Homepage
FRESH Analysis Report
Jun 27, 2026
today · 96% complete · +9 refreshed

Amphenol Corporation

APH NYSE Categories PDF
Technology · Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Wallingford, CT 06492, United States IPO 1991 amphenol.com Updated Jun 27, 3:06am
Price
$163.72
Market Cap
$201.4B
Employees
170,000
Beta
1.28
Avg Volume
9,693,554
CEO
Richard Adam Norwitt
Business Description

Amphenol Corporation, alongside its numerous subsidiaries, operates globally as a prominent designer, manufacturer, and distributor of electrical, electronic, and fiber optic connectors. Its market reach extends across the United States, China, and various international territories. The company is organized into three primary operational divisions: Harsh Environment Solutions, Communications Solutions, and Interconnect and Sensor Systems. Amphenol's comprehensive product lineup features an extensive array of connectors and integrated connector systems. These include specialized interconnects engineered for demanding conditions (covering data, power, high-speed, fiber optic, and radio frequency applications), in addition to busbars and complete power distribution systems. Beyond these core offerings, the company provides value-added products such as backplane interconnect systems, bespoke cable assemblies and harnesses, and cable management solutions. Their portfolio also encompasses flexible and rigid printed circuit boards (PCBs), hinges, and various other mechanical and production-related components. Furthermore, Amphenol supplies antennas for consumer electronics, network infrastructure, and other uses; a range of coaxial, power, and specialty cables; and an assortment of sensors and sensor-based technologies. The company distributes its products through a multi-channel approach, utilizing its internal sales force, independent representatives, and an extensive network of electronics distributors. Its diverse customer base comprises original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), electronic manufacturing services (EMS) providers, original design manufacturers (ODMs), and service providers. These clients span numerous industries, including automotive, broadband communication, commercial aerospace, industrial, information technology and data communication, military, mobile device, and mobile network markets. Amphenol Corporation was founded in 1932 and is presently headquartered in Wallingford, Connecticut.

