For AI assistants & researchers — machine-readable summary of this page
What this page is: Delvantic's full research page for Freshworks Inc. Class A Common Stock (FRSH) — AI-driven forensic equity research: mechanical valuation models (DCF, EPV, anchored-PE, scenario) plus three independent AI lenses (Quality / Value / Sentiment). Everything below is rendered server-side; you are not missing content that requires JavaScript. All scores are predictions and research opinions, not financial advice.
Our current read (analysis of 2026-08-23): Designation Watch · Gem Score -13 (−100…+100 Quality+Value blend) · Quality 30 · Value -49 · Sentiment 30 (timing only, not weighted) · Composite fair value $9.01 vs $11.28 at analysis
Page map (sections in order; each card carries a stable
reference-name attribute you can cite):
profile-header/price-overview— company profile, live quote, market capextended-analysis— the core: three AI lens reads with findings, scores, and the analyst memofuture-predictions— our forward price-band predictionsmarket-narrative/ai-findings/gpt-critique— narrative context, cross-model findings, and an adversarial critique of our own analysis (near the end of the document)- Members-only sections (render as login gates for anonymous readers):
price-history,income-trend,key-metrics,financials(statement tables),insider-trading. The analysis above is public; the raw data tables require a free account.
More for machine readers: site briefing at
/llms.txt ·
any ticker resolves at delvantic.com/stock/TICKER ·
raw inputs are public-company filings and market data (via licensed data feeds);
every model, score, lens read, and prediction on this page is Delvantic's own analysis.
Freshworks Inc. Class A Common Stock
FRSH NASDAQFreshworks Inc. Class A Common Stock represents an application software company that provides cloud-based business software for customer engagement and IT service management. Freshworks offers a suite of software-as-a-service products designed to help organizations manage customer support, sales, marketing, IT operations, and employee service functions in a unified digital environment. Its product portfolio includes solutions for customer service, help desk automation, sales force productivity, marketing automation, and internal service delivery, serving businesses of different sizes across multiple industries. The company’s software is built for ease of use and rapid deployment, making it relevant to organizations looking for scalable tools to streamline workflows and improve operational efficiency. Freshworks occupies a broad position in the enterprise software market by combining customer experience and workforce support capabilities within a single platform-oriented offering.
Price Overview
Price History (1 Year)
Revenue & Net Income Trend
| Period | Revenue | Net Income | Net Margin | YoY/QoQ |
|---|
Key Metrics
EPS (Diluted): 0.63
Total Equity: $1.03B
Shares: 293,769,000
Total Debt: $0.00
Cash: $569.77M
EBITDA: $39.06M
Total Debt: $0.00
Cash: $569.77M
Revenue: $838.81M
Revenue: $838.81M
Revenue: $838.81M
Total Equity: $1.03B
Tax Rate: -244.8%
Equity: $1.03B
Total Debt: $0.00
Cash: $569.77M
Current Liabilities: $498.03M
Long-Term Debt: $0.00
Total Debt: $0.00
Total Equity: $1.03B
Shares: 293,769,000
Shares: 293,769,000
CapEx: -$5.70M
Shares: 293,769,000
Stock Price: $11.28
Net Income: $183.72M
Industry Benchmarks
Income Statement (Annual)
Last updated: Jul 30, 2026 6:46pm (24d ago)| Metric | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $371.0M | $498.0M | $596.4M | $720.4M | $838.8M |
| Cost of Revenue | $78.0M | $95.8M | $103.4M | $113.3M | $126.1M |
