Homepage
AGING Analysis Report
Jun 17, 2026
10 days ago · 96% complete · +8 refreshed

Kennametal Inc.

KMT NYSE Categories PDF
Industrials · Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories
Pittsburgh, PA 15219, United States IPO 1943 kennametal.com Updated Jun 17, 3:00am
Price
$36.50
Market Cap
$2.8B
Employees
8,400
Beta
1.37
Avg Volume
1,311,780
CEO
Sanjay K. Chowbey
Business Description

Kennametal Inc. is a global leader in developing and applying cutting-edge materials, including tungsten carbides, ceramics, and super-hard compounds. Their core mission is to provide robust solutions for demanding industrial applications, specifically in metal cutting and environments prone to extreme wear, high temperatures, and corrosion, serving clients worldwide. The company's operations are structured into two primary segments: Metal Cutting and Infrastructure. Within the Metal Cutting division, Kennametal offers a comprehensive portfolio of standard and bespoke products, encompassing tools for turning, milling, and hole-making, integrated tooling systems, and associated technical services. They also supply specialized wear-resistant components and advanced metallurgical powders. These critical products serve a diverse array of manufacturers across industries such as transportation (vehicles and components), machine tools, light and heavy machinery, aerospace (airframes and components), and the energy sector (oil and gas, power generation). The company further supports these clients with expert product design, selection, application guidance, and ongoing support services, delivering customized metal cutting solutions. Under its Infrastructure segment, Kennametal produces a variety of specialized items. This includes compacts, nozzles, frac seats, and tailored components crucial for the oil and gas and petrochemical industries. They also provide rod blanks and abrasive water jet nozzles for broader industrial applications, alongside durable earth-cutting tools and systems essential for underground mining, trenching, foundation drilling, and road milling. Furthermore, the company manufactures tungsten carbide powders for aerospace, oil and gas, and process industries, as well as ceramics specifically utilized by the packaging industry for film and paper metallization. Kennametal's extensive product lines are marketed under well-known brands such as Kennametal, WIDIA, WIDIA Hanita, and WIDIA GTD. Distribution occurs through a multi-channel approach, leveraging a direct sales force, a broad network of independent and national distributors, integrated supplier relationships, and online platforms. Founded in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, in 1938, the company boasts a long-standing history in the industrial materials sector.

