Skip to main content
Homepage
Full 18-step deep-dive · ~20–30 min · a member feature.
AGING Analysis Report
Aug 5, 2026
18 days ago · 100% complete
NOT DEPENDABLE This report predates a filing — its financial basis has been replaced.
Report generated: Aug 5, 2026 · Filing on record since: Aug 20, 2026 · 15 days after
For AI assistants & researchers — machine-readable summary of this page

What this page is: Delvantic's full research page for The Walt Disney Company (DIS) — AI-driven forensic equity research: mechanical valuation models (DCF, EPV, anchored-PE, scenario) plus three independent AI lenses (Quality / Value / Sentiment). Everything below is rendered server-side; you are not missing content that requires JavaScript. All scores are predictions and research opinions, not financial advice.

Our current read (analysis of 2026-08-23): Designation Low · Gem Score -20 (−100…+100 Quality+Value blend) · Quality 45 · Value -73 · Sentiment 22 (timing only, not weighted) · Composite fair value $52.32 vs $98.18 at analysis

Page map (sections in order; each card carries a stable reference-name attribute you can cite):

  • profile-header / price-overview — company profile, live quote, market cap
  • extended-analysisthe core: three AI lens reads with findings, scores, and the analyst memo
  • future-predictions — our forward price-band predictions
  • market-narrative / ai-findings / gpt-critique — narrative context, cross-model findings, and an adversarial critique of our own analysis (near the end of the document)
  • Members-only sections (render as login gates for anonymous readers): price-history, income-trend, key-metrics, financials (statement tables), insider-trading. The analysis above is public; the raw data tables require a free account.

More for machine readers: site briefing at /llms.txt · any ticker resolves at delvantic.com/stock/TICKER · raw inputs are public-company filings and market data (via licensed data feeds); every model, score, lens read, and prediction on this page is Delvantic's own analysis.

The Walt Disney Company

DIS NYSE
Communication Services · Entertainment
Burbank, CA 91521, United States thewaltdisneycompany.com Updated Aug 4, 8:58am
Price
$98.14
Market Cap
$170.4B
Employees
175,560
Beta
1.40
Avg Volume
11,436,937
Last Dividend
$0.75
CEO
Mr. Josh D'Amaro

The Walt Disney Company is a global entertainment and media conglomerate operating across three primary business segments: Entertainment, Sports, and Experiences. In Entertainment, the company produces and distributes film and television content through networks including ABC, Disney, Freeform, FX, and National Geographic, while also operating streaming services Disney+ and Hulu. The Sports segment encompasses the ESPN family of television networks and digital platforms. The Experiences segment includes Disney's theme parks, cruise lines, vacation destinations, and merchandise licensing operations. The company leverages its portfolio of iconic franchises and characters—including Disney, Pixar, Marvel, Lucasfilm, and National Geographic properties—across all three segments. Disney's content strategy increasingly emphasizes direct-to-consumer distribution alongside traditional broadcasting partnerships. Founded in 1923 and headquartered in Burbank, California, The Walt Disney Company serves diverse audiences across the Americas, Europe, and the Asia Pacific region, maintaining a significant presence in global entertainment and media markets.

