Homepage
FRESH Analysis Report
Jun 23, 2026
4 days ago · 100% complete · +8 refreshed

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.

AMD NASDAQ Categories PDF
Technology · Semiconductors
Santa Clara, CA 95054, United States IPO 1972 amd.com Updated Jun 23, 3:00am
Price
$551.63
Market Cap
$899.5B
Employees
28,000
Beta
2.49
Avg Volume
37,960,051
CEO
Lisa T. Su
Business Description

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD), established in 1969 and headquartered in Santa Clara, California, operates as a global leader in the semiconductor industry. The company organizes its extensive operations into two primary segments: Computing and Graphics, and Enterprise, Embedded and Semi-Custom. In its Computing and Graphics division, AMD develops a range of products including x86 microprocessors (often as accelerated processing units), chipsets, and various graphics processing units (GPUs), encompassing discrete, integrated, data center, and professional variants, alongside providing development services. The Enterprise, Embedded and Semi-Custom segment focuses on server and embedded processors, bespoke System-on-Chip (SoC) products, and foundational technology for popular game consoles, also offering associated development support. AMD's diverse product lineup features processors for desktop and notebook personal computers under well-known brands such as AMD Ryzen, Ryzen PRO, Ryzen Threadripper, Threadripper PRO, AMD Athlon, Athlon PRO, AMD FX, AMD A-Series, and PRO A-Series. Discrete GPUs for these PCs are offered through the AMD Radeon graphics and AMD Embedded Radeon graphics brands, while professional graphics solutions include AMD Radeon Pro and AMD FirePro. Furthermore, the company provides high-performance accelerators for servers, including Radeon Instinct, Radeon PRO V-series, and AMD Instinct, along with AMD EPYC microprocessors designed for server environments. Its embedded processor solutions span multiple brands, such as AMD Athlon, AMD Geode, AMD Ryzen, AMD EPYC, AMD R-Series, and G-Series. AMD also produces chipsets under its own trademark and crafts customer-specific solutions leveraging its CPU, GPU, and multimedia expertise, including specialized semi-custom SoC products. AMD reaches its wide array of clients, which comprise original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), public cloud service providers, original design manufacturers (ODMs), system integrators, independent distributors, online retailers, and add-in-board manufacturers. The company's sales and distribution network includes its direct sales force, independent distributors, and dedicated sales representatives.