Business History
Generated: Jun 17, 2026 3:02am
Price Overview
Last updated: Jun 17, 2026 3:00am (10d ago)
$36.50
+0.95 (+2.67%)
Day Range
$35.86 – $36.83
52-Week Range
$17.62 – $43.81
50-Day MA
$36.59
200-Day MA
$31.30
Volume
777,265.00
Analyst Price Targets
Low $29.00
Consensus $35.75
High $47.50
(29 analysts)
Share Structure
Outstanding 76,210,103.00
Float 75,547,075.00
Free Float 99.1%
High free float — 99.1% of shares trade freely, ~0.9% held by insiders/institutions
Very liquid — most shares trade freely. Low insider ownership can mean less management alignment, but makes large position sizing straightforward.
Price History (1 Year)
Last updated: Jun 17, 2026 3:05am (10d ago)
Revenue & Net Income Trend
The directional story — useful even when net income is negative.
Last updated: Jun 17, 2026 3:05am (10d ago)
Revenue
The top line — total sales before any costs or taxes are subtracted. A measure of how much business the company is doing.
Net Income
The bottom line — profit left after subtracting all expenses, interest, and taxes from revenue. Reflects accounting profitability, but includes non-cash items like depreciation, so it isn't the same as cash earned.
Operating Cash Flow
The real cash generated by the day-to-day business — selling products, paying suppliers, collecting from customers. Calculated from net income by adding back non-cash items and adjusting for timing (unpaid bills, unsold inventory). When OCF consistently lags net income, the reported profit may not be converting to real money.
Period Revenue Net Income Net Margin YoY/QoQ
Key Metrics
API Direct from provider CALC Derived from statements
Industry comparison last run: Jun 17, 2026 3:01am
P/E Ratio (Price per dollar of earnings)
API
Stock Price / EPS (Diluted)
20.30
Stock Price: $36.50
EPS (Diluted): 1.21
P/B Ratio (Price vs net asset value)
API
Stock Price / Book Value Per Share
1.38
Stock Price: $36.50
Total Equity: $1.28B
Shares: 77,894,000
EV/EBITDA (Total value vs operating profit)
API
Enterprise Value / EBITDA
9.26
Market Cap: $2.78B
Total Debt: $597.77M
Cash: $140.54M
EBITDA: $293.43M
Enterprise Value (Takeover price (cap + debt - cash))
API
Market Cap + Total Debt - Cash
$2.3B
Market Cap: $2.78B
Total Debt: $597.77M
Cash: $140.54M
Gross Margin (Revenue left after direct costs)
API
Gross Profit / Revenue
30.4%
Gross Profit: $598.07M
Revenue: $1.97B
Operating Margin (Revenue left after all operations)
API
Operating Income / Revenue
7.3%
Operating Income: $143.12M
Revenue: $1.97B
Net Margin (Revenue left as actual profit)
API
Net Income / Revenue
4.7%
Net Income: $93.13M
Revenue: $1.97B
ROE (Profit from shareholder equity)
API
Net Income / Total Equity
10.5%
Net Income: $93.13M
Total Equity: $1.28B
ROIC (Profit from all invested capital)
API
NOPAT / Invested Capital
7.0%
Operating Income: $143.12M
Tax Rate: 25.2%
Equity: $1.28B
Total Debt: $597.77M
Cash: $140.54M
Current Ratio (Can it pay short-term bills)
API
Current Assets / Current Liabilities
2.46
Current Assets: $1.04B
Current Liabilities: $422.33M
Debt/Equity (Leverage — debt vs equity)
CALC
Total Debt / Total Equity
0.47
Short-Term Debt: $977,000
