Skip to main content
Homepage
AGING Analysis Report
Aug 24, 2026
20 days ago · 100% complete
For AI assistants & researchers — machine-readable summary of this page

What this page is: Delvantic's full research page for EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) — AI-driven forensic equity research: mechanical valuation models (DCF, EPV, anchored-PE, scenario) plus three independent AI lenses (Quality / Value / Sentiment). Everything below is rendered server-side; you are not missing content that requires JavaScript. All scores are predictions and research opinions, not financial advice.

Our current read (analysis of 2026-09-13): Designation Low · Gem Score -19 (−100…+100 Quality+Value blend) · Quality 67 · Value -76 · Sentiment 36 (timing only, not weighted) · Composite fair value $572.16 vs $776.62 at analysis

Page map (sections in order; each card carries a stable reference-name attribute you can cite):

  • profile-header / price-overview — company profile, live quote, market cap
  • extended-analysisthe core: three AI lens reads with findings, scores, and the analyst memo
  • future-predictions — our forward price-band predictions
  • market-narrative / ai-findings / gpt-critique — narrative context, cross-model findings, and an adversarial critique of our own analysis (near the end of the document)
  • Members-only sections (render as login gates for anonymous readers): price-history, income-trend, key-metrics, financials (statement tables), insider-trading. The analysis above is public; the raw data tables require a free account.

More for machine readers: site briefing at /llms.txt · any ticker resolves at delvantic.com/stock/TICKER · raw inputs are public-company filings and market data (via licensed data feeds); every model, score, lens read, and prediction on this page is Delvantic's own analysis.

EMCOR Group, Inc.

EME NYSE
Industrials · Engineering & Construction
Norwalk, CT 06851-1092, United States emcorgroup.com Updated Aug 24, 4:30am
Price
$776.62
Market Cap
$34.3B
Employees
44,000
Beta
1.15
Avg Volume
442,440
Last Dividend
$1.45
CEO
Mr. Anthony J. Guzzi

EMCOR Group, Inc. is a diversified mechanical and electrical construction and facilities services company headquartered in Norwalk, Connecticut. It focuses on designing, installing, operating, and maintaining complex building and industrial systems, including electrical, mechanical, lighting, air conditioning, heating, security, fire protection, and power generation infrastructure. EMCOR Group, Inc. operates through major service divisions such as EMCOR Construction Services, EMCOR Building Services, and EMCOR Industrial Services, each specializing in project-based construction, ongoing facilities management, and industrial and energy infrastructure support. The company serves commercial, industrial, institutional, utility, and government clients across the United States and the United Kingdom, with a strong presence in non-residential construction and services. In the broader financial market, EMCOR Group, Inc. functions as a leading provider of critical infrastructure solutions, offering both large-scale installation projects and recurring maintenance contracts that support operational reliability and resilience for a wide range of organizations.