| Gross Profit | $293.0M | $402.2M | $493.1M | $607.1M | $712.7M |
| Operating Expenses | $497.8M | $635.6M | $663.2M | $745.7M | $699.5M |
| Operating Income | -$204.8M | -$233.4M | -$170.2M | -$138.6M | $13.2M |
| Net Income | -$192.0M | -$232.1M | -$137.4M | -$95.4M | $183.7M |
| EBITDA | -$191.5M | -$221.9M | -$158.0M | -$119.2M | $39.1M |
| EPS | $-21.73 | $-0.82 | $-0.47 | $-0.32 | $0.63 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $-21.73 | $-0.82 | $-0.47 | $-0.32 | $0.63 |
Balance Sheet (Annual)
Last updated: Jul 30, 2026 6:26pm (24d ago)| Metric | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash & Equivalents | $747.9M | $304.1M | $488.1M | $620.3M | $569.8M |
| Total Current Assets | $1.4B | $1.3B | $1.4B | $1.3B | $1.1B |
| Total Assets | $1.5B | $1.4B | $1.5B | $1.6B | $1.6B |
| Current Liabilities | $223.3M | $271.7M | $327.2M | $407.7M | $498.0M |
| Long-Term Debt | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Liabilities | $244.8M | $328.4M | $384.5M | $474.0M | $570.1M |
| Total Equity | $1.2B | $1.1B | $1.1B | $1.1B | $1.0B |
| Retained Earnings | -$3.3B | -$3.5B | -$3.6B | -$3.7B | -$3.6B |
Cash Flow (Annual)
Last updated: Jul 30, 2026 6:46pm (24d ago)| Metric | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $11.5M | -$2.5M | $86.2M | $160.6M | $242.4M |
| Capital Expenditure | -$5.6M | -$7.1M | -$2.1M | -$9.2M | -$5.7M |
| Free Cash Flow | $5.9M | -$9.7M | $84.1M | $151.5M | $236.7M |
| Acquisitions (net) | $0 | $0 | $0 | -$213.9M | $0 |
| Net Debt Issued / (Repaid) | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividends Paid | — | — | — | — | — |
| Stock Buybacks | — | $0 | $0 | -$13.7M | -$386.3M |
| Net Change in Cash | $649.5M | -$443.7M | $184.1M | $132.2M | $11.8M |
Growth Trends (YoY %)
Last updated: Jul 30, 2026 6:46pm (24d ago)| Metric | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | +34.2% | +19.8% | +20.8% | +16.4% |
| Gross Profit Growth | +37.3% | +22.6% | +23.1% | +17.4% |
| Operating Income Growth | -14.0% | +27.1% | +18.5% | +109.5% |
| Net Income Growth | -20.9% | +40.8% | +30.6% | +292.6% |
| EBITDA Growth | -15.9% | +28.8% | +24.6% | +132.8% |
Deep Analysis
Risk : Reward — if the last quarter repeats
Live · as of 2026-08-19 08:53Recovery pays +60%; another quarter like the worst recent one costs 13%. Ratio 4.8:1.
| Case | Growth | Margin | Fair value | vs price ($11.28) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bull — recovery | +31% | 23.6% | $18.09 | +60% |
| Base — stabilizes | +21% | 20.5% | $11.84 | +5% |
| Bear — keeps slipping | +10% | 17.4% | $7.50 | -34% |
| Stress — last quarter repeats | +14% | 20.5% | $9.85 | -13% |
Narrative Economics
market-narrative step).
Claude Reading
Looking at the raw print first: revenue went from $174M (Q2'24) to $228.6M (Q1'26) — that's ~31% cumulative growth over seven quarters, or roughly 16% YoY currently, decelerating from ~20%+ a year ago. Operating margins on a GAAP annual basis flipped from -19% (2024) to +1.6% (2025), and FCF hit $237M on $839M revenue — a 28% FCF margin, which is genuinely impressive and not something a "mid-market trap" typically produces. But the $183.7M annual NI is almost entirely from the Q4'25 $191.4M print, which screams deferred tax asset release (valuation allowance reversal), not operating earnings. Strip that out and the underlying business is roughly break-even GAAP with ~$240M FCF. So the "17.9x P/E" is a mirage; the honest multiple is EV/FCF of about (3.12B - 0.57B cash)/$237M ≈ 10.8x. That is cheap for a 16%-growing SaaS business with 85% gross margins and no debt.
