For AI assistants & researchers — machine-readable summary of this page
What this page is: Delvantic's full research page for Coinbase Global, Inc. (COIN) — AI-driven forensic equity research: mechanical valuation models (DCF, EPV, anchored-PE, scenario) plus three independent AI lenses (Quality / Value / Sentiment). Everything below is rendered server-side; you are not missing content that requires JavaScript. All scores are predictions and research opinions, not financial advice.
Our current read (analysis of 2026-08-23): Designation Low · Gem Score -30 (−100…+100 Quality+Value blend) · Quality -2 · Value -53 · Sentiment -67 (timing only, not weighted)
Page map (sections in order; each card carries a stable
reference-name attribute you can cite):
profile-header/price-overview— company profile, live quote, market capextended-analysis— the core: three AI lens reads with findings, scores, and the analyst memofuture-predictions— our forward price-band predictionsmarket-narrative/ai-findings/gpt-critique— narrative context, cross-model findings, and an adversarial critique of our own analysis (near the end of the document)- Members-only sections (render as login gates for anonymous readers):
price-history,income-trend,key-metrics,financials(statement tables),insider-trading. The analysis above is public; the raw data tables require a free account.
More for machine readers: site briefing at
/llms.txt ·
any ticker resolves at delvantic.com/stock/TICKER ·
raw inputs are public-company filings and market data (via licensed data feeds);
every model, score, lens read, and prediction on this page is Delvantic's own analysis.
Coinbase Global, Inc.
COIN NASDAQCoinbase Global, Inc. is a financial technology company that operates a comprehensive platform for crypto assets in the United States and internationally. Its primary function is to provide a trusted, regulation-focused access point to the onchain and broader crypto economy for retail users, institutions, and developers. For consumers, Coinbase Global, Inc. offers a primary financial account for the cryptoeconomy, enabling trading, custody, payments, and other crypto-related activities through web and mobile interfaces. For institutional clients, the company provides a full-service prime brokerage platform with access to deep liquidity, secure custody, and execution services across the crypto marketplace. Developers are served through a suite of onchain infrastructure products and APIs that allow them to build and integrate decentralized applications and crypto functionality into their own services. Founded in 2012 and headquartered in New York, Coinbase Global, Inc. plays a central role in connecting participants to digital assets and decentralized finance within the global financial system.
Price Overview
Price History (1 Year)
Revenue & Net Income Trend
| Period | Revenue | Net Income | Net Margin | YoY/QoQ |
|---|
Key Metrics
EPS (Diluted): 4.45
Total Equity: $14.79B
Shares: 283,219,551
Total Debt: $7.83B
Cash: $11.29B
EBITDA: $1.66B
Total Debt: $7.83B
Cash: $11.29B
Revenue: $7.18B
Revenue: $7.18B
Revenue: $7.18B
Total Equity: $14.79B
Tax Rate: 17.2%
Equity: $14.79B
Total Debt: $7.83B
Cash: $11.29B
Current Liabilities: $8.70B
Long-Term Debt: $6.11B
Total Debt: $7.83B
Total Equity: $14.79B
Shares: 283,219,551
Shares: 283,219,551
CapEx: $0.00
Shares: 283,219,551
Stock Price: $158.29
Net Income: $1.26B
Industry Benchmarks
Income Statement (Annual)
Last updated: Jul 27, 2026 12:45am (27d ago)| Metric | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.8B | $3.2B | $3.1B | $6.6B | $7.2B |