Business History
Generated: Jun 27, 2026 3:09am
Price Overview
Last updated: Jun 27, 2026 3:06am (4h ago)
$163.72
-1.43 (-0.87%)
Day Range
$160.66 – $165.94
52-Week Range
$95.19 – $168.75
50-Day MA
$144.60
200-Day MA
$137.82
Volume
11,820,489.00
Analyst Price Targets
Low $165.00
Consensus $182.89
High $215.00
(47 analysts)
Share Structure
Outstanding 1,230,230,000.00
Float 1,222,360,945.00
Free Float 99.4%
High free float — 99.4% of shares trade freely, ~0.6% held by insiders/institutions
Very liquid — most shares trade freely. Low insider ownership can mean less management alignment, but makes large position sizing straightforward.
Price History (1 Year)
Last updated: Jun 27, 2026 3:11am (4h ago)
Revenue & Net Income Trend
The directional story — useful even when net income is negative.
Last updated: Jun 27, 2026 3:09am (4h ago)
Revenue
The top line — total sales before any costs or taxes are subtracted. A measure of how much business the company is doing.
Net Income
The bottom line — profit left after subtracting all expenses, interest, and taxes from revenue. Reflects accounting profitability, but includes non-cash items like depreciation, so it isn't the same as cash earned.
Operating Cash Flow
The real cash generated by the day-to-day business — selling products, paying suppliers, collecting from customers. Calculated from net income by adding back non-cash items and adjusting for timing (unpaid bills, unsold inventory). When OCF consistently lags net income, the reported profit may not be converting to real money.
Period Revenue Net Income Net Margin YoY/QoQ
Key Metrics
API Direct from provider CALC Derived from statements
Industry comparison last run: Jun 27, 2026 3:08am
P/E Ratio (Price per dollar of earnings)
API
Stock Price / EPS (Diluted)
44.95
Stock Price: $163.72
EPS (Diluted): 3.51
P/B Ratio (Price vs net asset value)
API
Stock Price / Book Value Per Share
12.27
Stock Price: $163.72
Total Equity: $13.41B
Shares: 1,277,500,000
EV/EBITDA (Total value vs operating profit)
API
Enterprise Value / EBITDA
27.16
Market Cap: $201.41B
Total Debt: $15.50B
Cash: $11.13B
EBITDA: $6.89B
Enterprise Value (Takeover price (cap + debt - cash))
API
Market Cap + Total Debt - Cash
$169.0B
Market Cap: $201.41B
Total Debt: $15.50B
Cash: $11.13B
Gross Margin (Revenue left after direct costs)
API
Gross Profit / Revenue
36.9%
Gross Profit: $8.52B
Revenue: $23.09B
Operating Margin (Revenue left after all operations)
API
Operating Income / Revenue
25.9%
Operating Income: $5.97B
Revenue: $23.09B
Net Margin (Revenue left as actual profit)
API
Net Income / Revenue
18.5%
Net Income: $4.27B
Revenue: $23.09B
ROE (Profit from shareholder equity)
API
Net Income / Total Equity
34.8%
Net Income: $4.27B
Total Equity: $13.41B
ROIC (Profit from all invested capital)
API
NOPAT / Invested Capital
13.7%
Operating Income: $5.97B
Tax Rate: 23.1%
Equity: $13.41B
Total Debt: $15.50B
Cash: $11.13B
Current Ratio (Can it pay short-term bills)
API
Current Assets / Current Liabilities
2.98
Current Assets: $20.27B
Current Liabilities: $6.80B
Debt/Equity (Leverage — debt vs equity)
CALC
Total Debt / Total Equity
1.16
Short-Term Debt: $937.20M
Long-Term Debt: $14.56B
Total Debt: $15.50B
Total Equity: $13.41B
Rev/Share (Top-line per share)
CALC
Revenue / Shares Outstanding
$18.08
Revenue: $23.09B
Shares: 1,277,500,000
Book Value/Share (Net assets per share)
CALC
(Total Assets - Total Liabilities) / Shares
$10.50
Total Equity: $13.41B
Shares: 1,277,500,000
FCF/Share (Real cash generated per share)
CALC
(Operating Cash Flow + CapEx) / Shares
$3.43
Operating CF: $5.37B
CapEx: -$996.60M
Shares: 1,277,500,000
CapEx is negative (outflow) — added to OCF to get FCF
Div Yield (Annual income from holding)
API
Last Annual Dividend / Stock Price
0.5%
Last Dividend: N/A
Stock Price: $163.72
Payout Ratio (Earnings paid out as dividends)
Dividends Paid / Net Income
Dividends Paid: N/A
Net Income: $4.27B
Dividends paid not available in cash flow statement
Industry Benchmarks
Last run: Jun 27, 2026 3:08am
Compares APH against LLM-researched typical ranges for its industry. One research call per industry, cached indefinitely — every stock in the same industry reuses the same baseline.
Advanced Analysis Forensic deep-dive · three lenses
Three separate reads — Company Quality (is it a great business?), Valuation (is it mispriced?), and General Sentiment (how macro + narrative are pushing it), kept deliberately apart · 2026-06-27 03:21:13
Delvantic - Cairn AI
Elite business, wait for a dip - tiny tracker only 8/10
Fortress-quality compounder (+100) trading 25-30% above deserved value (-78) with an AI-narrative tailwind (+63) that's exactly why I shouldn't chase here.
The cruxWhether AI-infrastructure capex enthusiasm holds long enough to grow APH into its multiple, or wobbles and gives me the $130 handle I actually want.
Forensic checks Derived mechanically from APH's filed financials — not from the AI lenses
Liquidity & RunwaySelf-Funding
DilutionStable Share Count
Earnings QualityHigh Earnings Quality
The three lensesswitch a tab for its full read — score + evidence
Company Quality
+100
Fortress
edge √Σ 150 · risk √Σ 32 · conf 9/10

The trajectory is exceptional: revenue more than doubled from 10.88B in 2021 to 23.09B in 2025, with gross margin expanding from 31.3% to 36.9% and operating margin from 20% to 25.9%. Net income rose from 1.59B to 4.27B while FCF tracked from 1.18B to 4.38B, and OCF/NI of 1.17x plus accruals of -2% of assets confirm earnings are cash-backed, not accrual-inflated. Beneish M of -2.44 and Altman Z of 7.33 corroborate clean books and balance-sheet safety.

