Skip to main content
Homepage
Full 18-step deep-dive · ~20–30 min · a member feature.
FRESH Analysis Report
Aug 19, 2026
4 days ago · 100% complete
For AI assistants & researchers — machine-readable summary of this page

What this page is: Delvantic's full research page for Fastenal Co. (FAST) — AI-driven forensic equity research: mechanical valuation models (DCF, EPV, anchored-PE, scenario) plus three independent AI lenses (Quality / Value / Sentiment). Everything below is rendered server-side; you are not missing content that requires JavaScript. All scores are predictions and research opinions, not financial advice.

Our current read (analysis of 2026-08-23): Designation Watch · Gem Score +8 (−100…+100 Quality+Value blend) · Quality 84 · Value -54 · Sentiment 28 (timing only, not weighted) · Composite fair value $25.32 vs $51.44 at analysis

Page map (sections in order; each card carries a stable reference-name attribute you can cite):

  • profile-header / price-overview — company profile, live quote, market cap
  • extended-analysisthe core: three AI lens reads with findings, scores, and the analyst memo
  • future-predictions — our forward price-band predictions
  • market-narrative / ai-findings / gpt-critique — narrative context, cross-model findings, and an adversarial critique of our own analysis (near the end of the document)
  • Members-only sections (render as login gates for anonymous readers): price-history, income-trend, key-metrics, financials (statement tables), insider-trading. The analysis above is public; the raw data tables require a free account.

More for machine readers: site briefing at /llms.txt · any ticker resolves at delvantic.com/stock/TICKER · raw inputs are public-company filings and market data (via licensed data feeds); every model, score, lens read, and prediction on this page is Delvantic's own analysis.

Fastenal Co.

FAST NASDAQ
Industrials · Industrial Distribution
Winona, MN 55987-1500, United States fastenal.com Updated Aug 19, 12:28am
Price
$51.27
Market Cap
$58.8B
Employees
22,230
Beta
0.71
Avg Volume
8,590,226
Last Dividend
$0.96
CEO
Mr. Jeffery Michael Watts

Fastenal Co. is a wholesale distributor of industrial and construction supplies headquartered in Winona, Minnesota, founded in 1967 in the United States. The company’s core business centers on fasteners such as bolts, nuts, screws, studs, and related washers, which are used in manufactured products, construction projects, and maintenance and repair operations. Beyond fasteners, Fastenal Co. offers a broad range of industrial and construction materials, including safety equipment and services, tools, cutting tools, material handling products, janitorial items, electrical components, and general maintenance supplies. Fastenal Co. serves a diversified customer base spanning manufacturing, non-residential construction, maintenance, repair and operations (MRO), transportation, energy, agriculture, and government entities. It operates through an extensive network of branches, onsite locations, distribution centers, and industrial vending solutions that integrate directly into customer facilities to support inventory management and supply chain efficiency. Today, Fastenal Co. plays a significant role in the industrial distribution market by acting as a one-stop partner for businesses seeking reliable access to mission-critical components and consumable supplies.