Runs with full report Generated: Aug 24, 2026 4:46am
Price Overview
Price at report time
$776.62
as of Aug 24, 4:30am (20d ago)
Change · Aug 24
-10.77 (-1.37%)
Day Range
$775.53 – $794.27
52-Week Range
$564.92 – $951.96
50-Day MA
$797.42
200-Day MA
$753.88
Volume
326,200.00
Right now · live
Log in to get the live feed
Members see the real-time price and the move since this report (over 20d).
Share Structure
Outstanding 44,439,940.00
Float 43,542,648.00
Free Float 98.0%
High free float — 98.0% of shares trade freely, ~2% held by insiders/institutions
Very liquid — most shares trade freely. Low insider ownership can mean less management alignment, but makes large position sizing straightforward.
Price History (1 Year)
Last updated: Aug 24, 2026 5:32am (20d ago)
Revenue & Net Income Trend
The directional story — useful even when net income is negative.
Last updated: Aug 24, 2026 5:32am (20d ago)
Revenue
The top line — total sales before any costs or taxes are subtracted. A measure of how much business the company is doing.
Net Income
The bottom line — profit left after subtracting all expenses, interest, and taxes from revenue. Reflects accounting profitability, but includes non-cash items like depreciation, so it isn't the same as cash earned.
Operating Cash Flow
The real cash generated by the day-to-day business — selling products, paying suppliers, collecting from customers. Calculated from net income by adding back non-cash items and adjusting for timing (unpaid bills, unsold inventory). When OCF consistently lags net income, the reported profit may not be converting to real money.
Period Revenue Net Income Net Margin YoY/QoQ
Key Metrics
TD Twelve Data statement HEX SEC filing
Industry comparison last run: Aug 24, 2026 4:38am
P/E Ratio (Price per dollar of earnings)
HEX
Stock Price / EPS (Diluted)
27.55
Stock Price: $776.62
EPS (Diluted): 28.19
P/B Ratio (Price vs net asset value)
HEX
Stock Price / Book Value Per Share
9.54
Stock Price: $776.62
Total Equity: $3.67B
Shares: 45,145,767
EV/EBITDA (Total value vs operating profit)
HEX
Enterprise Value / EBITDA
18.99
Market Cap: $34.26B
Total Debt: $0.00
Cash: $1.11B
EBITDA: $1.78B
Enterprise Value (Takeover price (cap + debt - cash))
HEX
Market Cap + Total Debt - Cash
$33.8B
Market Cap: $34.26B
Total Debt: $0.00
Cash: $1.11B
Gross Margin (Revenue left after direct costs)
HEX
Gross Profit / Revenue
19.3%
Gross Profit: $3.28B
Revenue: $16.99B
Operating Margin (Revenue left after all operations)
HEX
Operating Income / Revenue
10.1%
Operating Income: $1.71B
Revenue: $16.99B
Net Margin (Revenue left as actual profit)
HEX
Net Income / Revenue
7.5%
Net Income: $1.27B
Revenue: $16.99B
ROE (Profit from shareholder equity)
HEX
Net Income / Total Equity
34.6%
Net Income: $1.27B
Total Equity: $3.67B
ROIC (Profit from all invested capital)
HEX
NOPAT / Invested Capital
49.4%
Operating Income: $1.71B
Tax Rate: 26.1%
Equity: $3.67B
Total Debt: $0.00
Cash: $1.11B
Zero debt — invested capital = equity minus cash (very efficient)
Current Ratio (Can it pay short-term bills)
HEX
Current Assets / Current Liabilities
1.22
Current Assets: $5.94B
Current Liabilities: $4.86B
Debt/Equity (Leverage — debt vs equity)
HEX
Total Debt / Total Equity
0.00
Short-Term Debt: $0.00
Long-Term Debt: $0.00
Total Debt: $0.00
Total Equity: $3.67B
Zero debt — this company carries no debt obligations. Strongest possible score.
Rev/Share (Top-line per share)
HEX
Revenue / Shares Outstanding
$376.26
Revenue: $16.99B
Shares: 45,145,767
Book Value/Share (Net assets per share)
HEX
(Total Assets - Total Liabilities) / Shares
$81.40
Total Equity: $3.67B
Shares: 45,145,767
FCF/Share (Real cash generated per share)
HEX
(Operating Cash Flow + CapEx) / Shares
$26.34
Operating CF: $1.30B
CapEx: -$112.75M
Shares: 45,145,767
CapEx is negative (outflow) — added to OCF to get FCF
Div Yield (Annual income from holding)
TD
Last Annual Dividend / Stock Price
0.2%
Last Dividend: $1.45
Stock Price: $776.62
Payout Ratio (Earnings paid out as dividends)
HEX
Dividends Paid / Net Income
3.5%
Dividends Paid: -$45.02M
Net Income: $1.27B
Industry Benchmarks
Last run: Aug 24, 2026 4:38am
Compares EME against LLM-researched typical ranges for its industry. One research call per industry, cached indefinitely — every stock in the same industry reuses the same baseline.
Income Statement (Annual)
Last updated: Aug 24, 2026 5:32am (20d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Revenue $9.9B $11.1B $12.6B $14.6B $17.0B
Cost of Revenue $8.4B $9.5B $10.5B $11.8B $13.7B
Gross Profit $1.5B $1.6B $2.1B $2.8B $3.3B
Operating Expenses $970.9M $1.0B $1.2B $1.4B $1.6B
Operating Income $530.8M $564.9M $875.8M $1.3B $1.7B
Net Income $383.5M $406.1M $633.0M $1.0B $1.3B
EBITDA $579.1M $612.2M $927.6M $1.4B $1.8B
EPS $7.09 $8.13 $13.37 $21.61 $28.30
EPS (Diluted) $7.06 $8.10 $13.31 $21.52 $28.19
Balance Sheet (Annual)
Last updated: Aug 24, 2026 4:30am (20d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Cash & Equivalents $821.3M $456.4M $789.8M $1.3B $1.1B
Total Current Assets $3.4B $3.5B $4.4B $5.4B $5.9B
Total Assets $5.4B $5.5B $6.6B $7.7B $9.3B
Current Liabilities $2.4B $2.8B $3.5B $4.2B $4.9B
Long-Term Debt
Total Liabilities $3.2B $3.6B $4.1B $4.8B $5.6B
Total Equity $2.3B $2.0B $2.5B $2.9B $3.7B
Retained Earnings $2.8B $3.2B $3.8B $4.8B $6.0B
Cash Flow (Annual)
Last updated: Aug 24, 2026 5:32am (20d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Operating Cash Flow $318.8M $497.9M $899.7M $1.4B $1.3B
Capital Expenditure -$36.2M -$49.3M -$78.4M -$75.0M -$112.8M
Free Cash Flow $282.6M $448.6M $821.3M $1.3B $1.2B
Acquisitions (net) -$118.2M -$98.7M -$96.5M -$228.2M -$1.0B
Net Debt Issued / (Repaid) -$13.9M -$13.9M -$246.2M $0 $0
Dividends Paid -$28.2M -$27.2M -$32.7M -$43.4M -$45.0M
Stock Buybacks -$195.5M -$660.6M -$127.7M -$489.8M -$586.3M
Net Change in Cash -$81.0M -$365.5M $332.7M $550.6M -$228.4M
Growth Trends (YoY %)
Last updated: Aug 24, 2026 5:32am (20d ago)
Metric 2022 2023 2024 2025
Revenue Growth +11.8% +13.6% +15.8% +16.6%
Gross Profit Growth +6.8% +30.3% +32.3% +18.7%
Operating Income Growth +6.4% +55.0% +53.6% +27.4%
Net Income Growth +5.9% +55.9% +59.1% +26.4%
EBITDA Growth +5.7% +51.5% +51.1% +27.1%
Dividend History (Last 20)
Last updated: Aug 24, 2026 4:31am (20d ago)
Date Dividend Declaration Record Payment
2026-07-15 $0.40
2026-04-16 $0.40
2026-01-14 $0.40
2025-10-15 $0.25
2025-07-15 $0.25
2025-04-17 $0.25
2025-01-16 $0.25
2024-10-15 $0.25
2024-07-15 $0.25
2024-04-15 $0.25
2024-01-12 $0.18
2023-10-13 $0.18
2023-07-19 $0.18
2023-04-14 $0.18
2023-01-13 $0.15
2022-10-17 $0.15
2022-07-15 $0.13
2022-04-14 $0.13
2022-01-14 $0.13
2021-10-14 $0.13
0Company Classification 1Industry Landscape 2Company Momentum 3Forward Projection 4aDCF Valuation 4bEarnings Power Value 4cAnchored PE 4dReverse DCF 4eRevenue-Based DCF 4fAnchored P/S 4gScenario Analysis 4hDividend Discount Model 4iBook Value Analysis 4jInsider Activity 4fCash Flow Quality 4gDebt Maturity Risk 4hMacro Environment 4iSector Intelligence 4jRevenue Confidence 4kSensitivity Analysis 4lSector Demand Cycle 5AI Investigation 5bThesis Evaluation 6Valuation Synthesis
computed not applicable 18 computed · 6 not applicable
Risk : Reward — upside vs downside from this company's own quarters
Computed 2026-09-06 19:08
-0.6 : 1 +1σ upside vs −1σ downside, from this company's own quarterly history
A +1σ run of quarters pays -31%; a −1σ run costs 48%. Ratio -0.6:1 (μ 17.4%, σ 3.8% floored by sector, 16 pairs).
Older method (repeat-worst-quarter): 0.1 : 1
CaseGrowthMarginFair valuevs price ($776.62)
Bull — recovery +33% 9.2% $799.34 +3%
Base — stabilizes +22% 8.0% $517.27 -33%
Bear — keeps slipping +11% 6.8% $324.17 -58%
Stress — last quarter repeats +16% 7.4% $410.95 -47%
Upside — a +1σ run of quarters (v2) +21% 8.5% $536.06 -31%
Stress — a −1σ run of quarters (v2) +14% 8.0% $402.74 -48%
The next quarters keep the trajectory of the worst recent matched quarter (ending 2025-09-30) — growth stays at 16.4% and margins bend by the same profit-vs-revenue ratio (×0.96). Stress is a trajectory, not a prediction — it answers "what if the ship's current heading simply continues," which history says is the case to respect.
Why this is appearing: this company files quarterly, so its recent trajectory could be measured rather than assumed — the engine matched Jun 2026, Mar 2026 against the same quarters one year earlier and found revenue +19.7% · operating income +29.6% · net income +30.6% year-over-year. That measured heading is what the stress case extends forward. Of those, the stress case extends the worst matched quarter — the one ending Sep 30, 2025 (revenue +16.4%, operating income +11.6% YoY) — not the average. Data measured through Jun 30, 2026 — this card recalculates automatically when the next quarterly filing is ingested. Companies without quarterly filings (many foreign listings) never show this card: with no measured trajectory, there is nothing honest to repeat.
Narrative Economics
The story the market is telling about this stock — the intangible X-factor (founder mythology, cult dynamics, TAM-of-imagination) that moves price beyond what cash flows alone explain. After Shiller, Narrative Economics.
No narrative profile yet for EME — it's generated by the pipeline (market-narrative step).
Growth Outlook
Analyzed 2026-08-24 05:41

