Skip to main content
Homepage
Full 18-step deep-dive · ~20–30 min · a member feature.
AGING Analysis Report
Aug 8, 2026
15 days ago · 100% complete
NOT DEPENDABLE This report predates a filing — its financial basis has been replaced.
Report generated: Aug 8, 2026 · Filing on record since: Aug 5, 2026
For AI assistants & researchers — machine-readable summary of this page

What this page is: Delvantic's full research page for Automatic Data Processing Inc. (ADP) — AI-driven forensic equity research: mechanical valuation models (DCF, EPV, anchored-PE, scenario) plus three independent AI lenses (Quality / Value / Sentiment). Everything below is rendered server-side; you are not missing content that requires JavaScript. All scores are predictions and research opinions, not financial advice.

Our current read (analysis of 2026-08-23): Designation Watch · Gem Score -1 (−100…+100 Quality+Value blend) · Quality 87 · Value -73 · Sentiment -3 (timing only, not weighted) · Composite fair value $201.90 vs $271.34 at analysis

Page map (sections in order; each card carries a stable reference-name attribute you can cite):

  • profile-header / price-overview — company profile, live quote, market cap
  • extended-analysisthe core: three AI lens reads with findings, scores, and the analyst memo
  • future-predictions — our forward price-band predictions
  • market-narrative / ai-findings / gpt-critique — narrative context, cross-model findings, and an adversarial critique of our own analysis (near the end of the document)
  • Members-only sections (render as login gates for anonymous readers): price-history, income-trend, key-metrics, financials (statement tables), insider-trading. The analysis above is public; the raw data tables require a free account.

More for machine readers: site briefing at /llms.txt · any ticker resolves at delvantic.com/stock/TICKER · raw inputs are public-company filings and market data (via licensed data feeds); every model, score, lens read, and prediction on this page is Delvantic's own analysis.

Automatic Data Processing Inc.

ADP NASDAQ
Technology · Software - Application
Roseland, NJ 07068, United States adp.com Updated Aug 8, 12:22am
Price
$271.34
Market Cap
$107.8B
Employees
67,000
Beta
0.82
Avg Volume
2,664,596
Last Dividend
$6.80
CEO
Ms. Maria Black

Automatic Data Processing Inc. is a global provider of cloud-based human capital management and business outsourcing solutions. The company focuses on unifying payroll, human resources, talent management, time and attendance, tax, and benefits administration into integrated platforms for employers of all sizes. Through its Employer Services and Professional Employer Organization segments, Automatic Data Processing Inc. delivers payroll processing, tax filing and remittance, HR recordkeeping, workforce management, recruiting, and benefits administration, as well as co-employment solutions for clients seeking more comprehensive HR outsourcing. Its technology and services support organizations across industries including financial services, manufacturing, hospitality, construction, healthcare, retail, government, and education, helping them manage complex regulatory and compliance requirements. Headquartered in Roseland, New Jersey, and operating in over 140 countries and territories, Automatic Data Processing Inc. plays a central role in the global employment infrastructure by providing recurring, mission-critical HR and payroll services to businesses worldwide.