Runs with full report Generated: Aug 19, 2026 2:09pm
Price Overview
Price at report time
$51.44
as of Aug 19, 5:22pm (4d ago)
Change · Aug 19
+0.17 (+0.33%)
Day Range
$51.23 – $52.05
52-Week Range
$38.97 – $52.92
50-Day MA
$47.74
200-Day MA
$44.82
Volume
6,187,014.00
Right now · live
Log in to get the live feed
Members see the real-time price and the move since this report (over 4d).
Share Structure
Outstanding 1,147,494,415.00
Float 1,144,743,579.00
Free Float 99.8%
High free float — 99.8% of shares trade freely, ~0.2% held by insiders/institutions
Very liquid — most shares trade freely. Low insider ownership can mean less management alignment, but makes large position sizing straightforward.
Price History (1 Year)
Last updated: Aug 19, 2026 5:28pm (4d ago)
Revenue & Net Income Trend
The directional story — useful even when net income is negative.
Last updated: Aug 19, 2026 5:28pm (4d ago)
Revenue
The top line — total sales before any costs or taxes are subtracted. A measure of how much business the company is doing.
Net Income
The bottom line — profit left after subtracting all expenses, interest, and taxes from revenue. Reflects accounting profitability, but includes non-cash items like depreciation, so it isn't the same as cash earned.
Operating Cash Flow
The real cash generated by the day-to-day business — selling products, paying suppliers, collecting from customers. Calculated from net income by adding back non-cash items and adjusting for timing (unpaid bills, unsold inventory). When OCF consistently lags net income, the reported profit may not be converting to real money.
Period Revenue Net Income Net Margin YoY/QoQ
Key Metrics
TD Twelve Data statement HEX SEC filing
Industry comparison last run: Aug 19, 2026 1:56pm
P/E Ratio (Price per dollar of earnings)
HEX
Stock Price / EPS (Diluted)
47.25
Stock Price: $51.27
EPS (Diluted): 1.09
P/B Ratio (Price vs net asset value)
HEX
Stock Price / Book Value Per Share
15.02
Stock Price: $51.27
Total Equity: $3.94B
Shares: 1,150,334,204
EV/EBITDA (Total value vs operating profit)
HEX
Enterprise Value / EBITDA
32.13
Market Cap: $58.83B
Total Debt: $125.00M
Cash: $276.80M
EBITDA: $1.83B
Enterprise Value (Takeover price (cap + debt - cash))
HEX
Market Cap + Total Debt - Cash
$59.0B
Market Cap: $58.83B
Total Debt: $125.00M
Cash: $276.80M
Gross Margin (Revenue left after direct costs)
HEX
Gross Profit / Revenue
45.0%
Gross Profit: $3.69B
Revenue: $8.20B
Operating Margin (Revenue left after all operations)
HEX
Operating Income / Revenue
20.2%
Operating Income: $1.66B
Revenue: $8.20B
Net Margin (Revenue left as actual profit)
HEX
Net Income / Revenue
15.3%
Net Income: $1.26B
Revenue: $8.20B
ROE (Profit from shareholder equity)
HEX
Net Income / Total Equity
31.9%
Net Income: $1.26B
Total Equity: $3.94B
ROIC (Profit from all invested capital)
HEX
NOPAT / Invested Capital
33.2%
Operating Income: $1.66B
Tax Rate: 24.0%
Equity: $3.94B
Total Debt: $125.00M
Cash: $276.80M
Current Ratio (Can it pay short-term bills)
HEX
Current Assets / Current Liabilities
4.85
Current Assets: $3.47B
Current Liabilities: $715.60M
Debt/Equity (Leverage — debt vs equity)
HEX
Total Debt / Total Equity
0.03
Short-Term Debt: $25.00M
Long-Term Debt: $100.00M
Total Debt: $125.00M
Total Equity: $3.94B
Rev/Share (Top-line per share)
HEX
Revenue / Shares Outstanding
$7.13
Revenue: $8.20B
Shares: 1,150,334,204
Book Value/Share (Net assets per share)
HEX
(Total Assets - Total Liabilities) / Shares
$3.43
Total Equity: $3.94B
Shares: 1,150,334,204
FCF/Share (Real cash generated per share)
HEX
(Operating Cash Flow + CapEx) / Shares
$0.91
Operating CF: $1.30B
CapEx: -$245.30M
Shares: 1,150,334,204
CapEx is negative (outflow) — added to OCF to get FCF
Div Yield (Annual income from holding)
TD
Last Annual Dividend / Stock Price
1.9%
Last Dividend: $0.96
Stock Price: $51.27
Payout Ratio (Earnings paid out as dividends)
HEX
Dividends Paid / Net Income
79.8%
Dividends Paid: -$1.00B
Net Income: $1.26B
Industry Benchmarks
Last run: Aug 19, 2026 1:56pm
Compares FAST against LLM-researched typical ranges for its industry. One research call per industry, cached indefinitely — every stock in the same industry reuses the same baseline.
Income Statement (Annual)
Last updated: Aug 19, 2026 5:28pm (4d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Revenue $6.0B $7.0B $7.3B $7.5B $8.2B
Cost of Revenue $3.2B $3.8B $4.0B $4.1B $4.5B
Gross Profit $2.8B $3.2B $3.4B $3.4B $3.7B
Operating Expenses $1.6B $1.8B $1.8B $1.9B $2.0B
Operating Income $1.2B $1.5B $1.5B $1.5B $1.7B
Net Income $925.0M $1.1B $1.2B $1.2B $1.3B
EBITDA $1.6B $1.7B $1.7B $1.8B
EPS $1.61 $1.89 $2.02 $2.01 $1.10
EPS (Diluted) $1.60 $1.89 $2.02 $2.00 $1.09
Balance Sheet (Annual)
Last updated: Aug 19, 2026 12:27pm (4d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Cash & Equivalents $236.2M $230.1M $221.3M $255.8M $276.8M
Total Current Assets $2.9B $3.1B $3.0B $3.2B $3.5B
Total Assets $4.3B $4.5B $4.5B $4.7B $5.1B
Current Liabilities $682.2M $789.8M $661.3M $687.1M $715.6M
Long-Term Debt $330.0M $353.2M $200.0M $125.0M $100.0M
Total Liabilities $1.3B $1.4B $1.1B $1.1B $1.1B
Total Equity $3.0B $3.2B $3.3B $3.6B $3.9B
Retained Earnings $3.0B $3.2B $3.4B $3.6B $3.9B
Cash Flow (Annual)
Last updated: Aug 19, 2026 5:28pm (4d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Operating Cash Flow $770.1M $941.0M $1.4B $1.2B $1.3B
Capital Expenditure -$156.6M -$173.8M -$172.8M -$226.5M -$245.3M
Free Cash Flow $613.5M $767.2M $1.3B $946.8M $1.1B
Acquisitions (net) $0 $0
Net Debt Issued / (Repaid) -$15.0M $165.0M -$295.0M -$60.0M -$75.0M
Dividends Paid -$643.7M -$711.3M -$1.0B -$893.3M -$1.0B
Stock Buybacks $0 -$237.8M $0 $0
Net Change in Cash -$9.5M -$6.1M -$8.8M $34.5M $21.0M
Growth Trends (YoY %)
Last updated: Aug 19, 2026 5:28pm (4d ago)
Metric 2022 2023 2024 2025
Revenue Growth +16.1% +5.2% +2.7% +8.7%
Gross Profit Growth +15.8% +4.3% +1.4% +8.5%
Operating Income Growth +19.4% +5.2% -1.2% +9.6%
Net Income Growth +17.5% +6.3% -0.4% +9.4%
EBITDA Growth +4.6% -1.2% +8.9%
Dividend History (Last 20)
Last updated: Aug 19, 2026 12:26pm (4d ago)
Date Dividend Declaration Record Payment
2026-07-28 $0.26
2026-04-28 $0.24
2026-01-29 $0.24
2025-10-28 $0.22
2025-07-29 $0.22
2025-04-25 $0.44
2025-01-31 $0.43
2024-10-25 $0.39
2024-07-26 $0.39
2024-04-24 $0.39
2024-01-31 $0.39
2023-12-05 $0.38
2023-10-25 $0.35
2023-07-26 $0.35
2023-04-26 $0.35
2023-02-01 $0.35
2022-10-26 $0.31
2022-07-26 $0.31
2022-04-26 $0.31
2022-02-01 $0.31
0Company Classification 1Industry Landscape 2Company Momentum 3Forward Projection 4aDCF Valuation 4bEarnings Power Value 4cAnchored PE 4dReverse DCF 4eRevenue-Based DCF 4fAnchored P/S 4gScenario Analysis 4hDividend Discount Model 4iBook Value Analysis 4jInsider Activity 4fCash Flow Quality 4gDebt Maturity Risk 4hMacro Environment 4iSector Intelligence 4jRevenue Confidence 4kSensitivity Analysis 4lSector Demand Cycle 5AI Investigation 5bThesis Evaluation 6Valuation Synthesis
computed not applicable 18 computed · 6 not applicable
Risk : Reward — if the last quarter repeats
Live · as of 2026-08-19 17:41
-0.8 : 1 recovery upside vs repeat-quarter downside
Even the bull case prices 52% below today — the ratio here measures the model-vs-market gap, not payoff odds. Another quarter like the worst recent one costs 63%.
CaseGrowthMarginFair valuevs price ($51.44)
Bull — recovery +16% 17.8% $24.64 -52%
Base — stabilizes +10% 15.5% $18.44 -64%
Bear — keeps slipping +5% 13.1% $13.50 -74%
Stress — last quarter repeats +11% 15.5% $18.91 -63%
The next quarters keep the trajectory of the worst recent matched quarter (ending 2025-12-31) — growth stays at 11.1% and margins bend by the same profit-vs-revenue ratio (×1.00). Stress is a trajectory, not a prediction — it answers "what if the ship's current heading simply continues," which history says is the case to respect.
Why this is appearing: this company files quarterly, so its recent trajectory could be measured rather than assumed — the engine matched Jun 2026, Mar 2026 against the same quarters one year earlier and found revenue +13.6% · operating income +14.4% · net income +14.9% year-over-year. That measured heading is what the stress case extends forward. Of those, the stress case extends the worst matched quarter — the one ending Dec 31, 2025 (revenue +11.1%, operating income +11.4% YoY) — not the average. Data measured through Jun 30, 2026 — this card recalculates automatically when the next quarterly filing is ingested. Companies without quarterly filings (many foreign listings) never show this card: with no measured trajectory, there is nothing honest to repeat.
Narrative Economics
The story the market is telling about this stock — the intangible X-factor (founder mythology, cult dynamics, TAM-of-imagination) that moves price beyond what cash flows alone explain. After Shiller, Narrative Economics.
No narrative profile yet for FAST — it's generated by the pipeline (market-narrative step).
Growth Outlook
Analyzed 2026-08-19 17:39

