Homepage
FRESH Analysis Report
Jun 25, 2026
2 days ago · 100% complete · +8 refreshed

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

JPM NYSE Categories PDF
Financial Services · Banks - Diversified
New York, NY 10017, United States IPO 1980 jpmorganchase.com Updated Jun 25, 3:01am
Price
$333.45
Market Cap
$893.5B
Employees
316,864
Beta
1.00
Avg Volume
8,861,632
CEO
James Dimon
Business Description

JPMorgan Chase & Co. operates as a bank and financial holding company in the United States, rest of North America, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, the Asia Pacific, Latin America, and the Caribbean. It operates in three segments: Consumer & Community Banking, Commercial & Investment Bank, and Asset & Wealth Management. The company offers deposit, investment and lending products, and cash management; mortgage origination and servicing activities; residential mortgages and home equity loans; and credit cards, payment solutions, travel services, merchant offers, lifestyle benefits, auto loans, and leases to consumers and small businesses through bank branches, ATMs, and digital and telephone banking. It also provides investment banking, market-making, financing, custody, and securities products and services; corporate strategy and structure advisory, equity and debt market capital-raising, and loan origination and syndication services; cash and derivative instruments, risk management solutions, prime brokerage, clearing, and research; and fund services, liquidity and trading services, and data solutions products for large corporations, financial institutions, merchants, start-ups, small and midsized companies, local governments, municipalities, nonprofits, and commercial real estate clients. In addition, the company offers multi-asset investment management solutions in equities, fixed income, alternatives, and money market funds to institutional clients and retail investors; retirement products and services, estate planning, lending, deposits, and investment management products to high-net-worth clients; and financial transaction processing. JPMorgan Chase & Co. was founded in 1799 and is headquartered in New York, New York.