Runs with full report Generated: Aug 8, 2026 12:28am
Price Overview
Price at report time
$271.34
as of Aug 8, 12:38am (15d ago)
Change · Aug 8
-2.17 (-0.79%)
Day Range
$270.14 – $275.27
52-Week Range
$188.16 – $310.08
50-Day MA
$240.55
200-Day MA
$235.60
Volume
2,076,594.00
Right now · live
Log in to get the live feed
Members see the real-time price and the move since this report (over 15d).
Share Structure
Outstanding 397,262,737.00
Float 396,360,951.00
Free Float 99.8%
High free float — 99.8% of shares trade freely, ~0.2% held by insiders/institutions
Very liquid — most shares trade freely. Low insider ownership can mean less management alignment, but makes large position sizing straightforward.
Price History (1 Year)
Last updated: Aug 8, 2026 12:38am (15d ago)
Revenue & Net Income Trend
The directional story — useful even when net income is negative.
Last updated: Aug 7, 2026 4:17am (16d ago)
Revenue
The top line — total sales before any costs or taxes are subtracted. A measure of how much business the company is doing.
Net Income
The bottom line — profit left after subtracting all expenses, interest, and taxes from revenue. Reflects accounting profitability, but includes non-cash items like depreciation, so it isn't the same as cash earned.
Operating Cash Flow
The real cash generated by the day-to-day business — selling products, paying suppliers, collecting from customers. Calculated from net income by adding back non-cash items and adjusting for timing (unpaid bills, unsold inventory). When OCF consistently lags net income, the reported profit may not be converting to real money.
Period Revenue Net Income Net Margin YoY/QoQ
Key Metrics
TD Twelve Data statement HEX SEC filing
Industry comparison last run: Aug 8, 2026 12:26am
P/E Ratio (Price per dollar of earnings)
HEX
Stock Price / EPS (Diluted)
24.80
Stock Price: $271.34
EPS (Diluted): 10.94
P/B Ratio (Price vs net asset value)
HEX
Stock Price / Book Value Per Share
18.14
Stock Price: $271.34
Total Equity: $6.03B
Shares: 403,300,000
EV/EBITDA (Total value vs operating profit)
HEX
Enterprise Value / EBITDA
18.38
Market Cap: $107.79B
Total Debt: $4.97B
Cash: $4.23B
EBITDA: $5.91B
Enterprise Value (Takeover price (cap + debt - cash))
HEX
Market Cap + Total Debt - Cash
$108.5B
Market Cap: $107.79B
Total Debt: $4.97B
Cash: $4.23B
Gross Margin (Revenue left after direct costs)
HEX
Gross Profit / Revenue
46.4%
Gross Profit: $10.19B
Revenue: $21.95B
Operating Margin (Revenue left after all operations)
HEX
Operating Income / Revenue
24.2%
Operating Income: $5.32B
Revenue: $21.95B
Net Margin (Revenue left as actual profit)
HEX
Net Income / Revenue
20.1%
Net Income: $4.41B
Revenue: $21.95B
ROE (Profit from shareholder equity)
HEX
Net Income / Total Equity
73.2%
Net Income: $4.41B
Total Equity: $6.03B
ROIC (Profit from all invested capital)
HEX
NOPAT / Invested Capital
60.6%
Operating Income: $5.32B
Tax Rate: 23.0%
Equity: $6.03B
Total Debt: $4.97B
Cash: $4.23B
Current Ratio (Can it pay short-term bills)
HEX
Current Assets / Current Liabilities
1.05
Current Assets: $52.56B
Current Liabilities: $50.02B
Debt/Equity (Leverage — debt vs equity)
HEX
Total Debt / Total Equity
0.82
Short-Term Debt: $1.00M
Long-Term Debt: $4.96B
Total Debt: $4.97B
Total Equity: $6.03B
Rev/Share (Top-line per share)
HEX
Revenue / Shares Outstanding
$54.42
Revenue: $21.95B
Shares: 403,300,000
Book Value/Share (Net assets per share)
HEX
(Total Assets - Total Liabilities) / Shares
$14.95
Total Equity: $6.03B
Shares: 403,300,000
FCF/Share (Real cash generated per share)
HEX
(Operating Cash Flow + CapEx) / Shares
$13.00
Operating CF: $5.44B
CapEx: -$196.60M
Shares: 403,300,000
CapEx is negative (outflow) — added to OCF to get FCF
Div Yield (Annual income from holding)
TD
Last Annual Dividend / Stock Price
2.5%
Last Dividend: $6.80
Stock Price: $271.34