The question every valuation on this page silently assumes: is this company likely to grow? Judged forward — the business, its category, the world — against what's already printed.

Growing Fastenal is compounding above its own history and above its category — matched-quarter revenue +13.6% and operating income +14.4% on a 5.7% long-run CAGR — driven by the onsite/FMI installed base plus tariff-era fastener pricing; durable growth, but nowhere near the ~41% the price is underwriting. conf 8/10
Share gain Category growing · Category is in a boom phase with median recent growth ~6.6% on a mature 4.3% long-run industry CAGR; Fastenal is running 8.7% recent YoY and +13.6% in the newest matched quarters — a +4.2pp gap and widening.
Next 2 quarters
Growing
Onsite/FMI installed base and pricing carryover keep daily sales in high-single to low-double digits, with operating leverage holding. Comps begin to stiffen against the boom-phase base, so acceleration likely plateaus rather than extends.
≈ inline with expectations
Year 1
Growing
Full-year revenue likely high-single to low-double digits with earnings modestly faster on branch/hub leverage. Growth is driven by contract-signing cadence the company controls, not by a macro bet, which makes the FY path unusually predictable.
≈ inline with expectations
Years 2–3
Growing
The installed-base flywheel and demonstrated share capture in a flat category support mid-to-high-single-digit revenue and low-double-digit earnings power structurally. But the category ceiling (4.3% CAGR) and scale arithmetic pull the rate down over time, and weak FCF conversion says some of the growth is bought with working capital.
↓ below expectations
The creme: each rung's call measured against what's already printed (vs analyst estimates · vs guidance / FY consensus · vs price-implied growth) — expectations in print are already in the price, so only the variant margin can pay. Hover a rung's chip for the margin read.
Growth drivers
74 Onsite + FMI installed base compounding — Each signed onsite/vending device converts episodic spot purchasing into contracted, consumption-triggered replenishment, so share-of-wallet inside an existing customer keeps rising without new-account wins. This is the specific mechanism behind same-store growth running above the category's 6.6% median, and it is cumulative — the installed base is the growth engine, not the macro.
66 Documented share gain vs a flat industry — Recent YoY 8.7% against industry ~4.5% is a +4.2pp gap, and the newest matched quarters (+13.6%) widen it further. In a 4.3%-CAGR mature category, growth of this shape can only come from displacing regional distributors and in-house purchasing — a structural, not cyclical, source.
48 Operating leverage intact — Operating income +14.4% and net income +14.9% both outrunning revenue +13.6% says incremental volume is flowing through fixed hub/branch infrastructure rather than being competed away — pricing and freight are being managed, not surrendered. Earnings power is growing slightly faster than the top line.
40 Category in a genuine boom phase — Sector demand score 2, phase boom, with broad revenue acceleration and holding margins across industrial distribution. Reshoring/capex-linked MRO consumption is a real volume tailwind for a consumables distributor whose revenue tracks factory run-hours.
30 Fastener price/mix from tariff regime — Tariffs on imported fastener inputs push realized prices up and favor distributors with domestic sourcing and inventory depth — a near-term revenue lift and a customer reason to consolidate suppliers. Real, but partly a level effect rather than a compounding rate.
Growth risks
81 Price-implied growth is unreachable — The reverse-DCF demands +41.2% versus a house path of ~10.4% and an actual trajectory of 8-14% revenue with low-teens earnings. Even a best-case onsite ramp plus full pricing carryover does not produce 40%+ compounding for a distributor with a 4.3%-CAGR addressable category. The business grows; the printed bar does not get cleared.
45 Cash conversion deteriorating — FCF CAGR of -8.7% against positive revenue and earnings CAGRs points to inventory and hub/capex absorption funding the growth. Growth financed by working capital is lower-quality growth and it caps how much of the reported earnings expansion is real distributable power.
43 Manufacturing cyclicality — Revenue is levered to factory activity and daily sales; an industrial slowdown compresses volumes fast, and the current print is flattered by a boom-phase comparison base. Comps stiffen materially over the next four quarters.
32 Pricing tailwind can reverse — If tariff schedules ease or input costs roll over, the price component of the +13.6% unwinds into a headwind, taking reported growth back toward mid-single digits even with unit volumes flat.
36 Mature category ceiling / scale drag — Industry revenue CAGR of 4.3% means sustained double-digit growth must be taken from competitors indefinitely — arithmetically harder each year at this revenue base. Long-run growth gravitates toward category plus a shrinking share-gain increment.
Neutral macro (10y 4.72%, curve +0.53) with reshoring capex and tariff-driven input inflation both working in a domestic industrial distributor's favor: higher realized fastener prices, plus a customer incentive to consolidate onto a supplier with inventory depth and on-site replenishment. The risk in the world is the same one that helps — this is a factory-activity-levered consumables business, so any industrial deceleration or tariff normalization hits volume and price simultaneously. Nothing in the world backdrop supports the ~41% growth the price embeds.
Growth position composite +8
ShrinkingStallingHoldingGrowingAccelerating
70Next 2 quarters · Growing
70Year 1 · Growing
70Years 2–3 · Growing
+8Composite (−100…+100)
A research prediction, not advice. Forward-graded: each rung is scored against the prints that follow it. Not an input to the GEM designation — track record first.
Claude Reading
Independent analyst synthesis · claude-opus-4-7 · generated 2026-08-19 17:27:14
Verdict Overvalued but the DCF is broken — real fair value $38-42, not $28; wait for $40 or a cycle-driven flush, don't short a 33% ROIC compounder.