Runs with full report Generated: Aug 5, 2026 12:18am
Price Overview
Price at report time
$98.18
as of Aug 5, 12:38am (18d ago)
Change · Aug 5
+0.04 (+0.04%)
Day Range
$97.38 – $98.57
52-Week Range
$92.19 – $119.78
50-Day MA
$98.92
200-Day MA
$104.56
Volume
16,294,560.00
Right now · live
Log in to get the live feed
Members see the real-time price and the move since this report (over 18d).
Share Structure
Outstanding 1,738,519,851.00
Float 1,733,698,275.00
Free Float 99.7%
High free float — 99.7% of shares trade freely, ~0.3% held by insiders/institutions
Very liquid — most shares trade freely. Low insider ownership can mean less management alignment, but makes large position sizing straightforward.
Price History (1 Year)
Last updated: Aug 5, 2026 12:38am (18d ago)
Revenue & Net Income Trend
The directional story — useful even when net income is negative.
Last updated: Jul 30, 2026 9:13am (24d ago)
Revenue
The top line — total sales before any costs or taxes are subtracted. A measure of how much business the company is doing.
Net Income
The bottom line — profit left after subtracting all expenses, interest, and taxes from revenue. Reflects accounting profitability, but includes non-cash items like depreciation, so it isn't the same as cash earned.
Operating Cash Flow
The real cash generated by the day-to-day business — selling products, paying suppliers, collecting from customers. Calculated from net income by adding back non-cash items and adjusting for timing (unpaid bills, unsold inventory). When OCF consistently lags net income, the reported profit may not be converting to real money.
Period Revenue Net Income Net Margin YoY/QoQ
Key Metrics
TD Twelve Data statement HEX SEC filing
Industry comparison last run: Aug 5, 2026 12:17am
P/E Ratio (Price per dollar of earnings)
HEX
Stock Price / EPS (Diluted)
14.33
Stock Price: $98.14
EPS (Diluted): 6.85
P/B Ratio (Price vs net asset value)
HEX
Stock Price / Book Value Per Share
1.55
Stock Price: $98.14
Total Equity: $114.61B
Shares: 1,811,000,000
EV/EBITDA (Total value vs operating profit)
HEX
Enterprise Value / EBITDA
9.16
Market Cap: $170.42B
Total Debt: $42.03B
Cash: $5.70B
EBITDA: $22.88B
Enterprise Value (Takeover price (cap + debt - cash))
HEX
Market Cap + Total Debt - Cash
$209.6B
Market Cap: $170.42B
Total Debt: $42.03B
Cash: $5.70B
Gross Margin (Revenue left after direct costs)
HEX
Gross Profit / Revenue
Gross Profit: N/A
Revenue: $94.43B
Missing from API: Gross Profit
Operating Margin (Revenue left after all operations)
HEX
Operating Income / Revenue
18.6%
Operating Income: $17.55B
Revenue: $94.43B
Net Margin (Revenue left as actual profit)
HEX
Net Income / Revenue
13.1%
Net Income: $12.40B
Revenue: $94.43B
ROE (Profit from shareholder equity)
HEX
Net Income / Total Equity
10.8%
Net Income: $12.40B
Total Equity: $114.61B
ROIC (Profit from all invested capital)
HEX
NOPAT / Invested Capital
13.0%
Operating Income: $17.55B
Tax Rate: -11.9%
Equity: $114.61B
Total Debt: $42.03B
Cash: $5.70B
Current Ratio (Can it pay short-term bills)
HEX
Current Assets / Current Liabilities
0.71
Current Assets: $24.27B
Current Liabilities: $34.16B
Debt/Equity (Leverage — debt vs equity)
HEX
Total Debt / Total Equity
0.37
Short-Term Debt: $6.71B
Long-Term Debt: $35.32B
Total Debt: $42.03B
Total Equity: $114.61B
Rev/Share (Top-line per share)
HEX
Revenue / Shares Outstanding
$52.14
Revenue: $94.43B
Shares: 1,811,000,000
Book Value/Share (Net assets per share)
HEX
(Total Assets - Total Liabilities) / Shares
$63.29
Total Equity: $114.61B
Shares: 1,811,000,000
FCF/Share (Real cash generated per share)
HEX
(Operating Cash Flow + CapEx) / Shares
$5.56
Operating CF: $18.10B
CapEx: -$8.02B
Shares: 1,811,000,000
CapEx is negative (outflow) — added to OCF to get FCF
Div Yield (Annual income from holding)
TD
Last Annual Dividend / Stock Price
0.8%
Last Dividend: $0.75
Stock Price: $98.14
Payout Ratio (Earnings paid out as dividends)
HEX
Dividends Paid / Net Income
14.5%
Dividends Paid: -$1.80B
Net Income: $12.40B
Industry Benchmarks
Last run: Aug 5, 2026 12:16am
Compares DIS against LLM-researched typical ranges for its industry. One research call per industry, cached indefinitely — every stock in the same industry reuses the same baseline.
Income Statement (Annual)
Last updated: Jul 30, 2026 9:13am (24d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Revenue $67.4B $82.7B $88.9B $91.4B $94.4B
Cost of Revenue
Gross Profit
Operating Expenses $63.8B $76.0B $79.9B $79.4B $80.6B
Operating Income $7.8B $12.1B $12.9B $15.6B $17.6B
Net Income $2.0B $3.1B $2.4B $5.0B $12.4B