Payout Ratio (Earnings paid out as dividends)
HEX
Dividends Paid / Net Income
59.5%
Dividends Paid: -$2.63B
Net Income: $4.41B
Industry Benchmarks
Last run: Aug 8, 2026 12:26am
Compares ADP against LLM-researched typical ranges for its industry. One research call per industry, cached indefinitely — every stock in the same industry reuses the same baseline.
Income Statement (Annual)
Last updated: Aug 7, 2026 4:17am (16d ago)
Metric 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Revenue $16.5B $18.0B $19.2B $20.6B $21.9B
Cost of Revenue $9.5B $10.0B $10.5B $11.1B $11.8B
Gross Profit $7.0B $8.1B $8.7B $9.5B $10.2B
Operating Expenses $3.3B $3.8B $4.1B $4.5B $4.9B
Operating Income $3.7B $4.3B $4.6B $5.0B $5.3B
Net Income $2.9B $3.4B $3.8B $4.1B $4.4B
EBITDA $4.2B $4.8B $5.1B $5.5B $5.9B
EPS $7.04 $8.25 $9.14 $10.02 $10.97
EPS (Diluted) $7.00 $8.21 $9.10 $9.98 $10.94
Balance Sheet (Annual)
Last updated: Aug 7, 2026 4:17am (16d ago)
Metric 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Cash & Equivalents $1.4B $2.1B $2.9B $3.3B $4.2B
Total Current Assets $54.8B $42.2B $45.5B $43.3B $52.6B
Total Assets $63.1B $51.0B $54.4B $53.4B $63.2B
Current Liabilities $55.2B $42.8B $45.1B $41.3B $50.0B
Long-Term Debt $3.0B $3.0B $3.0B $4.0B $5.0B
Total Liabilities $59.8B $47.5B $49.8B $47.2B $57.2B
Total Equity $3.2B $3.5B $4.5B $6.2B $6.0B
Retained Earnings $20.7B $22.1B $23.6B $25.2B $27.0B
Cash Flow (Annual)
Last updated: Aug 7, 2026 4:17am (16d ago)
Metric 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Operating Cash Flow $3.1B $4.2B $4.2B $4.9B $5.4B
Capital Expenditure -$174.4M -$206.3M -$208.4M -$168.7M -$196.6M
Free Cash Flow $2.9B $4.0B $3.9B $4.8B $5.2B
Acquisitions (net) -$11.7M -$32.4M -$33.6M -$1.2B -$22.8M
Net Debt Issued / (Repaid) $-900,000 -$1.0M $-900,000 $979.1M $984.6M
Dividends Paid -$1.7B -$1.9B -$2.2B -$2.4B -$2.6B
Stock Buybacks -$2.0B -$1.1B -$1.2B -$1.3B -$2.1B
Net Change in Cash $9.6B -$14.0B $1.3B -$5.0B $5.6B
Growth Trends (YoY %)
Last updated: Aug 7, 2026 4:17am (16d ago)
Metric 2023 2024 2025 2026
Revenue Growth +9.2% +6.6% +7.1% +6.7%
Gross Profit Growth +14.5% +8.3% +8.5% +7.6%
Operating Income Growth +14.3% +7.8% +8.1% +7.3%
Net Income Growth +15.7% +10.0% +8.7% +8.2%
EBITDA Growth +13.4% +7.2% +7.6% +6.6%
Dividend History (Last 20)
Last updated: Aug 5, 2026 9:46am (18d ago)
Date Dividend Declaration Record Payment
2026-06-12 $1.70
2026-03-13 $1.70
2025-12-12 $1.70
2025-09-12 $1.54
2025-06-13 $1.54
2025-03-14 $1.54
2024-12-13 $1.54
2024-09-13 $1.40
2024-06-14 $1.40
2024-03-07 $1.40
2023-12-07 $1.40
2023-09-07 $1.25
2023-06-08 $1.25
2023-03-09 $1.25
2022-12-08 $1.25
2022-09-08 $1.04
2022-06-09 $1.04
2022-03-10 $1.04
2021-12-09 $1.04
2021-09-09 $0.93
0Company Classification 1Industry Landscape 2Company Momentum 3Forward Projection 4aDCF Valuation 4bEarnings Power Value 4cAnchored PE 4dReverse DCF 4eRevenue-Based DCF 4fAnchored P/S 4gScenario Analysis 4hDividend Discount Model 4iBook Value Analysis 4jInsider Activity 4fCash Flow Quality 4gDebt Maturity Risk 4hMacro Environment 4iSector Intelligence 4jRevenue Confidence 4kSensitivity Analysis 4lSector Demand Cycle 5AI Investigation 5bThesis Evaluation 6Valuation Synthesis
computed not applicable 18 computed · 6 not applicable
Narrative Economics
The story the market is telling about this stock — the intangible X-factor (founder mythology, cult dynamics, TAM-of-imagination) that moves price beyond what cash flows alone explain. After Shiller, Narrative Economics.
No narrative profile yet for ADP — it's generated by the pipeline (market-narrative step).
Claude Reading
Independent analyst synthesis · claude-opus-4-7 · generated 2026-08-08 00:38:11
Verdict Modestly overvalued — fair value $230-245 vs $271; quality is real but you're paying for float-driven earnings quality that fades with rate cuts. Wait for $235 or hold, don't chase.

