Homepage
FRESH Analysis Report
Jun 23, 2026
4 days ago · 100% complete · +8 refreshed

Intel Corporation

INTC NASDAQ Categories PDF
Technology · Semiconductors
Santa Clara, CA 95054-1549, United States IPO 1980 intel.com Updated Jun 23, 3:00am
Price
$140.94
Market Cap
$708.4B
Employees
85,100
Beta
2.23
Avg Volume
132,945,327
CEO
Lip-Bu Tan
Business Description

Intel Corporation is a global leader specializing in the development, production, and distribution of advanced computing technologies and products. The company manages its diverse operations through various segments, including CCG, DCG, IOTG, Mobileye, NSG, PSG, and others. Its comprehensive product line features fundamental platform components such as central processing units (CPUs), chipsets, system-on-chip solutions, and multi-chip packages. Additionally, Intel supplies an array of non-platform and adjacent products, including accelerators, integrated boards and systems, connectivity products, graphics processors, and memory and storage solutions. Beyond core components, Intel provides high-performance computing solutions customized for specific industries like retail, industrial, and healthcare, as well as for embedded applications. Their automotive contributions support assisted and autonomous driving with advanced compute platforms, computer vision and machine learning-based sensing, mapping and localization tools, driving policy software, and active sensors. The company also offers platforms optimized for specific workloads, catering to cloud service providers, enterprise and government clients, and communications service providers. Intel's clientele comprises original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), original design manufacturers (ODMs), and cloud service providers. Demonstrating a dedication to cutting-edge research, Intel Corporation has a strategic alliance with MILA to leverage artificial intelligence for breakthroughs in drug discovery. Established in 1968, Intel Corporation is based in Santa Clara, California.