The question every valuation on this page silently assumes: is this company likely to grow? Judged forward — the business, its category, the world — against what's already printed.

Growing EMCOR is compounding at ~20% revenue and ~30% earnings on record electrical/mechanical backlog tied to data centers, semiconductor fabs and healthcare — genuine growth, but the growth rate is flattening off extraordinary comps and the price already assumes far more. conf 8/10
Share gain Category growing · Engineering & Construction is in a confirmed boom phase (demand score 2, category median recent growth +16.6%, industry revenue CAGR 12.2%, earnings CAGR 47.6%). EMCOR's +19.7% recent revenue growth runs modestly ahead of the category median and its 16.2% three-year CAGR sits well above the 12.2% industry CAGR, with margin expansion in line with or better than the industry's +2.3pp.
Next 2 quarters
Growing
Backlog already booked plus contractual building services revenue makes the next two prints highly visible; double-digit revenue growth and above-revenue earnings growth should persist, though the growth rate steps down from the ~20% peak on harder comps.
↑ above expectations
Year 1
Growing
Full-year trajectory is anchored by record remaining performance obligations and a boom-phase category; revenue growth likely settles in the low-to-mid teens with continued operating leverage, below the recent 19.7% but firmly positive.
≈ inline with expectations
Years 2–3
Growing
Structural earnings power keeps rising: the electrical buildout, self-funded tuck-in consolidation, and a recurring services base give a credible high-single to low-teens compounding path. But the growth rate itself should normalize well below current levels as datacenter awards digest and labor caps conversion — this is Growing, not Accelerating.
↓ below expectations
The creme: each rung's call measured against what's already printed (vs analyst estimates · vs guidance / FY consensus · vs price-implied growth) — expectations in print are already in the price, so only the variant margin can pay. Hover a rung's chip for the margin read.
Growth drivers
79 Data center / high-tech backlog — Network & communications and high-tech manufacturing work is the engine behind +19.7% matched-quarter revenue growth. These are multi-year, mission-critical MEP scopes with visibility measured in quarters of remaining performance obligations, not bid-to-bid cycles — the single most load-bearing driver of the next 4-6 prints.
64 Margin leverage, not just volume — Operating income +29.6% and net income +30.6% against +19.7% revenue means mix and project selectivity are compounding on top of volume; industry net margins expanded +2.3pp over three years, so this is category-wide capacity tightness EMCOR is pricing into.
48 Consolidation in a fragmented MEP market — Tuck-in acquisitions of regional mechanical/electrical contractors add both revenue and density in a market with no dominant national player. Self-funded from strong FCF (20% FCF CAGR), so growth does not depend on external capital in a 4.69% 10y environment.
38 Recurring building services base — Facilities maintenance and repair revenue is contractual and less capex-cyclical, which is why all years of the growth record are positive and revenue volatility is only 0.0043 — it dampens the trough of any construction cycle.
Growth risks
61 Decelerating quarterly trend on brutal comps — Revenue confidence explicitly flags the quarterly trend as decelerating even while the level stays high. Lapping two years of 16-20% growth mathematically compresses the rate; the direction of change in the growth rate is down even if the absolute call stays Growing.
57 Concentration in one capex theme — The bull case is largely hyperscaler and fab construction. If AI-related datacenter awards are digested or re-phased, EMCOR loses the highest-margin, fastest-growing slice of backlog with no equivalent replacement scope on deck.
47 Skilled labor supply as the binding constraint — Electricians and pipefitters, not demand, cap revenue conversion. Wage inflation on fixed-price scopes is the classic mechanism by which E&C boom-phase margins peak and roll over.
30 Non-datacenter commercial construction under rate pressure — Macro backdrop is flagged as headwinds with the 10y at 4.69%; office, retail and speculative commercial starts are the weakest part of the addressable mix and offset institutional strength.
26 Growth quality mix (M&A vs organic) — A portion of reported growth is acquired revenue. That is fine for compounding but makes the underlying organic rate harder to verify and raises the bar on integration execution to sustain the printed trajectory.
The world is rebuilding electrical capacity: AI datacenters, onshored semiconductor and pharma capacity, and grid/power upgrades all convert into exactly the mechanical and electrical scope EMCOR sells. That is a multi-year physical buildout that does not reverse on a single rate print. The offsets are real but second-order: high long rates suppress speculative commercial starts, and skilled trade labor is the true ceiling on how much of the demand the industry can actually bill. EMCOR is not a bet on a new technology — it is a bet that whoever builds the technology needs union pipefitters and switchgear installed, and that scale plus a recurring service base lets EMCOR pick the best of an oversubscribed bid table. The genuine uncertainty is duration and rate-of-change, not direction.
Growth position composite +15
ShrinkingStallingHoldingGrowingAccelerating
70Next 2 quarters · Growing
70Year 1 · Growing
70Years 2–3 · Growing
+15Composite (−100…+100)
A research prediction, not advice. Forward-graded: each rung is scored against the prints that follow it. Not an input to the GEM designation — track record first.
Claude Reading
Independent analyst synthesis · claude-opus-4-7 · generated 2026-08-24 05:31:54
Verdict Modestly overvalued at 27.5x on peaking margins — fair value $620-660 on normalized earnings; wait for the deceleration quarter before entering, no reason to short a 49% ROIC business with zero debt.