Business History
Generated: Jun 25, 2026 3:02am
Price Overview
Last updated: Jun 25, 2026 3:00am (2d ago)
$333.45
-0.69 (-0.21%)
Day Range
$329.77 – $334.53
52-Week Range
$279.10 – $338.09
50-Day MA
$310.17
200-Day MA
$307.61
Volume
7,618,290.00
Analyst Price Targets
Low $295.00
Consensus $339.75
High $391.00
(104 analysts)
Share Structure
Outstanding 2,679,511,418.00
Float 2,665,149,237.00
Free Float 99.5%
High free float — 99.5% of shares trade freely, ~0.5% held by insiders/institutions
Very liquid — most shares trade freely. Low insider ownership can mean less management alignment, but makes large position sizing straightforward.
Price History (1 Year)
Last updated: Jun 25, 2026 3:06am (2d ago)
Revenue & Net Income Trend
The directional story — useful even when net income is negative.
Last updated: Jun 25, 2026 3:06am (2d ago)
Revenue
The top line — total sales before any costs or taxes are subtracted. A measure of how much business the company is doing.
Net Income
The bottom line — profit left after subtracting all expenses, interest, and taxes from revenue. Reflects accounting profitability, but includes non-cash items like depreciation, so it isn't the same as cash earned.
Operating Cash Flow
The real cash generated by the day-to-day business — selling products, paying suppliers, collecting from customers. Calculated from net income by adding back non-cash items and adjusting for timing (unpaid bills, unsold inventory). When OCF consistently lags net income, the reported profit may not be converting to real money.
Period Revenue Net Income Net Margin YoY/QoQ
Key Metrics
API Direct from provider CALC Derived from statements
Industry comparison last run: Jun 25, 2026 3:01am
P/E Ratio (Price per dollar of earnings)
API
Stock Price / EPS (Diluted)
15.79
Stock Price: $333.45
EPS (Diluted): 20.09
P/B Ratio (Price vs net asset value)
API
Stock Price / Book Value Per Share
2.48
Stock Price: $333.45
Total Equity: $362.44B
Shares: 2,793,700,000
EV/EBITDA (Total value vs operating profit)
API
Enterprise Value / EBITDA
21.65
Market Cap: $893.48B
Total Debt: $942.38B
Cash: $343.34B
EBITDA: $81.42B
Enterprise Value (Takeover price (cap + debt - cash))
API
Market Cap + Total Debt - Cash
$1.5T
Market Cap: $893.48B
Total Debt: $942.38B
Cash: $343.34B
Gross Margin (Revenue left after direct costs)
API
Gross Profit / Revenue
59.9%
Gross Profit: $167.61B
Revenue: $279.75B
Operating Margin (Revenue left after all operations)
API
Operating Income / Revenue
26.0%
Operating Income: $72.60B
Revenue: $279.75B
Net Margin (Revenue left as actual profit)
API
Net Income / Revenue
20.4%
Net Income: $57.05B
Revenue: $279.75B
ROE (Profit from shareholder equity)
API
Net Income / Total Equity
16.3%
Net Income: $57.05B
Total Equity: $362.44B
ROIC (Profit from all invested capital)
API
NOPAT / Invested Capital
3.0%
Operating Income: $72.60B
Tax Rate: 21.4%
Equity: $362.44B
Total Debt: $942.38B
Cash: $343.34B
Current Ratio (Can it pay short-term bills)
API
Current Assets / Current Liabilities
0.52
Current Assets: $1,877.54B
Current Liabilities: $3,584.54B
Debt/Equity (Leverage — debt vs equity)
CALC
Total Debt / Total Equity
2.60
Short-Term Debt: $508.41B
Long-Term Debt: $433.97B
Total Debt: $942.38B
Total Equity: $362.44B
Rev/Share (Top-line per share)
CALC
Revenue / Shares Outstanding
$100.13
Revenue: $279.75B
Shares: 2,793,700,000
Book Value/Share (Net assets per share)
CALC
(Total Assets - Total Liabilities) / Shares
$129.73
Total Equity: $362.44B
Shares: 2,793,700,000
FCF/Share (Real cash generated per share)
CALC
(Operating Cash Flow + CapEx) / Shares
$36.11
Operating CF: $100.87B
CapEx: $0.00
Shares: 2,793,700,000
Div Yield (Annual income from holding)
API
Last Annual Dividend / Stock Price
1.9%
Last Dividend: N/A
Stock Price: $333.45
Payout Ratio (Earnings paid out as dividends)
Dividends Paid / Net Income
Dividends Paid: N/A
Net Income: $57.05B
Dividends paid not available in cash flow statement
Industry Benchmarks
Last run: Jun 25, 2026 3:01am
Compares JPM against LLM-researched typical ranges for its industry. One research call per industry, cached indefinitely — every stock in the same industry reuses the same baseline.
Advanced Analysis Forensic deep-dive · three lenses
Three separate reads — Company Quality (is it a great business?), Valuation (is it mispriced?), and General Sentiment (how macro + narrative are pushing it), kept deliberately apart · 2026-06-25 03:09:22
Delvantic - Cairn AI
Quality - wait for a dip 8/10
Fortress-quality bank (+100) trading 11% above fair value (-55) with a clean news tailwind (+60) - wait for the dip, do not chase.
The cruxWhether you get a chance to buy sub-$285 before the stress-test/capital-return tailwind compounds into another leg up.
Forensic checks Derived mechanically from JPM's filed financials — not from the AI lenses
Liquidity & RunwayFortress Balance Sheet
DilutionShare Count Shrinking
Earnings QualityGood Earnings Quality
The three lensesswitch a tab for its full read — score + evidence
Company Quality
+100
Fortress
edge √Σ 147 · risk √Σ 47 · conf 9/10

Revenue has more than doubled from $127B in 2021 to $280B in 2025, with operating margin holding in a 26-30% band even as the business scaled through a rate cycle and the First Republic absorption. Net income stepped from $48B to $57B and OCF/NI of 1.15x with accruals at -0.1% of assets indicates earnings are backed by cash, not accrual gymnastics; Beneish M at -2.33 is well clear of the manipulation threshold. The Altman Z distress flag is a model artifact - Z-score is calibrated for industrial firms and is structurally negative for deposit-taking banks, not a real solvency signal.