Long-Term Debt: $596.79M
Total Debt: $597.77M
Total Equity: $1.28B
Rev/Share (Top-line per share)
CALC
Revenue / Shares Outstanding
$25.25
Revenue: $1.97B
Shares: 77,894,000
Book Value/Share (Net assets per share)
CALC
(Total Assets - Total Liabilities) / Shares
$16.48
Total Equity: $1.28B
Shares: 77,894,000
FCF/Share (Real cash generated per share)
CALC
(Operating Cash Flow + CapEx) / Shares
$1.53
Operating CF: $208.32M
CapEx: -$88.97M
Shares: 77,894,000
CapEx is negative (outflow) — added to OCF to get FCF
Div Yield (Annual income from holding)
API
Last Annual Dividend / Stock Price
3.5%
Last Dividend: N/A
Stock Price: $36.50
Payout Ratio (Earnings paid out as dividends)
Dividends Paid / Net Income
Dividends Paid: N/A
Net Income: $93.13M
Dividends paid not available in cash flow statement
Industry Benchmarks
Last run: Jun 17, 2026 3:01am
Compares KMT against LLM-researched typical ranges for its industry. One research call per industry, cached indefinitely — every stock in the same industry reuses the same baseline.
Advanced Analysis Forensic deep-dive · three lenses
Three separate reads — Company Quality (is it a great business?), Valuation (is it mispriced?), and General Sentiment (how macro + narrative are pushing it), kept deliberately apart · 2026-06-17 03:08:25
Delvantic - Cairn AI
Good business, wrong price — pass, set alerts 8/10
Solid 8/10 business but the -73 valuation lens says you're paying ~2× deserved value at a cyclical-trough margin moment — pass at $36.50.
The cruxWhether the four-year operating-margin compression reverses into a real cycle recovery soon enough to validate a price already embedding it.
Forensic checks Derived mechanically from KMT's filed financials — not from the AI lenses
Liquidity & RunwaySelf-Funding
DilutionShare Count Shrinking
Earnings QualityHigh Earnings Quality
The three lensesswitch a tab for its full read — score + evidence
Company Quality
+8
Solid
edge √Σ 111 · risk √Σ 103 · conf 7/10

Kennametal is a mature industrial earner with genuinely high-quality accounting: OCF/NI of 2.51x, negative accruals (-5% of assets), Beneish M at -2.69 and Altman Z at 3.28 all point to real, conservatively-stated earnings. FCF has averaged ~$130M/yr across the last five years ($119M in 2025), comfortably funding the dividend and a buyback that has shrunk diluted shares from 84.3M to 77.9M (a ~2%/yr CAGR) while SBC is a modest 1.1% of revenue and buybacks run 223% of SBC — per-share value is being concentrated, not leaked.

The concern is the operating trajectory. Revenue peaked at $2.08B in 2023 and has slid two years in a row to $1.97B in 2025. Gross margin has drifted from 32.2% (2022) to 30.4%, and — more telling — operating margin has compressed every single year from 10.8% (2022) → 9.3% → 8.3% → 7.3%, with net income falling from $144.6M to $93.1M. That is a clear loss of operating leverage in a cyclical, late-cycle short-cycle industrial. The balance sheet is workable but not a cushion: net debt of $457M against $140M cash means leverage matters if the down-cycle deepens, though Altman Z of 3.28 says solvency is not in question.