The raw trajectory here is genuinely impressive and I want to steelman it before tearing at it. Revenue went from $9.9B (2021) to a run-rate above $19B (annualizing the last two quarters at $5.15B and $4.63B gets you $19.5B+), while net income quadrupled from $383M to a run-rate near $1.5B. Net margins expanded from ~3.9% to 7.8% in Q2 2026 — that's not cyclical noise, that's mix shift toward higher-value mechanical/electrical work tied to data centers and semiconductor fabs. ROIC of 49% and ROE of 35% with zero net debt and $1.11B cash is exceptional capital efficiency for a construction-services roll-up. FCF of $1.19B on $34B market cap is a 3.5% yield — not cheap, not egregious.

That said, the synthesis's -15% overvaluation call ($659 signal-adjusted vs $776) understates the risk asymmetry, and the thesis engine's -9 score feels closer to right. Here's the contrarian read the models are dancing around but not landing: EMCOR at 27.5x earnings and 2.06x sales is being priced as a secular compounder, but the Q1 2026 print already flashed a warning — margin dropped to 6.6% from 9.6% the prior quarter, and Q3 2025 was 6.9%. The 7.8% Q2 print looks like the outlier, not the trend. If normalized margins are actually 6.5-7% rather than 8%+, forward earnings power is ~$1.35B, not $1.5B+, which pushes the multiple toward 25x on a business whose historical multiple range was 15-20x. The market is extrapolating the peak quarter.

Where I disagree with the prior work: the "Neutral Market Forces" and "fair_value" tags are too soft given what the numbers show about deceleration. Recent revenue YoY of 16.6% is down from the 20%+ range earlier in the cycle, and the sequential pattern ($4.30B → $4.30B → $4.51B → $4.63B → $5.15B) is lumpy, not the smooth compounding a 27x multiple demands. The narrative layer correctly identifies this as "anchored" with moderate intensity, but I'd argue the anchor is slipping — the +18% premium to DCF is the market paying for a data center capex cycle that has a well-documented boom-bust cadence (2000, 2015-16, 2022). Hyperscaler capex guidance for 2026 is decelerating from 2025 growth rates. EMCOR's backlog conversion is real but it's a lagging indicator; the leading indicator is bid activity, which none of the data here captures. The insider sale of 950 shares in June is small in absolute terms but it's a sale into strength with no offsetting open-market buys — directionally consistent with "management thinks this is fully valued."

Where I'd push back on the bears: the roll-up thesis has actually delivered. Debt-to-equity of zero while generating 49% ROIC means M&A has been genuinely accretive, not financial engineering. And unlike pure construction contractors, the building services segment provides recurring maintenance revenue that dampens cyclicality. So a full-cycle multiple of 20x rather than the 15x contractor comp is defensible. That gets me to fair value of ~$610-650 on normalized $30-32 EPS, which is meaningfully below current price but not a short — this is a "wait for the disappointment quarter" setup, not a conviction sell. The models converging on $551-659 are directionally correct. I dissent from "fair_value" and lean toward mild overvaluation with a specific catalyst path: the first quarter where organic revenue growth prints below 10% or margins revert to 6.5% will compress the multiple 20-25% because the compounder narrative dies. Given Q1 2026 already showed the margin wobble, that quarter may be closer than consensus expects.

GPT Reading
Independent reading · gpt-5.4 · generated 2026-08-24 05:32:11
Verdict Overvalued at $776.62 — exceptional execution is real, but fair value looks closer to $650-$675 unless EMCOR proves 7%+ margins and mid-teens growth are durable through the cycle.