EBITDA $12.9B $17.3B $18.2B $20.6B $22.9B
EPS $1.10 $1.73 $1.29 $2.72 $6.88
EPS (Diluted) $1.09 $1.72 $1.29 $2.72 $6.85
Balance Sheet (Annual)
Last updated: Jul 30, 2026 9:13am (24d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Cash & Equivalents $16.0B $11.6B $14.2B $6.0B $5.7B
Total Current Assets $33.7B $29.1B $32.8B $25.2B $24.3B
Total Assets $203.6B $203.6B $205.6B $196.2B $197.5B
Current Liabilities $31.1B $29.1B $31.1B $34.6B $34.2B
Long-Term Debt $48.5B $45.3B $42.1B $39.0B $35.3B
Total Liabilities $101.4B $95.3B $92.6B $90.7B $82.9B
Total Equity $102.2B $108.4B $113.0B $105.5B $114.6B
Retained Earnings $40.4B $43.6B $46.1B $49.7B $60.4B
Cash Flow (Annual)
Last updated: Jul 30, 2026 9:13am (24d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Operating Cash Flow $9.9B $14.0B $18.1B
Capital Expenditure -$3.6B -$4.9B -$5.0B -$5.4B -$8.0B
Free Cash Flow $4.9B $8.6B $10.1B
Acquisitions (net)
Net Debt Issued / (Repaid) -$3.7B -$3.7B -$1.6B -$2.9B -$2.7B
Dividends Paid $0 $0 $0 -$1.4B -$1.8B
Stock Buybacks $0 $0 -$3.0B -$3.5B
Net Change in Cash -$2.0B -$4.3B $2.6B -$8.1B -$303.0M
Growth Trends (YoY %)
Last updated: Jul 30, 2026 9:13am (24d ago)
Metric 2022 2023 2024 2025
Revenue Growth +22.7% +7.5% +2.8% +3.4%
Gross Profit Growth
Operating Income Growth +56.1% +6.1% +21.3% +12.5%
Net Income Growth +57.6% -25.2% +111.2% +149.5%
EBITDA Growth +34.2% +5.5% +12.9% +11.1%
Dividend History (Last 20)
Last updated: Jul 31, 2026 1:59pm (23d ago)
Date Dividend Declaration Record Payment
2026-06-30 $0.75
2025-12-15 $0.75
2025-06-24 $0.50
2024-12-16 $0.50
2024-07-08 $0.45
2023-12-08 $0.30
2019-12-13 $0.88
2019-07-05 $0.88
2018-12-07 $0.88
2018-07-06 $0.84
2017-12-08 $0.84
2017-07-06 $0.78
2016-12-08 $0.78
2016-07-07 $0.71
2015-12-10 $0.71
2015-07-01 $0.66
2014-12-11 $1.15
2013-12-12 $0.86
2012-12-06 $0.75
2011-12-14 $0.60
0Company Classification 1Industry Landscape 2Company Momentum 3Forward Projection 4aDCF Valuation 4bEarnings Power Value 4cAnchored PE 4dReverse DCF 4eRevenue-Based DCF 4fAnchored P/S 4gScenario Analysis 4hDividend Discount Model 4iBook Value Analysis 4jInsider Activity 4fCash Flow Quality 4gDebt Maturity Risk 4hMacro Environment 4iSector Intelligence 4jRevenue Confidence 4kSensitivity Analysis 4lSector Demand Cycle 5AI Investigation 5bThesis Evaluation 6Valuation Synthesis
computed not applicable 18 computed · 6 not applicable
Risk : Reward — if the last quarter repeats
Live · as of 2026-08-20 09:09
-0.3 : 1 recovery upside vs repeat-quarter downside
Even the bull case prices 22% below today — the ratio here measures the model-vs-market gap, not payoff odds. Another quarter like the worst recent one costs 68%.
CaseGrowthMarginFair valuevs price ($98.18)
Bull — recovery +7% 17.4% $76.14 -22%
Base — stabilizes +5% 15.1% $61.98 -37%
Bear — keeps slipping +2% 12.9% $49.51 -50%
Stress — last quarter repeats -0% 8.3% $31.02 -68%
The next quarters keep the trajectory of the worst recent matched quarter (ending 2025-09-27) — growth stays at -0.5% and margins bend by the same profit-vs-revenue ratio (×0.96). Stress is a trajectory, not a prediction — it answers "what if the ship's current heading simply continues," which history says is the case to respect.
Why this is appearing: this company files quarterly, so its recent trajectory could be measured rather than assumed — the engine matched Jun 2026, Mar 2026, Dec 2025 against the same quarters one year earlier and found revenue +6.2% · operating income +4.9% · net income -34.3% year-over-year. That measured heading is what the stress case extends forward. Of those, the stress case extends the worst matched quarter — the one ending Sep 27, 2025 (revenue -0.5%, operating income -4.8% YoY) — not the average. Data measured through Jun 27, 2026 — this card recalculates automatically when the next quarterly filing is ingested. Companies without quarterly filings (many foreign listings) never show this card: with no measured trajectory, there is nothing honest to repeat.
Narrative Economics
The story the market is telling about this stock — the intangible X-factor (founder mythology, cult dynamics, TAM-of-imagination) that moves price beyond what cash flows alone explain. After Shiller, Narrative Economics.
No narrative profile yet for DIS — it's generated by the pipeline (market-narrative step).
Claude Reading
Independent analyst synthesis · claude-opus-4-7 · generated 2026-08-05 00:37:10
Verdict Fairly valued near $98 — synthesis's $46 DCF is punitive; honest fair value $85-95 on normalized ~$5.50 EPS and 5.9% FCF yield, so hold/neutral, not the 53% overvalued call.