Strengths 4
m88
Margin expansion on big revenue jump
Operating margin climbed from 20% to 25.9% while revenue grew 51% in 2025 to 23.09B - real operating leverage and pricing power, not just scale.
m80
Clean earnings quality
OCF/NI 1.17x, accruals -2% of assets, Beneish M -2.44, Altman Z 7.33. Mechanical checks find no red flags; FCF of 4.38B exceeds net income of 4.27B.
m70
Disciplined share count
Diluted shares went 1.25B to 1.28B over 5 years (0.5% CAGR), with buybacks running 874% of SBC value - per-share value is protected.
m60
Strong self-funding FCF
4.38B annual FCF easily covers the modest net debt position of ~4.07B; no external capital dependence.
Concerns 2
m25
Carries net debt
Net cash is -4.07B; balance sheet is a constraint not a cushion, though FCF coverage is ample.
m20
Heavy insider selling vs minimal buying
18 sells totaling 307.7M vs 1 buy of 1.29M in last 12 months. Insiders are monetizing equity awards heavily; the e2e 'net buying' label looks mislabeled given the dollar imbalance.
This is a genuinely elite industrial compounder. Interconnect is a fragmented, M&A-driven moat business and Amphenol runs the playbook better than anyone - margins are expanding even as revenue scales 2x, cash conversion is over 100% of net income, and share count is essentially flat. The only nits are net debt (a constraint, not a problem given 4.4B FCF) and that the insider tape is dominated by award-driven sells, which is normal for a long-tenured executive team but contradicts the 'net buying' label in the e2e module. Quality grade: fortress.
Verify before trusting this (4)
  • Whether the 2025 revenue jump to 23.09B includes a major acquisition (e.g., CommScope Andrew) and the organic vs inorganic split
  • Customer/end-market concentration disclosure (AI/datacom exposure mix)
  • Detail on the net debt structure, maturities and covenants
  • Whether ROIC remains elevated post any large acquisition (goodwill build-up)
Valuation / Mispricing
-78
Rich
edge √Σ 25 · risk √Σ 103 · conf 7/10
Price $163.72 vs deserved ~$125-135, roughly 25-30% premium - priced for continued perfection. attractive below $130.00

The composite fair value of $102.98 and signal-adjusted FV of $125.19 both sit well below the $163.72 price, implying -24% downside on the synthesis. The DCF at $116 is the most credible anchor (the $30 EPV floor is a no-growth scenario and largely ignorable for a genuine compounder); the EPV is best read as 'absent growth, this is worth a third of today's price' - a useful reminder of how much of the cap is growth-dependent. Earnings quality is high (score 3), so no haircut is warranted - if anything, deserved value sits at the top of the FV range, call it ~$125-135 for a Fortress-grade compounder.

Cheap signals 1
m25
Quality deserves a premium multiple
Fortress-grade business with >100% cash conversion and flat share count justifies pricing toward the top of the FV range; the gap is real but not as wide as the headline -24% suggests.
Rich / priced-in 3
m70
24% above signal-adjusted FV
Composite FV $102.98 and signal-adjusted FV $125.19 both sit materially below $163.72. Even crediting the higher DCF of $116, the stock trades ~41% above it.
m60
Priced for AI/EV perfection
Multiple expansion reflects the AI-infrastructure narrative; any deceleration in datacenter or telecom capex unwinds the premium quickly in a cyclical hardware name.
m45
EPV floor signals growth dependency
EPV of $30.64 vs $163.72 price means roughly 80% of the market cap is growth-discounted cash flow - leaves little cushion if the compounding rate slows.
I love the business, hate the entry. At $163 I'm paying ~30% above what I think this is worth even giving full credit to the compounder math. The DCF says $116, the signal-adjusted blend says $125 - I want a handle of 13 before this is interesting, and I'd back up the truck closer to $115. Fortress quality doesn't make a rich price cheap; it just means I shouldn't short it. Pass on valuation, wait for a cyclical wobble.
Verify before trusting this (4)
  • Forward organic growth guidance vs the 10%+ baked into DCF
  • AI/datacenter mix and durability of orders into 2025
  • M&A pipeline and incremental margin on recent deals
  • Any softening in communications or industrial end markets in the next print
General Sentiment
+63
Tailwind
tail √Σ 115 · head √Σ 52 · conf 7/10