Starting with the raw numbers: ADP printed $21.95B in FY2026 revenue, up 6.8% YoY, with net income of $4.41B (net margin 20.1%) and FCF of $5.24B against a $107.8B market cap — that's a ~4.9% FCF yield. The quarterly cadence is remarkably clean: fiscal Q3 (March) is seasonally the fat quarter at ~22.9% margin (unemployment tax filings, W-2 processing), and every Q3 shows this pattern. The June 2026 quarter at 17.9% margin vs June 2025 at 17.8% is essentially flat sequentially YoY, which means the "margin expansion" thesis is more measured than the bulls claim — full-year operating margin went from 24.1% (FY25) to 24.2% (FY26), roughly 10 bps. Revenue growth is decelerating slightly: FY22→23 was 9.2%, FY25→26 was 6.8%. This is a 7% grower with 20 bps/year of margin creep and a 2.5% dividend, not a compounding rocket.

On valuation, I largely agree with the synthesis but think its $198 fair value is too punitive. At 24.8x earnings and 20.6x FCF for a business earning 60%+ ROIC with contractual revenue and negative working capital float (client funds held), a modest premium to the market multiple is defensible. My back-of-envelope: 7% top-line, 50 bps of annual margin lift, 2% buyback, 2.5% dividend → ~11-12% total return at a flat multiple. But the multiple isn't flat-safe; a de-rate to 20x on $18 FY27 EPS lands you at $360... wait, that's higher. Recompute: TTM EPS ≈ $10.94 (NI $4.41B / ~403M shares), so 24.8x checks out. At 20x forward $11.80, fair value is ~$236 — meaningfully below $271 but not the $198 the synthesis floats. I'd peg fair value at $230-245, implying 10-15% overvaluation, not 19%.

Where I dissent from the Market Forces model: calling ADP "dead money losing a winnable war to cloud-native competitors" is the kind of narrative that has been wrong for a decade. Rippling and Gusto have been "eating ADP's lunch" in SMB since 2018; meanwhile ADP grew revenue from $14.2B (FY19) to $21.95B (FY26), a 6.4% CAGR through a pandemic. The switching costs in payroll are underappreciated — you don't rip out the system that handles your 941s and state UI filings for a marginal UX improvement. That said, the bear case has a real kernel: FCF CAGR of 15.2% vs earnings CAGR of 8.5% is unsustainable and suggests working capital tailwinds (client float benefiting from higher rates) that will reverse when the Fed cuts. Strip out interest on funds held for clients and the underlying growth is closer to 5-6%. This is the contrarian point nobody's making: ADP's earnings quality benefited enormously from 5% rates on ~$35B of client float; a 200 bps rate cut cycle could shave $500M+ off pretax income.

Insider activity is noisy — a few small sales and one 3,619-share purchase in May doesn't move the needle either way; calling it "net insider buying" is generous. Balance sheet is fine ($4.97B debt vs $5.44B OCF), though the 0.82 D/E and only $4.23B cash aren't fortress-grade. ROE of 73% is optically absurd but reflects aggressive buybacks shrinking equity, not underlying capital efficiency — ROA of 7% is the honest number. I agree with the synthesis verdict that ADP is fully priced, but disagree on magnitude and the market-forces framing. The stock isn't a value trap; it's a high-quality compounder trading ~10-15% above where the math supports, with a hidden interest-rate sensitivity nobody is discounting. I'd wait for either $235 (buy zone) or a growth reacceleration catalyst. At $271 with a 2.5% yield and 7% growth, you're underwriting 9-10% returns with real downside if the float tailwind reverses — mediocre risk/reward.