Business History
Generated: Jun 23, 2026 3:05am
Price Overview
Last updated: Jun 23, 2026 3:00am (4d ago)
$140.94
+6.95 (+5.19%)
Day Range
$136.21 – $141.45
52-Week Range
$18.97 – $141.45
50-Day MA
$103.01
200-Day MA
$56.10
Volume
122,379,465.00
Analyst Price Targets
Low $45.00
Consensus $89.38
High $150.00
(165 analysts)
Share Structure
Outstanding 5,026,000,000.00
Float 5,016,551,120.00
Free Float 99.8%
High free float — 99.8% of shares trade freely, ~0.2% held by insiders/institutions
Very liquid — most shares trade freely. Low insider ownership can mean less management alignment, but makes large position sizing straightforward.
Price History (1 Year)
Last updated: Jun 23, 2026 3:09am (4d ago)
Revenue & Net Income Trend
The directional story — useful even when net income is negative.
Last updated: Jun 23, 2026 3:06am (4d ago)
Revenue
The top line — total sales before any costs or taxes are subtracted. A measure of how much business the company is doing.
Net Income
The bottom line — profit left after subtracting all expenses, interest, and taxes from revenue. Reflects accounting profitability, but includes non-cash items like depreciation, so it isn't the same as cash earned.
Operating Cash Flow
The real cash generated by the day-to-day business — selling products, paying suppliers, collecting from customers. Calculated from net income by adding back non-cash items and adjusting for timing (unpaid bills, unsold inventory). When OCF consistently lags net income, the reported profit may not be converting to real money.
Period Revenue Net Income Net Margin YoY/QoQ
Key Metrics
API Direct from provider CALC Derived from statements
Industry comparison last run: Jun 23, 2026 3:03am
P/E Ratio (Price per dollar of earnings)
CALC
Stock Price / EPS (Diluted)
-2,392.87
Stock Price: $140.94
EPS (Diluted): -0.06
P/B Ratio (Price vs net asset value)
API
Stock Price / Book Value Per Share
1.54
Stock Price: $140.94
Total Equity: $114.28B
Shares: 4,856,000,000
EV/EBITDA (Total value vs operating profit)
API
Enterprise Value / EBITDA
64.56
Market Cap: $708.36B
Total Debt: $46.59B
Cash: $14.27B
EBITDA: $14.35B
Enterprise Value (Takeover price (cap + debt - cash))
API
Market Cap + Total Debt - Cash
$208.1B
Market Cap: $708.36B
Total Debt: $46.59B
Cash: $14.27B
P/S Ratio (Price per dollar of revenue)
API
Stock Price / Revenue Per Share
3.33
Stock Price: $140.94
Revenue: $52.85B
Shares: 4,856,000,000
EV/Sales (Total value vs revenue — works when P/E can't)
API
3.94
Gross Margin (Revenue left after direct costs)
API
Gross Profit / Revenue
34.8%
Gross Profit: $18.38B
Revenue: $52.85B
Operating Margin (Revenue left after all operations)
API
Operating Income / Revenue
0.0%
Operating Income: -$23.00M
Revenue: $52.85B
Net Margin (Revenue left as actual profit)
API
Net Income / Revenue
-0.5%
Net Income: -$267.00M
Revenue: $52.85B
ROE (Profit from shareholder equity)
API
Net Income / Total Equity
-3.0%
Net Income: -$267.00M
Total Equity: $114.28B
ROIC (Profit from all invested capital)
API
NOPAT / Invested Capital
-2.8%
Operating Income: -$23.00M
Tax Rate: 98.3%
Equity: $114.28B
Total Debt: $46.59B
Cash: $14.27B
Current Ratio (Can it pay short-term bills)
API
Current Assets / Current Liabilities
2.02
Current Assets: $63.69B
Current Liabilities: $31.58B
Debt/Equity (Leverage — debt vs equity)
CALC
Total Debt / Total Equity
0.41
Short-Term Debt: $2.50B
Long-Term Debt: $44.09B
Total Debt: $46.59B
Total Equity: $114.28B
Rev/Share (Top-line per share)
CALC
Revenue / Shares Outstanding
$10.88
Revenue: $52.85B
Shares: 4,856,000,000
Book Value/Share (Net assets per share)
CALC
(Total Assets - Total Liabilities) / Shares
$23.53
Total Equity: $114.28B
Shares: 4,856,000,000
FCF/Share (Real cash generated per share)
CALC
(Operating Cash Flow + CapEx) / Shares
$-1.02
Operating CF: $9.70B
CapEx: -$14.65B
Shares: 4,856,000,000
CapEx is negative (outflow) — added to OCF to get FCF
Div Yield (Annual income from holding)
API
Last Annual Dividend / Stock Price
0.0%
Last Dividend: N/A
Stock Price: $140.94
Payout Ratio (Earnings paid out as dividends)
Dividends Paid / Net Income
Dividends Paid: N/A
Net Income: -$267.00M
Dividends paid not available in cash flow statement
Industry Benchmarks
Last run: Jun 23, 2026 3:03am
Compares INTC against LLM-researched typical ranges for its industry. One research call per industry, cached indefinitely — every stock in the same industry reuses the same baseline.
Advanced Analysis Forensic deep-dive · three lenses
Three separate reads — Company Quality (is it a great business?), Valuation (is it mispriced?), and General Sentiment (how macro + narrative are pushing it), kept deliberately apart · 2026-06-23 03:11:51
Delvantic - Cairn AI
Pass at $141 - wait for sub-$60 8/10
A structurally broken business priced for a completed turnaround, riding a powerful Trump-reshoring tailwind that I refuse to chase at $141.
The cruxWhether the Trump/CHIPS narrative can keep levitating a 2.23-beta story stock before the financials (FCF burn, 35% GM, ~0% op margin) catch up - and they won't on this timeline.
Forensic checks Derived mechanically from INTC's filed financials — not from the AI lenses
Liquidity & RunwayLong Runway
DilutionModerate Dilution
Earnings QualityHigh Earnings Quality
The three lensesswitch a tab for its full read — score + evidence
Company Quality
-100
Shaky
edge √Σ 62 · risk √Σ 168 · conf 8/10

Intel's fundamentals have deteriorated severely across the five-year window. Revenue has fallen from $79.0B (2021) to $52.9B (2025), a one-third contraction. Gross margin collapsed from 55.4% to 34.8%, operating margin went from 24.6% to roughly breakeven (with a -22% trough in 2024), and net income swung from $19.9B of profit to a $18.8B loss in 2024 before a near-breakeven 2025. FCF has been negative four years running, cumulatively burning more than $44B since 2022. This is a business losing both scale and unit economics simultaneously.