APH is being carried by an active, durable 'invisible AI backbone' narrative that the financial press is amplifying this week - record orders, breakout setups, momentum pieces, and decade-return puff stories are all hitting in the same 72 hours. That kind of one-sided news flow on a quiet-quality name with low cult coefficient tends to pull in trend and growth-momentum funds, which is exactly what the price action (+6.6% in a week, 51.7% recent vs 35.6% long-term CAGR) reflects. Analyst tone is constructive (Buy consensus, fresh upward revision to $198) and notably is not diverging from the narrative - it is reinforcing it. The macro tape is a mild offset, not a real brake. Regime is Neutral with VIX at 18, S&P only 3.4% off highs, and 10y at 4.38% creating a generic rate headwind for all equities. APH's 1.28 beta means it would feel a real risk-off move, but there isn't one - just chop. Sector positioning (AI/data-center hardware) is squarely in the part of tech the market still wants to own, so the macro headwind is muted for this specific name. Net: narrative + momentum + analyst revisions outweigh a soft macro drag. The risk is that the story is already in the tape - any crack in AI-capex enthusiasm hits high-beta picks-and-shovels names first.

Tailwinds 4
m70
AI-backbone narrative actively running
Durable 'invisible AI infrastructure' story is being reinforced by record-orders headlines and breakout commentary. Quiet-quality archetype means the narrative has room to broaden without being dismissed as hype.
m65
Momentum and trend-follower bid
+6.6% in a week and recent CAGR pulling well ahead of long-term trend draws in momentum and growth funds, with multiple momentum-tagged articles this week amplifying the flow.
m50
Analyst tone reinforcing, not fading
Buy consensus with a fresh $198 revision well above the $182.89 average target signals brokers chasing the narrative higher rather than diverging from it.
m40
One-sided news flow in last 72h
Every APH-specific headline in the window is constructive (record orders, growth stock, decade returns). No counter-narrative is currently competing for attention.
Headwinds 3
m35
Rate and valuation backdrop
10y at 4.38% and stretched market PE create a generic drag on premium-multiple hardware names; APH trades ~31% above DCF, so any rate scare hits this name's multiple first.
m30
High beta into a fragile-neutral tape
Beta 1.28 with S&P already 3.4% off highs and regime confidence low means any rotation out of AI-capex names would mark APH down faster than the market.
m25
Narrative crowding risk
The 'picks and shovels of AI' story is well-known and now being written up in retail-facing outlets; late-cycle narrative adoption raises the odds the easy sentiment lift is already priced.
Net pressure is clearly to the upside right now. APH is the textbook quiet-quality AI-infrastructure name catching a durable narrative tailwind, one-sided news flow, momentum bid, and constructive analyst revisions, while the macro headwind is real but muted because the tape is only neutral-soft, not risk-off. I lean Tailwind, not Strong Tailwind, because the story is well-known and the 1.28 beta plus 31% premium to DCF means any genuine crack in AI-capex enthusiasm would unwind this sentiment quickly - but until that crack appears, the pressure is pushing the stock higher.
Verify before trusting this (4)
  • Any deceleration in hyperscaler capex commentary or data-center order cadence that would crack the AI-backbone story
  • Whether VIX breaks above 20 and the S&P pullback extends - that would flip the muted macro headwind into a real one for a 1.28-beta name
  • Sell-side target revision breadth - one $198 print is encouraging; needs follow-through from other analysts to sustain the bid
  • Sector rotation signals out of AI-capex hardware into defensives or software
The market-wide tape + this name's exposure to it (beta / sector / narrative durability). Context on the non-fundamental pressure — not a call on the business or the price. processId: detail-general-sentiment
Please log in to view trade setups
The Augustus trade-setup read is a members feature.
Log in
Three lenses kept deliberately separate — Company Quality (price-agnostic), Valuation (price-conditional), and General Sentiment (non-fundamental macro/narrative pressure). The scores are not blended. Filing-level items (convertibles, lock-ups, customer concentration) are v2 — see each lens's "verify."
Deep Analysis
Last run: Jun 27, 2026 3:11:14 am

Pre-flight intelligence scans the company first, then routes to the right analytical methods.