EMCOR’s numbers are good enough to tempt you into treating it like a higher-quality industrial compounder, but the valuation still looks ahead of what the underlying economics usually justify. The operating performance has been genuinely exceptional: revenue rose from $9.90B in 2021 to $16.99B in 2025, a 14%-plus annualized climb, while net income more than tripled from $383.5M to $1.27B. That is not just a revenue story; operating margin expanded from 5.4% in 2021 to 10.1% in 2025, and net margin from 3.9% to 7.5%. Even the most recent run-rate is stronger still: over the last four quarters through 2026-06-30, EMCOR generated about $18.6B of revenue and $1.44B of net income, implying roughly 7.7% net margin. For an engineering and construction name, zero debt, $1.11B of cash, and $1.19B of free cash flow against just $112.8M of capex is unusually clean. This is a superb business in execution terms.

The issue is that the stock at $776.62 already capitalizes EMCOR as though these elevated margins and double-digit top-line growth are durable through the cycle. On 2025 figures, the market is paying 27.5x earnings, 19.0x EV/EBITDA, and about 2.0x sales for a contractor-like business, albeit a best-in-class one. Using the latest annual net income of $1.27B, the earnings yield is only 3.6%; even annualizing the last two quarters does not make it cheap. Price/book at 9.5x also tells you the market is not valuing EMCOR like a project business exposed to labor availability, bidding cycles, and customer capex pauses. To justify this setup, EMCOR likely needs to keep compounding EPS at a rate far above normal construction-services peers while defending 7%-8% net margins that are historically peak-like for the category. The quarterly sequence shows growth is still healthy — 2026-06 revenue of $5.15B was up nearly 20% versus $4.30B a year earlier, and net income rose 34% from $302.2M to $403.7M — but there is nothing in these figures that says the market is getting a bargain on merely “good” continuation.

What stands out most is the asymmetry between business quality and stock setup. EMCOR has earned a premium through real execution: ROE of 34.6% and ROIC of 49.4% are eye-catching, and unlike many premium industrial stories, this one is backed by cash rather than leverage. But some of that capital efficiency is a function of low tangible equity and strong working-capital characteristics, not evidence of an infinitely scalable moat. The current ratio is only 1.22, which is fine but reminds you this is still an operating business with contract timing and customer collections in the mix, not a software annuity. The company has transformed from a decent contractor into an elite operator, yet the stock now asks investors to pay as though transformation risk is gone and cyclicality has been repealed. I don’t buy that. My read is that fair value is lower unless EMCOR can show another year or two of 15%-plus revenue growth with margins holding near today’s level.

The strongest case against that skepticism is straightforward: maybe this is not a cyclical contractor in the old sense anymore. The evidence for that bull case is substantial. Revenue has not just grown; it has accelerated in dollar terms, from $3.70B in 2024-09 to $5.15B in 2026-06, while margins have remained consistently above 6% each quarter and often closer to 7%-10%. Free cash flow of $1.19B on $16.99B of sales is real, not adjusted. A debt-free balance sheet gives EMCOR room to keep consolidating a fragmented market, and if end-markets like data centers, healthcare, industrial electrification, and mission-critical service work stay strong, then historical peer multiples may simply be the wrong yardstick. On that view, paying a high-20s P/E for a company growing earnings 25%-plus with this balance sheet is not obviously excessive. I weigh that argument less heavily because construction-adjacent businesses almost always look structurally rerated near cyclical highs, and the multiple leaves little room for merely solid execution.

What would change my mind is not another quarter of strength by itself, but proof that today’s economics are repeatable at larger scale. If EMCOR can sustain quarterly revenue above $5B, keep net margin around 7.5%-8.0%, and convert that into annual free cash flow materially above $1.3B without balance-sheet stretch, then the premium deserves more respect. Conversely, if revenue growth slips toward high single digits or margins retreat back toward 5.5%-6.0%, the current valuation will look plainly too rich. I would also watch insider activity carefully: the recent 950-share sale is small in absolute terms, but at this price I would rather see meaningful open-market buying than routine awards and light selling. As it stands, I see a great company and an overextended stock.

Grok Reading
Independent reading · grok-4.5 · generated 2026-08-24 05:32:40
Verdict Quality compounder already priced for perfection at $777; fair value nearer $650–680, ~12–15% downside

The numbers describe a genuine operating transformation, not a one-quarter mirage. EMCOR took revenue from $9.9B in 2021 to $17.0B in 2025 while lifting operating income from $531M to $1.71B and net income from $384M to $1.27B—an earnings CAGR near 42% on a 16% revenue CAGR. Gross margin sits at 19.3%, operating margin at 10.1%, net at 7.5%; ROIC of 49% and ROE of 35% on a clean balance sheet (zero reported debt-to-equity, $1.11B cash, $1.19B FCF against only $113M capex) are elite for engineering and construction. The latest prints reinforce the run: Q2 2026 revenue of $5.15B and 7.8% net margin, with trailing four-quarter earnings already well above the $1.27B full-year 2025 figure. This is a scaled, cash-generative industrial services platform executing at a high level, with clear mix benefits from mission-critical MEP, facilities services, and data-center-adjacent work.

The valuation does not give the company the benefit of the doubt—it assumes the transformation is permanent and that high-teens top-line momentum largely persists. At $776.62 the stock trades 27.5x annual earnings, 2.1x sales, 19x EV/EBITDA, and roughly 9.5x book, for a free-cash-flow yield near 3.5%. Historical contractor multiples lived in the mid-teens P/E; the current premium is the market capitalizing both the margin step-up and a multi-year data-center/infrastructure supercycle. Quarterly revenue is still growing, but the secondary signal flags a decelerating trend, and at a $17B revenue base the law of large numbers is already biting. Implied growth embedded in 27x earnings for a construction-services business with cyclical end markets is simply higher than base rates support once the current boom normalizes.