Independent read first: Disney's TTM revenue is roughly $97.3B (25.17+25.98+22.46+23.65) with TTM net income near $11.2B — that's ~11.5% net margin, running slightly below the FY25 print of 13.1% but well above FY24's 5.4%. The quarterly trajectory is genuinely accelerating on the top line (Q1'26 $25.98B and Q2'26 $25.17B both above the prior four quarters) but earnings quality is noisy: the June'25 quarter carried a $5.26B NI print at 22.2% margin that looks like a one-off (likely Hulu/DTC accounting or tax benefit), and stripping it out normalizes TTM NI closer to $9-10B, or ~$5.50 EPS on 1.74B shares — a real P/E closer to 17-18x, not 14.3x. FCF of $10.08B against a $170B market cap is a 5.9% FCF yield, which is genuinely attractive if durable. Balance sheet is fine: $42B debt on $114B equity, 0.37 D/E, EBITDA coverage comfortable.

Where I disagree with the synthesis: a $46-51 fair value implies Disney is worth ~0.5x sales and ~5x FCF, which is distressed-media pricing (think Paramount, not a company with $10B FCF, IP monopoly, and record parks margins). The DCF is almost certainly assuming terminal margin compression back to mid-single digits and/or aggressive linear-decline modeling — defensible as a bear case, but not as a base case for a company that just did $17.6B operating income and grew it 12.5% YoY. The synthesis engine and the narrative layer are essentially double-counting the bear case: DCF assumes low terminal margins, then the narrative layer says the 112% premium is unjustified faith — but the premium only exists because the DCF is punitive. I'd put honest fair value at 15-16x normalized $5.50 EPS = $82-88, or 12x EV/EBITDA on ~$16B EBITDA = ~$95-105 equity value. That makes $98 roughly fairly valued, not 53% overvalued.

Where the bears have a real point: revenue CAGR is only 3.1% over five years, and the recent 3.4% YoY is not a growth-stock trajectory — this is a GDP-plus business dressed up as a transformation story. Parks margins are cyclical and 2024-2025 experiences comps will get harder; ESPN's streaming transition is a genuine 2026-27 event risk with unknowable unit economics; the 129.6% earnings CAGR is entirely a recovery-from-trough artifact (FY21 was $2B NI post-COVID). The insider activity is pure option-exercise/tax-withholding mechanics — zero signal, and the "No Insider Transactions" tag is wrong on its face but directionally right (no open-market buying is the tell). Current ratio of 0.71 is worth noting but normal for media conglomerates with deferred revenue.

The contrarian argument even if all signals aligned bearish: Disney's IP library (Marvel, Star Wars, Pixar, ESPN rights, Disney vault) is genuinely irreplaceable and the market has repeatedly re-rated this company to 20-25x when narrative flips — you're being paid a 5.9% FCF yield to wait for either an ESPN DTC surprise, a parks re-acceleration, or an activist/breakup catalyst (Trian round two is not impossible). At $98, downside to a real $80 fair-value floor is ~18%; upside to a re-rating scenario at 18x $6 normalized EPS is $108, plus optionality on ESPN monetization. Asymmetry is roughly balanced, not the 53% downside the synthesis implies. My dissent from the synthesis is specifically about the DCF inputs, not the qualitative concerns — the qualitative concerns are real but already reflected at 14x reported / 17-18x normalized earnings, which is a discount to the S&P and to media peers, not a premium. Fair value $85-95, current $98, so mildly rich but not the screaming short the composite suggests. Starter position only makes sense below $85; trim above $110.

GPT Reading
Independent reading · gpt-5.4 · generated 2026-08-05 00:37:35
Verdict Undervalued at $98 — not a bargain-bin steal, but fair value looks closer to $115 than $50 if Disney can hold $10B+ free cash flow and mid-teens operating margins.

At $98, Disney does not look like a stock that needs heroic assumptions. The raw numbers show a company that has already repaired far more of the income statement than the bear framing admits. Annual revenue went from $67.4B in 2021 to $94.4B in 2025, a 40% step-up, but the more important shift is profitability: operating income climbed from $7.8B to $17.6B and net income from $2.0B to $12.4B. Even allowing for one-offs in the quarterly path, this is not a business limping into relevance; it is a business reestablishing earnings power. The latest annual operating margin is 18.6% and net margin 13.1%, versus just 8.9% operating leverage back in 2021 on a much smaller base. Cash generation backs it up: $18.1B of operating cash flow and $10.1B of free cash flow after a hefty $8.0B of capex. On today’s $170.4B market cap, that is roughly a 5.9% FCF yield, and on enterprise value it is still respectable for a global branded asset with parks, sports, studios, and direct-to-consumer optionality.