Business History
Generated: Jun 23, 2026 3:03am
Price Overview
Last updated: Jun 23, 2026 3:00am (4d ago)
$551.63
+14.26 (+2.65%)
Day Range
$535.71 – $562.99
52-Week Range
$132.93 – $562.99
50-Day MA
$417.35
200-Day MA
$263.10
Volume
25,248,056.00
Analyst Price Targets
Low $260.00
Consensus $452.91
High $665.00
(239 analysts)
Share Structure
Outstanding 1,630,600,000.00
Float 1,622,007,374.00
Free Float 99.5%
High free float — 99.5% of shares trade freely, ~0.5% held by insiders/institutions
Very liquid — most shares trade freely. Low insider ownership can mean less management alignment, but makes large position sizing straightforward.
Price History (1 Year)
Last updated: Jun 23, 2026 3:08am (4d ago)
Revenue & Net Income Trend
The directional story — useful even when net income is negative.
Last updated: Jun 23, 2026 3:04am (4d ago)
Revenue
The top line — total sales before any costs or taxes are subtracted. A measure of how much business the company is doing.
Net Income
The bottom line — profit left after subtracting all expenses, interest, and taxes from revenue. Reflects accounting profitability, but includes non-cash items like depreciation, so it isn't the same as cash earned.
Operating Cash Flow
The real cash generated by the day-to-day business — selling products, paying suppliers, collecting from customers. Calculated from net income by adding back non-cash items and adjusting for timing (unpaid bills, unsold inventory). When OCF consistently lags net income, the reported profit may not be converting to real money.
Period Revenue Net Income Net Margin YoY/QoQ
Key Metrics
API Direct from provider CALC Derived from statements
Industry comparison last run: Jun 23, 2026 3:02am
P/E Ratio (Price per dollar of earnings)
API
Stock Price / EPS (Diluted)
179.62
Stock Price: $551.63
EPS (Diluted): 2.67
P/B Ratio (Price vs net asset value)
API
Stock Price / Book Value Per Share
5.54
Stock Price: $551.63
Total Equity: $63.00B
Shares: 1,636,000,000
EV/EBITDA (Total value vs operating profit)
API
Enterprise Value / EBITDA
111.03
Market Cap: $899.49B
Total Debt: $3.85B
Cash: $5.54B
EBITDA: $7.28B
Enterprise Value (Takeover price (cap + debt - cash))
API
Market Cap + Total Debt - Cash
$348.1B
Market Cap: $899.49B
Total Debt: $3.85B
Cash: $5.54B
Gross Margin (Revenue left after direct costs)
API
Gross Profit / Revenue
49.5%
Gross Profit: $17.15B
Revenue: $34.64B
Operating Margin (Revenue left after all operations)
API
Operating Income / Revenue
10.7%
Operating Income: $3.69B
Revenue: $34.64B
Net Margin (Revenue left as actual profit)
API
Net Income / Revenue
12.5%
Net Income: $4.34B
Revenue: $34.64B
ROE (Profit from shareholder equity)
API
Net Income / Total Equity
8.1%
Net Income: $4.34B
Total Equity: $63.00B
ROIC (Profit from all invested capital)
API
NOPAT / Invested Capital
6.2%
Operating Income: $3.69B
Tax Rate: -2.5%
Equity: $63.00B
Total Debt: $3.85B
Cash: $5.54B
Current Ratio (Can it pay short-term bills)
API
Current Assets / Current Liabilities
2.85
Current Assets: $26.95B
Current Liabilities: $9.46B
Debt/Equity (Leverage — debt vs equity)
CALC
Total Debt / Total Equity
0.06
Short-Term Debt: $874.00M
Long-Term Debt: $2.97B
Total Debt: $3.85B
Total Equity: $63.00B
Rev/Share (Top-line per share)
CALC
Revenue / Shares Outstanding
$21.17
Revenue: $34.64B
Shares: 1,636,000,000
Book Value/Share (Net assets per share)
CALC
(Total Assets - Total Liabilities) / Shares
$38.51
Total Equity: $63.00B
Shares: 1,636,000,000
FCF/Share (Real cash generated per share)
CALC
(Operating Cash Flow + CapEx) / Shares
$4.12
Operating CF: $7.71B
CapEx: -$974.00M
Shares: 1,636,000,000
CapEx is negative (outflow) — added to OCF to get FCF
Div Yield (Annual income from holding)
API
Last Annual Dividend / Stock Price
0.0%
Last Dividend: N/A
Stock Price: $551.63
Payout Ratio (Earnings paid out as dividends)
Dividends Paid / Net Income
Dividends Paid: N/A
Net Income: $4.34B
Dividends paid not available in cash flow statement
Industry Benchmarks
Last run: Jun 23, 2026 3:02am
Compares AMD against LLM-researched typical ranges for its industry. One research call per industry, cached indefinitely — every stock in the same industry reuses the same baseline.
Advanced Analysis Forensic deep-dive · three lenses
Three separate reads — Company Quality (is it a great business?), Valuation (is it mispriced?), and General Sentiment (how macro + narrative are pushing it), kept deliberately apart · 2026-06-23 03:12:14
Delvantic - Cairn AI
Quality at full price - wait for a dip, no chase 8/10
Excellent business at a perfection price - the +45 quality doesn't rescue the -100 valuation, and the +38 sentiment tailwind only argues against chasing it here.
The cruxWhether AMD can scale MI300/MI350 into tens of billions at NVIDIA-class margins fast enough to grow into a $900B cap before the AI narrative cools or Intel re-rates the CPU side.
Forensic checks Derived mechanically from AMD's filed financials — not from the AI lenses
Liquidity & RunwaySelf-Funding
DilutionHeavy Dilution
Earnings QualityHigh Earnings Quality
The three lensesswitch a tab for its full read — score + evidence
Company Quality
+45
Strong
edge √Σ 132 · risk √Σ 87 · conf 7/10