The strongest case against an overvalued read is straightforward and data-backed: margins have expanded for four straight years, not one; FCF conversion is pristine; returns on capital are extraordinary; the company has no leverage; and the bull weights on structural data-center demand and durable margin gains are heavy for a reason. If mix continues to shift toward higher-recurring building services and EMCOR keeps compounding mid-teens revenue with 7–8% net margins, today’s multiple can be grown into rather than compressed. A smart opponent would also note that the valuation synthesis composite near $659 already incorporates some caution, and that sector-leader status plus acquisition capacity in a fragmented market can justify a quality premium over pure-play contractors. I weigh that evidence seriously—the quality is real—but still discount it because the price already capitalizes several more years of exceptional outcomes, insider activity has skewed to sales, and construction-cycle history is littered with “this time the margins stuck” stories that later mean-reverted.

What flips the verdict is concrete: sustained quarterly revenue growth re-accelerating above 15% with net margins holding 7.5%+ through a full year of softer non-res construction, or clear evidence that data-center and infrastructure backlog has extended visibility beyond 24 months at current pricing. A decisive break below roughly $650 on deteriorating organic growth or margin compression would confirm the overvaluation call; a clean print of another 20%+ earnings year with stable multiples would force a reassessment toward fair value.

Big-3 Panel — where each AI stands
Each AI above independently stated a direction (undervalued, fairly valued, or overvalued) and how strongly it believes it (conviction, 0–5). We combine those into a Bull-Bear Index on a 0–10 scale: 5 is neutral, 10 is maximum bullish (undervalued at full conviction), 0 is maximum bearish. We compute the score ourselves with the same arithmetic for every seat — the models never grade their own bullishness — so the three are directly comparable. Δ shows how far each seat sits from the panel average of 1.7; a large Δ marks the dissenting voice, usually the one worth reading.
Claude claude-opus-4-7 2.0
overvalued · conviction 3/5 · Δ +0.3 vs panel · self: 4.0
GPT gpt-5.4 1.0
overvalued · conviction 4/5 · Δ -0.7 vs panel · self: 3.0
Grok grok-4.5 2.0
overvalued · conviction 3/5 · Δ +0.3 vs panel · self: 3.0
Advanced Analysis Forensic deep-dive · separate lenses
Separate reads — Company Quality (is it a great business?), Valuation (is it mispriced?), and General Sentiment (how macro + narrative are pushing it), kept deliberately apart · 2026-08-24 05:42:13
Delvantic - Cairn AI
Quality — wait for a dip 7/10
Great compounder at a full-cycle price — quality is real (+67) but valuation (-76) leaves no margin of safety, so this is a wait-for-a-dip, not a buy.
The cruxWhether the ~10% operating margin is a new structural level (data center/electrification) or a cycle peak — that single question decides if $777 is fair or 25% too high.
Forensic checks Derived mechanically from EME's filed financials — not from the AI lenses
Liquidity & RunwaySelf-Funding
DilutionShare Count Shrinking
Earnings QualityHigh Earnings Quality
The four lensesswitch a tab for its full read — score + evidence
Company Quality
+67
Strong
edge √Σ 136 · risk √Σ 55 · conf 8/10

EMCOR shows one of the cleaner quality profiles in E&C: revenue grew from $9.9B (2021) to $17.0B (2025), a ~14% CAGR, while operating margin nearly doubled from 5.4% to 10.1% and net income more than tripled from $384M to $1.27B. FCF scaled from $283M to $1.19B, and OCF/NI at 1.18x with negative accruals (-2% of assets), Beneish M of -2.25, and Altman Z of 7.14 all point to real, cash-backed earnings. There are no mechanical red flags in earnings quality.

Strengths 4
m80
Margin expansion with scale
Operating margin went from 5.4% (2021) to 10.1% (2025) while revenue grew 72%; net income 3.3x-ed to $1.27B. Genuine operating leverage in a historically thin-margin industry.
m70
Cash-backed earnings
OCF/NI 1.18x, accruals -2% of assets, Beneish -2.25, Altman Z 7.14. FCF of $1.19B roughly tracks $1.27B net income; no accrual games detectable.
m65
Fortress balance sheet
$1.11B net cash, self-funding, Altman Z 7.14 deep in safe zone. No refinancing or solvency risk.
m55
Disciplined share shrink
Diluted shares -4.5% CAGR, from 54.3M to 45.1M. Per-share earnings growth is amplified, not diluted, by capital allocation.
Concerns 3
m45
Cyclical end-market risk
E&C contractor margins historically compress in downturns; current 10.1% OpM likely reflects data-center/electrification tailwinds. Durability across a full cycle is unproven in the data shown.
m20
One-way insider selling
10 sales / 0 buys for $40.8M over 12 months. Dollar amounts are small relative to $34B cap and consistent with routine post-award liquidation, but the absence of any open-market buying is worth noting.
m25
FCF dipped year-over-year
FCF fell from $1.33B (2024) to $1.19B (2025) despite net income rising to $1.27B - working capital consumption as revenue accelerated. Not alarming but worth monitoring.
This is a genuinely well-run compounder inside a traditionally mediocre industry. The numbers tell a coherent story: scale, operating leverage, cash conversion, net cash, and buybacks all aligned. My hesitation is not about integrity or execution - it's that E&C is cyclical and the current 10% operating margin is almost certainly cycle-elevated by data-center and electrification demand. As a business today it is Strong; whether it earns a higher tier depends on whether these margins prove structural rather than cyclical.
Verify before trusting this (5)
  • Backlog composition and customer concentration (data-center exposure) in latest 10-K
  • Segment margin detail - is US Electrical driving the mix shift and is it sustainable?
  • Nature of insider sales (10b5-1 plans vs discretionary)
  • Acquisition activity and goodwill trends given roll-up model
  • Working capital dynamics behind 2025 FCF dip vs net income
Valuation / Mispricing
-76
Rich
edge √Σ 20 · risk √Σ 119 · conf 7/10
Price $777 vs deserved ~$550-660 - roughly 15-30% overvalued, no margin of safety. attractive below $620.00