Strengths 3
m45
Adequate near-term runway
$37.4B liquid cash and 30+ quarters of runway at current burn means no imminent solvency risk; Altman Z of 5.75 confirms distress is not near-term.
m35
Stabilization signs in 2025
Operating margin recovered from -22% to ~0%, FCF burn narrowed from -15.7B to -5.0B, GM% ticked up from 32.7% to 34.8% - early evidence the trough may be in.
m25
Clean mechanical accounting
Beneish M -2.59 and accruals -6.7% of assets show no signs of earnings manipulation; reported losses appear real, not cosmetic.
Concerns 6
m90
Gross margin collapse
GM% fell from 55.4% in 2021 to 34.8% in 2025 - a 20+ point structural erosion indicating lost pricing power and/or under-absorbed fab capacity. This is the single biggest quality signal.
m85
Persistent cash burn
FCF: +9.1B, -9.6B, -14.3B, -15.7B, -5.0B across 2021-2025. Cumulative burn over $44B; capital intensity of the foundry pivot is overwhelming operating cash generation.
m80
Revenue contraction with operating losses
Revenue fell 33% from $79B to $52.9B; operating margin went from 24.6% to -22% in 2024 before recovering to ~0% in 2025. Lost share in CPUs to AMD and is absent from the AI accelerator wave.
m60
Dilution outpacing buybacks
Diluted share count grew 4.09B to 4.86B (+19% over 4yrs, 4.4% CAGR). SBC at 4.6% of revenue while buybacks recover only 17% of SBC - per-share value is leaking.
m45
Net debt position
Net cash is -$9.2B; cash/mktcap only 5.3%. Liquidity buffer exists but balance sheet cannot indefinitely fund a multi-year foundry build alongside operating losses.
m30
Insider tape is not bullish
Despite a 'net buying' header, the tape shows one $2.5M open-market sale (Chandrasekaran) and zero meaningful open-market P-code buys among recent 15 transactions - the rest are awards and tax withholding.
This is a shaky business right now, full stop. A 20-point gross margin collapse and four straight years of FCF burn totaling over $44B is not a wobble - it is a structural reset of what Intel earns per dollar of revenue. The foundry strategy may eventually work, but the data in front of me shows a company that has lost pricing power, lost share, is diluting holders ~4.4% a year while buybacks barely offset SBC, and is funding the turnaround off a net-debt balance sheet. The 2025 stabilization is real and worth noting, but one year of near-breakeven operating margin after four years of destruction doesn't make this a quality compounder. Mechanical accounting is clean, runway is adequate, but as a business this is a turnaround bet, not a great company.
Verify before trusting this (7)
  • Foundry segment economics and capex runway - how much more cash must be invested before external foundry revenue contributes meaningfully
  • 18A node yield and customer commitments (Microsoft, government, others) per recent 10-K and earnings calls
  • Government/CHIPS Act funding receipts and any equity-linked strings attached
  • Mobileye and Altera stake monetization plans and impact on share count
  • Specifics of any preferred or convertible instruments issued to strategic partners that could drive further dilution
  • Updated capex guidance vs. depreciation to gauge true normalized FCF
  • Server CPU share trajectory vs. AMD and AI accelerator (Gaudi) traction
Valuation / Mispricing
-100
Overvalued
edge √Σ 20 · risk √Σ 145 · conf 8/10
Price $140.94 vs a quality-adjusted deserved value likely in the $40-60 range - roughly 2-3x overvalued on fundamentals, with the gap being pure turnaround optionality. attractive below $45.00

The price tag here is extraordinary for what the underlying business is currently delivering. A $708B market cap implies the market is paying for restored process leadership, recaptured server share, and a profitable foundry - none of which are in the financials today. The quality lens flags four consecutive years of FCF burn totaling north of $44B, a ~20-point gross margin collapse, and ~4.4% annual dilution. Paying ~$708B for a business actively bleeding cash and losing share requires heroic assumptions about 2027-2030 outcomes.

Cheap signals 1
m20
Geopolitical/strategic optionality is real but not free
CHIPS Act support and reshoring tailwinds provide a floor on the asset base, but this is already widely understood and arguably in the price.
Rich / priced-in 4
m90
Priced for a completed turnaround that has not happened
A $708B cap on a business with four years of cumulative FCF burn over $44B and collapsing gross margins implies the market has already credited Intel with foundry success and share recapture. Zero margin of safety if execution slips.
m75
No normalized earnings to anchor a multiple
With margins reset ~20 points lower and cash burning, there is no clean EPS or FCF figure to multiply. Any DCF justifying $141 requires heroic out-year assumptions on foundry yields and pricing.
m65
Dilution silently raises the bar
~4.4% annual share creep means per-share deserved value erodes even if enterprise value holds. Buybacks are not offsetting it given the cash burn.
m55
e2e fair-value flagged 'Disconnected from Fundamentals'
The composite itself signals the models cannot find footing - a tell that price is being set by narrative, not cash flows.
I would not touch this at $141. The market is paying a fully-executed-turnaround price for a business that is currently a cash-burning, share-losing, margin-collapsed franchise. I need to see either a dramatically lower price (sub-$60 to get interested, sub-$45 to be aggressive) or hard evidence in the financials - real foundry revenue, margin inflection, FCF turning positive - before the deserved value rises to meet the quote. Right now this is narrative pricing, not value pricing.
Verify before trusting this (5)
  • Foundry external customer revenue and any signed volume commitments at 18A
  • Gross margin trajectory and whether FY guidance shows inflection or further compression
  • FCF guide and CapEx envelope - is the $25B+/yr burn rate moderating
  • Server CPU unit share trend vs AMD in latest quarter
  • Any one-time charges or impairments masking underlying run-rate margins
General Sentiment
+89
Strong Tailwind
tail √Σ 146 · head √Σ 57 · conf 8/10