0 Company Classification — What type of company is this?
1 Industry Landscape — Where is the industry headed?
2 Company Momentum — Where is this company trending?
3 Forward Projection — 1Y & 2Y projected metrics (requires Layer 1 + 2)
4a DCF Valuation — Present value of future cash flows
4b Earnings Power Value — Floor value — worth with zero growth
4c Anchored PE — Industry PE adjusted for growth differential
4d Reverse DCF — What growth is the market pricing in?
4e Revenue-Based DCF — For growth/narrative companies (skip if mature earner)
Not applicable for High Growth Profitable companies
4f Anchored P/S — Price-to-Sales peer comparison (skip if mature earner)
Not applicable for High Growth Profitable companies
4g Scenario Analysis — Bull / Base / Bear (skip if mature earner)
Not applicable for High Growth Profitable companies
4h Dividend Discount Model — For dividend/income stocks only
Not applicable for High Growth Profitable companies
4i Book Value Analysis — For deep value / turnaround stocks only
Not applicable for High Growth Profitable companies
4j Insider Activity — Are insiders buying or selling?
4f Cash Flow Quality — How trustworthy is the FCF?
4g Debt Maturity Risk — Can it handle its debt?
4h Macro Environment — Rates, market valuation, volatility
4i Sector Intelligence — How does this company compare within its sector?
4j Revenue Confidence — How reliable is the growth projection?
4k Sensitivity Analysis — How fragile is the fair value estimate?
4l Sector Demand Cycle — Is the sector in a boom, steady state, or contraction?
5 AI Investigation — Adaptive research engine (Claude)
5b Thesis Evaluation — What does the market believe? (narrative/platform stocks only)
Not applicable for High Growth Profitable companies
6 Valuation Synthesis — Weighted verdict from all methods (requires Layer 4)
Income Statement (Annual)
Last updated: Jun 27, 2026 3:09am (4h ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Revenue $10.9B $12.6B $12.6B $15.2B $23.1B
Cost of Revenue $7.5B $8.6B $8.5B $10.1B $14.6B
Gross Profit $3.4B $4.0B $4.1B $5.1B $8.5B
Operating Expenses $1.2B $1.4B $1.5B $1.9B $2.5B
Operating Income $2.2B $2.6B $2.6B $3.3B $6.0B
Net Income $1.6B $1.9B $1.9B $2.4B $4.3B
EBITDA $2.5B $3.0B $3.0B $3.8B $6.9B
EPS $1.33 $1.60 $1.62 $2.01 $3.51
EPS (Diluted)
Balance Sheet (Annual)
Last updated: Jun 27, 2026 3:06am (4h ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Cash & Equivalents $1.2B $1.4B $1.5B $3.3B $11.1B
Total Current Assets $6.0B $6.5B $6.8B $9.7B $20.3B
Total Assets $14.7B $15.3B $16.5B $21.4B $36.2B
Current Liabilities $2.4B $2.7B $3.2B $4.1B $6.8B
Long-Term Debt $4.8B $4.6B $4.0B $6.5B $14.6B
Total Liabilities $8.3B $8.2B $8.1B $11.6B $22.7B
Total Equity $6.3B $7.0B $8.3B $9.8B $13.4B
Retained Earnings $4.3B $5.0B $5.9B $7.1B $9.9B