Price is $776.62 against a composite FV of $551.34 and a signal-adjusted FV of $658.69 — roughly 18-40% above deserved value depending on how much credit you give current margins. The DCF ($551) and EPV floor ($222) both scream that today's earnings power is cycle-elevated; only the anchored-PE ($881) supports the tape, and that method simply extrapolates the current multiple. Earnings quality is high, so no haircut is warranted, but the quality is already fully reflected. The stock is priced for continued data-center/electrification tailwinds, sustained ~10% operating margins, and ongoing accretive M&A - a lot to ask from an E&C business whose historical mid-cycle margin is materially lower. There is no margin of safety here; the bull case is required just to justify the current print. That said, quality, net cash, and buybacks argue against calling it overvalued outright - it is a full-priced good business, not a bubble.

Cheap signals 1
m20
High earnings quality, no haircut
Quality score 3 means no discount to deserved value for accruals or dilution; net cash and buybacks are real - just already priced.
Rich / priced-in 4
m70
Price 40% above composite FV
$776.62 vs composite FV $551.34 implies -15% signal-adjusted upside and -29% on the unadjusted DCF - the market is paying well through deserved value.
m65
EPV floor at $222 flags cycle risk
The earnings-power floor of $222 is ~29% of price, meaning ~70% of today's cap depends on growth/margin persistence - a heavy bet on the current cycle continuing.
m55
Only PE-anchored method supports price
Anchored PE of $881 is the sole method above spot, and it works by extrapolating the current premium multiple - circular support, not independent evidence of value.
m45
Peak-cycle margins baked in
10% operating margin is cycle-elevated by data-center demand; any mean reversion to a mid-single-digit historical margin collapses the earnings base the current multiple rests on.
This is a wonderful business at a full price - exactly the trap the lens is designed to catch. Two of three methods put fair value below $600 and the third is just PE extrapolation. I want a 20%+ discount to the signal-adjusted $659 to compensate for cyclical margin risk, so I need this in the low $600s or below before it interests me. Today it is a hold-if-you-own-it, not a buy.
Verify before trusting this (5)
  • Backlog composition and mix between data-center/electrification vs traditional construction
  • Organic vs acquired revenue growth split in latest 10-Q
  • Management commentary on margin sustainability and pricing
  • Incremental M&A pipeline and multiples paid
  • Any signs of project deferrals or bid activity softening
General Sentiment
+36
Tailwind
tail √Σ 85 · head √Σ 47 · conf 6/10

The macro tape is nascent risk-on (VIX ~15, S&P just 1.6% off highs), and at a beta of 1.15 EME participates in that lift without being whipsawed by it. The active narrative is a moderate-intensity, moderate-durability steady-compounder story - not a cult, not a meme, but the kind of quiet framing that lets a name grind higher on momentum without needing catalysts. Momentum is strong-positive (16% CAGR trajectory), which itself is a self-reinforcing sentiment tailwind for a name in this archetype. News flow in the last 72h is favorable and stock-specific: a widely-syndicated 'EME still looks cheap on DCF and earnings' piece is exactly the kind of anchoring narrative bulls need to keep the compounder story alive, and the adjacent Quanta/MasTec coverage keeps the infrastructure/MEP cohort in the spotlight as a place to be. Offsetting: 10y at 4.69% and a market PE near 26 mean any wobble in the tape hits industrial cyclicals like EME harder than defensives, and the narrative has no cult coefficient to defend it if sentiment turns. Net, the pressure leans positive but is not decisive - a tailwind, not a strong one.

Tailwinds 4
m55
Compounder narrative intact and reinforced by DCF-discount headline
A fresh piece framing EME as still cheap on DCF directly feeds the steady-compounder story the market is already telling. Moderate intensity, but well-aligned with current price action.
m45
Strong price momentum is self-reinforcing sentiment
16% CAGR and positive 3-year trend put EME in the 'working' bucket; in a risk-on tape, momentum names in favored cohorts keep attracting flows regardless of fundamentals.
m35
Infrastructure/MEP cohort in narrative spotlight
Coverage of PWR and MTZ keeps the infrastructure services group top-of-mind for allocators; EME rides the halo even when not the direct subject.
m30
Nascent risk-on tape favors a 1.15-beta industrial
With VIX at 15 and S&P near highs, a slightly above-market beta helps rather than hurts. Regime is only 1 day old though, so conviction is limited.
Headwinds 2
m40
Rates and rich market multiple cap the upside pressure
10y near 4.7% and market PE near 26 mean any risk-off flinch lands harder on cyclicals; EME already trades at a premium to peers, giving sentiment more room to compress than expand.
m25
Low cult coefficient means no fan base to defend a wobble
Steady-compounder with moderate durability and low cult means no reflexive dip-buying if the narrative cracks - the tailwind is real but not sticky.
Net pressure leans positive but modest. EME has a coherent, moderately-intense compounder narrative that just got a helpful DCF-discount headline, momentum is working, and the tape is nascent risk-on - all pushing the same direction. But this is not a cult name and it is not cheap versus peers, so the tailwind is a breeze, not a gale. Rates and a stretched market PE are the visible offset, and at 1.15 beta any risk-off flinch would land. I call it a Tailwind, not Strong Tailwind, and I would not confuse this sentiment lift with a quality or valuation verdict.
Verify before trusting this (4)
  • Whether the 'premium multiple to peers' framing starts leaking into analyst notes as a downgrade catalyst
  • Duration of the risk-on regime beyond the current 1-day stretch
  • Any crack in M&A cadence or organic growth prints that would puncture the compounder story
  • 10y yield behavior - a move above 4.8-5.0% would pressure the whole industrial-services cohort
The market-wide tape + this name's exposure to it (beta / sector / narrative durability). Context on the non-fundamental pressure — not a call on the business or the price. processId: detail-general-sentiment
Growth Outlook
+15
Growing
edge √Σ 119 · risk √Σ 104 · conf 8/10

