Skip to main content
Homepage
Full 18-step deep-dive · ~20–30 min · a member feature.
AGING Analysis Report
Aug 7, 2026
16 days ago · 100% complete
NOT DEPENDABLE This report predates a filing — its financial basis has been replaced.
Report generated: Aug 7, 2026 · Filing on record since: Aug 19, 2026 · 12 days after
For AI assistants & researchers — machine-readable summary of this page

What this page is: Delvantic's full research page for Lowe's Companies Inc. (LOW) — AI-driven forensic equity research: mechanical valuation models (DCF, EPV, anchored-PE, scenario) plus three independent AI lenses (Quality / Value / Sentiment). Everything below is rendered server-side; you are not missing content that requires JavaScript. All scores are predictions and research opinions, not financial advice.

Our current read (analysis of 2026-08-23): Designation Low · Gem Score -20 (−100…+100 Quality+Value blend) · Quality 31 · Value -62 · Sentiment 4 (timing only, not weighted) · Composite fair value $198.31 vs $218.40 at analysis

Page map (sections in order; each card carries a stable reference-name attribute you can cite):

  • profile-header / price-overview — company profile, live quote, market cap
  • extended-analysisthe core: three AI lens reads with findings, scores, and the analyst memo
  • future-predictions — our forward price-band predictions
  • market-narrative / ai-findings / gpt-critique — narrative context, cross-model findings, and an adversarial critique of our own analysis (near the end of the document)
  • Members-only sections (render as login gates for anonymous readers): price-history, income-trend, key-metrics, financials (statement tables), insider-trading. The analysis above is public; the raw data tables require a free account.

More for machine readers: site briefing at /llms.txt · any ticker resolves at delvantic.com/stock/TICKER · raw inputs are public-company filings and market data (via licensed data feeds); every model, score, lens read, and prediction on this page is Delvantic's own analysis.

Lowe's Companies Inc.

LOW NYSE
Consumer Cyclical · Home Improvement Retail
Mooresville, NC 28117, United States corporate.lowes.com Updated Aug 6, 7:45am
Price
$219.94
Market Cap
$123.4B
Employees
167,000
Beta
0.85
Avg Volume
3,033,135
Last Dividend
$4.85
CEO
Mr. Marvin R. Ellison

Lowe's Companies Inc. is a leading home improvement retailer serving homeowners, renters, and professional contractors across the United States. The company offers a broad assortment of products for construction, maintenance, repair, remodeling, and home decorating, spanning categories such as appliances, building materials, lumber, tools, hardware, paint, flooring, kitchens and bath, electrical, lighting, lawn and garden, and seasonal and outdoor living. Its stores and digital platforms support both do-it-yourself customers and do-it-for-me projects, while also addressing the needs of professional trades and property managers. Lowe's provides installation services, project support, and online ordering with in-store pickup or delivery, integrating its physical footprint with e-commerce capabilities. Headquartered in Mooresville, North Carolina, Lowe's plays a significant role in the U.S. consumer discretionary and retail sectors by enabling residential investment, property upkeep, and renovation activity across diverse housing markets.