AMD is executing a credible compute-platform expansion: revenue scaled from 16.4B in 2021 to 34.6B in 2025 (about 20% CAGR), gross margin recovered from a 44.9% trough in 2022 back to 49.5%, and operating margin rebuilt from 1.8% in 2023 to 10.7% in 2025. Net income jumped from 854M to 4.34B and FCF from 1.12B to 6.74B in two years - that is real operating leverage, and OCF/NI of 1.88x with accruals at -2.8% of assets says the earnings are cash-backed, not manufactured. Beneish M of -2.76 and Altman Z of 39.76 corroborate clean books and a fortress-style balance sheet (10.55B liquid, 6.71B net cash). The blemish is dilution. Diluted shares went from 1.23B (2021) to 1.64B (2025) - a roughly 7.4% CAGR driven mostly by the Xilinx stock deal, with SBC running 4.7% of revenue. Buybacks at 177% of SBC have stabilized the count near 1.64B for the last two years, which is the right direction, but per-share compounding has materially lagged the headline business growth over the full window. Insider tape is routine: CEO Su and others selling via option-exercise and scheduled programs, no open-market buys - a neutral signal, not a red flag. Net-net this looks like a structurally improving, cash-generative, well-capitalized franchise with a credible AI/data-center tailwind. Quality is high; the share-count history is the only meaningful demerit on a per-share basis.

Strengths 4
m80
Cash-backed earnings inflection
FCF grew from 1.12B (2023) to 6.74B (2025) with OCF/NI 1.88x and accruals -2.8% of assets - operating leverage is real and the cash is showing up.
m70
Margin recovery and operating leverage
Gross margin rebuilt from 44.9% (2022) to 49.5% (2025); operating margin from 1.8% (2023) to 10.7% (2025) on 53% revenue growth over two years.
m65
Fortress balance sheet
10.55B liquid cash, 6.71B net cash, Altman Z 39.76 - effectively zero solvency risk, fully self-funding at 6.74B annual FCF.
m45
Clean forensic profile
Beneish M -2.76, negative accruals, OCF well above NI - no mechanical red flags on revenue recognition or earnings management.
Concerns 4
m70
Heavy dilution history
Diluted share count rose from 1.23B to 1.64B (about 7.4% CAGR), largely Xilinx-driven; per-share metrics have lagged the underlying business growth meaningfully.
m35
Ongoing SBC drag
SBC at 4.7% of revenue is elevated for a sub-50% gross margin semi business; buybacks at 177% of SBC offset it but consume cash that could otherwise fund growth or net retirement.
m25
Insider distribution-only pattern
0 buys vs 72 sells (180M) in 12 months, including CEO Su programmatic sales; not alarming for a large-cap but no insider conviction signal either.
m30
Cyclical/competitive exposure
2022-2023 showed operating margin can collapse to 1.8% on a demand wobble; the business is durable but not immune, and Nvidia dominates the most lucrative AI accelerator segment.
This is a high-quality, improving business - the 2023-to-2025 swing in margins and FCF is the real thing, the balance sheet is a fortress, and the earnings-quality diagnostics are clean across the board. My one honest reservation on quality is per-share discipline: a 7.4% diluted share CAGR is a meaningful leak, and even with buybacks now matching SBC at 177%, shareholders paid a real price for Xilinx. I would grade the underlying enterprise as Strong bordering on excellent, with the dilution history the main reason I am not calling it Fortress.
Verify before trusting this (5)
  • Data center vs client/gaming/embedded segment mix and growth contribution in 2025 - how concentrated is the inflection in MI300/MI325 ramp?
  • Customer concentration in data center GPU revenue (hyperscaler share) per 10-K risk factors
  • Forward share-count guidance and any remaining Xilinx-related issuance overhang
  • Inventory and purchase-commitment levels relative to AI demand assumptions
  • R and D as percent of revenue trend vs Nvidia/Intel to confirm reinvestment discipline
Valuation / Mispricing
-100
Overvalued
edge √Σ 25 · risk √Σ 134 · conf 8/10
Price $551 vs deserved ~$400, roughly 25-30% premium - priced for perfection, not mispriced cheap. attractive below $400.00

AMD trades at $551.63 for a $899B market cap on roughly $30B trailing revenue and mid-single-digit-billion GAAP earnings - call it 150x+ trailing earnings and ~30x sales. The e2e synthesis itself flags 'High Conviction Required,' which is code for the multiple needing heroic assumptions to clear. To deserve $900B you have to underwrite AMD capturing a durable, double-digit share of a multi-hundred-billion AI accelerator TAM at NVIDIA-like margins, AND defending server CPU share against an Intel that is finally shipping competitive nodes. That is the bull case fully priced in, with little left for the investor.