The non-fundamental pressure on INTC is decisively positive right now. The fallen-angel narrative has flipped into an active 'American champion' story: a Trump announcement is being amplified by Cramer, the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index just printed a record high, and INTC itself tagged a 52-week high on AI-infrastructure and sovereign-AI headlines (Xeon 6 win, UMC deal buzz, peer M&A in Qualcomm-Modular). With beta 2.23 in a neutral-to-slightly-risk-on tape (VIX 16.8, S&P just 1.4% off highs), this name is a leveraged beneficiary of any semi-sector euphoria, and the geopolitical-subsidy angle gives it a story no other large-cap semi has.

Tailwinds 4
m88
Trump reshoring catalyst live
A 'big Intel announcement' from the White House is being megaphoned by Cramer and financial media, directly feeding the geopolitical-asset leg of the bull narrative. This is exactly the kind of event that re-rates a fallen angel.
m75
SOX at record high, INTC at 52-week high
The semi tape is in full risk-on mode and INTC is participating as a high-beta laggard catching up. With beta 2.23, sector momentum lands on this name with leverage.
m70
Analyst tone wildly behind the story
$89 consensus target vs $141 price with Hold rating creates a setup where every up-day forces capitulation revisions. The five revisions this month already averaged $115 - the gap is closing under pressure.
m55
Sovereign-AI and product wins refreshing the story
TPIsoftware adopting Xeon 6 for sovereign AI gives the bull case a tangible data point beyond subsidies, helping the narrative durability problem at the margin.
Headwinds 2
m45
Narrative durability is fragile
The story is rated fragile with story-driven valuation against burning cash and collapsing margins. Any execution miss or node delay would unwind this fast on a 2.23-beta name.
m35
Megacap tech wobble and rate backdrop
Nasdaq futures dipping after a megacap tech selloff and 10y at 4.51% are mild background pressure; on a high-beta unprofitable name these usually amplify, but the semi-specific narrative is currently overpowering them.
I read this as a Strong Tailwind, full stop. The fallen-angel narrative just got the one catalyst it needed - explicit U.S. government backing amplified by Cramer - while the semi tape is at record highs and analysts are caught flat-footed with $89 targets against a $141 print. On a 2.23 beta this is exactly the kind of name that gets violently re-rated in a story-driven semi melt-up, and the forced revision cycle is its own fuel. I'd respect that the underlying story is fragile and the macro backdrop isn't bulletproof, so this pressure can reverse quickly, but right now the wind is at the back and it's blowing hard.
Verify before trusting this (5)
  • Details and durability of the Trump/Intel announcement - subsidy size, equity stake, or order book
  • Whether SOX holds its breakout or rolls over with megacap tech
  • Pace of analyst target hikes - if revisions accelerate above $130 the squeeze extends
  • Any 18A node execution update - the single biggest narrative-break risk
  • VIX behavior; a spike above 20 would hit beta 2.23 hard
The market-wide tape + this name's exposure to it (beta / sector / narrative durability). Context on the non-fundamental pressure — not a call on the business or the price. processId: detail-general-sentiment
Please log in to view trade setups
The Augustus trade-setup read is a members feature.
Log in
Three lenses kept deliberately separate — Company Quality (price-agnostic), Valuation (price-conditional), and General Sentiment (non-fundamental macro/narrative pressure). The scores are not blended. Filing-level items (convertibles, lock-ups, customer concentration) are v2 — see each lens's "verify."
Deep Analysis
Last run: Jun 23, 2026 3:08:50 am

Pre-flight intelligence scans the company first, then routes to the right analytical methods.