Cash Flow (Annual)
Last updated: Jun 23, 2026 3:06am (4d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Operating Cash Flow $1.5B $2.2B $2.5B $2.8B $5.4B
Capital Expenditure -$360.4M -$383.8M -$372.8M -$665.4M -$996.6M
Free Cash Flow $1.2B $1.8B $2.2B $2.1B $4.4B
Acquisitions (net) -$2.2B -$288.2M -$970.4M -$2.1B -$3.8B
Debt Repayment
Dividends Paid
Stock Buybacks -$661.7M -$730.5M -$585.1M -$689.3M -$665.2M
Net Change in Cash -$504.9M $176.0M $101.9M $1.8B $7.8B
Analyst Estimates (Annual)
Last updated: Jun 27, 2026 3:06am (4h ago)
Metric 2026 2027 2028 2029
Revenue $33.4B
$32.9B – $34.2B
$38.1B
$36.9B – $38.9B
$41.9B
$41.8B – $42.1B
$46.4B
$44.4B – $48.2B
EBITDA $8.4B
$8.2B – $8.6B
$9.6B
$9.3B – $9.7B
$10.5B
$10.5B – $10.6B
$11.6B
$11.1B – $12.1B
Net Income $6.1B
$6.0B – $6.3B
$7.3B
$7.1B – $7.5B
$8.4B
$6.4B – $9.1B
$9.6B
$9.1B – $10.1B
EPS
Growth Trends (YoY %)
Last updated: Jun 27, 2026 3:09am (4h ago)
Metric 2022 2023 2024 2025
Revenue Growth +16.1% -0.5% +21.3% +51.7%
Gross Profit Growth +18.4% +1.4% +25.8% +65.7%
Operating Income Growth +19.8% -0.5% +26.6% +81.8%
Net Income Growth +19.6% +1.4% +25.7% +76.2%
EBITDA Growth +19.5% +0.4% +26.7% +81.3%
Insider Trading (Recent)
Last updated: Jun 27, 2026 3:09am (4h ago)
Type codes PPurchase SSale AAward / grant MOption exercise FIn-kind (tax) CConversion GGift DReturn to issuer
All SEC Form 4 codes
Open market
P Purchase
Open-market or private purchase of shares.
S Sale
Open-market or private sale of shares.
Compensation (Rule 16b-3)
A Award / grant
Grant or award of securities (RSUs, options, etc.) under Rule 16b-3.
D Return to issuer
Securities disposed back to the company under Rule 16b-3.
F In-kind (tax)
Shares withheld or delivered to pay the option-exercise price or tax — not an open-market sale.
I Discretionary
Discretionary transaction under an employee plan — Rule 16b-3(f).
M Option exercise
Exercise or conversion of a derivative (option/RSU) into shares — exempt.
Derivatives
C Conversion
Conversion of a derivative security into the underlying shares.
E Short expiration
Expiration of a short derivative position.
H Long expiration
Expiration or cancellation of a long derivative position with value received.
O OTM exercise
Exercise of an out-of-the-money derivative.
X ITM exercise
Exercise of an in-the-money or at-the-money derivative.
Other exempt
G Gift
Bona fide gift of securities.
L Small acquisition
Small acquisition under Rule 16a-6.
W Inheritance
Acquisition or disposition by will or the laws of descent.
Z Voting trust
Deposit into or withdrawal from a voting trust.
Other
J Other
Other acquisition or disposition (explained in a Form 4 footnote).
K Equity swap
Transaction in an equity swap or similar instrument.
U Tender / buyout
Disposition via tender of shares in a change-of-control transaction.

