent conservative methods - agree the cash-generative core is worth roughly 40% of today's price.
m55
Only anchored P/E supports price
Anchored-PE FV of $856.74 barely covers $807, meaning the entire bull case leans on peer/multiple comps extrapolating current earnings power without discounting cyclicality.
m45
Priced as a growth platform, not a mature c-store
The bear frame is right that today's multiple embeds perpetual SSS growth and margin expansion; secular pressure from delivery, dollar stores, and EV transition is not discounted.
I like the business but I do not like the price. Three of four valuation methods point to a fair value between $269 and $447; only the anchored P/E, which just extrapolates today's multiple, gets me near $807. That is not margin of safety, that is paying full retail for a Midwest convenience chain and hoping the compounding continues uninterrupted. I would need this stock roughly 35-40% lower - call it the low $500s - before the risk-reward interests me. Until then, it is a hold-your-nose-and-admire, not a buy.
Verify before trusting this (5)
  • Inside-store gross margin trajectory and prepared-food mix trend in next 10-Q
  • Same-store sales guidance and fuel margin normalization commentary
  • M&A cadence and acquisition multiples paid for tuck-in stores
  • Capex intensity and returns on new-store openings
  • Any share-repurchase acceleration or leverage change
General Sentiment
+7
Balanced
tail √Σ 60 · head √Σ 54 · conf 6/10

Casey's sits in a benign spot on the tape. The regime is mildly risk-on (+30) but the name's 0.62 beta means it neither catches much of the updraft nor gets hurt when the S&P wobbles 1.6% off highs. The active narrative is quiet-quality with moderate intensity and durability, low cult - exactly the kind of story that neither de-rates violently nor gets bid into a mania. Momentum is strong-positive with an 8.7% CAGR and steady cash generation, which is quietly reinforcing the compounder framing. News flow is a mixed bag but tilts constructive: index inclusion in the Bloomberg 500 is a mechanical positive, and the college-football / Texas Football brand tie-ups feed the 'sticky rural moat plus prepared-food loyalty' story the bulls want to tell. Cutting the other way, two separate valuation pieces (a 16% overvalued DCF flag and a 'valuation questions in play' headline) are circulating in the sentiment layer - not a narrative break, but a persistent whisper that the multiple is stretched. Macro headwinds from 4.64% 10y and a 25.7 market PE press harder on premium-multiple names like this than the low beta suggests. Net: a calm, moderately supportive backdrop with a nagging valuation murmur. No decisive force in either direction.

Tailwinds 4
m35
Low-beta defensive in a wobbly tape
Beta 0.62 in a risk-on-but-fragile regime (VIX 15.2, S&P -1.6% off highs) means Casey's is a natural park-it name if rotation turns defensive. Muted but real support.
m30
Quiet-quality narrative intact and reinforced
The prepared-food/rural-moat story is being actively fed by the Texas Football and college-football pizza tie-ups plus a bullish inside-sales momentum piece. Moderate intensity, moderate durability - no cracks visible.
m25
Bloomberg 500 index add
Mechanical passive inflow catalyst on Sept 10 reconstitution. Small but directional bid, and a sentiment signal that CASY has graduated in index-land.
m30
Strong-positive momentum tape
8.7% CAGR with low revenue-growth volatility keeps trend-followers and quality-momentum funds on the right side. Self-reinforcing in the absence of a shock.
Headwinds 3
m40
Valuation-overhang whisper in the news layer
Two recent pieces explicitly flag DCF overvaluation (16% overvalued, 89% premium framing). Not a narrative break but a persistent drag that caps upside enthusiasm and invites profit-taking on any wobble.
m30
Rates and market PE press premium multiples
10y at 4.64% and market PE 25.7 are unfriendly to stocks trading well above intrinsic-value anchors. Low beta softens the blow but doesn't neutralize multiple compression risk for a premium-priced compounder.
m20
Secular bear whisper (delivery, dollar stores)
Bear frame exists but is dormant - not driving flows today. Low intensity, but it's the story that would activate if a comp print disappoints.
Honestly this is a Balanced read and I don't want to force it either way. Casey's has a quiet, durable narrative that isn't running hot enough to crack, a low-beta profile that insulates it from tape stress, and constructive micro-news (index add, brand tie-ups, inside-sales momentum). Against that, there's a real but low-decibel valuation-overhang whisper circulating, and a 4.64% 10y plus 25.7 market PE is the exact macro that pressures premium-multiple compounders. Net pressure is close to zero - slight tailwind bias from momentum and defensiveness, offset by the valuation murmur. This is not a name where sentiment is doing the heavy lifting in either direction; it will trade on its next comp print.
Verify before trusting this (4)
  • Next same-store sales / prepared-food margin print - the one datapoint that could either validate the compounder story or hand the bears a lever
  • Whether the 'overvalued on DCF' framing gets picked up by sell-side or stays as retail-blog chatter
  • Sept 10 Bloomberg 500 add - watch for passive-flow bid into the reconstitution
  • Any rotation from defensive quality into higher-beta risk-on names that would drain the low-beta bid
The market-wide tape + this name's exposure to it (beta / sector / narrative durability). Context on the non-fundamental pressure — not a call on the business or the price. processId: detail-general-sentiment
Growth Outlook
+26
Growing
edge √Σ 108 · risk √Σ 82 · conf 7/10

Two forces dominate. First, consolidation: the US convenience channel is still overwhelmingly small operators who cannot fund food programs, loyalty tech or fuel-supply scale, and rising cost/regulatory burden keeps pushing them to sell — a multi-year acquisition runway for the few scaled buyers. Second, fuel's changing role: gallons are flat-to-slowly-declining while cents-per-gallon has structurally reset higher, so the pump is becoming a traffic driver rather than a profit center, and profit migrates inside the store to food. Macro is a headwind at the margin — a 4.64% 10-year raises the cost of debt-funded M&A, and rural consumers are stretched — but convenience demand is habitual and defensive, so volume risk is modest. Net: the world is shrinking the number of operators while growing the profit pool per surviving store, which favors Casey's.