Cheap signals 1
m25
Quality and FCF inflection real
Genuine margin expansion and fortress balance sheet justify a premium multiple vs commodity semis - this is why deserved value is not $200, but it does not get you to $551.
Rich / priced-in 5
m80
Priced for AI co-leadership not yet proven
$900B cap on ~$30B revenue (~30x sales) requires MI300/MI350 to scale into tens of billions at NVIDIA-class margins; ROCm software gap and customer concentration risk make that outcome a hope, not a base case.
m70
Trailing multiple is extreme
At ~150x trailing GAAP earnings and ~50x forward consensus EPS, the multiple already embeds years of flawless execution; even a great cyclical semi rarely deserves this on a through-cycle basis.
m55
Dilution silently lifts the bar
7.4% diluted share CAGR from Xilinx-era issuance means per-share value grows materially slower than enterprise value; buybacks at 177% of SBC help but do not erase the historical leak baked into the share count.
m50
Two-front competitive war underpriced
Intel Lunar/Panther Lake and Granite Rapids are real on advanced nodes; NVIDIA Blackwell extends the AI moat. Current price assumes AMD wins or holds on both fronts simultaneously.
m35
e2e synthesis itself flags caution
The composite read 'High Conviction Required' is the model admitting the fair value depends on assumptions that are not self-evident at this price.
I cannot make the numbers work at $551. The business is excellent and deserves a premium, but a $900B cap on $30B of revenue requires AMD to become a credible second pillar of AI compute at NVIDIA-like economics - that is the bull case fully baked into today's price, with no margin of safety if execution slips on either the AI ramp or the Intel front. I would want a 25%+ pullback before this becomes an interesting risk/reward; until then, quality at full price gets me zero edge.
Verify before trusting this (5)
  • MI350/MI400 data center GPU revenue run-rate and gross margin trajectory
  • hyperscaler commitments and customer concentration disclosure
  • server CPU share data vs Intel Granite Rapids in next 2 quarters
  • diluted share count trajectory and buyback pace vs SBC
  • forward EPS guide quality - one-time tax/IP items
General Sentiment
+38
Tailwind
tail √Σ 115 · head √Σ 77 · conf 7/10

The dominant force on AMD right now is the AI-infrastructure narrative, which remains intense and is actively pulling capital into the entire compute cohort (Lam, Broadcom, Dell, NVDA all in the news for AI capex). AMD is firmly inside that story as the credible number-two to NVIDIA, and the tape rewards that: shares closed +2.65% on a down market day, momentum is strong-positive, and four fresh target revisions this month average $582.50 - well above both the stale consensus target ($452.91) and spot. That divergence between backward-looking consensus and live revisions is a classic tailwind tell. Against that, the macro tape is only mildly constructive (neutral, VIX 16.8, 10y at 4.51%) and AMD's 2.49 beta means any risk-off flinch hits this name roughly 2.5x the index - the overnight megacap tech selloff headline is the warning shot. Add a fresh Intel narrative crack (risk production on a new node, framed explicitly as a warning to AMD holders) and you have a real, name-specific headwind nibbling at the share-gain leg of the bull case. Net: narrative and analyst flow are pushing up harder than macro and the Intel jab are pushing down, but the cushion is thinner than the price action suggests given the beta.