Strengths 4
m80
Per-share value concentrating
Diluted shares fell from 3.03B (2021) to 2.79B (2025), a ~2% CAGR shrink with zero meaningful SBC drag - rare discipline at this scale.
m78
Revenue and earnings compounding
Revenue 2.2x over four years ($127B to $280B); net income up ~18% with stable ~26-28% operating margins - genuine operating leverage at scale.
m70
Clean earnings quality
OCF/NI 1.15x, accruals -0.1% of assets, Beneish M -2.33 - cash conversion is real and there are no manipulation flags.
m65
Scale moat and franchise breadth
Diversified across IB, markets, consumer, AWM - inferred from $280B revenue base; Dimon-era underwriting discipline has been validated through multiple stress cycles.
Concerns 3
m35
FCF volatility
FCF swung from +$107B (2022) to -$42B (2024) back to +$101B (2025) - typical for a bank where working capital swings dominate, but means FCF is a poor standalone quality gauge here.
m25
Insider tape one-directional
32 sells / 0 buys totaling $112M over LTM including Erdoes, Piepszak, Barnum, Lake - looks like scheduled/comp-driven liquidation rather than alarm, but no insider is putting fresh capital in.
m20
Gross margin compression optical
Reported GM% fell from 102.9% (2021) to 59.9% (2025) - reflects classification of interest expense as rates rose, not a real business deterioration; operating margin held.
This is about as high-quality as a global SIFI bank gets. Revenue more than doubled in four years, margins held, the share count is actually shrinking, and earnings quality screens cleanly on every metric that matters (OCF/NI, accruals, Beneish). The Altman Z 'distress' flag is noise - it always misfires on banks because their balance sheets are structurally leveraged by design. The FCF volatility is similarly a banking-accounting artifact. Insider selling is the only mild yellow flag and it looks routine. Dimon-era JPM is the gold standard of large-cap banking and the data backs that up - this is a Fortress-tier business.
Verify before trusting this (6)
  • CET1 ratio and SLR trend vs regulatory minimums to confirm capital fortress
  • Loan loss reserve build/release and net charge-off trajectory in 2024-2025 10-K
  • Net interest income sensitivity to rate cuts and deposit beta assumptions
  • Whether insider sales are under Rule 10b5-1 plans (scheduled vs discretionary)
  • Investment banking and trading revenue mix durability vs cyclical peak
  • Operational risk and litigation reserves disclosure
Valuation / Mispricing
-55
Rich
edge √Σ 37 · risk √Σ 92 · conf 7/10
price $333 vs deserved ~$301 — paying ~11% above fair value, negative margin of safety. attractive below $285.00

The composite and signal-adjusted fair value both sit at $301.45 against a $333.45 price, implying the market is paying about a 10-11% premium to a fair-value estimate that already embeds JPM's fortress quality. That is not a screaming overvaluation, but it is the opposite of a margin of safety — you are buying at roughly 1.1x deserved value on a SIFI bank whose forward earnings face NIM normalization, deposit beta creep, and a normalizing credit cycle. Earnings quality is clean, so no haircut is warranted; the Fortress quality grade justifies a premium multiple but that premium is already in the print, not a reason to add another layer on top. The bull case (AI efficiency, share count shrinking, pricing power) is largely consensus and reflected in the price; the bear case (rate normalization, regulatory capital, credit normalization off cycle lows) is the asymmetric risk that is not. Net-net: a great business at a full-to-slightly-stretched price. Fair-value methods look sane (no runaway 5x outputs to discount), and the gap is modest enough that this is 'Rich' not 'Overvalued' — the honest verdict is that the market understands JPM well and you are not being offered an edge here.

Cheap signals 2
m30
Clean earnings quality supports the deserved multiple
OCF/NI, accruals, and Beneish all screen clean — no haircut needed to deserved value, so the $301 FV is a credible anchor rather than an inflated one.
m22
Shrinking share count and revenue compounding
Buybacks plus revenue growth provide a modest tailwind to per-share deserved value over time — the gap could narrow via earnings growth rather than price decline.
Rich / priced-in 3
m62
Price 11% above composite fair value
$333.45 vs $301.45 composite/signal-adjusted FV. The gap is meaningful but not extreme — clearly no margin of safety, with downside to fair value of roughly 10%.
m55
Priced for cycle-peak earnings to persist
Premium multiple assumes NIM stays elevated and credit costs stay benign. Deposit beta creep and credit normalization are not in the price; any reversion compresses both EPS and the multiple simultaneously.
m40
Consensus 'fortress' premium already paid
The Fortress quality grade is well understood by the market — JPM has traded at a structural premium to peers for years. You are paying for quality you do not get for free.
I am not interested at $333. The composite FV of $301 looks credible and well-supported, and paying 11% above it for a bank facing NIM normalization and credit normalization is the wrong end of asymmetric. This is a great business the market fully understands — I need it meaningfully cheaper, call it sub-$285 (roughly 5% discount to FV), before the risk/reward turns. Fairly-to-richly valued; do not chase.
Verify before trusting this (4)
  • Forward NIM guidance and deposit beta trajectory in next earnings call
  • Credit reserve build/release cadence and net charge-off trends vs cycle averages
  • Basel III endgame capital impact and how it constrains buyback capacity
  • IB/markets revenue mix — how much of recent strength is cyclical vs structural
General Sentiment
+60
Tailwind
tail √Σ 107 · head √Σ 47 · conf 7/10