The world is rebuilding electrical capacity: AI datacenters, onshored semiconductor and pharma capacity, and grid/power upgrades all convert into exactly the mechanical and electrical scope EMCOR sells. That is a multi-year physical buildout that does not reverse on a single rate print. The offsets are real but second-order: high long rates suppress speculative commercial starts, and skilled trade labor is the true ceiling on how much of the demand the industry can actually bill. EMCOR is not a bet on a new technology — it is a bet that whoever builds the technology needs union pipefitters and switchgear installed, and that scale plus a recurring service base lets EMCOR pick the best of an oversubscribed bid table. The genuine uncertainty is duration and rate-of-change, not direction.

Growth drivers 4
m79
Data center / high-tech backlog
Network & communications and high-tech manufacturing work is the engine behind +19.7% matched-quarter revenue growth. These are multi-year, mission-critical MEP scopes with visibility measured in quarters of remaining performance obligations, not bid-to-bid cycles — the single most load-bearing driver of the next 4-6 prints.
m64
Margin leverage, not just volume
Operating income +29.6% and net income +30.6% against +19.7% revenue means mix and project selectivity are compounding on top of volume; industry net margins expanded +2.3pp over three years, so this is category-wide capacity tightness EMCOR is pricing into.
m48
Consolidation in a fragmented MEP market
Tuck-in acquisitions of regional mechanical/electrical contractors add both revenue and density in a market with no dominant national player. Self-funded from strong FCF (20% FCF CAGR), so growth does not depend on external capital in a 4.69% 10y environment.
m38
Recurring building services base
Facilities maintenance and repair revenue is contractual and less capex-cyclical, which is why all years of the growth record are positive and revenue volatility is only 0.0043 — it dampens the trough of any construction cycle.
Growth risks 5
m61
Decelerating quarterly trend on brutal comps
Revenue confidence explicitly flags the quarterly trend as decelerating even while the level stays high. Lapping two years of 16-20% growth mathematically compresses the rate; the direction of change in the growth rate is down even if the absolute call stays Growing.
m57
Concentration in one capex theme
The bull case is largely hyperscaler and fab construction. If AI-related datacenter awards are digested or re-phased, EMCOR loses the highest-margin, fastest-growing slice of backlog with no equivalent replacement scope on deck.
m47
Skilled labor supply as the binding constraint
Electricians and pipefitters, not demand, cap revenue conversion. Wage inflation on fixed-price scopes is the classic mechanism by which E&C boom-phase margins peak and roll over.
m30
Non-datacenter commercial construction under rate pressure
Macro backdrop is flagged as headwinds with the 10y at 4.69%; office, retail and speculative commercial starts are the weakest part of the addressable mix and offset institutional strength.
m26
Growth quality mix (M&A vs organic)
A portion of reported growth is acquired revenue. That is fine for compounding but makes the underlying organic rate harder to verify and raises the bar on integration execution to sustain the printed trajectory.
vs expectations: ~6m above · 1y inline · 2-3y below
The forward growth verdict — is the business itself likely to grow (next 2 quarters / year 1 / years 2–3), judged against its category and against printed expectations. The full horizon ladder + creme renders on the Growth Outlook card above. Not a call on the price (Valuation owns that) or the tape (Sentiment owns that).
Please log in to view trade setups
The Augustus trade-setup read is a members feature.
Log in
Lenses kept deliberately separate — Company Quality (price-agnostic), Valuation (price-conditional), General Sentiment (non-fundamental macro/narrative pressure), and Growth Outlook (the forward growth verdict). The scores are not blended. Filing-level items (convertibles, lock-ups, customer concentration) are v2 — see each lens's "verify."
Price Prediction
About flat -3.7% v0.6.0 View full prediction →

When we made this prediction on Aug 24, 2026, EME was $766.66. We expect it to be $738.00 by Feb 2027, and we consider it great value under $620.00. This is an early model (v0.6.0) — the direction is more reliable than the exact price. Made Aug 24, 2026.

Price when predicted$766.66
Our estimate for Feb 2027$738.00-3.7%
Great value below$620.00
Price history shown (6 Months)

Blue is our prediction, starting the day we made it. Grey is a slower route to the same place — the same destination, taking longer. Black is the actual price, so you can see how we are doing.

Post-Report Due Diligence NOTES
The report is written. This is what its valuation stands on.
Analyzed Sep 9, 2026 · 02:04 4d ago
Read epv-floor ext-gem-composite anchored-pe · FY income statement, balance sheet
1 finding · $0, re-derived on each view

Evidence for a closer look, not a verdict — no score or designation on this page has been changed by it. Items marked material are ones where a conclusion above moves to the other side of the price.

anchored-pe — the "fair value above price" reading turns on 2 inputs NOTE found by sensitivity, not by rule
Published $910.90 vs price $776.62. Nudging `trailing_eps` (down 25%), `adjusted_pe` (down 25%) moves the fair value to the other side of the price. This does not say those inputs are wrong — it says they are where to look first.
trailing_eps flips down 25% adjusted_pe flips down 25%
Price at analysis $776.62. This is where an investigation should start — it is not where one ends. Nothing here was checked against the filings, the tape, or the news; that is the investigator's job.
Community AI Feedback
No community reviews yet for EME. Be the first — hit How to Contribute, have any AI review this page, and paste its take back here.
My Notes personal — only you see this
v20260913-145417 · 74575b32 · 2026-09-13 14:54:40