Tailwinds 3
m78
AI-infrastructure narrative still the dominant flow
News cycle is saturated with AI capex winners (Dell, Lam, Broadcom, NVDA expansion). AMD is the default number-two beneficiary and the platform-monopoly archetype keeps drawing momentum buyers.
m65
Target revisions diverging above stale consensus
Four revisions this month avg $582.50 vs $452.91 consensus target and $551.63 spot. Live analyst tone is catching up to price, a classic upward-pressure signal.
m55
Strong relative momentum and outperformance on red days
Closed +2.65% while futures sold off on megacap tech weakness; recent 34.3% trail vs 23.6% long-term CAGR. Tape is treating AMD as a buy-the-dip name within AI.
Headwinds 3
m55
Beta 2.49 amplifies any risk-off flinch
VIX 16.8 and a megacap tech selloff overnight; if the neutral tape tips defensive, AMD gets hit roughly 2.5x the index. The macro cushion is thin for a name this geared.
m45
Intel-resurgence narrative crack
Headline 'Intel Has a Warning for AMD Stock Investors' on new-node risk production directly attacks the share-gain leg of the bull story. Not fatal, but it reintroduces a competitive doubt that had faded.
m30
Rates backdrop still unfriendly to long-duration story stocks
10y at 4.51% with stretched market valuations keeps a lid on multiple expansion for high-beta AI names; limits how far the narrative can push the tape.
Net pressure on AMD leans tailwind: the AI narrative is doing the heavy lifting and live analyst revisions are pulling above stale consensus, which is exactly the setup that keeps a high-beta name bid even on red tape days - you saw it Monday. But I'm not calling this Strong Tailwind because the 2.49 beta plus a 4.51% 10y plus a fresh Intel competitive headline mean the downside whip is real if the macro mood tips. The story is winning right now, but it's a story-led tailwind, not a fortress one.
Verify before trusting this (5)
  • Whether the Intel node-progress narrative gains traction in sell-side notes or stays a one-off headline
  • VIX behavior - a move above 20 would punish AMD's beta disproportionately
  • Continuation of upward target revisions vs any first downgrade as price approaches new revision avg ($582)
  • AI capex commentary from hyperscaler earnings - the load-bearing pillar of the narrative
  • Any ROCm/CUDA share-of-mind shifts in customer announcements
The market-wide tape + this name's exposure to it (beta / sector / narrative durability). Context on the non-fundamental pressure — not a call on the business or the price. processId: detail-general-sentiment
Please log in to view trade setups
The Augustus trade-setup read is a members feature.
Log in
Three lenses kept deliberately separate — Company Quality (price-agnostic), Valuation (price-conditional), and General Sentiment (non-fundamental macro/narrative pressure). The scores are not blended. Filing-level items (convertibles, lock-ups, customer concentration) are v2 — see each lens's "verify."
Deep Analysis
Last run: Jun 23, 2026 3:07:09 am

Pre-flight intelligence scans the company first, then routes to the right analytical methods.