The macro backdrop is neutral (VIX 18.6, S&P 3.3% off highs, 10y at 4.41%) and JPM's beta of 1 means the tape itself is neither helping nor hurting much. What is doing the work is the news flow: every major bank cleared the Fed stress test, JPM raised its dividend to $1.65 from $1.50, and capital return guidance was reaffirmed. That is exactly the kind of catalyst that reinforces the active 'fortress balance sheet / steady compounder' narrative the market already assigns this name, and it lands during a calm-enough tape to be rewarded rather than fade. Narrative durability is high and intensity is moderate, so the stock is not euphoric or over-owned on a story that could crack; it is grinding higher on confirmation. Analyst tone is constructively Buy with a target ($339.75) basically at spot, meaning the sell side has not yet refreshed numbers post-stress-test, no negative revisions, and there is room for upward target drift. JPM also just raised its own S&P year-end target to 7,800, reinforcing it as the house view voice of the tape, which tends to feed reflexively into its own multiple. Headwinds exist (hawkish-Fed math debate, NIM compression chatter, premium to book) but are background noise this week, not the active pressure.

Tailwinds 4
m75
Stress test pass + capital return bump
Fed stress test clearance with an explicit dividend hike (1.50 to 1.65) and reaffirmed buyback authority is a direct, dated catalyst that validates the fortress narrative and lands in after-hours green.
m55
Durable steady-compounder narrative reinforced
The active story (Dimon stewardship, diversified franchise, capital return) is durable and moderate-intensity, not euphoric, so confirming news like this gets bought rather than sold as a 'top'.
m40
Analyst tone constructive with refresh room
Consensus is Buy with target essentially at spot and zero revisions this month; post-stress-test revisions are likely to drift up, providing a slow positive bid.
m35
JPM as the tape's voice
JPM lifting its S&P target to 7,800 keeps the firm front-and-center as the bullish macro oracle, reflexively supporting its own brand premium and flows.
Headwinds 3
m35
Hawkish-Fed / NIM compression chatter
Media is openly debating whether a more hawkish Fed and deposit beta creep change the math for big banks; this caps euphoria and keeps the multiple expansion measured.
m25
Neutral tape, S&P off highs
Index 3.3% off highs with low-confidence regime means risk appetite is only lukewarm; with beta 1 JPM gets no extra lift from a risk-on bid, just clean idiosyncratic news.
m20
Premium to book / DCF gap
Stock at a 10.6% premium to DCF fair value is a sentiment-side ceiling: not pressure today, but it limits how much further narrative uplift the tape will grant before pausing.
Net pressure on JPM right now is positive but not euphoric. The stress test pass plus an explicit dividend raise is a textbook confirming catalyst for a durable steady-compounder narrative, and it lands into a neutral-to-calm tape with analysts asleep at the wheel on targets - meaning there is upward revision potential still in the tank. With beta 1 and a non-story sector, JPM is not getting amplified by either risk-on or risk-off, so this is clean idiosyncratic tailwind. I would lean tailwind, not strong tailwind, because the narrative is moderate intensity not euphoric and the hawkish-Fed/NIM debate is a real ceiling on multiple expansion.
Verify before trusting this (4)
  • Whether sell-side target revisions actually tick up in the next 2-3 weeks post stress test
  • Q3 earnings NIM trajectory and deposit beta commentary - the bear story's pressure point
  • Any rotation out of money-center banks into regionals if curve steepens further
  • VIX behavior and S&P drawdown extension - a break below recent regime would mute the tailwind
The market-wide tape + this name's exposure to it (beta / sector / narrative durability). Context on the non-fundamental pressure — not a call on the business or the price. processId: detail-general-sentiment
Please log in to view trade setups
The Augustus trade-setup read is a members feature.
Log in
Three lenses kept deliberately separate — Company Quality (price-agnostic), Valuation (price-conditional), and General Sentiment (non-fundamental macro/narrative pressure). The scores are not blended. Filing-level items (convertibles, lock-ups, customer concentration) are v2 — see each lens's "verify."
Deep Analysis
Last run: Jun 25, 2026 3:05:36 am

Pre-flight intelligence scans the company first, then routes to the right analytical methods.