0 Company Classification — What type of company is this?
1 Industry Landscape — Where is the industry headed?
2 Company Momentum — Where is this company trending?
3 Forward Projection — 1Y & 2Y projected metrics (requires Layer 1 + 2)
4a DCF Valuation — Present value of future cash flows
Not applicable for Pre Profit Growth companies
4b Earnings Power Value — Floor value — worth with zero growth
Not applicable for Pre Profit Growth companies
4c Anchored PE — Industry PE adjusted for growth differential
Not applicable for Pre Profit Growth companies
4d Reverse DCF — What growth is the market pricing in?
Not applicable for Pre Profit Growth companies
4e Revenue-Based DCF — For growth/narrative companies (skip if mature earner)
4f Anchored P/S — Price-to-Sales peer comparison (skip if mature earner)
4g Scenario Analysis — Bull / Base / Bear (skip if mature earner)
4h Dividend Discount Model — For dividend/income stocks only
Not applicable for Pre Profit Growth companies
4i Book Value Analysis — For deep value / turnaround stocks only
Not applicable for Pre Profit Growth companies
4j Insider Activity — Are insiders buying or selling?
4f Cash Flow Quality — How trustworthy is the FCF?
4g Debt Maturity Risk — Can it handle its debt?
4h Macro Environment — Rates, market valuation, volatility
4i Sector Intelligence — How does this company compare within its sector?
4j Revenue Confidence — How reliable is the growth projection?
4k Sensitivity Analysis — How fragile is the fair value estimate?
Not applicable for Pre Profit Growth companies
4l Sector Demand Cycle — Is the sector in a boom, steady state, or contraction?
5 AI Investigation — Adaptive research engine (Claude)
5b Thesis Evaluation — What does the market believe? (narrative/platform stocks only)
6 Valuation Synthesis — Weighted verdict from all methods (requires Layer 4)
Income Statement (Annual)
Last updated: Jun 23, 2026 3:06am (4d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Revenue $79.0B $63.1B $54.2B $53.1B $52.9B
Cost of Revenue $35.2B $36.2B $32.5B $35.8B $34.5B
Gross Profit $43.8B $26.9B $21.7B $17.3B $18.4B
Operating Expenses $24.4B $24.5B $21.7B $29.0B $18.4B
Operating Income $19.5B $2.3B $93.0M -$11.7B -$23.0M
Net Income $19.9B $8.0B $1.7B -$18.8B -$267.0M
EBITDA $33.9B $21.3B $11.2B $1.2B $14.4B
EPS $4.89 $1.95 $0.40 $-4.38 $-0.06
EPS (Diluted)
Balance Sheet (Annual)
Last updated: Jun 23, 2026 3:00am (4d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Cash & Equivalents $4.8B $11.1B $7.1B $8.2B $14.3B
Total Current Assets $58.6B $50.4B $43.3B $47.3B $63.7B
Total Assets $168.4B $182.1B $191.6B $196.5B $211.4B
Current Liabilities $27.5B $32.2B $28.1B $35.7B $31.6B
Long-Term Debt $33.5B $37.7B $47.0B $46.3B $44.1B
Total Liabilities $73.0B $78.8B $81.6B $91.5B $85.1B
Total Equity $95.4B $101.4B $105.6B $99.3B $114.3B