Insider tape is one-sided sell (7 sales, 0 buys, $4.8M) across multiple officers (Patel, Reilly, Keating, Witt, Bacchus) — consistent with a mature comp structure but notable given the deteriorating margin trend; no insider is leaning in.

Strengths 3
m78
Clean earnings, real cash
OCF/NI 2.51x, accruals -5% of assets, Beneish -2.69, Altman Z 3.28. Five-year FCF consistently positive ($84–170M). Reported earnings are backed by cash, not accruals.
m65
Disciplined per-share stewardship
Diluted shares down from 84.3M (2021) to 77.9M (2025), a ~2% CAGR shrink. Buybacks run 223% of SBC and SBC is only 1.1% of revenue — owners are not being diluted.
m45
Self-funding through the cycle
$119M FCF in 2025 even as revenue and margins fell — the business throws off cash even in a weak year, supporting the dividend and buyback without new debt.
Concerns 4
m72
Operating margin compression every year since 2022
OpM has fallen 10.8% → 9.3% → 8.3% → 7.3% over four years while gross margin slipped from 32.2% to 30.4%. Net income dropped from $144.6M to $93.1M. Operating leverage is working in reverse.
m55
Two-year revenue decline
Revenue: $2.08B (2023) → $2.05B → $1.97B (2025). For a cyclical short-cycle tooling supplier this signals end-market softness (machining, energy, aerospace cycle) and limits the ability to re-leverage fixed costs.
m38
Net debt of $457M is a constraint
Cash $140M vs net debt $457M (cash only 5.1% of mkt cap). Manageable while FCF is positive, but balance sheet is a constraint, not a cushion, if the down-cycle extends.
m30
Broad, one-sided insider selling
7 sales / 0 buys totaling $4.8M across at least 5 different officers (Patel, Reilly x2, Keating, Witt, Bacchus) in the past ~4 months. Not catastrophic in size but the breadth and absence of any open-market buys signal no insider conviction at current levels.
This is a competent, conservatively-run mature industrial — the books are clean, cash conversion is real, and management is genuinely reducing the share count rather than papering over SBC. That earns a 'Solid' grade, not better. What keeps it from 'Strong' is that the operating engine is visibly losing pressure: four straight years of operating margin compression and two years of revenue decline are not noise, and the net debt position means there's no balance-sheet luxury to absorb a deeper trough. The insider tape — broad selling, zero buying — quietly confirms nobody inside is calling a turn. Good company, mid-cycle fade; quality is intact but trending the wrong way.
Verify before trusting this (6)
  • Segment-level revenue/margin split (Metal Cutting vs Infrastructure) to see whether the OpM compression is mix, volume, or pricing.
  • End-market exposure (oil & gas, aerospace, general engineering) and whether the revenue decline is share loss or cyclical.
  • Debt maturity ladder and covenants on the $457M net debt position.
  • Restructuring/'modernization' charges in 2024–25 — are reported OpMs depressed by one-timers that should reverse?
  • Whether buyback pace is being maintained into the margin downturn or being throttled to protect the balance sheet.
  • 10b5-1 plan disclosures behind the insider sales to gauge whether selling is programmatic or discretionary.
Valuation / Mispricing
-73
Rich
edge √Σ 29 · risk √Σ 102 · conf 6/10
Price $36.50 vs deserved ~$17-20 (charitably ~$22-24) — roughly 60-100% above defensible value, no margin of safety. attractive below $22.00

The composite fair value comes in at $16.84 (signal-adjusted $15.64), with DCF at $17.38 and an EPV floor at $15.76 — a tight cluster, not a runaway method. Against a $36.50 price that implies the market is paying ~2.2× deserved value, or about -57% downside to fair. Even if I generously haircut these as too conservative (EPV assumes no growth; DCF likely uses depressed near-term FCF), getting to $36.50 requires either a meaningful margin re-rate back toward prior peaks or a multi-year capex super-cycle — neither of which is in evidence given four straight years of operating margin compression and two years of revenue decline.

Quality is Solid (8/10) and earnings quality is high, which earns deserved value some uplift over EPV — call it $20-24 on a charitable view that normalized FCF is higher than trailing. That still leaves the stock ~50-80% above what I'd defend. The bull case (cycle recovery, IP-driven re-rate) is plausible but is exactly what's already priced in; the bear case (commodity tooling, China, secular tool consolidation) is not.

This isn't a screaming short — clean books, buybacks, and a real franchise create a floor — but at $36.50 you are buying optionality on a cyclical recovery at a full multiple. No margin of safety.