0 Company Classification — What type of company is this?
1 Industry Landscape — Where is the industry headed?
2 Company Momentum — Where is this company trending?
3 Forward Projection — 1Y & 2Y projected metrics (requires Layer 1 + 2)
4a DCF Valuation — Present value of future cash flows
4b Earnings Power Value — Floor value — worth with zero growth
4c Anchored PE — Industry PE adjusted for growth differential
4d Reverse DCF — What growth is the market pricing in?
4e Revenue-Based DCF — For growth/narrative companies (skip if mature earner)
Not applicable for Mature Earner companies
4f Anchored P/S — Price-to-Sales peer comparison (skip if mature earner)
Not applicable for Mature Earner companies
4g Scenario Analysis — Bull / Base / Bear (skip if mature earner)
Not applicable for Mature Earner companies
4h Dividend Discount Model — For dividend/income stocks only
Not applicable for Mature Earner companies
4i Book Value Analysis — For deep value / turnaround stocks only
Not applicable for Mature Earner companies
4j Insider Activity — Are insiders buying or selling?
4f Cash Flow Quality — How trustworthy is the FCF?
4g Debt Maturity Risk — Can it handle its debt?
4h Macro Environment — Rates, market valuation, volatility
4i Sector Intelligence — How does this company compare within its sector?
4j Revenue Confidence — How reliable is the growth projection?
4k Sensitivity Analysis — How fragile is the fair value estimate?
4l Sector Demand Cycle — Is the sector in a boom, steady state, or contraction?
5 AI Investigation — Adaptive research engine (Claude)
5b Thesis Evaluation — What does the market believe? (narrative/platform stocks only)
Not applicable for Mature Earner companies
6 Valuation Synthesis — Weighted verdict from all methods (requires Layer 4)
Income Statement (Annual)
Last updated: Jun 25, 2026 3:06am (2d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Revenue $127.2B $153.8B $236.3B $270.8B $279.7B
Cost of Revenue -$3.7B $32.4B $90.6B $112.0B $112.1B
Gross Profit $130.9B $121.4B $145.7B $158.8B $167.6B
Operating Expenses $71.3B $75.2B $84.1B $83.7B $95.0B
Operating Income $59.6B $46.2B $61.6B $75.1B $72.6B
Net Income $48.3B $37.7B $49.6B $58.5B $57.0B
EBITDA $67.5B $53.2B $69.1B $83.0B $81.4B
EPS $15.39 $12.10 $16.25 $19.79 $20.09
EPS (Diluted)
Balance Sheet (Annual)
Last updated: Jun 25, 2026 3:00am (2d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Cash & Equivalents $740.8B $567.2B $624.2B $469.3B $343.3B
Total Current Assets $1.7T $1.4T $1.5T $1.7T $1.9T
Total Assets $3.7T $3.7T $3.9T $4.0T $4.4T
Current Liabilities $3.1T $3.1T $3.1T $3.2T $3.6T
Long-Term Debt $301.0B $295.9B $391.8B $401.4B $434.0B
Total Liabilities $3.4T $3.4T $3.5T $3.7T $4.1T
Total Equity $294.1B $292.3B $327.9B $344.8B $362.4B
Retained Earnings $272.3B $296.5B $332.9B $376.2B $416.1B
Cash Flow (Annual)