What stands out most is that the quarterly earnings cadence is messy, but the floor is much higher than a few years ago. Revenue over the last eight quarters has largely held in a $22.5B-$26.0B range, so this is not a top-line rocket ship. But net income has normalized materially upward: excluding the standout $5.26B quarter, Disney still posted $2.25B, $2.40B, $3.28B, $2.55B, and $2.62B in five of the last eight quarters. That suggests a company finding margin through mix, pricing, and cost discipline despite only modest revenue growth. The 2024-09 quarter’s 2.0% net margin and the 2025-09 quarter’s 5.8% net margin are reminders that this remains a lumpy media conglomerate, but the annual trend says those weak quarters are the exception, not the norm. At 14.3x earnings and 9.2x EV/EBITDA, the stock is being valued more like a no-growth cyclically exposed incumbent than a company earning 13.0% ROIC with some self-help still available. I do not buy the extreme DCF-style conclusion that fair value is in the mid-$40s; that would imply the market should value Disney at about 4.6x free cash flow for a company with durable franchises and double-digit billions of annual operating cash flow, which is plainly too punitive.

The balance sheet is also better than the scarier versions of the narrative imply. Debt of $42.0B against $5.7B of cash is meaningful, but not oppressive for a company generating $18.1B in operating cash flow and carrying only 0.37x debt-to-equity. The current ratio of 0.71 is not pretty, yet for a company with recurring inflows and broad capital market access it is not the core issue. More important is whether Disney can keep converting its asset base into cash while funding parks and content. So far, yes: ROE is 10.8%, ROA 6.3%, and free cash flow covers the dividend many times over given a 14.5% payout ratio. This is why the “mature earner” label is directionally more useful than the dramatic transformation story. The market may still obsess over streaming inflection and ESPN transition, but the numbers increasingly read like a restored compounder with cyclical blemishes, not a broken turnaround.

The best case against my view is that the stock may already reflect most of the recovery while the underlying growth engine remains mediocre. Revenue CAGR of 3.1% is not exciting, and the extraordinary earnings CAGR is largely a rebound from depressed post-pandemic profitability rather than evidence of a structurally faster business. If margins stall around current levels, then 14x earnings is not obviously cheap for a company facing secular linear-TV erosion, content cost inflation, and parks exposure to consumer softness. The quarter-to-quarter volatility matters because Disney is still proving the quality of its earnings mix: one quarter at 22.2% net margin followed by one at 5.8% tells you there are still accounting, timing, and segment swings that can flatter annual snapshots. A bear would also point out that FCF of $10.1B against a $170B equity value is only “fine,” not a screaming bargain, especially if capex remains elevated and if a chunk of current cash flow resilience comes from price increases that may become harder to repeat. That is the serious objection, and it keeps me from calling this deeply mispriced.

What would change my mind is pretty specific. If annual revenue stalls below roughly $95B while operating income slips back toward $15B and free cash flow falls under $8B, then the current multiple would look full and I would move toward fair-value-at-best. Likewise, if upcoming quarters revert to the 2024-09 type margin profile without a clear one-off explanation, the “restored earnings power” thesis weakens fast. On the other hand, if Disney can show another year of even low-single-digit revenue growth with operating income above $18B and FCF sustainably above $10B while keeping leverage contained, then a stock under $100 is too cheap; that would support a valuation comfortably into the $110-$125 range without requiring any speculative streaming euphoria.

Grok Reading
Independent reading · grok-4.5 · generated 2026-08-05 00:38:11
Verdict Fairly valued to modestly undervalued at $98 — 14x earnings and 9x EV/EBITDA already discount linear decline and streaming risks; $46 DCF is unrealistically punitive

The raw numbers show a company that has already executed the bulk of its earnings recovery, not one still waiting on a miracle. Annual net income climbed from $2.35B in FY2023 to $4.97B in FY2024 to $12.40B in FY2025, while operating income marched from $12.86B to $15.60B to $17.55B—an unbroken expansion that is far cleaner than the lumpy quarterly NI prints (the $5.26B June 2025 quarter was clearly inflated by one-timers; the more recent $2.25–2.40B quarters at 9% margins are the real run-rate). Free cash flow of $10.08B against an $8.02B capex load is high-quality, and the 18.6% operating margin plus 13.1% net margin put Disney back in the zone of a mature earner rather than a turnaround story. Revenue growth remains anemic at a 3.1% CAGR and only 3.4% recent YoY, so the entire re-rating case rests on margin durability and capital returns, not top-line acceleration. At $98 the stock trades at 14.3x trailing earnings, 9.2x EV/EBITDA, 1.9x sales and a roughly 5.9% FCF yield—multiples that sit well below Disney’s own 18–25x historical band and below pure-play streaming peers, even after the Fox acquisition hangover and linear-network erosion.

The valuation synthesis claiming a $46–51 fair value (implying the shares are 50%+ overvalued) is the clearest contradiction in the briefing. That DCF would capitalize the current $10B FCF at roughly 8x and the $12.4B NI at roughly 6–7x—levels that only make sense if one assumes a near-total collapse in parks pricing power and a reversion of streaming to heavy losses. Nothing in the recent operating trajectory supports that; ROIC is already 13% and ROE 10.8% on a still-conservative balance sheet (debt-to-equity 0.37, net debt ~$36B). The market is not pricing a “dramatic reinflation” so much as simply refusing to apply a distressed multiple to a business that has already delivered mid-teens margins and double-digit billion FCF. Insider activity is pure option exercises and tax withholdings—noise, not signal—while the current ratio of 0.71 is the only genuine balance-sheet soft spot, though it is typical for an experiences-heavy model with predictable cash conversion.