Cheap signals 2
m25
Quality and clean earnings deserve a premium to EPV
Solid 8/10 business, high earnings quality, real buybacks — fair to add 30-50% over EPV for franchise durability, lifting deserved value to ~$20-24. Still well below $36.50.
m15
Cyclical optionality is real
Carbide/ceramics IP and infrastructure/reshoring exposure mean a genuine capex up-cycle could push normalized FCF materially higher — a tail that partially defends the premium.
Rich / priced-in 3
m75
Price ~2× clustered fair value
DCF $17.38 and EPV $15.76 cluster tightly at ~$16-17; $36.50 is a 117% premium. Two independent methods agreeing reduces the chance this is a method artifact.
m60
Priced for a cycle recovery that hasn't shown up
Operating margins have compressed four straight years and revenue has declined two years — the current price embeds a margin/revenue reversal that is narrative, not evidence.
m35
EPV floor below price by 57%
EPV $15.76 says even on a no-growth basis the steady-state earnings power doesn't support anywhere near $36.50; you need real growth to justify today's quote.
I can't get there at $36.50. Two methods cluster at $16-17, and even being generous for franchise quality I land at maybe $20-24 deserved. Paying ~2× that for a business whose margins have compressed four years running is the opposite of margin of safety — you're paying a cyclical-peak multiple at a cyclical-trough operating moment, hoping recovery bails you out. I'd want it in the low $20s before this is interesting, and closer to $18 to actually back up the truck.
Verify before trusting this (5)
  • FY guidance for organic revenue and operating margin — is the four-year margin slide bottoming?
  • Segment-level pricing vs volume to see if Chinese competition is showing in mix
  • Normalized FCF after stripping any one-off restructuring/working-capital items — recompute EPV on that
  • Buyback pace and any debt paydown — capital return supports floor but doesn't justify multiple
  • Order book / book-to-bill commentary as a real-time cycle tell
General Sentiment
-73
Headwind
tail √Σ 29 · head √Σ 102 · conf 6/10

KMT sits in an awkward sentiment spot: the active narrative is a 'fallen-angel' industrial with only moderate intensity and explicitly fragile durability, meaning there is no cult bid to defend the stock when the tape wobbles. The bull case requires a manufacturing capex re-acceleration the market is not currently underwriting, while the bear case (China competition, tool consolidation, mean reversion) is the easier story to tell in a neutral regime with the 10y at 4.43% and VIX elevated versus its own year. At beta 1.37 in a Manufacturing - Tools sub-industry that screens as cyclical and unloved, even a flat tape lands harder here than on a defensive compounder. Analyst tone is the clearest tell: consensus is a sleepy Hold, targets ($35.75) sit essentially at spot, and the two revisions this month averaged $33.50 - downward drift, not capitulation, but the direction is wrong and diverges from the bullish 're-rate' narrative. Combined with negative price momentum (-2.7% CAGR) and weakening cash generation in the recent flow, the non-fundamental pressure leans headwind: nothing is actively pushing this name up, and several small forces are pushing it down.

Tailwinds 2
m25
Sentiment already washed out
Hold consensus, no SS ratings, low cult, and price at target leaves expectations low; a single capex-cycle headline or industrial rotation could spark a short-cover bounce.
m15
Low revenue-growth volatility perceived as steady
The one thing the tape likes here is predictability; in a defensive rotation this could earn a small relative bid versus more volatile cyclicals.
Headwinds 5
m55
Fragile narrative, no cult bid
Fallen-angel archetype with moderate intensity, fragile durability, and low cult coefficient means there is no committed holder base to absorb selling; story can crack on any soft print.
m50
Downward target revisions
Two revisions this month averaging $33.50 vs spot $35.50 - analysts are quietly trimming, which diverges from the bullish capex-recovery narrative and tends to drip-feed selling.
m45
High beta into a jittery neutral tape
Beta 1.37 with VIX above its yearly median amplifies any risk-off impulse; cyclical tooling names get sold first when the tape wobbles, regardless of fundamentals.
m40
Rates pressure on industrial capex story
10y at 4.43% directly undermines the bull thesis that requires a manufacturing/infrastructure capex re-acceleration; macro is leaning against the narrative the stock needs.
m35
Negative price and cash momentum
-2.7% CAGR and weakening cash generation reinforce the bear framing; momentum traders are absent and trend-followers are short or sidelined.
Net read: modest but real headwind. This is not a name being actively destroyed by sentiment - it is a name nobody is defending. The narrative is fragile, the cult is absent, analysts are quietly cutting targets, momentum is negative, and a 1.37 beta means every wobble in a neutral-with-elevated-VIX tape hits harder here than on the average industrial. There is no offsetting story or flow pushing it up. I would expect continued slow drift lower until either rates ease or capex data turns, at which point the setup flips quickly because expectations are already low.
Verify before trusting this (5)
  • Whether sell-side revisions continue to drift down through next quarter or stabilize
  • Any rotation into industrial cyclicals tied to ISM or capex data prints
  • VIX behavior - a move back below 15 would soften the high-beta drag
  • Headlines on China tooling pricing or automation displacement that could harden the bear narrative
  • Whether the 10y breaks below 4.2%, which would relieve rate pressure on the capex bull case
The market-wide tape + this name's exposure to it (beta / sector / narrative durability). Context on the non-fundamental pressure — not a call on the business or the price. processId: detail-general-sentiment
Please log in to view trade setups
The Augustus trade-setup read is a members feature.
Log in
Three lenses kept deliberately separate — Company Quality (price-agnostic), Valuation (price-conditional), and General Sentiment (non-fundamental macro/narrative pressure). The scores are not blended. Filing-level items (convertibles, lock-ups, customer concentration) are v2 — see each lens's "verify."
Deep Analysis
Last run: Jun 17, 2026 3:04:32 am