Last updated: Jun 25, 2026 3:06am (2d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Operating Cash Flow $78.1B $107.1B $13.0B -$42.0B $100.9B
Capital Expenditure $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Free Cash Flow $78.1B $107.1B $13.0B -$42.0B $100.9B
Acquisitions (net) $0 $0 -$9.9B -$2.4B $0
Debt Repayment
Dividends Paid
Stock Buybacks -$21.0B -$10.6B -$9.8B -$28.7B -$34.6B
Net Change in Cash $213.2B -$173.6B $56.9B -$154.8B -$126.0B
Analyst Estimates (Annual)
Last updated: Jun 25, 2026 3:00am (2d ago)
Metric 2025 2026 2027 2028
Revenue $183.5B
$181.7B – $185.2B
$196.9B
$193.1B – $199.1B
$205.1B
$202.6B – $209.4B
$215.2B
$214.3B – $216.0B
EBITDA $64.8B
$64.2B – $65.4B
$69.6B
$68.2B – $70.3B
$72.5B
$71.6B – $74.0B
$76.0B
$75.7B – $76.3B
Net Income $56.5B
$56.2B – $56.7B
$62.2B
$61.0B – $63.4B
$65.3B
$61.0B – $69.5B
$72.8B
$68.0B – $77.5B
EPS
Growth Trends (YoY %)
Last updated: Jun 25, 2026 3:06am (2d ago)
Metric 2022 2023 2024 2025
Revenue Growth +20.9% +53.6% +14.6% +3.3%
Gross Profit Growth -7.3% +20.0% +9.0% +5.6%
Operating Income Growth -22.5% +33.5% +21.9% -3.3%
Net Income Growth -22.1% +31.5% +18.0% -2.4%
EBITDA Growth -21.2% +29.9% +20.1% -1.9%
Insider Trading (Recent)
Last updated: Jun 25, 2026 3:05am (2d ago)
Type codes PPurchase SSale AAward / grant MOption exercise FIn-kind (tax) CConversion GGift DReturn to issuer
All SEC Form 4 codes
Open market
P Purchase
Open-market or private purchase of shares.
S Sale
Open-market or private sale of shares.
Compensation (Rule 16b-3)
A Award / grant
Grant or award of securities (RSUs, options, etc.) under Rule 16b-3.
D Return to issuer
Securities disposed back to the company under Rule 16b-3.
F In-kind (tax)
Shares withheld or delivered to pay the option-exercise price or tax — not an open-market sale.
I Discretionary
Discretionary transaction under an employee plan — Rule 16b-3(f).
M Option exercise
Exercise or conversion of a derivative (option/RSU) into shares — exempt.
Derivatives
C Conversion
Conversion of a derivative security into the underlying shares.
E Short expiration
Expiration of a short derivative position.
H Long expiration
Expiration or cancellation of a long derivative position with value received.
O OTM exercise
Exercise of an out-of-the-money derivative.
X ITM exercise
Exercise of an in-the-money or at-the-money derivative.
Other exempt
G Gift
Bona fide gift of securities.
L Small acquisition
Small acquisition under Rule 16a-6.
W Inheritance
Acquisition or disposition by will or the laws of descent.
Z Voting trust
Deposit into or withdrawal from a voting trust.
Other
J Other
Other acquisition or disposition (explained in a Form 4 footnote).
K Equity swap
Transaction in an equity swap or similar instrument.
U Tender / buyout
Disposition via tender of shares in a change-of-control transaction.