GPT Reading
Independent reading · gpt-5.4 · generated 2026-08-08 00:38:27
Verdict Slightly overvalued at $271.34 — a superb business priced like a no-risk compounder; fair value is closer to $240-$255 unless growth reaccelerates above 8%.

ADP looks exactly like what the market thinks it is: a high-quality payroll/HCM tollbooth with unusually durable economics, but the stock already embeds most of that virtue. The operating record is hard to argue with. Revenue has climbed from $16.5B in 2022 to $21.95B in 2026, a 7.4% four-year CAGR, while operating income rose from $3.72B to $5.32B and net income from $2.95B to $4.41B. That is not financial engineering masking stagnation; margins have improved too, with gross margin at 46.4%, operating margin 24.2%, and net margin 20.1% in 2026. Quarterly numbers show the same pattern: June quarter revenue was $5.47B, up 6.6% from $5.13B a year earlier, and net income rose 7.5% to $978.7M. This is a mature business still compounding at a healthy clip, and the cash conversion is excellent: $5.44B of operating cash flow and $5.24B of free cash flow on $4.41B of net income, with capex of just $196.6M. That is elite for a company of this scale.

What stands out to me is not deterioration but the degree to which the valuation demands that the current machine-like performance continue with almost no wobble. At $271.34, ADP trades at 24.8x earnings, about 5.0x sales, and 18.4x EV/EBITDA. For a business growing revenue 6.9% and earnings 8.5%, that is rich, even allowing for recession resistance and a 2.5% dividend yield. A simple earnings-yield framing makes the point: the stock offers roughly a 4.0% earnings yield against a company whose long-run EPS growth profile appears high-single-digit, not low-teens. That can work for a fortress franchise, but it leaves little room for multiple expansion and not much room for disappointment. I do not see evidence in the raw numbers of a business accelerating into a meaningfully higher growth bracket. The last eight quarters are steady, not inflecting. Revenue moved from $4.83B in September 2024 to $5.94B in March 2026, then back to the seasonally lower $5.47B in June 2026; that is dependable, but it does not justify treating ADP like a scarce growth asset.

The balance sheet and return metrics explain why investors keep paying up. Net debt is minimal, with $4.97B of debt against $4.23B of cash, and the business is so asset-light that ROE of 73.2% and ROIC of 60.6% look almost absurdly strong. Some of that is optical because equity is only $6.03B, but the broader conclusion is still valid: ADP can distribute a lot of cash without stressing the business. A payout ratio near 59.5% is sustainable given FCF, and the low capex burden makes buybacks and dividends structurally easy. That is why I reject the “value trap” framing. Value traps usually show weakening growth, eroding margins, or balance-sheet stress. ADP shows none of those. This is not a trap; it is a premium bond-like equity. My issue is simply that the bond-like premium has become a bit too generous. For a company with mid- to high-single-digit growth, fair value feels closer to 21-23x earnings, which implies roughly $230-$255 rather than $271.

The strongest pushback is obvious and not trivial: quality this consistent rarely gets cheap. If revenue continues to rise 6-7% annually, net margins hold around 20%, and free cash flow remains above $5B, then a mid-20s P/E may be the right clearing price for a mission-critical platform with high switching costs and low cyclicality. The quarter-to-quarter stability supports that view, and the market may reasonably pay a structural premium because ADP’s downside earnings risk is lower than that of typical software companies. The insider tape is not alarming either; there was at least one open-market purchase of 3,619 shares in May 2026, and the rest looks like routine small sales and option activity, not an exodus. If you believe this business can keep compounding earnings near 9% while returning capital reliably, then 24-25x is expensive but not insane. I weigh that argument less heavily because even wonderful companies can be mediocre stocks when bought at full price, and here the present valuation assumes the defensive moat remains intact while growth stays steady. That is a lot to pay for “nothing goes wrong.”

What would change my mind is either price or proof of faster growth. If the stock fell into the low-$240s without a change in fundamentals, I would be much more constructive because the earnings multiple would move closer to 22x for a genuinely excellent franchise. Alternatively, if ADP starts printing something better than the current cadence — say revenue growth reaccelerating above 8% for several quarters, operating margin pushing toward 25-26%, and free cash flow rising decisively above $5.7B-$6.0B — then the current multiple would look more deserved. On the other side, if growth slips toward 4-5% while the multiple stays above 24x, the stock likely derates quickly because the “steady compounder” premium is the whole game here.