Looking at the raw quarterly tape first: FAST posted $2.39B in Q2 2026, up 14.9% YoY from $2.08B, with net margin expanding to 16.0% from 15.9%. That's an acceleration, not a deceleration — the trailing four quarters run $8.75B in revenue vs. the $8.20B FY2025 print, so run-rate growth is closer to 10-11% than the 5.7% five-year CAGR the momentum module cites. Earnings are compounding faster: TTM NI is roughly $1.35B versus $1.15B in FY2024, ~17% growth. ROIC of 33%, debt/equity of 3%, current ratio 4.85, and $1.05B FCF on $245M capex — this is a pristine balance sheet with genuine operating leverage showing up right now. The synthesis model's "growth slowing, margins plateaued" bear framing is contradicted by the last two quarters of actual data.

That said, the valuation is still uncomfortable. At $51.27 and ~$1.35B TTM earnings, the P/E is ~43x; EV/EBITDA at 32x is genuinely rich for a distributor. Even generously assuming FAST sustains 10% revenue growth and margins hold at 16%, you're looking at ~$1.55B NI in 2027, putting the forward multiple around 38x. Grainger (GWW) trades at ~25x. The synthesis DCF pinning fair value at $25-28 is, however, absurd on its face — that implies FAST should trade below book-value-adjusted replacement cost for a business earning 33% ROIC. Whoever ran that model almost certainly used a punitive terminal growth or discount rate that ignores the reinvestment economics. Fair value is more plausibly in the $38-45 range on a 28-32x forward multiple — expensive, but not the 45% haircut the composite claims.

The insider activity flag deserves scrutiny. Every single "sale" in the last ten transactions is paired 1:1 with an option exercise on the same day — this is mechanical cashless-exercise behavior, not conviction selling. The secondary signals module correctly flagged "Net Insider Buying" while the market-forces model called it "47:1 insider selling" — those two are looking at the same tape and reaching opposite conclusions. The secondary read is correct; there is no meaningful discretionary selling here. Market-forces is overweighting a non-signal. The narrative layer's framing — "82% premium sits entirely in narrative" — also overstates it once you correct the fundamental anchor upward.

A careful contrarian's real argument isn't that FAST is a bad business; it's that (a) industrial distribution is late-cycle and the 14.9% Q2 print may be capturing tariff-driven pull-forward or inventory restocking that reverses, (b) the 5.7% five-year CAGR is what you get across a full cycle and 10% is the peak, and (c) at 43x TTM, any reversion to trend growth plus multiple compression to peer levels (25-28x) implies 30-40% downside even without any operational stumble. The FCF CAGR of -8.7% is the one genuinely worrying number in the file — it suggests working capital investment (onsite/vending buildout) is consuming reinvestment dollars faster than accounting earnings admit, and warrants a look at inventory days trend that isn't in this file. I'd note the file is missing segment onsite/vending disclosure and the 2026 dates suggest this is forward-simulated data, which further reduces my conviction on the acceleration read.

My verdict: I partially dissent from the synthesis. FAST is overvalued, but not by 45% — the DCF anchor is broken. This is a genuine ~33% ROIC compounder trading at a ~50-60% premium to fair value, not a 100% premium. Fair value is $38-42; current $51.27 offers negative expected returns over 12-24 months absent multiple expansion, but the downside is bounded by business quality and cyclical resilience. I would not short it, would not buy it here, and would be a starter buyer in the low $40s or on a cycle-driven pullback to $35. The market-forces "priced for perfection at cyclical peak" framing is directionally right; the synthesis fair value is directionally wrong in magnitude.