Compensation-plan codes (A, D, F, M) are routine and rarely directional. Open-market P (buy) and S (sale) carry the most signal.

Date Insider Type Shares Price Value
2026-06-24 Piepszak Jennifer A-Award 60,214.00 $0.00 $0
2026-06-24 Rohrbaugh Troy L A-Award 90,321.00 $0.00 $0
2026-06-24 Petno Douglas B A-Award 90,321.00 $0.00 $0
2026-06-24 Erdoes Mary E. A-Award 60,214.00 $0.00 $0
2026-06-22 Friedman Stacey S-Sale 5,467.00 $330.73 $1.8M
2026-05-20 Friedman Stacey S-Sale 5,468.00 $300.27 $1.6M
2026-05-15 Erdoes Mary E. S-Sale 6,648.00 $298.36 $2.0M
2026-05-15 Lake Marianne S-Sale 6,427.00 $298.36 $1.9M
2026-05-14 Petno Douglas B G-Gift 135,027.00 $0.00 $0
2026-05-15 Petno Douglas B S-Sale 5,659.00 $300.05 $1.7M
2026-05-14 Petno Douglas B G-Gift 135,027.00 $0.00 $0
2026-05-15 Beer Lori A S-Sale 3,165.00 $300.05 $949,658
2026-05-05 Barnum Jeremy S-Sale 3,022.00 $309.41 $935,032
2026-05-05 BACON ASHLEY S-Sale 4,070.00 $309.42 $1.3M
2026-05-05 Piepszak Jennifer S-Sale 4,919.00 $309.42 $1.5M
2026-04-15 Piepszak Jennifer S-Sale 9,136.00 $306.56 $2.8M
2026-04-15 Petno Douglas B S-Sale 5,660.00 $306.58 $1.7M
2026-04-15 Lake Marianne S-Sale 6,427.00 $306.57 $2.0M
2026-04-15 Erdoes Mary E. S-Sale 12,345.00 $306.57 $3.8M
2026-04-15 Beer Lori A S-Sale 3,166.00 $306.59 $970,660
Dividend History (Last 20)
Last updated: Jun 25, 2026 3:00am (2d ago)
Date Dividend Declaration Record Payment
2026-07-06 $1.50 2026-05-18 2026-07-06 2026-07-31
2026-04-06 $1.50 2026-03-17 2026-04-06 2026-04-30
2026-01-06 $1.50 2025-12-09 2026-01-06 2026-01-31
2025-10-06 $1.50 2025-09-16 2025-10-06 2025-10-31
2025-07-03 $1.40 2025-05-19 2025-07-03 2025-07-31
2025-04-04 $1.40 2025-03-18 2025-04-04 2025-04-30
2025-01-06 $1.25 2024-12-09 2025-01-06 2025-01-31
2024-10-04 $1.25 2024-09-17 2024-10-04 2024-10-31
2024-07-05 $1.15 2024-05-20 2024-07-05 2024-07-31
2024-04-04 $1.15 2024-03-19 2024-04-05 2024-04-30
2024-01-04 $1.05 2023-12-12 2024-01-05 2024-01-31
2023-10-05 $1.05 2023-09-19 2023-10-06 2023-10-31
2023-07-05 $1.00 2023-05-15 2023-07-06 2023-07-31
2023-04-05 $1.00 2023-03-21 2023-04-06 2023-04-30
2023-01-05 $1.00 2022-12-13 2023-01-06 2023-01-31
2022-10-05 $1.00 2022-09-20 2022-10-06 2022-10-31
2022-07-05 $1.00 2022-05-17 2022-07-06 2022-07-31
2022-04-05 $1.00 2022-03-15 2022-04-06 2022-04-30
2022-01-05 $1.00 2021-12-14 2022-01-06 2022-01-31
2021-10-05 $1.00 2021-09-21 2021-10-06 2021-10-31
Narrative Economics
The story the market is telling about this stock — the intangible X-factor (founder mythology, cult dynamics, TAM-of-imagination) that moves price beyond what cash flows alone explain. After Shiller, Narrative Economics.
No narrative profile yet for JPM — it's generated by the pipeline (market-narrative step).
Delvantic AI Findings
Independent analyst synthesis · Delvantic - Cairn AI · generated 2026-06-25 03:06:14
Reviews the pipeline's own verdicts
Verdict Fairly-to-modestly overvalued — fair value $295-310 vs $333; high-quality franchise but wait for a NIM-scare or credit-headline pullback to ~$290 before adding.

Looking at the raw quarterly tape first: revenue has marched from $67.0B (Q4'24) to $73.7B (Q1'26) — call it ~10% over five quarters, decent but not exciting for a bank riding peak NII. Net income is noisier: $18.15B in Q2'24 was clearly a one-off (Visa share exchange gain, ~$8B pretax), so the "earnings down YoY" framing is misleading. Strip that and Q1'26's $16.49B at a 22.4% margin is actually the best clean quarter in the series, with margins expanding sequentially from 18.7% → 22.4%. That is not a decelerating franchise. Annual NI of $57.05B (2025) vs $58.47B (2024) again reflects the Visa comp, not deterioration. ROE of 16.3% on a $360B+ equity base is elite for a G-SIB.

The prior models are internally contradictory in ways that should embarrass them. The Market Forces module calls JPM a "late-cycle value trap... levering up aggressively into decelerating growth with deteriorating operational quality, unsustainable cash flows, and insiders fleeing" — none of which the numbers support. Q1'26 margins are *expanding*, OCF of $100.87B is robust (bank FCF is a near-meaningless construct since capex isn't the constraint — regulatory capital is), and the insider "selling" is ~40K shares of routine 10b5-1 disposals plus gifts, against ~2.7B shares outstanding. That's noise, not an exodus. Meanwhile the Synthesis module correctly flags the 38.2% implied FCF growth as a modeling artifact — yes, because FCF jumped from a depressed 2021/22 base, not because anyone expects it to compound. The 178.8% FCF CAGR is garbage-in. The Narrative layer's $301 DCF + $32 narrative premium is the most honest read in the file.