0 Company Classification — What type of company is this?
1 Industry Landscape — Where is the industry headed?
2 Company Momentum — Where is this company trending?
3 Forward Projection — 1Y & 2Y projected metrics (requires Layer 1 + 2)
4a DCF Valuation — Present value of future cash flows
4b Earnings Power Value — Floor value — worth with zero growth
4c Anchored PE — Industry PE adjusted for growth differential
4d Reverse DCF — What growth is the market pricing in?
4e Revenue-Based DCF — For growth/narrative companies (skip if mature earner)
Not applicable for High Growth Profitable companies
4f Anchored P/S — Price-to-Sales peer comparison (skip if mature earner)
Not applicable for High Growth Profitable companies
4g Scenario Analysis — Bull / Base / Bear (skip if mature earner)
Not applicable for High Growth Profitable companies
4h Dividend Discount Model — For dividend/income stocks only
Not applicable for High Growth Profitable companies
4i Book Value Analysis — For deep value / turnaround stocks only
Not applicable for High Growth Profitable companies
4j Insider Activity — Are insiders buying or selling?
4f Cash Flow Quality — How trustworthy is the FCF?
4g Debt Maturity Risk — Can it handle its debt?
4h Macro Environment — Rates, market valuation, volatility
4i Sector Intelligence — How does this company compare within its sector?
4j Revenue Confidence — How reliable is the growth projection?
4k Sensitivity Analysis — How fragile is the fair value estimate?
4l Sector Demand Cycle — Is the sector in a boom, steady state, or contraction?
5 AI Investigation — Adaptive research engine (Claude)
5b Thesis Evaluation — What does the market believe? (narrative/platform stocks only)
Not applicable for High Growth Profitable companies
6 Valuation Synthesis — Weighted verdict from all methods (requires Layer 4)
Income Statement (Annual)
Last updated: Jun 23, 2026 3:04am (4d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Revenue $16.4B $23.6B $22.7B $25.8B $34.6B
Cost of Revenue $8.5B $13.0B $12.2B $13.1B $17.5B
Gross Profit $7.9B $10.6B $10.5B $12.7B $17.2B
Operating Expenses $4.3B $9.3B $10.1B $10.8B $13.5B
Operating Income $3.6B $1.3B $401.0M $1.9B $3.7B
Net Income $3.2B $1.3B $854.0M $1.6B $4.3B
EBITDA $4.2B $5.5B $4.1B $5.3B $7.3B
EPS $2.61 $0.85 $0.53 $1.01 $2.67
EPS (Diluted)
Balance Sheet (Annual)
Last updated: Jun 23, 2026 3:00am (4d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Cash & Equivalents $2.5B $4.8B $3.9B $3.8B $5.5B
Total Current Assets $8.6B $15.0B $16.8B $19.0B $26.9B
Total Assets $12.4B $67.6B $67.9B $69.2B $76.9B
Current Liabilities $4.2B $6.4B $6.7B $7.3B $9.5B
Long-Term Debt $1.0M $2.5B $1.7B $1.7B $3.0B
Total Liabilities $4.9B $12.8B $12.0B $11.7B $13.9B
Total Equity $7.5B $54.8B $55.9B $57.6B $63.0B
Retained Earnings -$1.5B -$131.0M $723.0M $2.4B $6.7B
Cash Flow (Annual)
Last updated: Jun 22, 2026 3:04am (5d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Operating Cash Flow $3.5B $3.6B $1.7B $3.0B $7.7B
Capital Expenditure -$301.0M -$450.0M -$546.0M -$636.0M -$974.0M
Free Cash Flow $3.2B $3.1B $1.1B $2.4B $6.7B
Acquisitions (net) $0 $822.0M -$131.0M -$565.0M -$1.8B
Debt Repayment
Dividends Paid
Stock Buybacks -$2.0B -$4.1B -$1.4B -$1.6B -$1.3B
Net Change in Cash $940.0M $2.3B -$902.0M -$122.0M $1.9B
Analyst Estimates (Annual)
Last updated: Jun 23, 2026 3:00am (4d ago)
Metric 2027 2028 2029 2030
Revenue $76.6B
$62.5B – $84.3B
$101.5B
$101.0B – $102.1B
$144.3B
$122.5B – $167.6B
$171.4B
$145.5B – $199.1B
EBITDA $16.6B
$13.6B – $18.3B
$22.0B
$21.9B – $22.2B
$31.3B
$26.6B – $36.4B
$37.2B
$31.6B – $43.2B
Net Income $17.3B
$14.6B – $27.3B
$26.1B
$20.6B – $50.7B
$41.0B
$33.0B – $49.6B
$48.9B
$39.3B – $59.2B
EPS
Growth Trends (YoY %)
Last updated: Jun 23, 2026 3:04am (4d ago)
Metric 2022 2023 2024 2025
Revenue Growth +43.6% -3.9% +13.7% +34.3%
Gross Profit Growth +33.7% -1.3% +21.7% +34.8%
Operating Income Growth -65.4% -68.3% +373.8% +94.4%
Net Income Growth -58.3% -35.3% +92.2% +164.2%
EBITDA Growth +32.8% -25.0% +26.7% +38.4%
Insider Trading (Recent)
Last updated: Jun 23, 2026 3:04am (4d ago)
Type codes PPurchase SSale AAward / grant MOption exercise FIn-kind (tax) CConversion GGift DReturn to issuer
All SEC Form 4 codes
Open market
P Purchase
Open-market or private purchase of shares.
S Sale
Open-market or private sale of shares.
Compensation (Rule 16b-3)
A Award / grant
Grant or award of securities (RSUs, options, etc.) under Rule 16b-3.
D Return to issuer
Securities disposed back to the company under Rule 16b-3.
F In-kind (tax)
Shares withheld or delivered to pay the option-exercise price or tax — not an open-market sale.
I Discretionary
Discretionary transaction under an employee plan — Rule 16b-3(f).
M Option exercise
Exercise or conversion of a derivative (option/RSU) into shares — exempt.
Derivatives
C Conversion
Conversion of a derivative security into the underlying shares.
E Short expiration
Expiration of a short derivative position.
H Long expiration
Expiration or cancellation of a long derivative position with value received.
O OTM exercise
Exercise of an out-of-the-money derivative.
X ITM exercise
Exercise of an in-the-money or at-the-money derivative.
Other exempt
G Gift
Bona fide gift of securities.
L Small acquisition
Small acquisition under Rule 16a-6.
W Inheritance
Acquisition or disposition by will or the laws of descent.
Z Voting trust
Deposit into or withdrawal from a voting trust.
Other
J Other
Other acquisition or disposition (explained in a Form 4 footnote).
K Equity swap
Transaction in an equity swap or similar instrument.
U Tender / buyout
Disposition via tender of shares in a change-of-control transaction.

Compensation-plan codes (A, D, F, M) are routine and rarely directional. Open-market P (buy) and S (sale) carry the most signal.