GPT Reading
Independent reading · gpt-5.4 · generated 2026-08-19 17:27:31
Verdict Overvalued at $51.27 — a best-in-class distributor, but the 40x+ earnings and sub-2% FCF yield price in a level of durable growth that the historical numbers do not support; fair value is closer to $33-$38.

Fastenal is exactly the sort of business the market loves to overpay for: a genuinely excellent operator with fortress finances, high returns, and unusually stable profitability for an industrial name. The operating record is hard to argue with. Revenue rose from $6.01B in 2021 to $8.20B in 2025, about 8% annualized over that span, while net income climbed from $925M to $1.26B. Gross margin has held around 45%, operating margin around 20%, and net margin around 15%, which is elite for distribution. The latest quarterly run-rate is even better: 2026 Q2 revenue of $2.39B and net income of $382.8M imply 16.0% net margin, up from 15.9% a year earlier, and the last four quarters sum to roughly $8.75B of revenue and $1.35B of net income. Add a balance sheet with just $125M of debt against $276.8M of cash, plus 33% ROIC and 32% ROE, and you have a real quality compounder, not a story stock pretending to be one.

But the stock price is still asking for too much. At $51.27, the market cap is $58.8B, which is about 6.7x trailing annualized revenue on the recent run-rate and roughly 43-47x earnings depending on whether you use 2025 reported EPS power or annualize the last two quarters. That is an extreme multiple for a company whose longer-run revenue CAGR is 5.7%, earnings CAGR is 4.4%, and free cash flow has actually shrunk over the measured period. Even if I give full credit for the recent acceleration—Q2 revenue up roughly 15% year over year versus Q2 2025, and Q1 up about 12%—the valuation already embeds a continuation of unusually strong execution with no cyclical wobble. For a distributor, 32x EV/EBITDA and 7.2x sales are not “premium quality” numbers; they are near-perfection numbers. If this were a software business with incremental margins expanding off a sticky recurring base, maybe. For an industrial supply chain business, even a best-in-class one, that is a dangerous starting point.

What stands out most is the mismatch between business quality and shareholder yield at this valuation. Free cash flow was $1.05B in 2025, so the stock trades at about a 1.8% FCF yield. The dividend yield is 1.86%, and the payout ratio is nearly 80%, which means a large portion of the return case depends on continued multiple support rather than internally compounding retained cash at a high rate. Yes, the company earns high returns on capital, but if investors are paying 15x book and more than 7x sales, much of that quality is already capitalized into the stock. The recent margin improvement is real, but it is incremental improvement on an already mature base, not a step-change economics story. I do not see enough growth in the raw numbers to justify paying a multiple usually reserved for businesses with double-digit long-duration organic growth and significantly larger reinvestment runways.

The best argument against this view is that Fastenal is not a generic distributor and deserves to be valued as a structurally superior model. The evidence is there: margins have not compressed despite scale, ROIC above 30% is extraordinary, the balance sheet is pristine, and recent quarterly growth has clearly reaccelerated. If the company can sustain something like a $1.45B-$1.55B net income run-rate over the next year while holding 15.5%-16.0% net margins, then today’s P/E falls faster than the backward-looking metrics suggest. A smart bull would also note that the insider “selling” here is mostly option exercise-related rather than obvious discretionary dumping, so I do not read much signal into it. And in a market starved for dependable industrial compounders, scarcity itself can support a durable premium for much longer than valuation purists expect.

Still, I weigh those bullish points as reasons the stock should trade at a premium, not at this premium. I would change my mind if the next few quarters show that the 2026 acceleration is not just cyclical recovery but a new earnings level: specifically, if revenue can hold above $2.35B per quarter, net margins stay at or above 15.8%, and full-year free cash flow pushes toward $1.35B-$1.45B without balance-sheet leverage, then the current price becomes more defensible. Absent that, I think the likely outcome is not business disappointment but valuation compression: a great company still can be a mediocre stock when bought at 40x-plus earnings. My fair value range is closer to the low-to-mid $30s, and I would need a pullback toward roughly $35 before the quality and price start to line up.

Grok Reading
Independent reading · grok-4.5 · generated 2026-08-19 17:28:07
Verdict Overvalued at $51; high-quality compounder worth ~$30–35 on fundamentals, not 47x earnings

Fastenal’s numbers describe a genuinely excellent industrial distributor that the market has decided to price like a software franchise. Revenue climbed from $6.01B in 2021 to $8.20B in 2025, a roughly 5.7% CAGR, with a recent acceleration to 8.7% year-over-year and a latest quarter of $2.39B that keeps the sequential step-up intact. Net income followed a similar path to $1.26B, margins holding near 15% net and 20% operating while gross sits at a durable 45%. ROIC of 33% and ROE of 32% on a balance sheet carrying only $125M of debt against $277M cash and $3.94B equity is the profile of a high-quality compounder, not a cyclical metal-bender. Free cash flow of $1.05B against $245M of capex confirms the model converts earnings cleanly. None of that is in dispute. What is in dispute is the 47x trailing P/E, 7.2x sales, and 32x EV/EBITDA attached to mid-single-digit historical growth and a payout ratio already at 80%. At $51.27 the equity is capitalizing roughly $59B of enterprise value on a business that, even granting premium economics, is still an industrial distributor whose earnings power grows high-single-digits in a good year.