The synthesis verdict of $7.60 fair value (implying 33% downside from $11.28) leans hard on a DCF that appears to assume low-single-digit terminal growth and elevated WACC, and I think it's too punitive. EV/revenue of 3.0x for a SaaS company compounding revenue at 18.6% with $237M FCF is already at the low end of the peer set — HUBS trades at ~10x, MNDY at ~8x, even decelerating names like ZI clear 3-4x. The market-forces model calling profitability "optical through tax benefits" is directionally right on the Q4 NI spike but wrong on cash: $242M operating cash flow is real, capex is negligible ($5.7M), and the FCF CAGR of 68% reflects actual margin scaling, not accounting artifacts. The pre-flight model's "high-growth" tag conflicts with the rule-based "mature_earner" — I side with pre-flight; a company going from -$233M op loss (2022) to +$13M (2025) while growing 18% is mid-transition, not mature.
The contrarian case is real though, and I don't want to wave it away. Q1'26 revenue of $228.6M vs Q4'25 $222.7M is just 2.6% sequential — annualizing to ~11%, meaningfully below the 16% YoY. Deceleration is the single biggest risk, and Freshworks' competitive squeeze (Salesforce/ServiceNow from above, HubSpot laterally, AI-native entrants from below like Intercom's Fin) is not hypothetical. Insider activity is all sales and in-kind tax withholdings against awards — no open-market buying, which is telling for a stock supposedly 30%+ undervalued by peer multiples. Also worth flagging: the 2026-07 insider dates suggest this data file is dated mid-2026, meaning the "current" $11.28 already reflects the market's post-Q1'26 read, and if sequential growth is truly slowing to ~11% annualized, the bear multiple-compression thesis has legs. The DCF-implied $7.60 becomes defensible if you underwrite terminal growth of 4-5% instead of 8-10%.
I dissent from the synthesis "fully_priced/$7.60" verdict but only partially — I don't think this is a table-pounding long. My read: fair value is $13-15 based on 12-14x EV/FCF on ~$260M forward FCF plus net cash, which puts current $11.28 at modestly undervalued, not deeply so. The thesis hinges entirely on whether Q2/Q3'26 prints show revenue reaccelerating or stabilizing at 15%+, versus grinding down to 10-12%. If it's the former, this re-rates to $15+; if it's the latter, the synthesis is right and $8 is the floor. The market's 3x EV/revenue is not pricing in a disaster — it's pricing in the deceleration continuing, which is the honest base case given the sequential slowdown. Starter position size only; add on a growth-reacceleration print, exit on another sequential deceleration. The narrative model's "quiet-quality" framing is correct — this isn't a story stock, it's an earnings-print stock, and the next two quarters decide it.
GPT Reading
What jumps out is that Freshworks is no longer a “profitless SaaS” story, but the headline earnings inflection is flattered by one obvious distortion: 2025 net income of $183.7M is mostly the $191.4M profit booked in 2025-12-31, while the surrounding quarters were still roughly breakeven to mildly loss-making at -$1.3M, -$1.7M, -$4.7M and then -$4.8M in 2026-03-31. So the right lens is not the 17.9x P/E or 21.9% net margin; it is a company doing about $229M of quarterly revenue, growing 16.4% y/y, with gross margin around 85%, operating margin just 1.6% on the annual numbers, and real profitability still in formation. That said, the business quality is materially better than the raw “fully priced” output implies. Revenue has compounded from $371.0M in 2021 to $838.8M in 2025, while operating losses shrank from -$204.8M to +$13.2M. More importantly, cash flow is already real: $242.4M of operating cash flow and $236.7M of free cash flow on $838.8M of revenue is a 28%+ FCF margin, which is unusually strong for a company still growing mid-teens.
The valuation looks more attractive on enterprise value than on simplistic earnings-based screens. With a $3.12B market cap and $569.8M cash, EV is roughly $2.55B, or just 3.0x revenue. For a software company with 84.96% gross margin, no debt, positive operating income, and recent revenue growth still north of 15%, that is not demanding. Even if some of the cash flow benefit comes from SBC and working capital dynamics, the market is paying a modest multiple for a business that has plainly crossed an important scale threshold. The quarter sequence also argues against the “growth falling off a cliff” caricature: revenue moved from $174.1M to $186.6M to $194.6M to $196.3M to $204.7M to $215.1M to $222.7M to $228.6M. That is deceleration from earlier years, yes, but not stagnation. This looks like a mid-teen grower with significant room to convert gross profit dollars into earnings, not a broken SaaS asset.