Retained Earnings $68.3B $70.4B $69.2B $49.0B $49.0B
Cash Flow (Annual)
Last updated: Jun 23, 2026 3:03am (4d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Operating Cash Flow $29.5B $15.4B $11.5B $8.3B $9.7B
Capital Expenditure -$20.3B -$25.1B -$25.8B -$23.9B -$14.6B
Free Cash Flow $9.1B -$9.6B -$14.3B -$15.7B -$4.9B
Acquisitions (net) -$209.0M $6.6B -$13.0M -$82.0M $0
Debt Repayment
Dividends Paid
Stock Buybacks -$2.4B $0 $0 $0 $0
Net Change in Cash -$1.0B $6.3B -$4.1B $1.2B $6.5B
Analyst Estimates (Annual)
Last updated: Jun 23, 2026 3:00am (4d ago)
Metric 2027 2028 2029 2030
Revenue $65.1B
$57.4B – $72.2B
$71.6B
$71.4B – $71.9B
$82.6B
$74.8B – $92.0B
$110.6B
$100.1B – $123.2B
EBITDA $16.5B
$14.6B – $18.3B
$18.2B
$18.1B – $18.2B
$20.9B
$19.0B – $23.3B
$28.0B
$25.4B – $31.3B
Net Income $5.2B
$4.9B – $11.6B
$7.5B
$3.7B – $17.2B
$16.6B
$14.6B – $19.1B
$27.5B
$24.1B – $31.6B
EPS
Growth Trends (YoY %)
Last updated: Jun 23, 2026 3:06am (4d ago)
Metric 2022 2023 2024 2025
Revenue Growth -20.2% -14.0% -2.1% -0.5%
Gross Profit Growth -38.7% -19.2% -20.1% +5.9%
Operating Income Growth -88.0% -96.0% -12,657.0% +99.8%
Net Income Growth -59.7% -78.9% -1,210.5% +98.6%
EBITDA Growth -37.1% -47.2% -89.3% +1,093.2%
Insider Trading (Recent)
Last updated: Jun 23, 2026 3:06am (4d ago)
Type codes PPurchase SSale AAward / grant MOption exercise FIn-kind (tax) CConversion GGift DReturn to issuer
All SEC Form 4 codes
Open market
P Purchase
Open-market or private purchase of shares.
S Sale
Open-market or private sale of shares.
Compensation (Rule 16b-3)
A Award / grant
Grant or award of securities (RSUs, options, etc.) under Rule 16b-3.
D Return to issuer
Securities disposed back to the company under Rule 16b-3.
F In-kind (tax)
Shares withheld or delivered to pay the option-exercise price or tax — not an open-market sale.
I Discretionary
Discretionary transaction under an employee plan — Rule 16b-3(f).
M Option exercise
Exercise or conversion of a derivative (option/RSU) into shares — exempt.
Derivatives
C Conversion
Conversion of a derivative security into the underlying shares.
E Short expiration
Expiration of a short derivative position.
H Long expiration
Expiration or cancellation of a long derivative position with value received.
O OTM exercise
Exercise of an out-of-the-money derivative.
X ITM exercise
Exercise of an in-the-money or at-the-money derivative.
Other exempt
G Gift
Bona fide gift of securities.
L Small acquisition
Small acquisition under Rule 16a-6.
W Inheritance
Acquisition or disposition by will or the laws of descent.
Z Voting trust
Deposit into or withdrawal from a voting trust.
Other
J Other
Other acquisition or disposition (explained in a Form 4 footnote).
K Equity swap
Transaction in an equity swap or similar instrument.
U Tender / buyout
Disposition via tender of shares in a change-of-control transaction.