Date Insider Type Shares Price Value
2026-06-15 GUIDO PHILIP M-Exempt 7,495.00 $0.00 $0
2026-06-15 GUIDO PHILIP F-InKind 2,950.00 $547.26 $1.6M
2026-06-15 GUIDO PHILIP M-Exempt 7,495.00 $0.00 $0
2026-06-15 Papermaster Mark D M-Exempt 6,000.00 $84.85 $509,100
2026-06-15 Papermaster Mark D S-Sale 6,000.00 $536.33 $3.2M
2026-06-15 Papermaster Mark D M-Exempt 6,000.00 $84.85 $509,100
2026-06-10 Su Lisa T 0.00 $0.00 $0
2026-06-10 Su Lisa T S-Sale 2,720.00 $449.21 $1.2M
2026-06-10 Su Lisa T S-Sale 700.00 $450.40 $315,280
2026-06-10 Su Lisa T S-Sale 4,400.00 $451.53 $2.0M
2026-06-10 Su Lisa T S-Sale 12,862.00 $452.40 $5.8M
2026-06-10 Su Lisa T S-Sale 14,458.00 $453.45 $6.6M
2026-06-10 Su Lisa T S-Sale 9,392.00 $454.43 $4.3M
2026-06-10 Su Lisa T S-Sale 7,390.00 $455.40 $3.4M
2026-06-10 Su Lisa T S-Sale 6,638.00 $456.38 $3.0M
2026-06-10 Su Lisa T S-Sale 7,351.00 $457.42 $3.4M
2026-06-10 Su Lisa T S-Sale 5,700.00 $458.45 $2.6M
2026-06-10 Su Lisa T S-Sale 2,891.00 $459.41 $1.3M
2026-06-10 Su Lisa T S-Sale 1,700.00 $460.45 $782,765
2026-06-10 Su Lisa T S-Sale 900.00 $461.67 $415,503
Dividend History (Last 20)
Last updated: Jun 21, 2026 6:48pm (5d ago)
Date Dividend Declaration Record Payment
1995-04-28 $0.01 1995-04-18 1995-05-03 1995-05-24
Narrative Economics
The story the market is telling about this stock — the intangible X-factor (founder mythology, cult dynamics, TAM-of-imagination) that moves price beyond what cash flows alone explain. After Shiller, Narrative Economics.
No narrative profile yet for AMD — it's generated by the pipeline (market-narrative step).
Delvantic AI Findings
Independent analyst synthesis · Delvantic - Cairn AI · generated 2026-06-23 03:07:52
Reviews the pipeline's own verdicts
Verdict Overvalued on execution-priced-to-perfection — fair value $380-420 vs. $551 spot; trim existing, wait for either a Q2/Q3 margin proof point above 52% gross or a 25-30% drawdown before adding.

The raw quarterly trajectory is the most important fact here, and it's better than the "decelerating" tag suggests. Revenue went $5.84B → $6.82B → $7.66B → $7.44B → $7.69B → $9.25B → $10.27B → $10.25B across eight quarters — that's a doubling from mid-2024 to early 2026, with net margin expanding from 4.5% to ~14% over the same window. Annual 2025 revenue of $34.6B (+34% YoY) with $6.74B FCF and $4.34B NI is a genuine inflection, not a story. The flat sequential print at $10.25B in Q1 2026 is the first real pause, and net margin ticked down from 14.7% to 13.5% — worth flagging, but one quarter doesn't kill the trajectory. The "decelerating" label looks lazy: YoY is still +34%, and absolute dollars are at all-time highs.

That said, the valuation math is brutal. $899B market cap on $34.6B revenue is 26x sales and ~133x trailing earnings (the 179 TTM P/E is distorted but directionally honest). EV/FCF on $6.74B is ~133x. To grow into a "reasonable" 30x FCF over five years, FCF needs to roughly 4.4x to ~$30B — which requires both revenue near $90-100B and FCF margins climbing toward 30%. NVIDIA-class economics, in other words, on a company whose 2025 operating margin was 10.7% and whose 2023 operating margin was 1.8%. The synthesis call of "High Conviction Required" is the right hedge but understates how narrow the needle is: AMD has to sustain ~25%+ revenue CAGR AND expand op margins by ~1500bps simultaneously. Possible — NVIDIA did it — but the base rate for semis pulling that off is low, and AMD is doing it against a competitor with 75% gross margins and CUDA lock-in.