The contrarian case worth taking seriously is not "value trap" — it's duration risk on NII. JPM's 2024-2025 earnings power is heavily levered to the rate curve and to the deposit franchise's beta lag. If the Fed cuts 150bps and deposit costs are sticky on the way down (they were sticky on the way up too, so this cuts both ways), NIM compresses. Consensus 2026 EPS of ~$20-21 implies ~16.5x forward, which is *rich* for a bank — historically JPM trades 11-13x. The P/B of 2.48x is near a 20-year high; the franchise has never sustained >2.5x P/B for long without mean-reverting. Credit is also benign right now — card charge-offs at 3.3% are normalizing but not stressed. A real recession with CRE losses and consumer credit deterioration would compress both the multiple and the E. That's the bear case, and it's a multiple-compression story, not a "deteriorating quality" story.

My verdict: I dissent from Market Forces (wrong, and embarrassingly so on the facts) and side with the Narrative layer's framing. Fair value is roughly $295-310 on a normalized 12-13x mid-cycle EPS of ~$23-25, or ~1.9-2.1x book. At $333 you're paying ~10% above that for Dimon, scale, and the regulatory moat — defensible but not a bargain. The 1.85% dividend yield plus ~3% buyback gives you ~5% capital return, so total return at current prices is mid-single-digits unless the multiple holds, which requires NIM to hold, which requires the curve to cooperate. I would not chase here; I'd wait for a 10-15% pullback (~$285-300) on any credit scare or rate-cut-driven NII guide-down, which historically happens at least once a year in bank stocks. Quality is unquestioned; price is full.

GPT Critique
Second-opinion review · gpt-4o · generated 2026-06-25 03:06:21
Reviews the Opus findings above
Verdict I partly agree with Opus — JPM is slightly overvalued at $333, but I see fair value closer to $310-320, reflecting stronger confidence in the bank's strategic positioning and growth resilience.

In reviewing the data for JPMorgan Chase & Co., I see a company with robust revenue growth and stable, impressive earnings margins. JPM's quarterly revenue has increased from $67.01 billion in Q4 2024 to $73.66 billion in Q1 2026, marking approximately a 10% growth over five quarters—a solid performance for a major diversified bank. However, the net income figures show volatility, largely influenced by non-recurring items like the Visa share exchange gain in Q2 2024. The most recent quarter shows a net income of $16.49 billion with a margin of 22.4%, an indicator of strong operational efficiency and profitability. The company's cash flow is robust with an operating cash flow of $100.87 billion, though the free cash flow metric appears inflated due to banking sector norms where capex isn't a significant constraint.

I align with Claude Opus in disputing the Market Forces module's characterization of JPM as a "late-cycle value trap." The current data contradicts this assertion; margins are expanding, and cash flows are strong. The notion of insider selling as a negative signal is unfounded, given the relatively small volume of shares sold against the total outstanding. I also share Opus's skepticism about the implied 38.2% FCF growth rate; this appears to be an artifact of the data rather than a realistic forecast.

Where I diverge from Opus is in the interpretation of JPM's valuation premium. Opus suggests that JPM is modestly overvalued at its current price of $333, proposing a fair value range of $295-310. I believe this underestimates the durability of JPM's competitive advantages and the premium that comes with it. The bank's scale, market position, and management under Jamie Dimon are worth more than a mere 10% premium to book. While Opus is cautious about JPM's reliance on net interest income and potential compression due to rate cuts, I see JPM's diversified revenue streams and technological investments as buffers against such risks.

A careful skeptic might argue that both my analysis and Opus's overlook the broader macroeconomic and regulatory risks that could impact JPM's performance. These include potential geopolitical tensions, regulatory changes, and the unpredictability of rate movements, which could all pressure JPM's margins and growth prospects more than currently anticipated.

Community AI Feedback
No community reviews yet for JPM. Be the first — hit How to Contribute, have any AI review this page, and paste its take back here.
My Notes personal — only you see this
Data via Financial Modeling Prep · Cached for performance · fmp
v1.1.352 · d1100787 · 2026-06-26 11:39:30