Pre-flight intelligence scans the company first, then routes to the right analytical methods.

0 Company Classification — What type of company is this?
1 Industry Landscape — Where is the industry headed?
2 Company Momentum — Where is this company trending?
3 Forward Projection — 1Y & 2Y projected metrics (requires Layer 1 + 2)
4a DCF Valuation — Present value of future cash flows
4b Earnings Power Value — Floor value — worth with zero growth
4c Anchored PE — Industry PE adjusted for growth differential
4d Reverse DCF — What growth is the market pricing in?
4e Revenue-Based DCF — For growth/narrative companies (skip if mature earner)
Not applicable for Mature Earner companies
4f Anchored P/S — Price-to-Sales peer comparison (skip if mature earner)
Not applicable for Mature Earner companies
4g Scenario Analysis — Bull / Base / Bear (skip if mature earner)
Not applicable for Mature Earner companies
4h Dividend Discount Model — For dividend/income stocks only
Not applicable for Mature Earner companies
4i Book Value Analysis — For deep value / turnaround stocks only
Not applicable for Mature Earner companies
4j Insider Activity — Are insiders buying or selling?
4f Cash Flow Quality — How trustworthy is the FCF?
4g Debt Maturity Risk — Can it handle its debt?
4h Macro Environment — Rates, market valuation, volatility
4i Sector Intelligence — How does this company compare within its sector?
4j Revenue Confidence — How reliable is the growth projection?
4k Sensitivity Analysis — How fragile is the fair value estimate?
4l Sector Demand Cycle — Is the sector in a boom, steady state, or contraction?
5 AI Investigation — Adaptive research engine (Claude)
5b Thesis Evaluation — What does the market believe? (narrative/platform stocks only)
Not applicable for Mature Earner companies
6 Valuation Synthesis — Weighted verdict from all methods (requires Layer 4)
Income Statement (Annual)
Last updated: Jun 17, 2026 3:05am (10d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Revenue $1.8B $2.0B $2.1B $2.0B $2.0B
Cost of Revenue $1.3B $1.4B $1.4B $1.4B $1.4B
Gross Profit $552.5M $648.0M $646.4M $627.1M $598.1M
Operating Expenses $450.3M $429.8M $454.0M $456.9M $454.9M
Operating Income $102.2M $218.1M $192.4M $170.2M $143.1M
Net Income $54.4M $144.6M $118.5M $109.3M $93.1M
EBITDA $237.5M $364.3M $322.1M $305.6M $293.4M
EPS $0.65 $1.74 $1.47 $1.38 $1.21
EPS (Diluted)
Balance Sheet (Annual)
Last updated: Jun 17, 2026 3:00am (10d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Cash & Equivalents $154.0M $85.6M $106.0M $128.0M $140.5M
Total Current Assets $1.0B $1.0B $1.0B $1.0B $1.0B
Total Assets $2.7B $2.6B $2.5B $2.5B $2.5B
Current Liabilities $437.4M $485.6M $434.0M $416.0M $422.3M
Long-Term Debt $592.1M $594.4M $595.2M $596.0M $596.8M
Total Liabilities $1.3B $1.3B $1.2B $1.2B $1.2B
Total Equity $1.3B $1.3B $1.3B $1.2B $1.3B
Retained Earnings $992.6M $1.1B $1.1B $1.2B $1.2B
Cash Flow (Annual)
Last updated: Jun 17, 2026 3:05am (10d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Operating Cash Flow $235.7M $181.4M $257.9M $277.1M $208.3M
Capital Expenditure -$127.3M -$96.9M -$94.4M -$107.6M -$89.0M
Free Cash Flow $108.4M $84.5M $163.6M $169.5M $119.4M
Acquisitions (net) $0 $1.0M $0 -$4.0M $0
Debt Repayment
Dividends Paid
Stock Buybacks $-197,000 -$85.5M -$49.3M -$65.6M -$60.1M
Net Change in Cash -$452.6M -$68.5M $20.4M $22.0M $12.6M
Analyst Estimates (Annual)
Last updated: Jun 17, 2026 3:00am (10d ago)
Metric 2026 2027 2028 2029
Revenue $2.3B
$2.3B – $2.5B
$2.7B
$2.6B – $2.8B
$2.7B
$2.7B – $2.7B
$2.6B
$2.5B – $2.7B
EBITDA $358.5M
$347.2M – $375.3M
$409.8M
$397.2M – $420.8M
$413.4M
$413.4M – $413.4M
$393.2M
$380.8M – $411.6M
Net Income $297.1M
$117.1M – $399.3M
$344.8M
$101.9M – $482.5M
$180.1M
$148.3M – $218.6M
$218.3M
$209.3M – $231.6M
EPS
Growth Trends (YoY %)
Last updated: Jun 17, 2026 3:05am (10d ago)
Metric 2022 2023 2024 2025
Revenue Growth +9.3% +3.3% -1.5% -3.9%
Gross Profit Growth +17.3% -0.2% -3.0% -4.6%
Operating Income Growth +113.5% -11.8% -11.5% -15.9%
Net Income Growth +165.7% -18.1% -7.7% -14.8%
EBITDA Growth +53.4% -11.6% -5.1% -4.0%
Insider Trading (Recent)
Last updated: Jun 17, 2026 3:04am (10d ago)
Type codes PPurchase SSale AAward / grant MOption exercise FIn-kind (tax) CConversion GGift DReturn to issuer
All SEC Form 4 codes
Open market
P Purchase
Open-market or private purchase of shares.
S Sale
Open-market or private sale of shares.
Compensation (Rule 16b-3)
A Award / grant
Grant or award of securities (RSUs, options, etc.) under Rule 16b-3.
D Return to issuer
Securities disposed back to the company under Rule 16b-3.
F In-kind (tax)
Shares withheld or delivered to pay the option-exercise price or tax — not an open-market sale.
I Discretionary
Discretionary transaction under an employee plan — Rule 16b-3(f).
M Option exercise
Exercise or conversion of a derivative (option/RSU) into shares — exempt.
Derivatives
C Conversion
Conversion of a derivative security into the underlying shares.
E Short expiration
Expiration of a short derivative position.
H Long expiration
Expiration or cancellation of a long derivative position with value received.
O OTM exercise
Exercise of an out-of-the-money derivative.
X ITM exercise
Exercise of an in-the-money or at-the-money derivative.
Other exempt
G Gift
Bona fide gift of securities.
L Small acquisition
Small acquisition under Rule 16a-6.
W Inheritance
Acquisition or disposition by will or the laws of descent.
Z Voting trust
Deposit into or withdrawal from a voting trust.
Other
J Other
Other acquisition or disposition (explained in a Form 4 footnote).
K Equity swap
Transaction in an equity swap or similar instrument.
U Tender / buyout
Disposition via tender of shares in a change-of-control transaction.