The contrarian case the models underweight: ROIC of 6.2% and ROE of 8% are mediocre for a company priced as a platform monopoly. Gross margin at 49.5% is structurally below where the narrative needs it (55-60%+) and far below NVIDIA. The pre-flight thesis correctly identifies that MI300/MI400 datacenter share is the entire bull case, but doesn't quantify that AMD's datacenter GPU revenue is still a fraction of NVIDIA's — and hyperscaler concentration risk is real (a single Meta or Microsoft order shift moves quarters). The narrative layer rightly flags "moderate durability" — this isn't TSLA-style cult pricing, but it's a $900B bet on continued share capture in a market where the incumbent has 90%+ share and a deeper software moat. Insider activity skews to sales (M-Exempt + S-Sale pattern); not damning, but not the buying you'd expect if insiders thought $551 was cheap. Cash position of $5.5B is fine but not a fortress, and the balance sheet has missing debt/equity fields which is annoying for a real leverage read.

I dissent mildly with the synthesis "High Conviction Required" framing — that's analyst-speak for "we don't know." The numbers are clearer than that: this is a great company at a demanding price. Reverse-DCF requires ~25% FCF CAGR for a decade to justify $551, which is a 2-sigma outcome even in a bullish AI scenario. Fair value on a more reasonable 18-20% FCF CAGR and terminal 25x multiple lands closer to $380-420. The Q1 2026 sequential flatness ($10.27B → $10.25B) and the modest margin compression are the first cracks worth watching — if Q2 confirms a plateau, multiple compression will be violent given the 133x earnings starting point. Conversely, if MI400 ramps cleanly and datacenter mix pushes gross margin above 52%, the bull case re-accelerates. I wouldn't short — the trajectory and Lisa Su execution premium are real — but I wouldn't be a new buyer here. Existing holders should trim into strength; new money waits for either a $400-handle re-rating or two more quarters of margin proof.

GPT Critique
Second-opinion review · gpt-4o · generated 2026-06-23 03:08:02
Reviews the Opus findings above
Verdict I agree with Opus — overvalued at $551, but I'd peg fair value closer to $400-450, considering the potential for sustained AI-driven growth tempered by competitive pressures and macroeconomic risks.

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) presents a compelling growth narrative, evidenced by its recent revenue surge from $5.84 billion in mid-2024 to over $10 billion by early 2026, which represents a near doubling in a relatively short span. This growth is accompanied by a significant improvement in net margins, elevating from 4.5% to approximately 14%. AMD's annual 2025 performance, with $34.64 billion in revenue and $4.34 billion in net income, marks a strong upward trajectory, particularly given the free cash flow (FCF) of $6.74 billion. The company's current valuation, however, suggests an aggressive market expectation, with a market capitalization of $899.49 billion and a P/E ratio well above traditional benchmarks, indicating that investors are pricing in substantial future growth and margin expansion that may be challenging to sustain.

Opus argues that AMD is overvalued, pegging fair value between $380 and $420 versus the current $551, contingent on achieving a gross margin above 52% or a significant price decline. I concur with the notion that the current market price demands near-perfect execution from AMD, as the valuation metrics such as the 179.6 P/E ratio and 133x EV/FCF are exceptionally high and suggest that any deviation from expected growth could lead to severe re-evaluation. However, I diverge slightly in my interpretation of the narrative dynamics. The flat revenue in the most recent quarter ($10.27 billion to $10.25 billion) and slight margin compression indeed merit attention, yet these could also be seen as temporary fluctuations rather than definitive indicators of a plateau, given the robust year-over-year growth of 34%.

While Opus emphasizes the difficulty AMD faces in expanding its datacenter GPU market share against NVIDIA's stronghold, I see potential in AMD's strategic positioning to capitalize on AI and cloud growth, which could support continued revenue and margin expansion. The company's operating cash flow of $7.71 billion and a healthy FCF suggest an underlying cash-generating capability that can sustain investment in growth areas, which might bolster its competitive stance in the long run.

Critics might argue that both Opus and I overlook the inherent volatility of the semiconductor industry and the macroeconomic headwinds that could impact AMD's growth trajectory. Additionally, the reliance on a narrative of perpetual AI-driven growth could lead to overestimation of AMD's ability to maintain its current momentum without facing technological and competitive setbacks. A skeptic would highlight the uncertain macro environment and the potential for technological disruptions, which could challenge AMD's market position.

Community AI Feedback
No community reviews yet for AMD. Be the first — hit How to Contribute, have any AI review this page, and paste its take back here.
My Notes personal — only you see this
Data via Financial Modeling Prep · Cached for performance · fmp
v1.1.352 · d1100787 · 2026-06-26 11:39:30