The strongest opposing case is straightforward: revenue is barely growing, linear TV and ESPN cord-cutting are structural headwinds, streaming subscriber growth is plateauing globally, and parks margins have historically proved cyclical. A smart bear would note that the $12.4B NI and 13% net margin may already embed peak experiences pricing and favorable content amortization timing; any simultaneous softening in park attendance and renewed streaming content inflation could drop the earnings power back toward $7–8B, at which point 14x becomes 20x+ overnight. The narrative premium identified in the briefing—Disney’s cultural-moat story keeping the stock 100% above a harsh DCF—is real, and narratives reverse faster than cash flows. I weigh this less heavily because the operating-income ladder over three years is not a one-quarter fluke, FCF conversion is already strong, and even a partial mean-reversion in margins still leaves the shares at a mid-teens earnings multiple that is defensible for irreplaceable IP and a global parks oligopoly.

What would flip the view is two consecutive quarters of net income falling back below a $2B run-rate (implying sub-8% margins) accompanied by parks operating-margin compression of 200 bp or more, or free cash flow dropping under $7B on a trailing twelve-month basis. Either would validate the $46 DCF and force a re-rating lower.

Big-3 Panel — where each AI stands
Each AI above independently stated a direction (undervalued, fairly valued, or overvalued) and how strongly it believes it (conviction, 0–5). We combine those into a Bull-Bear Index on a 0–10 scale: 5 is neutral, 10 is maximum bullish (undervalued at full conviction), 0 is maximum bearish. We compute the score ourselves with the same arithmetic for every seat — the models never grade their own bullishness — so the three are directly comparable. Δ shows how far each seat sits from the panel average of 7.0; a large Δ marks the dissenting voice, usually the one worth reading.
Claude claude-opus-4-7 5.0
fairly valued · conviction 3/5 · Δ -2.0 vs panel · self: 5.0
GPT gpt-5.4 8.0
undervalued · conviction 3/5 · Δ +1.0 vs panel · self: 7.0
Grok grok-4.5 8.0
undervalued · conviction 3/5 · Δ +1.0 vs panel · self: 6.0
Advanced Analysis Forensic deep-dive · separate lenses
Separate reads — Company Quality (is it a great business?), Valuation (is it mispriced?), and General Sentiment (how macro + narrative are pushing it), kept deliberately apart · 2026-08-05 01:27:29
Delvantic - Cairn AI
Quality - wait for a dip 6/10
Solid recovering business (+45) but the tape's fair-value math ($51-58) says $98 is doing a lot of storytelling - I wait, I don't chase.
The cruxWhether streaming/ESPN DTC profitability and parks pricing are already fully in the price at $98, or still have another leg - that gap between EPV floor ~$58 and my willingness to pay decides everything.
Forensic checks Derived mechanically from DIS's filed financials — not from the AI lenses
Liquidity & RunwaySelf-Funding
DilutionStable Share Count
Earnings QualityHigh Earnings Quality
The four lensesswitch a tab for its full read — score + evidence
Company Quality
+45
Solid
edge √Σ 114 · risk √Σ 65 · conf 7/10

Revenue has climbed from $67.4B (2021) to $94.4B (2025), with operating margin expanding every year from 11.5% to 18.6% and net income jumping from $2.0B to $12.4B. Free cash flow has flipped from -$3.6B in 2021/-$4.9B in 2022 to +$4.9B, +$8.6B, and +$10.1B - a genuine operating recovery, not an accounting artifact: OCF/NI is 2.82x and accruals are -3.7% of assets, both consistent with high earnings quality. Diluted share count actually shrank slightly (1.83B to 1.81B) with buybacks running 119% of SBC and SBC only 1.4% of revenue - per-share value is being protected. The soft spot is the balance sheet. Net debt is roughly $36B, liquid cash is only $5.7B (3.3% of market cap), and short-term debt of $6.7B exceeds cash, so Disney is dependent on rolling paper. Altman Z of 2.37 sits in the grey zone - not distressed, but not a fortress. Insider tape shows only routine option exercises, tax withholdings, and awards - no directional open-market buys or sells to read. Taken together this is a large, cash-generative, improving mature earner with clean accounting and disciplined share count, but carrying meaningful leverage and operating in a structurally challenged linear/streaming transition that the raw financials cannot fully speak to.