Compensation-plan codes (A, D, F, M) are routine and rarely directional. Open-market P (buy) and S (sale) carry the most signal.

Date Insider Type Shares Price Value
2026-06-15 Bacchus Judith L S-Sale 5,488.00 $35.94 $197,239
2026-06-08 Patel Sagar A S-Sale 29,498.61 $33.50 $988,203
2026-06-02 Reilly Carlonda R. S-Sale 12,013.00 $33.12 $397,907
2026-05-26 DIETRICH DOUGLAS T A-Award 697.08 $0.00 $0
2026-05-26 Bausch Shelley J A-Award 575.26 $0.00 $0
2026-03-09 Reilly Carlonda R. S-Sale 13,410.00 $36.31 $486,971
2026-03-09 Reilly Carlonda R. G-Gift 1,590.00 $0.00 $0
2026-02-24 DIETRICH DOUGLAS T A-Award 642.15 $0.00 $0
2026-02-24 Bausch Shelley J A-Award 529.93 $0.00 $0
2026-02-19 Witt John Wayne S-Sale 5,060.00 $38.29 $193,737
2026-02-18 LAMBERT WILLIAM M M-Exempt 14,000.00 $20.87 $292,180
2026-02-18 LAMBERT WILLIAM M F-InKind 7,485.00 $39.04 $292,214
2026-02-18 LAMBERT WILLIAM M M-Exempt 14,000.00 $20.97 $293,580
2026-02-18 Reilly Carlonda R. G-Gift 2,500.00 $0.00 $0
2026-02-11 Keating Michelle R S-Sale 24,617.00 $40.22 $990,194
2026-02-11 Bacchus Judith L S-Sale 39,051.00 $40.23 $1.6M
2026-01-30 DIETRICH DOUGLAS T M-Exempt 841.00 $0.00 $0
2026-01-30 DIETRICH DOUGLAS T M-Exempt 841.00 $34.39 $28,922
2026-01-30 DIETRICH DOUGLAS T F-InKind 25.00 $34.39 $860
2026-01-15 Sternlieb Paul M-Exempt 885.00 $34.56 $30,586
Dividend History (Last 20)
Last updated: Jun 17, 2026 3:00am (10d ago)
Date Dividend Declaration Record Payment
2026-05-12 $0.20 2026-04-28 2026-05-12 2026-05-26
2026-02-10 $0.20 2026-01-27 2026-02-10 2026-02-24
2025-11-10 $0.20 2025-10-28 2025-11-10 2025-11-24
2025-08-12 $0.20 2025-07-29 2025-08-12 2025-08-26
2025-05-13 $0.20 2025-05-01 2025-05-13 2025-05-27
2025-02-11 $0.20 2025-01-28 2025-02-11 2025-02-25
2024-11-12 $0.20 2024-10-29 2024-11-12 2024-11-26
2024-08-13 $0.20 2024-07-30 2024-08-13 2024-08-27
2024-05-13 $0.20 2024-04-30 2024-05-14 2024-05-28
2024-02-12 $0.20 2024-01-30 2024-02-13 2024-02-27
2023-11-06 $0.20 2023-10-24 2023-11-07 2023-11-21
2023-08-07 $0.20 2023-08-01 2023-08-08 2023-08-22
2023-05-08 $0.20 2023-05-01 2023-05-09 2023-05-23
2023-02-13 $0.20 2023-02-06 2023-02-14 2023-02-28
2022-11-07 $0.20 2022-10-31 2022-11-08 2022-11-22
2022-08-08 $0.20 2022-08-01 2022-08-09 2022-08-23
2022-05-09 $0.20 2022-05-02 2022-05-10 2022-05-24
2022-02-14 $0.20 2022-02-07 2022-02-15 2022-03-01
2021-11-08 $0.20 2021-11-01 2021-11-09 2021-11-23
2021-08-09 $0.20 2021-08-02 2021-08-10 2021-08-24
Narrative Economics
The story the market is telling about this stock — the intangible X-factor (founder mythology, cult dynamics, TAM-of-imagination) that moves price beyond what cash flows alone explain. After Shiller, Narrative Economics.
No narrative profile yet for KMT — it's generated by the pipeline (market-narrative step).
Delvantic AI Findings
Independent analyst synthesis · Delvantic - Cairn AI · generated 2026-06-17 03:05:07
Reviews the pipeline's own verdicts
Verdict Fairly valued to modestly rich at $36.50 — prior models materially understate fair value by missing the Mar-26 inflection; real fair value range $26-40 depending on cycle durability, hold/trim rather than the synthesis "avoid."

The raw quarterly tape tells a very different story than the synthesis verdict acknowledges. Revenue went from $482M in Sep-24 to $592.6M in Mar-26 — that's +23% over six quarters, with net income going from $17.9M (Dec-24) to $58.2M (Mar-26), a 3.25x jump. Net margin expanded from 3.7% to 9.8% sequentially across the last four prints. This is not a "structurally challenged industrial losing share" — this is a cyclical inflecting hard off a trough. The trailing-twelve-month revenue is now ~$2.14B (vs. FY2025's $1.97B), and TTM net income annualized off the recent run-rate is approaching $140-150M, which would put forward P/E closer to 18-19x on depressed-but-recovering earnings, not the headline 20x on stale TTM.

The Market Forces and Synthesis modules appear to be anchored on the FY2021-FY2025 annual decline (rev $2.08B → $1.97B, NI $118M → $93M) and the trailing CAGRs (-2.7% rev, -11.3% earnings), which entirely miss the recent quarterly turn. A $15.64 DCF fair value implies KMT earns ~$50-60M sustainably forever — but they just printed $58M in a single quarter. The DCF is using trough inputs as terminal assumptions, which is a classic late-cycle valuation error on cyclicals. Meanwhile the Pre-Flight thesis actually got it right by flagging "60% drawdown prices in prolonged downturn with no recovery catalyst" — except the Mar-26 print IS the catalyst, and the models seem not to have integrated it. The Narrative layer's "fallen angel/fragile" framing is internally inconsistent with the secondary signal flagging "Revenue Confidence: accelerating."