The contradiction with the quantitative fair-value work is therefore not subtle. A composite intrinsic estimate near $28 implies the stock is embedding an 80%+ narrative premium for the vending-machine stickiness story and multi-decade execution track record. Recent quarterly prints ($2.20B then $2.39B) and 9.4% earnings growth show the flywheel is still turning, but they do not re-rate the growth algorithm into double digits on a sustained basis. Insider activity is almost entirely option exercise followed by immediate sale of the same share counts—classic liquidity events, not accumulation—so the “net buying” secondary signal is noise. FCF CAGR of –8.7% over the measured window is an additional soft spot beneath the steady revenue line. The stock is being valued for perpetual quality compounding at a rate the income statement has not yet delivered outside of short bursts.

The strongest counter-argument is that quality of this consistency is rare and the market has spent a decade correctly paying up for it. Gross margin has not compressed, ROIC remains elite, the onsite/vending model does create switching costs that pure catalog peers lack, and the fortress balance sheet plus $1B-plus FCF gives management decades of optionality to keep buying back stock and raising the dividend. A skeptic of the under-valuation call would note that applying a 30x multiple—still a fat premium to industrial distributors—to something like $1.35–1.40B of forward earnings already gets you into the low-to-mid $30s, and any sustained 10%+ growth regime plus modest margin creep could justify mid-30s without requiring heroics. In a world that systematically overpays for predictable compounders, Fastenal’s 50-year record is the exact asset that keeps the multiple from mean-reverting quickly. That case is coherent; it simply requires believing the current 47x is the new normal rather than late-cycle quality froth.

I would reverse course if the next four quarters delivered sustained revenue growth above 12% with operating margin expansion past 22%, or if a market drawdown brought the shares into the $32–36 range where a 28–32x earnings multiple on demonstrated earnings power would restore an asymmetric reward-to-risk profile. Until one of those arrives, the data say the story has outrun the cash flows.

Big-3 Panel — where each AI stands
Each AI above independently stated a direction (undervalued, fairly valued, or overvalued) and how strongly it believes it (conviction, 0–5). We combine those into a Bull-Bear Index on a 0–10 scale: 5 is neutral, 10 is maximum bullish (undervalued at full conviction), 0 is maximum bearish. We compute the score ourselves with the same arithmetic for every seat — the models never grade their own bullishness — so the three are directly comparable. Δ shows how far each seat sits from the panel average of 1.3; a large Δ marks the dissenting voice, usually the one worth reading.
Claude claude-opus-4-7 2.0
overvalued · conviction 3/5 · Δ +0.7 vs panel · self: 3.0
GPT gpt-5.4 1.0
overvalued · conviction 4/5 · Δ -0.3 vs panel · self: 3.0
Grok grok-4.5 1.0
overvalued · conviction 4/5 · Δ -0.3 vs panel · self: 2.0
Advanced Analysis Forensic deep-dive · separate lenses
Separate reads — Company Quality (is it a great business?), Valuation (is it mispriced?), and General Sentiment (how macro + narrative are pushing it), kept deliberately apart · 2026-08-19 17:41:13
Delvantic - Cairn AI
Quality — wait for a dip 7/10
Elite compounder trading modestly rich after a 14% rally — a name to own, but not at $51.
The cruxWhether you get a chance to buy this quality business with a real margin of safety; the low-$40s is where quality meets price.
Forensic checks Derived mechanically from FAST's filed financials — not from the AI lenses
Liquidity & RunwaySelf-Funding
DilutionHeavy Dilution
Earnings QualityHigh Earnings Quality
The four lensesswitch a tab for its full read — score + evidence
Company Quality
+84
Strong
edge √Σ 156 · risk √Σ 35 · conf 8/10

Fastenal shows the profile of a high-quality mature earner: revenue compounded from 6.01B in 2021 to 8.20B in 2025 (about 8% CAGR), gross margin held in a tight 45-46% band, and operating margin sat at roughly 20% every year. Net income rose from 925M to 1.26B and FCF ran 613M to 1.05B, with OCF/NI at 1.0x and accruals at -0.1% of assets. Beneish M of -2.4 and Altman Z of 36.25 corroborate that reported earnings are cash-backed and solvency risk is negligible. Net cash of 151.8M against 1.05B annual FCF means the business is self-funding with ample optionality. The dilution module's 18.8% diluted share CAGR flag looks mechanical: share count was flat at 573-577M from 2021-2024, then printed 1.15B in 2025 - almost exactly a 2-for-1 change, consistent with a stock split, not real dilution. SBC is only 0.1% of revenue and buyback/SBC is 651%, both indicating strong per-share discipline. Insider tape is routine option-exercise-and-sell behavior with no meaningful open-market buying or selling; the 'net insider buying' framing in the context module is not supported by the tape.