Runs with full report Generated: Aug 7, 2026 12:16am
Price Overview
Price at report time
$218.40
as of Aug 7, 12:24am (16d ago)
Change · Aug 7
-1.54 (-0.70%)
Day Range
$216.26 – $220.00
52-Week Range
$199.40 – $293.06
50-Day MA
$214.52
200-Day MA
$238.80
Volume
1,488,608.00
Right now · live
Log in to get the live feed
Members see the real-time price and the move since this report (over 16d).
Share Structure
Outstanding 561,000,000.00
Float 559,467,878.00
Free Float 99.7%
High free float — 99.7% of shares trade freely, ~0.3% held by insiders/institutions
Very liquid — most shares trade freely. Low insider ownership can mean less management alignment, but makes large position sizing straightforward.
Price History (1 Year)
Last updated: Aug 7, 2026 12:30am (16d ago)
Revenue & Net Income Trend
The directional story — useful even when net income is negative.
Last updated: Aug 6, 2026 7:45am (17d ago)
Revenue
The top line — total sales before any costs or taxes are subtracted. A measure of how much business the company is doing.
Net Income
The bottom line — profit left after subtracting all expenses, interest, and taxes from revenue. Reflects accounting profitability, but includes non-cash items like depreciation, so it isn't the same as cash earned.
Operating Cash Flow
The real cash generated by the day-to-day business — selling products, paying suppliers, collecting from customers. Calculated from net income by adding back non-cash items and adjusting for timing (unpaid bills, unsold inventory). When OCF consistently lags net income, the reported profit may not be converting to real money.
Period Revenue Net Income Net Margin YoY/QoQ
Key Metrics
TD Twelve Data statement HEX SEC filing
Industry comparison last run: Aug 7, 2026 12:14am
P/E Ratio (Price per dollar of earnings)
HEX
Stock Price / EPS (Diluted)
18.43
Stock Price: $219.94
EPS (Diluted): 11.85
P/B Ratio (Price vs net asset value)
HEX
Stock Price / Book Value Per Share
Stock Price: $219.94
Total Equity: -$9.92B
Shares: 560,000,000
EV/EBITDA (Total value vs operating profit)
HEX
Enterprise Value / EBITDA
13.03
Market Cap: $123.39B
Total Debt: $39.82B
Cash: $982.00M
EBITDA: $12.35B
Enterprise Value (Takeover price (cap + debt - cash))
HEX
Market Cap + Total Debt - Cash
$160.9B
Market Cap: $123.39B
Total Debt: $39.82B
Cash: $982.00M
Gross Margin (Revenue left after direct costs)
HEX
Gross Profit / Revenue
33.5%
Gross Profit: $28.89B
Revenue: $86.29B
Operating Margin (Revenue left after all operations)
HEX
Operating Income / Revenue
11.8%
Operating Income: $10.15B
Revenue: $86.29B
Net Margin (Revenue left as actual profit)
HEX
Net Income / Revenue
7.7%
Net Income: $6.65B
Revenue: $86.29B
ROE (Profit from shareholder equity)
HEX
Net Income / Total Equity
Net Income: $6.65B
Total Equity: -$9.92B
ROIC (Profit from all invested capital)
HEX
NOPAT / Invested Capital
Operating Income: $10.15B
Tax Rate: 23.9%
Equity: -$9.92B
Total Debt: $39.82B
Cash: $982.00M
Current Ratio (Can it pay short-term bills)
HEX
Current Assets / Current Liabilities
1.08
Current Assets: $20.96B
Current Liabilities: $19.46B
Debt/Equity (Leverage — debt vs equity)
HEX
Total Debt / Total Equity
Short-Term Debt: $0.00
Long-Term Debt: $39.82B
Total Debt: $39.82B
Total Equity: -$9.92B
Rev/Share (Top-line per share)
HEX
Revenue / Shares Outstanding
$154.08
Revenue: $86.29B
Shares: 560,000,000
Book Value/Share (Net assets per share)
HEX
(Total Assets - Total Liabilities) / Shares
Total Equity: -$9.92B
Shares: 560,000,000
FCF/Share (Real cash generated per share)
HEX
(Operating Cash Flow + CapEx) / Shares
$13.66
Operating CF: $9.86B
CapEx: -$2.21B
Shares: 560,000,000
CapEx is negative (outflow) — added to OCF to get FCF
Div Yield (Annual income from holding)
TD
Last Annual Dividend / Stock Price
2.2%
Last Dividend: $4.85
Stock Price: $219.94
Payout Ratio (Earnings paid out as dividends)
HEX
Dividends Paid / Net Income
39.6%
Dividends Paid: -$2.64B
Net Income: $6.65B
Industry Benchmarks