The contrarian case against my read: (1) the Mar-26 quarter could be a one-off pulled forward by tariff/inventory dynamics — industrial distributors stocking ahead of trade actions is a real phenomenon in 2025-26; (2) insider activity is unambiguously bearish — six sales and zero open-market buys over four months, with sales accelerating in June 2026 right after the strong print, which is exactly when insiders would dump into strength if they didn't believe it was durable; (3) gross margin at 30.4% is still well below the FY2022 peak (~32.3%), and operating margin at 7.3% trails the 10.8% peak — so "margin recovery" has room but isn't proven sustainable; (4) FCF of $119M on FY2025 supports the 3.49% dividend but barely — payout is tight, and capex of $89M is not discretionary in a tooling business. The balance sheet tile is missing total debt entirely, which is a real gap — KMT historically runs ~$600M net debt, and at 9.3x EV/EBITDA that's already reflected, but I can't verify leverage trajectory from this file.

I dissent from the synthesis "overvalued at $15.64 fair value" verdict — that number is absurd given a company generating $58M quarterly net income and $208M annual OCF. I also dissent from Market Forces' "structurally challenged, avoid" — the accelerating quarterly trajectory contradicts the structural-decline thesis directly. But I won't go full bull either: the insider selling cluster is a genuine yellow flag, the cyclical recovery may be tariff-distorted, and at $36.50 you're paying ~1x sales and 9.3x EV/EBITDA for a business whose normalized earnings power is genuinely uncertain between $90M (FY2025 actual) and $200M (annualized recent run-rate). Fair value on mid-cycle earnings of ~$130-140M at a 15x multiple lands around $24-28/share; on the optimistic run-rate it's $40-45. Current price splits the difference reasonably. The prior models' $15-17 fair value is mechanically wrong because they're extrapolating decay through an inflection.

GPT Critique
Second-opinion review · gpt-4o · generated 2026-06-17 03:05:18
Reviews the Opus findings above
Verdict I disagree with Opus's "fairly valued to modestly rich" position. While there's a recovery narrative, insider selling and potential tariff impacts warrant caution. I'd peg fair value at $24-28, aligning more conservatively with mid-cycle earnings stability concerns.

Kennametal Inc.'s recent performance signals a noteworthy turnaround that contrasts sharply with its past metrics. The company experienced a significant revenue increase from $482 million in September 2024 to $592.6 million by March 2026, marking a 23% rise over six quarters. Concurrently, net income jumped from $17.9 million in December 2024 to $58.2 million in March 2026, reflecting a compelling 3.25x increase. This resulted in a net margin uplift from 3.7% to 9.8%. These figures suggest a robust recovery from what seemed a cyclical bottom, contrary to the narrative of a "structurally challenged" firm. Furthermore, the trailing twelve-month revenue approximates $2.14 billion, exceeding the fiscal year 2025's $1.97 billion, indicating a positive growth trajectory.

I agree with Opus's contention that the synthesis verdict's overvaluation claim, pegging fair value at $15.64, is based on outdated assumptions. The quarter ending in March 2026 provides evidence of a substantial earnings rebound, which isn't accounted for in the synthesis model's conservative projections. Opus correctly identifies the outdated nature of using a $15.64 DCF fair value, which assumes perpetual earnings of $50-60 million, a figure that the company surpassed in the latest quarter alone. However, I diverge slightly from Opus's valuation optimism. While they suggest a fair range of $26-40, I am more cautious, noting that insider selling and potential tariff impacts could temper this recovery's durability.

Opus highlights insider selling as a critical concern, which I share. The recent spate of insider sales, particularly following the strong March 2026 quarterly results, raises questions about management's confidence in sustaining this recovery. Additionally, while gross margins have improved to 30.4%, they remain below the FY2022 peak of 32.3%, indicating room for improvement but also potential volatility. The absence of total debt figures in the balance sheet is a notable gap, considering Kennametal's historical net debt position near $600 million, which could influence financial flexibility and risk assessment.

A careful skeptic might argue that the recent quarterly improvements could be anomalies rather than the start of a sustained trend. The uptick might be attributed to temporary factors like inventory adjustments ahead of trade actions, which are prevalent in the current industrial climate. Furthermore, although the current price of $36.50 reflects a midpoint between potential earnings scenarios, the lack of clarity on long-term earnings stability introduces significant risk, particularly if macroeconomic conditions deteriorate.

Community AI Feedback
No community reviews yet for KMT. Be the first — hit How to Contribute, have any AI review this page, and paste its take back here.
My Notes personal — only you see this
Data via Financial Modeling Prep · Cached for performance · fmp
v1.1.352 · d1100787 · 2026-06-26 11:39:30