Grok Reading
Grok (xAI) reads the identical raw briefing blind — one of the Big-3 independent readings — and commits to its own verdict.
No Grok reading yet for ADP — it's generated by the pipeline (grok-critique step) alongside the other Big-3 seats, when a report is run on this ticker.
Big-3 Panel — where each AI stands
Each AI above independently stated a direction (undervalued, fairly valued, or overvalued) and how strongly it believes it (conviction, 0–5). We combine those into a Bull-Bear Index on a 0–10 scale: 5 is neutral, 10 is maximum bullish (undervalued at full conviction), 0 is maximum bearish. We compute the score ourselves with the same arithmetic for every seat — the models never grade their own bullishness — so the three are directly comparable. Δ shows how far each seat sits from the panel average of 2.0; a large Δ marks the dissenting voice, usually the one worth reading.
Claude claude-opus-4-7 2.0
overvalued · conviction 3/5 · Δ +0.0 vs panel · self: 4.0
GPT gpt-5.4 2.0
overvalued · conviction 3/5 · Δ +0.0 vs panel · self: 4.0
Advanced Analysis Forensic deep-dive · separate lenses
Separate reads — Company Quality (is it a great business?), Valuation (is it mispriced?), and General Sentiment (how macro + narrative are pushing it), kept deliberately apart · 2026-08-08 00:59:58
Delvantic - Cairn AI
Quality - wait for a dip 8/10
Fortress-grade payroll compounder trading 20% above deserved value - right business, wrong price, so I wait.
The cruxThe gap between quality score +87 and valuation score -73 is entirely a price problem: nothing about the business is broken, but $271 leaves zero margin of safety on a mid-single-digit grower.
Forensic checks Derived mechanically from ADP's filed financials — not from the AI lenses
Liquidity & RunwaySelf-Funding
DilutionShare Count Shrinking
Earnings QualityHigh Earnings Quality
The four lensesswitch a tab for its full read — score + evidence
Company Quality
+87
Fortress
edge √Σ 157 · risk √Σ 25 · conf 9/10

Revenue has climbed every year from 16.5B (2022) to 21.95B (2026), a ~7.4% CAGR, while gross margin expanded from 42.6% to 46.4% and operating margin from 22.6% to 24.2% - textbook operating leverage on a mature business. Net income grew from 2.95B to 4.41B and FCF from 2.93B to 5.24B, with OCF/NI at 1.17x and accruals at -1.2% of assets, meaning reported earnings are backed by actual cash. Beneish M of -2.63 shows no manipulation signature; the Altman Z of 2.4 (grey) is a quirk of a capital-light service model rather than a distress signal.

Strengths 5
m85
Four-year margin and FCF expansion in lockstep
Op margin 22.6% to 24.2% and FCF 2.93B to 5.24B (79% growth) over four years - durable pricing power and scale economics on a large base.
m75
Per-share value concentration
Diluted shares fell from 421.1M to 403.3M (-1.1% CAGR); buyback-to-SBC ratio of 654.5% with SBC only 1.1% of revenue - genuine net returns of capital, not optical buybacks.
m78
Clean earnings quality
OCF/NI 1.17x, accruals -1.2% of assets, Beneish -2.63 - no aggressive accounting flags across the mechanical checks.
m60
Self-funding cash machine
5.24B annual FCF against a modest 735M net debt position means the balance sheet is trivially serviceable; 4.23B liquid cash provides operating cushion.
m45
Director open-market buy
Robert Swan purchased 745K of stock in May 2026 - largest single directional print on the tape and unusual for a mature-earner board.
Concerns 2
m20
Routine insider selling
69 sales vs 1 buy over 12 months, though sizes are small (mostly under 250K) and consistent with normal comp-driven liquidations rather than a signal.
m15
Altman Z in grey zone
Z of 2.4 reflects the capital-light, float-heavy balance sheet of a payroll processor (client funds inflate liabilities) rather than credit risk given 5.24B FCF.
This is a fortress-grade compounder operating exactly as a mature payroll utility should - margins grinding higher every single year, FCF outrunning net income, share count shrinking, and no accounting funny business anywhere in the mechanical screens. The insider tape looks noisy but the sells are small option-driven housekeeping and there is an actual open-market director buy, which is rare at this kind of company. The only thing keeping me from calling it essentially flawless is that growth is steady rather than exceptional and the balance sheet carries a small net debt position. As a business, this is about as clean as public companies get.
Verify before trusting this (4)
  • Nature of the 735M net debt and any client-fund float classification in the 10-K
  • Segment mix between Employer Services and PEO and any client retention disclosures
  • Whether the Swan open-market purchase reflects a broader board pattern or a one-off
  • SBC grant vesting schedule versus the 654% buyback coverage sustainability
Valuation / Mispricing
-73
Rich
edge √Σ 30 · risk √Σ 122 · conf 7/10
price $271 vs deserved ~$220 signal-adjusted (composite $199) - roughly 20% overpaid, no margin of safety. attractive below $225.00