Strengths 4
m70
Sustained margin and profit recovery
Operating margin expanded from 11.5% (2021) to 18.6% (2025); net income 6x from $2.0B to $12.4B on 40% revenue growth - genuine operating leverage.
m65
FCF inflection is real
FCF moved from -$3.6B/-$4.9B in 2021-22 to +$10.1B in 2025, backed by OCF/NI of 2.82x and accruals of -3.7% of assets - cash quality is high.
m55
Share count discipline
Diluted shares declined 0.2% CAGR, SBC only 1.4% of revenue, buybacks 119% of SBC - per-share value not being diluted away.
m30
Clean earnings-quality checks
No mechanical red flags: negative accruals, high OCF/NI conversion, no signs of earnings inflation.
Concerns 2
m55
Net debt and thin liquidity
Net debt of $36.3B with only $5.7B liquid cash (3.3% of market cap); short-term debt of $6.7B exceeds cash, creating rollover dependence.
m35
Altman Z in grey zone
Z-score of 2.37 signals the balance sheet is neither safe nor distressed - a mid-tier credit profile for a company of this scale.
This is a genuinely recovering mature earner - the margin expansion and FCF swing over five years are not fake, and the accounting checks are clean. What holds me back from calling it strong is the balance sheet: $36B net debt with $5.7B cash and short-term debt exceeding liquidity is not a cushion, and the Altman grey zone confirms it. Add the structural transition risk that the raw numbers cannot fully expose (linear decline, streaming economics, content-spend intensity) and I land at solid-but-improving, not fortress. The insider tape is uninformative - only routine equity comp mechanics, no directional signal either way.
Verify before trusting this (5)
  • Debt maturity schedule and weighted-average cost - is the $6.7B short-term slice already termed out or a real 2026 refi risk?
  • Segment mix: how much of the margin expansion is DTC (streaming) turning profitable vs Parks - durability differs sharply
  • Linear networks trajectory and any impairment or restructuring charges baked into 2025 net income
  • Content spend and capex commitments (parks/cruise ships) that could pressure the FCF ramp
  • Whether the $12.4B net income includes one-time gains (Hulu remeasurement, tax items) versus underlying run-rate
Valuation / Mispricing
-73
Rich
edge √Σ 25 · risk √Σ 118 · conf 6/10
price $98 vs deserved ~$55-65 (composite $51, EPV $58); price is roughly 50-80% above fair - no margin of safety, ~40% downside to composite. attractive below $70.00

The e2e composite fair value pegs DIS at $51 (signal-adjusted $46), with DCF at $48 and an EPV floor at $58 - all methods cluster in the mid-$40s to high-$50s versus a $98 price. Even granting the quality lens's 'Solid' grade a generous premium to the EPV floor, deserved value likely sits in the $60-$70 range, still a material step below spot. The market is capitalizing a full streaming-profitability ramp, sustained parks pricing, and ESPN's DTC transition as if all three are already de-risked.

Cheap signals 1
m25
High earnings quality supports deserved value
Clean accounting and a real FCF swing justify a premium over the raw EPV floor - but not one that closes a 70-90% gap.
Rich / priced-in 4
m72
Price ~90% above composite FV
Composite FV $51.27 and signal-adjusted $46.34 imply -53% from $98.18. Even discounting the models for conservatism, the gap is too wide to explain away.
m60
Trades above the EPV floor
EPV of $57.59 is the earnings-power floor - the price is ~70% above it, meaning the market is paying a large premium for growth/optionality that isn't yet in the numbers.
m55
Priced for streaming and ESPN to work
The bull case (streaming profitability inflection, ESPN DTC, parks pricing power) appears fully embedded at $98; execution risk is asymmetric to the downside.
m45
Balance sheet limits multiple
$36B net debt, short-term debt exceeding liquidity, Altman grey zone - this argues for a discount, not a premium, to a pure earnings multiple.
I can't get to $98 on any honest math. Composite says $51, EPV floor $58, DCF $48 - even a generous quality-adjusted deserved value lands in the low-to-mid $60s. The business is genuinely healing, but the price already reflects a clean streaming win, an ESPN pivot that works, and parks staying at peak - all while carrying real leverage. This is a Rich, not Overvalued, because the moat is real and the FCF turn is real, but I need it in the $60s (call it $70 with room to spare) before valuation gives me any edge. Today it's a business I'd own at a different price.
Verify before trusting this (5)
  • DTC segment operating margin trajectory and streaming subscriber ARPU in latest quarter
  • Parks segment per-capita spend and attendance trends vs prior peak
  • ESPN linear affiliate revenue erosion pace and DTC pricing plan
  • Net debt paydown vs guidance and any buyback pace
  • One-time restructuring/impairment items normalizing reported earnings
General Sentiment
+22
Tailwind
tail √Σ 95 · head √Σ 72 · conf 6/10