Growth drivers 4
m69
Unit growth via acquisition of fragmented independents
Roughly half of US c-stores are single- or few-store operators lacking scale in fuel procurement, food supply chain and loyalty. Casey's has been buying and converting these (including large multi-hundred-store deals) and rebranding to its prepared-food model, which lifts inside sales per store well above the acquired base. This is a mechanical, repeatable revenue and EBITDA adder independent of same-store traffic, and it is the single clearest explanation of the +22.6pt growth gap versus a shrinking industry aggregate.
m63
Prepared food / private label mix shift
Pizza, bakery and dispensed beverages carry far higher gross margin than fuel or packaged grocery, and are effectively non-replicable in small-town markets where no national QSR competes at Casey's density. Growing food's share of inside sales raises blended margin faster than revenue, which is exactly the shape of the record: earnings CAGR 19.3% on revenue CAGR 8.7%, and recent earnings +30.7% on revenue +10.2%.
m45
Structurally higher fuel margins (CPG)
Industry fuel cents-per-gallon has reset materially above pre-2020 levels as sub-scale operators need wider margins to survive and consumers have proven fuel-price-inelastic at the pump. Casey's scale in procurement and its ability to monetize the fuel stop through the store means gallons can be flat while fuel gross profit still grows. This is the main reason estimate beats have been so persistent.
m31
Loyalty and low-competition geography
Sparse rural/small-town footprint means little head-to-head convenience competition and sticky commuter routines; a large digital loyalty base supports traffic and targeted promotion without broad discounting. Supports same-store resilience even with a stretched consumer.
Growth risks 5
m43
Fuel-linked revenue optics and gallon demand decay
A large share of reported revenue is fuel dollars, so falling crude mechanically deflates the top line (a big part of why the industry aggregate prints -10% CAGR). Longer term, improving fleet efficiency and EV adoption slowly erode gallons. Casey's offsets via CPG and inside mix, but revenue growth optics can turn negative in a low-oil year even while profit grows.
m53
Price already assumes ~38% growth
The reverse-DCF requires growth roughly five times the mechanical projection of 7.7%. Even a bullish, fully-executed unit-growth-plus-food-mix plan lands in the high-single to low-teens revenue and low-to-mid-teens EBITDA range. That is a structural expectations gap, not a business-quality gap.
m31
Low-income Midwest consumer squeeze
Core customer is exposed to food inflation, benefits changes and soft rural wage growth; trade-down from prepared food to packaged grocery would hit the highest-margin line first. Cigarette/nicotine volume decline is a persistent inside-sales drag only partly offset by alternative nicotine.
m26
Integration and leverage on large deals
Growth increasingly depends on digesting big acquisitions: remodel capex, food-service rollout timing and personnel constraints can push synergy realization out several quarters, and debt taken on at a 4.6% 10-year raises the bar on incremental deal returns.
m19
Competitive encroachment
Dollar stores in small towns, expanding large-format c-store chains and grocery delivery nibble at trip frequency. Slow-moving rather than acute given rural density economics, but it caps long-run same-store upside.
vs expectations: ~6m above · 1y inline · 2-3y below
The forward growth verdict — is the business itself likely to grow (next 2 quarters / year 1 / years 2–3), judged against its category and against printed expectations. The full horizon ladder + creme renders on the Growth Outlook card above. Not a call on the price (Valuation owns that) or the tape (Sentiment owns that).
Please log in to view trade setups
The Augustus trade-setup read is a members feature.
Log in
Lenses kept deliberately separate — Company Quality (price-agnostic), Valuation (price-conditional), General Sentiment (non-fundamental macro/narrative pressure), and Growth Outlook (the forward growth verdict). The scores are not blended. Filing-level items (convertibles, lock-ups, customer concentration) are v2 — see each lens's "verify."
Price Prediction
Lower -8.3% v0.6.0 View full prediction →

When we made this prediction on Aug 27, 2026, CASY was $776.51. We expect it to be $712.00 by Feb 2027, and we consider it great value under $520.00. This is an early model (v0.6.0) — the direction is more reliable than the exact price. Made Aug 27, 2026.

Price when predicted$776.51
Our estimate for Feb 2027$712.00-8.3%
Great value below$520.00
Price history shown (6 Months)

Blue is our prediction, starting the day we made it. Grey is a slower route to the same place — the same destination, taking longer. Black is the actual price, so you can see how we are doing.

Community AI Feedback
No community reviews yet for CASY. Be the first — hit How to Contribute, have any AI review this page, and paste its take back here.
My Notes personal — only you see this
v1.1.760 · f4b58a28 · 2026-10-07 20:07:48