Compensation-plan codes (A, D, F, M) are routine and rarely directional. Open-market P (buy) and S (sale) carry the most signal.

Date Insider Type Shares Price Value
2026-05-22 WALTER LUC A-Award 108,809.00 $132.06 $14.4M
2026-05-22 Straub Peter A-Award 108,809.00 $132.06 $14.4M
2026-05-22 Silverman David M A-Award 70,690.00 $132.06 $9.3M
2026-05-22 NORWITT RICHARD ADAM A-Award 464,989.00 $132.06 $61.4M
2026-05-22 Lampo Craig A A-Award 133,161.00 $132.06 $17.6M
2026-05-22 Ivas Michael R. A-Award 51,134.00 $132.06 $6.8M
2026-05-22 Doherty William J A-Award 108,809.00 $132.06 $14.4M
2026-05-22 D'AMICO LANCE E A-Award 83,020.00 $132.06 $11.0M
2026-05-22 Wolff Anne Clarke A-Award 1,552.00 $0.00 $0
2026-05-22 Singh Prahlad R. A-Award 1,552.00 $0.00 $0
2026-05-22 Livingston Robert A-Award 1,552.00 $0.00 $0
2026-05-22 Lane Rita S. A-Award 1,552.00 $0.00 $0
2026-05-22 Lamba Sanjiv A-Award 1,552.00 $0.00 $0
2026-05-22 Falck David P A-Award 1,552.00 $0.00 $0
2026-05-22 Altobello Nancy A. A-Award 1,552.00 $0.00 $0
2026-05-19 Lampo Craig A G-Gift 34,499.00 $86.88 $3.0M
2026-05-19 Lampo Craig A G-Gift 69,108.00 $65.96 $4.6M
2026-05-20 Lampo Craig A J-Other 41,203.00 $0.00 $0
2026-05-20 D'AMICO LANCE E G-Gift 21,508.00 $86.88 $1.9M
2026-05-20 D'AMICO LANCE E G-Gift 43,086.00 $65.96 $2.8M
Dividend History (Last 20)
Last updated: Jun 21, 2026 6:44pm (5d ago)
Date Dividend Declaration Record Payment
2026-06-23 $0.25 2026-05-06 2026-06-23 2026-07-15
2026-03-23 $0.25 2026-02-05 2026-03-23 2026-04-14
2025-12-16 $0.25 2025-10-22 2025-12-16 2026-01-07
2025-09-16 $0.17 2025-07-30 2025-09-16 2025-10-08
2025-06-17 $0.17 2025-05-01 2025-06-17 2025-07-09
2025-03-18 $0.17 2025-01-30 2025-03-18 2025-04-09
2024-12-17 $0.17 2024-10-31 2024-12-17 2025-01-08
2024-09-17 $0.17 2024-07-24 2024-09-17 2024-10-09
2024-06-18 $0.11 2024-05-02 2024-06-18 2024-07-10
2024-03-18 $0.22 2024-02-01 2024-03-19 2024-04-10
2023-12-18 $0.22 2023-10-24 2023-12-19 2024-01-10
2023-09-18 $0.21 2023-08-04 2023-09-19 2023-10-11
2023-06-16 $0.21 2023-05-05 2023-06-20 2023-07-12
2023-03-20 $0.21 2023-02-03 2023-03-21 2023-04-12
2022-12-19 $0.21 2022-10-25 2022-12-20 2023-01-11
2022-09-19 $0.20 2022-08-04 2022-09-20 2022-10-12
2022-06-17 $0.20 2022-05-04 2022-06-21 2022-07-13
2022-03-21 $0.20 2022-02-02 2022-03-22 2022-04-13
2021-12-20 $0.20 2021-10-26 2021-12-21 2022-01-12
2021-09-20 $0.15 2021-08-05 2021-09-21 2021-10-13
Narrative Economics
The story the market is telling about this stock — the intangible X-factor (founder mythology, cult dynamics, TAM-of-imagination) that moves price beyond what cash flows alone explain. After Shiller, Narrative Economics.
No narrative profile yet for APH — it's generated by the pipeline (market-narrative step).
Delvantic AI Findings
Independent analyst synthesis · Delvantic - Cairn AI · generated 2026-06-27 03:11:53
Reviews the pipeline's own verdicts
Verdict Overvalued — fair value $115-125 vs $163.72; Q1'26 margin compression (12.4% vs 20.1% peak) is the tell that acquisition dilution is hitting, wait for sub-$135 or a clean organic-growth print before committing.

Looking at the raw quarterly tape first: revenue ramps from $3.61B (Q2'24) to $7.62B (Q1'26) — a 2.1x in seven quarters. That's not organic; the step-change from $4.81B (Q1'25) to $5.65B (Q2'25) and the annual jump from $15.2B to $23.1B screams Andrew Clark Carlisle Interconnect plus the CommScope mobile networks deal closing. More importantly: margins peaked at 20.1% in Q3'25 and have now compressed to 12.4% in Q1'26 with net income falling sequentially from $1.25B → $1.20B → $943M despite revenue climbing $6.19B → $6.44B → $7.62B. That is a 620bp net margin collapse in two quarters on accelerating revenue — classic acquisition dilution plus integration costs, but also potentially the first crack in the AI-connector pricing story. The momentum module's "earnings YoY +76%" is backward-looking noise; the forward tape is decelerating earnings on rising revenue, which is the worst kind of mix for a 45x P/E.

The synthesis verdict of $125 fair value vs $163.72 (-23.5%) is directionally right but I think understates the risk. Pre-flight nailed the M&A read. Market Forces flagged "massive insider selling" — but I'd push back on that: the May 22 2026 transactions are all A-Award grants (equity comp), not open-market sales. The secondary signal calling this "Net Insider Buying" is also wrong; awards aren't buying. There's no real insider signal here, just RSU/PSU vesting events the models on both sides misread. The narrative layer's "quiet-quality / durable" framing is fair, but it's papering over the Q1'26 margin print. You cannot pay 27x EV/EBITDA and 7.1x sales for an industrial connector roll-up whose incremental quarter just printed sub-13% net margins, even if the trailing TTM still shows 18.5%.