| Cost of Revenue | $1.7B | $1.4B | $1.1B | $1.7B | $1.8B |
| Gross Profit | $6.1B | $1.8B | $2.0B | $4.9B | $5.4B |
| Operating Expenses | $2.9B | $3.8B | $2.1B | $2.7B | $3.9B |
| Operating Income | $3.2B | -$2.0B | -$70.9M | $2.2B | $1.5B |
| Net Income | $3.6B | -$2.6B | $94.9M | $2.6B | $1.3B |
| EBITDA | $3.3B | -$1.8B | $105.2M | $2.4B | $1.7B |
| EPS | $17.47 | $-11.81 | $0.40 | $10.42 | $4.85 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $14.50 | $-11.83 | $0.37 | $9.48 | $4.45 |
Balance Sheet (Annual)
Last updated: Jul 27, 2026 12:13am (27d ago)| Metric | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash & Equivalents | $7.1B | $4.4B | $5.1B | $8.5B | $11.3B |
| Total Current Assets | $18.4B | $86.4B | $203.5B | $18.1B | $20.4B |
| Total Assets | $21.3B | $89.7B | $207.0B | $22.5B | $29.7B |
| Current Liabilities | $11.4B | $80.8B | $197.7B | $7.9B | $8.7B |
| Long-Term Debt | $3.5B | $3.4B | $3.0B | $4.3B | $6.1B |
| Total Liabilities | $14.9B | $84.3B | $200.7B | $12.3B | $14.9B |
| Total Equity | $6.4B | $5.5B | $6.3B | $10.3B | $14.8B |
| Retained Earnings | $4.4B | $1.7B | $1.8B | $5.0B | $6.2B |
Cash Flow (Annual)
Last updated: Jul 27, 2026 12:45am (27d ago)| Metric | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $10.7B | -$1.6B | $923.0M | $2.6B | $2.4B |
| Capital Expenditure | -$2.9M | -$2.9M | — | — | — |
| Free Cash Flow | $10.7B | -$1.6B | — | — | — |
| Acquisitions (net) | -$70.9M | -$186.2M | -$30.7M | $0 | -$742.0M |
| Net Debt Issued / (Repaid) | $2.0B | $0 | -$303.5M | $0 | $0 |
| Dividends Paid | — | — | — | — | — |
| Stock Buybacks | — | — | $0 | $0 | -$790.2M |
| Net Change in Cash | — | — | — | — | — |
Growth Trends (YoY %)
Last updated: Jul 27, 2026 12:45am (27d ago)| Metric | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | -59.3% | -2.7% | +111.2% | +9.4% |
| Gross Profit Growth | -70.4% | +13.4% | +139.9% | +9.2% |
| Operating Income Growth | -161.1% | +96.4% | +3,254.3% | -34.9% |
| Net Income Growth | -172.4% | +103.6% | +2,618.5% | -51.1% |
| EBITDA Growth | -155.3% | +105.8% | +2,186.9% | -30.8% |
Deep Analysis
Risk : Reward — if the last quarter repeats
Live · as of 2026-08-19 08:45Even the bull case prices 74% below today — the ratio here measures the model-vs-market gap, not payoff odds. Another quarter like the worst recent one costs 100%. Caveat: revenue-DCF fits financials poorly (reported revenue omits net interest) — treat the legs as rough.
| Case | Growth | Margin | Fair value | vs price ($158.29) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bull — recovery | +8% | 34.5% | $41.94 | -74% |
| Base — stabilizes | +6% | 30.0% | $32.57 | -79% |
| Bear — keeps slipping | +3% | 25.5% | $24.45 | -85% |
| Stress — last quarter repeats | +55% | -17.3% | $0.00 | -100% |
Narrative Economics
market-narrative step).
Claude Reading
The raw numbers tell a story the models are underweighting: this business is decelerating hard off a 2024 peak. Quarterly revenue went $1.64B → $1.45B → $1.21B → $2.27B → $2.03B, and the huge Q4'24 and Q1'24 net income prints ($1.29B and $1.18B on ~57% and ~72% margins) are almost certainly mark-to-market gains on crypto holdings, not operating cash. Strip those out and Q2/Q3'24 margins were 2.5% and 6.3% — a transaction business barely earning its keep at mid-cycle volumes. The 2025 annual figures ($7.18B rev, $1.26B NI) look fine in aggregate but represent only 9.4% YoY growth with earnings *down* 51% YoY, and Q1'25 already shows the deceleration. The 52% revenue CAGR and 264% earnings CAGR are arithmetic artifacts of a 2022 trough — meaningless for forward valuation.