Compensation-plan codes (A, D, F, M) are routine and rarely directional. Open-market P (buy) and S (sale) carry the most signal.

Date Insider Type Shares Price Value
2026-06-01 Zinsner David M-Exempt 37,015.00 $0.00 $0
2026-06-01 Zinsner David F-InKind 18,353.00 $109.82 $2.0M
2026-06-01 Zinsner David M-Exempt 37,015.00 $0.00 $0
2026-05-30 Katouzian Aliyar A-Award 87,276.00 $0.00 $0
2026-05-30 Katouzian Aliyar A-Award 32,729.00 $0.00 $0
2026-05-30 Katouzian Aliyar A-Award 32,729.00 $0.00 $0
2026-05-29 Chandrasekaran Nagasubramaniyan S-Sale 21,024.00 $118.28 $2.5M
2026-05-30 Bawa Aparna A-Award 27,274.00 $0.00 $0
2026-05-30 Bawa Aparna A-Award 27,274.00 $0.00 $0
2026-05-15 Katouzian Aliyar 0.00 $0.00 $0
2026-05-13 Bawa Aparna 0.00 $0.00 $0
2026-05-13 WEISLER DION J A-Award 2,782.00 $0.00 $0
2026-05-13 Smith Stacy J A-Award 2,782.00 $0.00 $0
2026-05-13 Smith Gregory D A-Award 2,782.00 $0.00 $0
2026-05-13 Sanghi Steve A-Award 2,782.00 $0.00 $0
2026-05-13 NOVICK BARBARA A-Award 2,782.00 $0.00 $0
2026-05-13 NOVICK BARBARA A-Award 1,502.00 $0.00 $0
2026-05-13 Meurice Eric A-Award 2,782.00 $0.00 $0
2026-05-13 Henry Alyssa A-Award 2,782.00 $0.00 $0
2026-05-13 Goldsmith Andrea Jo A-Award 2,782.00 $0.00 $0
Dividend History (Last 20)
Last updated: Jun 20, 2026 5:03pm (6d ago)
Date Dividend Declaration Record Payment
2024-08-07 $0.13 2024-08-01 2024-08-07 2024-09-01
2024-05-06 $0.13 2024-04-25 2024-05-07 2024-06-01
2024-02-06 $0.13 2024-01-25 2024-02-07 2024-03-01
2023-11-06 $0.13 2023-10-26 2023-11-07 2023-12-01
2023-08-04 $0.13 2023-07-27 2023-08-07 2023-09-01
2023-05-04 $0.13 2023-02-22 2023-05-07 2023-06-01
2023-02-06 $0.37 2023-01-26 2023-02-07 2023-03-01
2022-11-04 $0.37 2022-09-16 2022-11-07 2022-12-01
2022-08-04 $0.37 2022-07-14 2022-08-07 2022-09-01
2022-05-05 $0.37 2022-04-14 2022-05-07 2022-06-01
2022-02-04 $0.37 2022-01-26 2022-02-07 2022-03-01
2021-11-04 $0.35 2021-09-17 2021-11-07 2021-12-01
2021-08-05 $0.35 2021-07-15 2021-08-07 2021-09-01
2021-05-06 $0.35 2021-03-11 2021-05-07 2021-06-01
2021-02-04 $0.35 2021-01-21 2021-02-07 2021-03-01
2020-11-05 $0.33 2020-09-18 2020-11-07 2020-12-01
2020-08-06 $0.33 2020-07-16 2020-08-07 2020-09-01
2020-05-06 $0.33 2020-03-11 2020-05-07 2020-06-01
2020-02-06 $0.33 2020-01-23 2020-02-07 2020-03-01
2019-11-06 $0.32 2019-09-12 2019-11-07 2019-12-01
Narrative Economics
The story the market is telling about this stock — the intangible X-factor (founder mythology, cult dynamics, TAM-of-imagination) that moves price beyond what cash flows alone explain. After Shiller, Narrative Economics.
No narrative profile yet for INTC — it's generated by the pipeline (market-narrative step).
Delvantic AI Findings
Independent analyst synthesis · Delvantic - Cairn AI · generated 2026-06-23 03:09:37
Reviews the pipeline's own verdicts

Starting from the raw tape: Intel did $52.85B in 2025 revenue versus $79.02B in 2021 — a 33% top-line contraction over four years, with gross margin compressed from 55.5% to 34.8%. The quarterly cadence is flat-to-down ($12.67B → $13.67B → $13.58B), so the "trough is in" thesis rests on stability, not growth. Q3 2025's $4.06B net income is a one-off (likely Altera/Mobileye-related gain or tax item) — strip it and the TTM is solidly loss-making, with Q1 2026 swinging back to -$3.73B (-27.5% margin). FCF was -$4.95B on $14.65B capex against $9.70B operating cash flow; this is a company spending 28% of revenue on capex to defend a position it's already lost on leading-edge logic. At $140.94 and ~$708B market cap, EV/sales of ~3.9x and EV/EBITDA of 64.6x are being paid for a business with negative ROIC (-2.8%) and declining share in every segment that matters.

The synthesis verdict of "Disconnected from Fundamentals" is correct in direction but I'd go further on magnitude. The pre-flight note frames this as a 643% rally from $19 — meaning the market cap went from ~$80B to $708B on essentially zero fundamental improvement (revenue is still shrinking YoY, margins still negative). That's not a turnaround being priced; that's a CHIPS Act / sovereign-asset / 18A-works narrative being priced at near-certainty. The classification engine tagging this "pre_profit_growth" at 0.56 confidence is the weakest link in the stack — Intel is not pre-profit, it's post-profit. It earned $19.87B in 2021. This is a melted-down incumbent, and applying growth-company forbearance to its margins is exactly the analytical error the bulls are making. The narrative layer ("fallen-angel, unanchored, fragile") is the most honest read in the file.

The contrarian-to-the-bears case: 18A is reportedly on schedule for late 2025/2026 ramp, Panther Lake is a real product, and if foundry lands even one marquee external customer (rumors persist around government/defense workloads and a possible Apple or Qualcomm tile), the re-rating math changes because foundry revenue carries optionality the current multiple already assumes. Net insider buying is a mild positive, though the transaction list here is mostly awards and tax-withholding (F-InKind), not open-market conviction buys — I'd discount that signal heavily. The sovereign-backstop argument is real: the U.S. government literally cannot let Intel fail, which compresses left-tail risk and arguably justifies *some* premium. But "cannot fail" is not "worth $708B" — TSMC, which actually has process leadership and ~50%+ operating margins, trades at roughly $1.1T. Paying 64% of TSMC's market cap for the company TSMC is beating is the trade you have to defend.