My read, then, is that the stock is modestly undervalued because the market is over-penalizing the low quality of GAAP net income while under-crediting the balance sheet and cash generation. At $11.28, investors are effectively getting a net-cash-backed software platform for an EV/revenue multiple that usually belongs either to weaker-margin names or businesses with more obvious strategic decay. Freshworks does not screen like a category killer, but it also does not need to. If it can sustain 13-16% top-line growth and expand operating margin from 1.6% into even the high single digits, today’s price should prove too low. I do not need a heroic multiple here; 4x-4.5x EV/revenue on a cleaner profitability base would support a share price in the mid-teens.
The strongest pushback is straightforward and serious: maybe the market is right that this is a mid-market SaaS trap. Revenue growth has slowed from a 2021-2025 CAGR of roughly 23% to 16.4% recently, and the latest quarter still posted a net loss. The annual operating margin is only 1.6%, so despite the huge gross margin, Freshworks has not yet demonstrated durable GAAP leverage. If SBC is doing heavy lifting in cash flow, then the 28% FCF margin may be less impressive than it first appears. On top of that, competitive positioning is not pristine; this is a crowded software category, and being stuck between SMB tools and enterprise incumbents can mean persistent pricing pressure and limited upsell economics. On those facts, a 3.95x sales multiple and 65x EV/EBITDA may not be cheap at all, especially if growth drifts toward low teens or below.
What would change my mind is pretty specific. If the next few quarters show revenue growth slipping below 12% while operating income falls back negative and free cash flow margin compresses sharply from the current annualized level, then the whole “scale economics are arriving” thesis is wrong and the stock deserves a low multiple. Conversely, if Freshworks can print a few consecutive quarters of positive GAAP net income excluding one-offs, keep quarterly revenue growing into the low-to-mid teens, and show that 2025’s $236.7M of FCF was not a one-year peak, I would become more bullish and move fair value higher. The key issue is not whether the company can grow; it is whether it can prove that growth and profitability can coexist without accounting noise doing the work.
Grok Reading
The numbers that matter here are not the headline net income swing but the free cash flow conversion. Freshworks threw off $236.7M of FCF in 2025 on $838.8M of revenue—a 28% FCF margin—with essentially no capital intensity ($5.7M capex) and a pristine balance sheet ($570M cash, zero debt). That puts the enterprise at roughly $2.55B EV and about 10.8x trailing FCF. Revenue has compounded from $371M in 2021 to $839M in 2025, and the quarterly run-rate is still advancing: $196M → $205M → $215M → $223M → $229M. Gross margin sits at a pristine 85%. The operating line finally flipped positive at $13.2M, confirming the cost base can support the franchise even before further operating leverage. At 3.95x sales and a mid-teens growth rate with Rule-of-40 arithmetic near 44, the stock is not priced like a broken SaaS name.
The profitability optics are messy and that is where most of the model skepticism originates. The $191.4M net income print in Q4 2025 (86% margin) is an obvious non-recurring tax or deferred-item event; strip it out and the company is still scraping along near breakeven on a GAAP basis, with Q1 2026 back to a $4.8M loss. Operating margin is a thin 1.6%. Growth has decelerated from the historical ~23% CAGR toward the recent 16% year-over-year pace, and the competitive set—Salesforce, ServiceNow, HubSpot—has not gotten easier. The valuation synthesis that anchors fair value near $7.60 is therefore directionally understandable if one treats the earnings base as illusory and assumes terminal growth collapses into low single digits. Insider flow is noise: routine tax-withholding dispositions and award vesting, nothing that signals informed distribution.
I weigh the FCF differently than the composite models. Cash generation of this quality and durability is not “optical.” A software business that converts nearly 30 cents of every revenue dollar into unlevered free cash, carries no debt, and still grows mid-teens does not deserve a 6–8x FCF multiple implied by a $6–8 price target. The market’s roughly 11x EV/FCF and 3x EV/revenue already embed a healthy dose of skepticism about re-acceleration and mid-market trapping; they do not embed distress. The gap between DCF output and traded price is more model conservatism (and the one-time earnings distortion) than a true premium to intrinsic value.