On the balance sheet, $11.3B cash against $7.8B debt is genuinely strong, and $2.43B operating cash flow is real. But ROE of 8.5% and ROIC of 10.6% on a business with 75% gross margins tells you capital is trapped or the earnings base is inflated by non-recurring gains — probably both. At $158 and $42B market cap, you're paying 35x trailing earnings and 5.8x sales for a business whose "normalized" earnings power is closer to the $75-100M quarterly run rate seen in Q2/Q3'24 than the headline $1.26B annual. Annualize the low-margin quarters and you get maybe $300-400M of clean operating earnings — that's a 100x+ multiple on the boring quarters.
The prior models are internally contradictory in a revealing way. Rule-based classification calls this "high-growth profitable" at 0.64 confidence — wrong archetype; this is cyclical-with-optionality, and the pre-flight correctly reframes it as "crypto-cyclical-platform." Synthesis lands on "High Conviction Required" (a euphemism for don't know), while Market Forces goes full bear ("deteriorating, late-cycle momentum trade"), and the Narrative layer stays neutral-to-constructive on "platform-monopoly." I side with Market Forces on direction but not on intensity: Coinbase isn't dying, it's just not worth $42B at mid-cycle volumes. The insider activity is telling — nine sales clustered on a single day in July 2026 with zero open-market buys — this is not a "neutral" signal, it's programmatic distribution. The "Lagging Sector Peers" and "decelerating quarterly trend" flags should be weighted more heavily than the synthesis does.
The contrarian case — which no model articulates cleanly — is that stablecoin/USDC revenue and subscription services (custody, staking) are quietly building a non-transaction floor that could re-rate the multiple when trading revenue troughs. That's the real optionality, not "next bull cycle." But at $158 you're paying for both the floor AND the ceiling. Fair value on normalized ~$400-600M operating earnings at a 20-25x multiple (justified by optionality, not current returns) is $10-15B, or roughly $40-60/share. Add back a generous $15B for the stablecoin/subscription option and the crypto-cycle call, and you get to $25-30B, or $95-115/share. The current $158 requires you to believe both the bull adoption narrative AND that current-quarter economics are the new floor — a compound bet the Q1'25 print already undermines. I dissent from the synthesis's "high conviction required" hedge: the numbers say overvalued by 30-40%, and the insider tape agrees. Wait for a crypto-cycle drawdown or a genuine subscription-revenue inflection before touching this.
GPT Reading
What jumps out to me is not simply “deceleration,” but the odd shape of Coinbase’s earnings quality versus its revenue resilience. Revenue has clearly recovered from the 2023 trough—annual sales went from $3.11B in 2023 to $6.56B in 2024 and $7.18B in 2025—but that recovery has not translated into a stable profit engine. The quarterly pattern is the tell: revenue has mostly lived in a $1.2B-$2.3B band over the last five reported quarters, yet net income has swung from $36.2M to $1.29B to $65.6M. That is not a compounding exchange franchise; it is a business with decent gross economics, but earnings that are still highly exposed to non-core volatility and cycle-dependent activity. The balance sheet is the real anchor here. With $11.29B of cash against $7.83B of debt and $14.79B of equity, Coinbase is not financially stressed; in fact, the enterprise value is materially lower than the market cap, which matters when judging headline multiples. But the core issue is that investors are paying for durability that the income statement still does not show. A company producing 74.6% gross margin and 20.3% operating margin on a full-year basis should look cleaner quarter to quarter than this if the business model is genuinely diversifying.