Strengths 5
m78
Consistent 20% operating margins at scale
OpM was 20.3/20.8/20.8/20.0/20.2 across 2021-2025 on rising revenue - evidence of durable pricing power and disciplined cost structure in industrial distribution.
m82
Pristine earnings quality
OCF/NI ~1.0x, accruals -0.1% of assets, Beneish M -2.4, Altman Z 36.25. Nothing in the mechanical checks suggests aggressive accounting.
m70
Self-funding with net cash
1.05B FCF against 151.8M net cash and 276.8M liquid cash - no reliance on external capital, ample flexibility despite low cash/mktcap ratio.
m55
Low SBC and consistent buyback posture
SBC at 0.1% of revenue and buybacks running 6.5x SBC indicate per-share value is protected, not eroded.
m60
Steady top-line compounding
Revenue 6.01B to 8.20B (8% CAGR) with net income up 36% over the period - a mature but still-growing distributor.
Concerns 3
m25
Apparent share-count doubling needs confirmation
Diluted shares jumped from 574.3M in 2024 to 1.15B in 2025. Given flat SBC and heavy buybacks, this is almost certainly a 2-for-1 split, but the module flagged it as 18.8% dilution CAGR - worth verifying it is a split, not issuance.
m20
Slight gross margin drift
GM% eased from 46.2 in 2021 to 45.0 in 2025 - small but monotonic, worth watching for mix or cost-pass-through pressure.
m15
Insider tape is exercise-and-sell, not conviction buying
The 15 most recent transactions are option exercises paired with sales plus awards - no open-market P buys. The 'net insider buying' framing overstates it.
This looks like a textbook high-quality industrial compounder. The numbers hang together: cash flow matches earnings, margins are steady, the balance sheet is fortress-grade, and there is no evidence of accounting games. The lone red flag - 18.8% share CAGR - is almost certainly a mechanical stock split misread by the dilution module, given flat share counts through 2024, minimal SBC, and heavy buybacks. Insider behavior is unremarkable exercise-and-sell, not a signal either way. I would call this Strong; it clears Solid comfortably but doesn't quite show the elite growth or widening moat one would want to push toward the 87+ bracket.
Verify before trusting this (5)
  • Confirm the 2025 share count jump from 574M to 1.15B is a stock split (likely 2-for-1) rather than an issuance
  • Customer and end-market concentration disclosures in the 10-K
  • Onsite/FMI (vending) program growth rates and contribution to revenue mix
  • Any changes in inventory turns or DSO that could presage the GM% drift continuing
  • Actual buyback vs dividend cash returned to shareholders per share on a split-adjusted basis
Valuation / Mispricing
-54
Rich
edge √Σ 35 · risk √Σ 96 · conf 6/10
price $51.44 vs a quality-adjusted deserved value near $45-48 - roughly 10-15% above fair, no margin of safety. attractive below $42.00

The e2e composite pegs fair value at $25.32 and signal-adjusted at $28.18 versus a $51.44 price, implying roughly 45% downside. The DCF ($21) and EPV floor ($12.54) are almost certainly too harsh for a business with Fastenal's returns on capital, steady same-store growth, and vending-machine flywheel - EPV in particular ignores reinvestment value entirely. The anchored-PE at $46.43 is the most credible read and lands only about 10% below spot, suggesting the honest gap is 'modestly rich,' not 'deeply overvalued.'

Cheap signals 1
m35
Model likely under-credits quality
DCF $21 and EPV $12.54 look mechanical - a business with pristine earnings quality, fortress balance sheet, and 50-year compounding record deserves a higher deserved value than a 60%+ discount to spot suggests.
Rich / priced-in 4
m60
Priced above every model output
At $51.44 the stock trades above the anchored-PE ($46.43), DCF ($21.16), EPV ($12.54), and both composite ($25.32) and signal-adjusted ($28.18) fair values - no method supports the current price.
m55
Premium multiple on a mature distributor
A ~$59B cap on a slow-growth fastener distributor implies a mid-to-high 20s P/E, embedding continued margin expansion and vending penetration that is already well understood by the market.
m40
Anchored-PE, the most defensible read, still says down ~10%
The anchored-PE fair value of $46.43 vs $51.44 spot implies ~10% overvaluation even giving full credit to the quality profile - fair-to-slightly-rich, not a bargain.
m30
No margin of safety on a cyclical
Industrial distribution earnings are cycle-sensitive; paying above every fair-value estimate at what may be a mid-to-late cycle print offers zero cushion if manufacturing PMI rolls.
I think this is fairly-to-modestly rich, not the 45% overvaluation the composite screams. The DCF and EPV outputs look mechanically punitive on a business this high-quality; the anchored-PE at $46 is the honest anchor and it says the stock is maybe 10% expensive. I'm not shorting a compounder like this, but I'm not paying $51 either - I'd want it in the low $40s before it's genuinely interesting, and even then I'm buying quality, not deep value.
Verify before trusting this (4)
  • Whether the 18.8% share CAGR is truly a stock split (confirm via 10-K share count) - a real dilution would materially cut deserved value
  • Forward same-store daily sales trajectory and vending device net adds
  • Gross margin trend vs the plateau bear thesis
  • Any FY guidance revision that would reset the anchored-PE base earnings
General Sentiment
+28
Tailwind
tail √Σ 80 · head √Σ 51 · conf 6/10

FAST is riding a clean positive news cycle: a well-received Q2 update, a 14% one-month rally, and headlines framing it as an outperformer within industrial products. The steady-compounder narrative is strong and durable, and in a mildly risk-on tape with neutral macro that kind of story tends to get rewarded with sticky flows even without a cult following. Low beta (0.71) means the S&P being 1.4% off highs barely registers here. Against that, the dominant media framing has shifted to 'is it pricey?' and 'fully valued despite the run' - not a narrative break, but a ceiling. Analyst tone in the flow leans cautious on upside from here even while acknowledging execution. Net, the pressure still leans up because the story is intact and momentum is fresh, but the tailwind is losing thrust as valuation chatter grows louder.

Tailwinds 3
m55
Fresh post-earnings momentum
A 14% month rally tied to a positive Q2 update is a real, visible push - recency bias and momentum-chasing flows keep working on low-vol compounders like this.
m50
Durable steady-compounder narrative
The vending-machine flywheel and 50-year execution story is intact and being actively retold in the press, which supports a premium multiple even as bears grumble.
m30
Low-beta name in a mildly risk-on tape
Beta 0.71 in a +25 risk-on regime means the macro tape is a light supportive breeze, not a driver - the stock is largely insulated either way.
Headwinds 2
m45
'Fully valued' framing dominates coverage
Multiple headlines explicitly question whether FAST is now pricey or fully valued after the run - this caps how much further sentiment can stretch and invites profit-taking on any wobble.
m25
No cult, no new bull catalyst
Low cult coefficient means there is no fanatical marginal buyer to push it into euphoria - the narrative works but does not accelerate.
Net tailwind, but a modest one. The story is intact, the tape is friendly, and the news flow is positive - that is a real push on a low-beta compounder. But the media has already pivoted to 'is it too expensive?' which tells me the easy sentiment gains are behind us. I lean tailwind with medium conviction; this is not a mania, it is a well-run stock enjoying a good month with valuation gravity starting to whisper.
Verify before trusting this (3)
  • Whether next monthly sales update sustains the beat cadence or shows deceleration
  • Analyst target revisions after the Q2 rally - if targets do not chase the price, the ceiling hardens
  • Any rotation out of defensive industrials into higher-beta cyclicals if the risk-on tape strengthens
The market-wide tape + this name's exposure to it (beta / sector / narrative durability). Context on the non-fundamental pressure — not a call on the business or the price. processId: detail-general-sentiment
Growth Outlook
+8
Growing
edge √Σ 121 · risk √Σ 113 · conf 8/10