Where the data is thin: total debt and equity are missing from the balance sheet block, which matters enormously for a capex-heavy turnaround — Intel carried ~$50B in debt last I checked, and EV/sales of 3.9x implies the model is using a debt figure the tile doesn't show. The Q3 2025 $4.06B NI spike needs a footnote (almost certainly a divestiture gain) before anyone uses TTM earnings for anything. Market Forces failed to run, and the momentum block has no earnings or FCF CAGR — both because the denominators flip signs. Anyone underwriting this at $141 should be modeling 2027 foundry revenue and 18A yield curves directly, not relying on backward metrics.

I dissent mildly from the synthesis on framing but agree on direction: this is not just "disconnected" — it's a narrative-driven priced-for-perfection turnaround where perfection means catching TSMC on process, winning external foundry customers, and stabilizing server share against AMD/ARM, all simultaneously, over 3-5 years. The base-rate for that triple is low. Fair value on a sober DCF — assume revenue recovers to $70B by 2028, 40% gross margin, 10% operating margin, 15x EBIT — gets you to roughly $350-400B market cap, or ~$70-80/share. To justify $141, you need to believe foundry becomes a $20B+ business at TSMC-like margins by 2029. Possible, not probable. The stock has already harvested most of

GPT Critique
Second-opinion review · gpt-4o · generated 2026-06-23 03:09:48
Reviews the Opus findings above
Verdict I agree with Opus — Intel is overvalued at $140.94, with fair value closer to $70-80 based on a sober evaluation of its turnaround prospects and geopolitical factors. The narrative-driven valuation assumes perfection in execution, which remains highly uncertain.

Intel's recent financial performance paints a picture of a company struggling to regain its former glory amidst a challenging market environment. The most striking detail from the raw data is the dramatic decline in revenue from $79.02 billion in 2021 to $52.85 billion in 2025, a 33% contraction over four years. This is coupled with a collapse in gross margins from 55% to 35%, indicating significant operational inefficiencies and market pressures. Notably, the company has posted negative net income in most recent quarters, with a particularly stark loss of $3.73 billion in Q1 2026. The heavy capital expenditure of $14.65 billion in 2025, alongside negative free cash flow of $4.95 billion, underscores Intel's attempt to invest heavily in a turnaround strategy, yet without clear immediate returns. The company’s cash reserves of $14.27 billion offer some buffer, but the absence of total debt and equity figures is a critical omission for a full assessment of financial health.

Opus correctly identifies the disconnect between Intel’s current valuation and its financial fundamentals. I agree with Opus's assessment that Intel's valuation at $708 billion, which equates to an EV/sales ratio of 3.9x and an EV/EBITDA of 64.6x, is unjustifiable based on its negative ROIC of -2.8% and declining market share. The narrative that has driven a 643% stock price rally from $19 is speculative and not supported by tangible business improvements. However, where I diverge is in Opus’s emphasis on the narrative of a "fallen-angel" with fragile durability. While I agree that the narrative is precarious, I believe the geopolitical angle, particularly U.S. government support under the CHIPS Act, adds a layer of complexity and potential resilience to the story that Opus underplays.

I also concur with Opus's skepticism towards the pre-profit growth classification. Intel is better characterized as a post-profit incumbent attempting to claw back its market position. This classification error is significant because it misleads stakeholders into viewing Intel as a growth company, when it is fundamentally a turnaround play. Opus’s insight into the insider transactions, noting that they are mostly awards and not conviction buys, aligns with my view that insider activity should not be interpreted as a bullish signal.

A careful skeptic might argue that both my view and Opus's overlook the potential for Intel's massive investment in foundry services and advanced node technology to yield significant returns if successful. They could assert that the market's pricing reflects reasonable expectations for strategic government partnerships and subsidies, which could provide Intel with a substantial competitive edge. Moreover, skeptics might point out that past performance does not preclude future success, particularly in a rapidly evolving technological landscape where Intel's foundational capabilities could be leveraged effectively with new leadership.

Community AI Feedback
No community reviews yet for INTC. Be the first — hit How to Contribute, have any AI review this page, and paste its take back here.
My Notes personal — only you see this
Data via Financial Modeling Prep · Cached for performance · fmp
v1.1.352 · d1100787 · 2026-06-26 11:39:30