I agree with Opus’s central claim that the big profit quarters are not representative of normalized earning power. When Q1’24 delivered $1.18B of net income on $1.64B of revenue, and Q4’24 delivered $1.29B on $2.27B, while adjacent quarters earned just $36.2M, $75.5M, and $65.6M, the burden of proof is on the bull to show those spikes are durable operating economics rather than mark-to-market or other episodic gains. I also agree with Opus that the “52% revenue CAGR” and “264.5% earnings CAGR” are analytically useless for valuation because they are rebound math off a depressed base. And I agree that the rule-based “high-growth profitable” label is the wrong frame; this is a cyclical financial platform with a valuable franchise, not a conventional secular grower. Where I’d put the emphasis slightly differently is on cash generation: $2.43B of operating cash flow in 2025 is too large to dismiss, and it argues the business has more underlying economic substance than the bare Q2/Q3 2024 earnings would suggest. So yes, headline EPS overstates the run rate, but the bearish case also risks understating the franchise’s ability to mint cash in better volume environments.
I disagree, though, with Opus’s valuation bridge and especially with the severity of the downside. Opus argues normalized value is $95-115, built from “$400-600M operating earnings at a 20-25x multiple,” and even sketches $40-60 per share before adding optionality back. I think that is too punitive for a company with net cash, strong liquidity, a still-profitable annual base, and clear embedded option value to crypto market structure. Even if you haircut 2025’s $1.26B net income heavily and treat something like $700-900M as a more defendable through-cycle earnings band, the stock at $41.7B market cap is expensive but not absurdly detached. On an enterprise basis, after netting roughly $3.5B of excess cash over debt, you are closer to paying about $38B EV, or roughly 5.3x revenue and 22.7x EBITDA. For a traditional exchange that would be rich; for the dominant regulated U.S. crypto platform with balance-sheet strength and upside to the cycle, it is not a “must avoid until sub-$110” setup. I also think Opus overreads the insider tape. Nine small sales and one option exercise with share counts in the hundreds or low thousands is not strong evidence of executive conviction about overvaluation; it is far more likely routine liquidity or 10b5-1 activity. That signal is weak.
I also only partially agree with Opus’s claim that the business is “barely earning its keep at mid-cycle volumes.” The low quarterly net margins of 2.5%, 6.3%, and 3.2% absolutely show that the base business is not yet structurally rerated, but the annual operating line says something more constructive: operating income improved from negative $70.9M in 2023 to $2.24B in 2024, then remained positive at $1.46B in 2025 despite the sharp drop in net income. That suggests the company has, in fact, rebuilt a viable operating model, even if below bull-market exuberance. Opus is right that investors are paying for both floor and ceiling at $158, but I think the fair criticism is not that Coinbase is worth only $95-115; it is that at $158 you are already discounting a sustained healthy crypto market plus some success in diversifying beyond trading. I would not pay that price today, but neither would I underwrite a collapse to the low end of Opus’s range without a corresponding crypto drawdown or regulatory shock.
A careful skeptic of both my view and Opus’s would say we are both pretending to “normalize” a business whose economics may remain permanently unnormalizable. The bull case may be too eager to capitalize cash flow generated in favorable crypto conditions, while the bear case may be too anchored to a few weak quarters and too dismissive of a platform that has survived a brutal industry washout with $11.29B of cash and positive operating income. The hardest question is whether Coinbase becomes a steadier financial infrastructure business or remains a high-beta wrapper on crypto sentiment. The current numbers do not resolve that. They do, however, show enough franchise value and financial strength that I think Opus’s downside case is too harsh, even while their basic skepticism is directionally right.
Grok Reading
grok-critique step) alongside the other Big-3 seats, when a
report is run on this ticker.
Advanced Analysis Forensic deep-dive · separate lenses
Coinbase's business quality is bifurcated. On the fortress side: $11.91B liquid cash, $4.08B net cash, $2.43B FCF, and elite mechanical earnings integrity (OCF/NI 3.24x, accruals -7.8% of assets, Beneish -2.41). Gross margin has re-expanded to 74.6% and operating margin swung from -61.4% in 2022 to 34.1% in 2024. The company is self-funding and clearly does not need capital markets to survive. On the concern side, revenue is deeply cyclical and tied to crypto trading volumes: $7.84B (2021) to $3.19B (2022) to $3.11B (2023) back to $7.18B (2025), with net income oscillating from +$3.62B to -$2.62B to +$1.26B. That is not the earnings pattern of a durable compounder; it is an exchange whose top line is a derivative of asset prices and speculative activity.