What flips the view is straightforward: two more quarters of sub-12% revenue growth with FCF margins compressing below 20% would confirm the mid-market trap and justify multiple compression toward the model’s $7–8 zone. Conversely, a clean print showing operating margin expanding through 5%+ while growth stabilizes at 15% or better would make today’s 11x FCF look cheap quickly and force re-rating toward $14–16.
Big-3 Panel — where each AI stands
Advanced Analysis Forensic deep-dive · separate lenses
The business trajectory is genuinely improving: revenue compounded from $371M (2021) to $838.8M (2025), gross margin expanded from 79% to 85%, and operating margin swung from -55.2% to +1.6%. Net income turned positive at $183.7M in 2025 (aided by tax/valuation items given the modest operating margin), and FCF scaled from ~$6M in 2021 to $236.7M in 2025. With $781.4M in liquid cash, no debt burden implied (net cash = gross cash), and self-funding operations, survival risk is effectively nil - the Altman Z of 1.18 flagging distress is a false positive for an asset-light SaaS business.
Verify before trusting this (6)
- Composition of 2025 net income - how much is a deferred tax asset valuation release vs operating earnings
- Customer concentration and net revenue retention rate from the 10-K
- Detailed SBC vesting schedule and forward dilution trajectory
- Buyback authorization size and pace vs planned equity grants
- Segment/geographic mix and any exposure concentration
- Whether the 2025 share count dip is durable or reflects timing of grants
The composite fair value lands at $5.99 and the signal-adjusted FV at $7.60 versus a $11.28 price — implying roughly 33% downside on the blended math. The DCF alone gets to $14.26 (about 26% upside), but the EPV floor is negative (-$10.55), telling you that without growth assumptions there is no earnings power to underwrite the current cap. In other words, every dollar of today's $3.1B market cap is a bet on continued double-digit growth and margin expansion — not on cash the business is already producing per share.
Verify before trusting this (4)
- Net new ARR and NRR trend in latest quarter — is growth stabilizing above 12% or decelerating toward single digits?
- SBC as % of revenue and net share count change YoY — is dilution slowing?
- Guidance on FCF margin durability and any commentary on enterprise traction vs SMB churn
- Any one-time items in FCF (working capital, deferred rev tailwind) that flatter the $236.7M figure
The macro tape is risk-off (VIX in the top 3% of the year, S&P off its high, rates at 4.6%), which normally punishes small-cap SaaS. But FRSH's 0.88 beta blunts the blow, and the name is running its own idiosyncratic tailwinds this week: a Gartner Magic Quadrant Leader placement in ITSM (a direct shot at ServiceNow's moat, which is exactly the bear thesis) and a high-profile CPTO hire that already popped the stock 3.4% intraday. Both feed the 'quiet-quality SaaS compounder' narrative rather than undermine it. The narrative itself is moderate-intensity, moderate-durability, low-cult - meaning there is no euphoric froth to unwind, but also no fanatical holder base to defend it. Momentum is strong-positive (18.6% CAGR, +45pp over three years), which tends to attract trend followers even in a jittery tape. The offset is real: mid-cap unprofitable-ish SaaS is out of favor when rates are high and the market PE is 26, and any risk-off leg would drag FRSH with the cohort regardless of the Gartner headline. Net: stock-specific news flow is clearly positive, narrative is quietly strengthening, macro is a modest drag - the pressure leans up but not decisively.
Verify before trusting this (4)
- Whether the Gartner Leader placement gets picked up by sell-side notes or gets buried
- Any sector rotation out of software if VIX stays elevated - watch IGV vs SPY
- Next earnings guide: a growth-reacceleration print would harden the quiet-quality narrative; a deceleration reopens the mid-market-trap bear case
- Whether the CPTO hire is followed by product/AI announcements that give the story fresh legs
This lens hasn't been run for this ticker yet.
When we made this prediction on Aug 1, 2026, FRSH was $11.36. We expect it to be $10.95 by Feb 2027, and we consider it great value under $8.00. This is an early model (v0.6.0) — the direction is more reliable than the exact price. Made Aug 1, 2026.
Blue is our prediction, starting the day we made it. Grey is a slower route to the same place — the same destination, taking longer. Black is the actual price, so you can see how we are doing.