The macro backdrop is mildly supportive: a risk-on tape with VIX at 16.5 and the S&P at highs favors high-beta consumer-facing names, and DIS at 1.4 beta gets amplified upside from that. The active narrative is a strong platform-monopoly story (Marvel, Star Wars, Pixar, ESPN) with medium cult following - that story is currently intact, reinforced by Spider-Man tracking as the second-biggest domestic opening in history, which feeds the IP-moat conviction the bulls need. Analyst and press tone into tomorrow's fiscal Q3 print is constructive: multiple outlets flag an impressive earnings surprise history and 'right combination' for another beat, options are pricing a big move, and the A+E divestiture for $1.2B is being framed as portfolio-cleanup rather than distress. Counter-pressure is real but narrower - one prominent piece flags that DIS 'needs more than an earnings beat to get a boost,' hinting the bar is elevated and the story is running ahead of DCF. Net: narrative momentum + risk-on tape + pre-earnings positioning outweigh the elevated-bar risk, but only modestly given event risk in under 24 hours.

Tailwinds 4
m45
Risk-on tape amplified by high beta
S&P at highs and VIX at 16.5 in a risk-on regime is a tailwind for a 1.4-beta consumer discretionary/media name; DIS captures more of the tape than the average stock.
m60
Platform-monopoly narrative reinforced by box office
Spider-Man tracking as the #2 domestic opening ever directly feeds the IP-moat story the bulls lean on, keeping the strong-intensity narrative fresh right before the print.
m50
Pre-earnings analyst tone constructive
Multiple outlets highlight DIS's beat history and set-up for another surprise; options market pricing a big move skews the reflexive sentiment tailwind if the beat lands.
m30
A+E divestiture framed positively
The $1.2B Hearst deal reads as focus/simplification rather than distress - a minor sentiment positive for the streaming-pivot narrative.
Headwinds 3
m55
Bar is elevated - 'needs more than a beat'
Barron's-style framing that a beat alone won't move the stock signals sentiment is already leaning long; a merely in-line print could trigger a sell-the-news reaction in a 1.4-beta name.
m40
Narrative running well ahead of DCF
Price at a large premium to modeled fair value means the story is doing heavy lifting; any crack in streaming-profitability or ESPN cord-cutting commentary tomorrow gets punished harder than fundamentals warrant.
m25
Rates/valuation macro drag
10y at 4.7% and market PE 26.9 is a mild persistent headwind for a long-duration IP/streaming story, though muted by the risk-on regime.
Net I read this as a modest tailwind, not a strong one. The tape is friendly, the IP-moat narrative just got a fresh Spider-Man data point, and pre-print chatter is skewed to another beat - all constructive for a high-beta name into a binary event. But sentiment is already leaning long and the 'needs more than a beat' framing tells me the reflexive upside is capped while the downside on a wobble is uncapped. Tailwind into the print, but I'd flip this reading fast if the DTC or ESPN commentary cracks tomorrow.
Verify before trusting this (4)
  • Fiscal Q3 print tomorrow AM - direct-to-consumer margins and ESPN subscriber/ad commentary
  • Whether Spider-Man legs hold or fade in weeks 2-3 (narrative reinforcement vs decay)
  • Any guidance revision that would separate this cohort from Netflix's compounding narrative
  • Post-print analyst target revisions - direction and dispersion
The market-wide tape + this name's exposure to it (beta / sector / narrative durability). Context on the non-fundamental pressure — not a call on the business or the price. processId: detail-general-sentiment
Growth Outlook
not run

This lens hasn't been run for this ticker yet.

The forward growth verdict — is the business itself likely to grow (next 2 quarters / year 1 / years 2–3), judged against its category and against printed expectations. The full horizon ladder + creme renders on the Growth Outlook card above. Not a call on the price (Valuation owns that) or the tape (Sentiment owns that).
Please log in to view trade setups
The Augustus trade-setup read is a members feature.
Log in
Lenses kept deliberately separate — Company Quality (price-agnostic), Valuation (price-conditional), General Sentiment (non-fundamental macro/narrative pressure), and Growth Outlook (the forward growth verdict). The scores are not blended. Filing-level items (convertibles, lock-ups, customer concentration) are v2 — see each lens's "verify."
Price Prediction
Lower -7.8% v0.6.0 View full prediction →

When we made this prediction on Aug 5, 2026, DIS was $98.18. We expect it to be $90.50 by Feb 2027, and we consider it great value under $70.00. This is an early model (v0.6.0) — the direction is more reliable than the exact price. Made Aug 5, 2026.

Price when predicted$98.18
Our estimate for Feb 2027$90.50-7.8%
Great value below$70.00
Price history shown (6 Months)

Blue is our prediction, starting the day we made it. Grey is a slower route to the same place — the same destination, taking longer. Black is the actual price, so you can see how we are doing.

Community AI Feedback
No community reviews yet for DIS. Be the first — hit How to Contribute, have any AI review this page, and paste its take back here.
My Notes personal — only you see this
v1.1.562 · 9b2927c4 · 2026-08-22 16:52:06