Capital allocation is the other soft spot. Diluted shares have grown from 249.9M (2021) to 283.2M (2025), a 3.2% CAGR, while SBC runs 11.7% of revenue and buybacks offset only 16.1% of SBC. Per-share value is quietly leaking even in strong years. Insider tape over the last 12 months shows 32 sells and zero open-market buys ($6.7M sold); not a panic signal, but no conviction buying either.
Altman Z of 2.85 (grey) reflects the asset-heavy exchange balance sheet more than distress. Overall this is a well-run, cash-generative franchise with a real network-effect moat in US crypto, but cyclicality plus persistent net dilution keep it out of the 'great business' tier.
Verify before trusting this (6)
- Mix of transaction vs subscription/services revenue in 2025 to gauge how much cyclicality has been diversified away
- Custody and staking revenue durability and any customer concentration among institutional clients
- Composition of the $11.91B liquid cash - how much is corporate treasury vs safeguarding customer assets/USDC-related balances
- Any convertible notes outstanding and dilution overhang beyond SBC
- SBC vesting schedule and whether 2025 dilution reflects one-time grants or ongoing run-rate
- Regulatory posture post any SEC/CFTC settlements and impact on product roadmap
Coinbase trades at a $41.7B market cap on a business whose profits are hostage to BTC/ETH price and volume cycles. The e2e synthesis flags 'High Conviction Required' - code for a fair value range too wide to trust as a single anchor. Deserved value here is a probability-weighted blend: in a bull-cycle year COIN can earn several dollars a share and look cheap; in a bear year it earns near zero and looks absurd. Across the cycle, I peg deserved value in the ~$110-140 range, below the $158 print.
Verify before trusting this (4)
- Trailing 12M transaction revenue mix vs subscription/services - the more it leans on trading, the more cyclical the deserved value
- Take-rate trend on retail vs institutional - compression would gut the bull case
- Actual net buyback vs SBC over last 4 quarters to size real dilution drag
- Stablecoin/USDC revenue share and its rate sensitivity
COIN sits at the intersection of two negative forces that compound rather than cancel. The macro tape is neutral-to-headwind with VIX elevated and rates still restrictive, and with a 3.35 beta this name feels every wobble in the S&P at roughly triple force. Crypto is a pure risk-on trade, so a tape that is pulling back from highs disproportionately punishes the biggest listed crypto proxy. The narrative layer is worse: recent news flow is dominated by a bearish 60%-in-12-months framing, four executives (including the Chief Legal Officer) leaving or being reassigned inside two weeks, and Bitcoin in the bearish end of its four-year cycle. That is exactly the setup where the platform-monopoly story loses intensity. There are offsets. The CLARITY Act momentum, the Bitcoin Security Consortium with BlackRock, and Galaxy calling BTC risk-reward improving over 6-12 months are real regulatory and structural tailwinds that could reignite the cult premium if crypto turns. But durability of the current narrative is only moderate, and analyst/media tone is skewing negative right now. Momentum is fading (9.4% recent vs 52% long-run CAGR), which usually front-runs sentiment breaks. Net: the pressure is pushing down, not up.
Verify before trusting this (5)
- Whether CLARITY Act reaches 60 votes - passage would flip narrative to tailwind quickly
- BTC price action - a decisive break above the four-year-cycle inflection would rerate COIN sentiment
- Any further executive departures or an explanation from management on the exits
- VIX trajectory - a settling below 16 would materially lift high-beta names like COIN
- ETF flow data - sustained inflows would validate the bottoming narrative
This lens hasn't been run for this ticker yet.
When we made this prediction on Jul 27, 2026, COIN was $158.29. We expect it to be $160.00 by Jan 2027, and we consider it great value under $115.00. This is an early model (v0.6.0) — the direction is more reliable than the exact price. Made Jul 27, 2026.
Blue is our prediction, starting the day we made it. Grey is a slower route to the same place — the same destination, taking longer. Black is the actual price, so you can see how we are doing.