The composite fair value sits at $198.67 and the signal-adjusted FV at $220.69 against a $271.34 price - implying the stock is 19-27% above deserved value. The anchored-PE of $252 is the most generous read and even that leaves no margin of safety; the DCF at $213 and EPV floor at $115 both say the market is paying a premium for certainty. Earnings quality is high (score 2), so no haircut is warranted - deserved value gets the full quality credit, and it still comes in below the tape.

Cheap signals 1
m30
Fortress quality deserves a premium
Quality score 87, expanding margins, FCF > NI, shrinking share count - this genuinely deserves to trade above naive DCF, which is why the signal-adj FV lifts to $221. But $271 still overshoots that adjusted number.
Rich / priced-in 5
m68
Price ~23% above composite FV
$271.34 vs $198.67 composite implies -19% forward return baked in before any multiple compression.
m60
Even the generous anchor screens rich
The friendliest input, anchored-PE at $252.25, is still ~7% below spot - meaning even a benign multiple regime gives no upside.
m55
DCF says $213
DCF at $213.46 vs $271.34 is a 21% overpayment; you are funding heroic margin expansion and buyback assumptions to close the gap.
m45
EPV floor $115 shows no downside cushion
If growth stalls, steady-state earnings power is worth less than half the current price - fortress quality does not insulate the multiple.
m40
Priced for perpetual perfection
SMB competitive pressure and a maturing payroll market are not in the price; the tape assumes the metronome never breaks.
This is a textbook great-business-wrong-price situation. Every method except the most generous PE anchor says fair value is in the $200-220 zone, and the tape is at $271. I do not need to argue with the quality lens - ADP is a fortress - but paying 20%+ over deserved value for a mid-single-digit grower with a maturing core market is how you earn zero for five years. I want it in the low $220s before it is interesting, ideally with a $200 handle.
Verify before trusting this (4)
  • Forward organic revenue growth guidance vs the low-teens implied by anchored-PE
  • Client funds float sensitivity to rate cuts (a swing factor in FCF)
  • Retention rates in the down-market SMB segment where Gusto/Rippling compete
  • Buyback pace vs share issuance to confirm net shrink continues
General Sentiment
-3
Balanced
tail √Σ 67 · head √Σ 70 · conf 6/10

The tape is benign (VIX 14.9, S&P at highs, risk-on regime building) but ADP's low beta of 0.82 and defensive-compounder archetype mean it neither surges with risk-on rallies nor gets marked down hard in stress. The dominant sentiment force here is the narrative: a 'forever hold, quality-at-fair-price' story that is durable but low-intensity and low-cult, meaning it doesn't attract momentum flows nor invite violent de-ratings. That is a small, persistent tailwind that justifies the ~23% premium to DCF the market has been extracting for years. The wrinkle: this week's July jobs report was a shock miss (-23k vs +80k expected), and ADP IS the payroll company - both symbolically and operationally, since employment weakness eventually shows up in pays-per-control and float. Headlines pairing ADP with slowing hiring reinforce a subtle bear read on the SMB franchise just as competitor comparisons (Rippling, Guideline) are being aired. Analyst tone appears neutral-to-constructive with no visible target cut wave. Net: the macro backdrop is fine, the narrative is intact but not exciting, and the news flow leans mildly negative on the labor angle. Pressures roughly cancel.