A careful contrarian would argue three things. First, the AI-connector tailwind is real but Amphenol's Communications segment is maybe 25-30% of revenue — the other 70% (industrial, auto, mil/aero, mobile devices) is cyclical and auto in particular is rolling over. Second, the company has done this acquisition-driven margin pattern before (2018, 2021) and the market eventually re-rates to ~22-25x once organic growth normalizes to high single digits; at 4.3B TTM NI and a 25x multiple you get ~$108B market cap, or roughly $87/share — well below even the DCF anchor. Third, ROIC of 13.7% is good but not extraordinary for a 45x multiple, and with $11.1B cash offset by undisclosed debt (the missing balance sheet line is a real gap given the recent M&A), net leverage post-deal is probably 1.5-2x EBITDA, not the fortress balance sheet the multiple implies. The bull retort: if 2026 organic growth holds at 8-10% on the new $30B+ revenue base and margins recover to 18%, you get $5.5B+ NI and the multiple looks like 36x — still rich but defensible for a compounder.

I agree with the synthesis that APH is overvalued but I'm more bearish than the -23.5% gap suggests. Composite fair value $125 assumes margin normalization back to 18-20%; the Q1'26 print is the first data point that says maybe not, and at 12.4% net margin the math gets uglier fast. The narrative durability is genuine — this is a 50-year compounder and you don't short it — but paying $163.72 for a stock where forward earnings are decelerating, the most recent quarter shows acquisition indigestion, and the entire bull case rests on AI capex sustaining at 2024-25 intensity is a poor risk/reward. I'd peg fair value at $115-125 for patient holders and note that a single weak guide could compress this 20-30% in a session. Quality compounders don't go on sale often; this one isn't on sale. Wait.

GPT Critique
Second-opinion review · gpt-4o · generated 2026-06-27 03:11:59
Reviews the Opus findings above
Verdict I agree with Opus — overvalued at $163.72, but I'd peg fair value closer to $125 given the potential for margin recovery and sustained growth in key segments, aligning with their $115-125 range.

Amphenol Corporation's recent financials reveal a compelling story of rapid growth, primarily driven by acquisitions rather than organic expansion. The revenue surged from $4.81B in Q1'25 to $7.62B in Q1'26, indicating a significant acquisition impact. This aligns with the massive jump in annual revenues from $15.22B in 2024 to $23.09B in 2025, suggesting a strategic acquisition that has reshaped the company's financial landscape. However, this growth comes with notable margin compression, as net margins fell from 20.1% in Q3'25 to 12.4% in Q1'26. The company's P/E ratio of 44.95 suggests a market expectation of sustained high growth, but the declining margins signal potential issues in integrating acquisitions and maintaining profitability.

Opus argues that Amphenol is overvalued, pegging fair value at $115-125 versus the current price of $163.72. I agree with this assessment, as the margin compression and decelerating net income despite rising revenues raise red flags about the sustainability of recent growth. The 620 basis point drop in net margin over two quarters supports Opus's view of acquisition-related dilution impacting financial performance. Furthermore, the lack of significant insider selling, as noted in the May 2026 transactions, corroborates Opus's correction of the market's perception of insider activity; these were equity awards, not market sales, and should not be mistaken for insider sentiment on valuation.

However, I diverge from Opus on the perceived severity of the valuation gap. While Opus suggests more bearish sentiment than the -23.5% gap indicates, I believe the fair value range of $115-125 is appropriate given the potential for margin recovery. The company's history of acquisition-driven growth patterns, as seen previously in 2018 and 2021, suggests a capability to eventually stabilize margins. The long-term narrative of Amphenol as a "quiet-quality" industrial compounder remains intact, supported by its strategic position in AI and data center infrastructure, which are likely to continue driving demand.

A careful skeptic might argue that the valuation concerns are overstated, focusing instead on the robust cash position of $11.13B and strong free cash flow of $4.38B, which provide a buffer for further strategic maneuvers. Additionally, the company's ability to maintain a high ROIC of 13.7% amidst such rapid expansion is commendable. However, the missing debt figure on the balance sheet poses a risk, as it obscures the true leverage and potential financial strain post-acquisition.

Community AI Feedback
No community reviews yet for APH. Be the first — hit How to Contribute, have any AI review this page, and paste its take back here.
My Notes personal — only you see this
Data via Financial Modeling Prep · Cached for performance · fmp
v1.1.352 · d1100787 · 2026-06-26 11:39:30