Neutral macro (10y 4.72%, curve +0.53) with reshoring capex and tariff-driven input inflation both working in a domestic industrial distributor's favor: higher realized fastener prices, plus a customer incentive to consolidate onto a supplier with inventory depth and on-site replenishment. The risk in the world is the same one that helps — this is a factory-activity-levered consumables business, so any industrial deceleration or tariff normalization hits volume and price simultaneously. Nothing in the world backdrop supports the ~41% growth the price embeds.

Growth drivers 5
m74
Onsite + FMI installed base compounding
Each signed onsite/vending device converts episodic spot purchasing into contracted, consumption-triggered replenishment, so share-of-wallet inside an existing customer keeps rising without new-account wins. This is the specific mechanism behind same-store growth running above the category's 6.6% median, and it is cumulative — the installed base is the growth engine, not the macro.
m66
Documented share gain vs a flat industry
Recent YoY 8.7% against industry ~4.5% is a +4.2pp gap, and the newest matched quarters (+13.6%) widen it further. In a 4.3%-CAGR mature category, growth of this shape can only come from displacing regional distributors and in-house purchasing — a structural, not cyclical, source.
m48
Operating leverage intact
Operating income +14.4% and net income +14.9% both outrunning revenue +13.6% says incremental volume is flowing through fixed hub/branch infrastructure rather than being competed away — pricing and freight are being managed, not surrendered. Earnings power is growing slightly faster than the top line.
m40
Category in a genuine boom phase
Sector demand score 2, phase boom, with broad revenue acceleration and holding margins across industrial distribution. Reshoring/capex-linked MRO consumption is a real volume tailwind for a consumables distributor whose revenue tracks factory run-hours.
m30
Fastener price/mix from tariff regime
Tariffs on imported fastener inputs push realized prices up and favor distributors with domestic sourcing and inventory depth — a near-term revenue lift and a customer reason to consolidate suppliers. Real, but partly a level effect rather than a compounding rate.
Growth risks 5
m81
Price-implied growth is unreachable
The reverse-DCF demands +41.2% versus a house path of ~10.4% and an actual trajectory of 8-14% revenue with low-teens earnings. Even a best-case onsite ramp plus full pricing carryover does not produce 40%+ compounding for a distributor with a 4.3%-CAGR addressable category. The business grows; the printed bar does not get cleared.
m45
Cash conversion deteriorating
FCF CAGR of -8.7% against positive revenue and earnings CAGRs points to inventory and hub/capex absorption funding the growth. Growth financed by working capital is lower-quality growth and it caps how much of the reported earnings expansion is real distributable power.
m43
Manufacturing cyclicality
Revenue is levered to factory activity and daily sales; an industrial slowdown compresses volumes fast, and the current print is flattered by a boom-phase comparison base. Comps stiffen materially over the next four quarters.
m32
Pricing tailwind can reverse
If tariff schedules ease or input costs roll over, the price component of the +13.6% unwinds into a headwind, taking reported growth back toward mid-single digits even with unit volumes flat.
m36
Mature category ceiling / scale drag
Industry revenue CAGR of 4.3% means sustained double-digit growth must be taken from competitors indefinitely — arithmetically harder each year at this revenue base. Long-run growth gravitates toward category plus a shrinking share-gain increment.
vs expectations: ~6m inline · 1y inline · 2-3y below
The forward growth verdict — is the business itself likely to grow (next 2 quarters / year 1 / years 2–3), judged against its category and against printed expectations. The full horizon ladder + creme renders on the Growth Outlook card above. Not a call on the price (Valuation owns that) or the tape (Sentiment owns that).
Please log in to view trade setups
The Augustus trade-setup read is a members feature.
Log in
Lenses kept deliberately separate — Company Quality (price-agnostic), Valuation (price-conditional), General Sentiment (non-fundamental macro/narrative pressure), and Growth Outlook (the forward growth verdict). The scores are not blended. Filing-level items (convertibles, lock-ups, customer concentration) are v2 — see each lens's "verify."
Price Prediction
Lower -9.0% v0.6.0 View full prediction →

When we made this prediction on Aug 19, 2026, FAST was $51.44. We expect it to be $46.80 by Feb 2027, and we consider it great value under $42.00. This is an early model (v0.6.0) — the direction is more reliable than the exact price. Made Aug 19, 2026.

Price when predicted$51.44
Our estimate for Feb 2027$46.80-9.0%
Great value below$42.00
Price history shown (6 Months)

Blue is our prediction, starting the day we made it. Grey is a slower route to the same place — the same destination, taking longer. Black is the actual price, so you can see how we are doing.

Community AI Feedback
No community reviews yet for FAST. Be the first — hit How to Contribute, have any AI review this page, and paste its take back here.
My Notes personal — only you see this
v1.1.562 · 9b2927c4 · 2026-08-22 16:52:06