Tailwinds 3
m40
Risk-on tape, low-beta beneficiary of calm
VIX under 15 and indices at highs favor holding quality compounders. With beta 0.82, ADP participates modestly but the calm regime removes the de-rating pressure defensives face in stress tapes.
m45
Durable steady-compounder narrative intact
The 'invisible backbone of payroll, forever hold' story is durable with no active crack. Low cult and moderate intensity mean no euphoria to unwind - a quiet, persistent bid that supports the premium multiple.
m30
Defensive rotation appeal
News flow references defensive positioning amid slowing hiring and geopolitical risk (Hormuz). ADP's profile fits the 'hide here' bucket when growth wobbles emerge.
Headwinds 3
m55
Weak July payrolls hits ADP's core symbolism
The -23k print vs +80k expected puts labor-market weakness front-and-center in the news flow. ADP is the payroll name - slower hiring pressures pays-per-control, float income optics, and feeds the bear thesis that SMB is softening just as competitors circle.
m35
Competitor comparison drumbeat
Multiple recent articles frame ADP against Microsoft, Accenture, and by extension Rippling/Guideline - subtly reinforcing the 'legacy, seasonal, maturing' bear narrative rather than the compounder frame.
m25
Higher rates cap multiple expansion
10y at 4.69% and market PE 26 create a mild valuation ceiling for premium-multiple defensives like ADP. Not decisive at low beta, but it caps upside from multiple re-rating.
Net pressure is close to neutral with a mild negative tilt from the labor-data news cycle landing directly on ADP's brand. The compounder narrative is durable enough to absorb this, and the calm tape is friendly to low-beta quality, but I would not call this an active tailwind - the story is quiet, not accelerating, and the July jobs miss gives bears a fresh talking point aimed straight at the franchise. Balanced, leaning slightly headwind if August payrolls disappoint again.
Verify before trusting this (4)
  • Whether analyst targets get trimmed in the next 2 weeks tied to the weak jobs print
  • August ADP National Employment Report - a second weak print would harden the SMB-softening narrative
  • Any commentary from Rippling/competitors on SMB share gains that could crack ADP's moat story
  • Whether the risk-on regime holds or a growth-scare rotation into pure defensives (staples/utilities) leaves ADP behind
The market-wide tape + this name's exposure to it (beta / sector / narrative durability). Context on the non-fundamental pressure — not a call on the business or the price. processId: detail-general-sentiment
Growth Outlook
not run

This lens hasn't been run for this ticker yet.

The forward growth verdict — is the business itself likely to grow (next 2 quarters / year 1 / years 2–3), judged against its category and against printed expectations. The full horizon ladder + creme renders on the Growth Outlook card above. Not a call on the price (Valuation owns that) or the tape (Sentiment owns that).
Please log in to view trade setups
The Augustus trade-setup read is a members feature.
Log in
Lenses kept deliberately separate — Company Quality (price-agnostic), Valuation (price-conditional), General Sentiment (non-fundamental macro/narrative pressure), and Growth Outlook (the forward growth verdict). The scores are not blended. Filing-level items (convertibles, lock-ups, customer concentration) are v2 — see each lens's "verify."
Price Prediction
Lower -5.3% v0.6.0 View full prediction →

When we made this prediction on Aug 8, 2026, ADP was $271.34. We expect it to be $257.00 by Feb 2027, and we consider it great value under $225.00. This is an early model (v0.6.0) — the direction is more reliable than the exact price. Made Aug 8, 2026.

Price when predicted$271.34
Our estimate for Feb 2027$257.00-5.3%
Great value below$225.00
Price history shown (6 Months)

Blue is our prediction, starting the day we made it. Grey is a slower route to the same place — the same destination, taking longer. Black is the actual price, so you can see how we are doing.

Community AI Feedback
No community reviews yet for ADP. Be the first — hit How to Contribute, have any AI review this page, and paste its take back here.
My Notes personal — only you see this
v1.1.562 · 9b2927c4 · 2026-08-22 16:52:06