Last run: Aug 7, 2026 12:14am
Compares LOW against LLM-researched typical ranges for its industry. One research call per industry, cached indefinitely — every stock in the same industry reuses the same baseline.
Income Statement (Annual)
Last updated: Aug 6, 2026 7:45am (17d ago)
Metric 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Revenue $96.3B $97.1B $86.4B $83.7B $86.3B
Cost of Revenue $64.2B $64.8B $57.5B $55.8B $57.4B
Gross Profit $32.1B $32.3B $28.8B $27.9B $28.9B
Operating Expenses $20.0B $22.1B $17.3B $17.4B $18.7B
Operating Income $12.1B $10.2B $11.6B $10.5B $10.2B
Net Income $8.4B $6.4B $7.7B $7.0B $6.7B
EBITDA $14.0B $12.1B $13.5B $12.4B $12.3B
EPS $12.07 $10.20 $13.23 $12.25 $11.87
EPS (Diluted) $12.04 $10.17 $13.20 $12.23 $11.85
Balance Sheet (Annual)
Last updated: Aug 5, 2026 9:40am (18d ago)
Metric 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Cash & Equivalents $1.1B $1.3B $921.0M $1.8B $982.0M
Total Current Assets $20.1B $21.4B $19.1B $20.4B $21.0B
Total Assets $44.6B $43.7B $41.8B $43.1B $54.1B
Current Liabilities $19.7B $19.5B $15.6B $18.8B $19.5B
Long-Term Debt $24.3B $33.3B $35.8B $35.3B $39.8B
Total Liabilities $49.5B $58.0B $56.8B $57.3B $64.1B
Total Equity -$4.8B -$14.3B -$15.1B -$14.2B -$9.9B
Retained Earnings -$5.1B -$14.9B -$15.6B -$14.8B -$10.8B
Cash Flow (Annual)
Last updated: Aug 6, 2026 7:45am (17d ago)
Metric 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Operating Cash Flow $10.1B $8.6B $8.1B $9.6B $9.9B
Capital Expenditure -$1.9B -$1.8B -$2.0B -$1.9B -$2.2B
Free Cash Flow $8.3B $6.8B $6.2B $7.7B $7.7B
Acquisitions (net) $0 $0 -$10.1B
Net Debt Issued / (Repaid) $2.9B $8.8B $2.4B -$545.0M $4.4B
Dividends Paid -$2.0B -$2.4B -$2.5B -$2.6B -$2.6B
Stock Buybacks -$13.0B -$14.1B -$6.1B -$4.1B -$211.0M
Net Change in Cash -$3.6B $215.0M -$427.0M $840.0M -$779.0M
Growth Trends (YoY %)
Last updated: Aug 6, 2026 7:45am (17d ago)
Metric 2023 2024 2025 2026
Revenue Growth +0.8% -11.0% -3.1% +3.1%
Gross Profit Growth +0.6% -10.6% -3.4% +3.6%
Operating Income Growth -16.0% +13.8% -9.4% -3.0%
Net Income Growth -23.8% +20.0% -10.0% -4.4%
EBITDA Growth -13.1% +11.0% -7.7% -0.7%
Dividend History (Last 20)
Last updated: Aug 5, 2026 9:40am (18d ago)
Date Dividend Declaration Record Payment
2026-07-22 $1.25
2026-04-22 $1.20
2026-01-21 $1.20
2025-10-22 $1.20
2025-07-23 $1.20
2025-04-23 $1.15
2025-01-22 $1.15
2024-10-23 $1.15
2024-07-24 $1.15
2024-04-23 $1.10
2024-01-23 $1.10
2023-10-24 $1.10
2023-07-25 $1.10
2023-04-25 $1.05
2023-01-24 $1.05
2022-10-18 $1.05
2022-07-19 $1.05
2022-04-19 $0.80
2022-01-18 $0.80
2021-10-19 $0.80
0Company Classification 1Industry Landscape 2Company Momentum 3Forward Projection 4aDCF Valuation 4bEarnings Power Value 4cAnchored PE 4dReverse DCF 4eRevenue-Based DCF 4fAnchored P/S 4gScenario Analysis 4hDividend Discount Model 4iBook Value Analysis 4jInsider Activity 4fCash Flow Quality 4gDebt Maturity Risk 4hMacro Environment 4iSector Intelligence 4jRevenue Confidence 4kSensitivity Analysis 4lSector Demand Cycle 5AI Investigation 5bThesis Evaluation 6Valuation Synthesis
computed not applicable 18 computed · 6 not applicable
Risk : Reward — if the last quarter repeats
Live · as of 2026-08-19 09:04
-0.2 : 1 recovery upside vs repeat-quarter downside
Even the bull case prices 10% below today — the ratio here measures the model-vs-market gap, not payoff odds. Another quarter like the worst recent one costs 44%.
CaseGrowthMarginFair valuevs price ($218.40)
Bull — recovery +8% 9.9% $197.19 -10%
Base — stabilizes +6% 8.6% $158.89 -27%
Bear — keeps slipping +3% 7.3% $125.66 -42%
Stress — last quarter repeats +2% 7.4% $122.80 -44%
The next quarters keep the trajectory of the worst recent matched quarter (ending 2025-08-01) — growth stays at 1.6% and margins bend by the same profit-vs-revenue ratio (×0.99). Stress is a trajectory, not a prediction — it answers "what if the ship's current heading simply continues," which history says is the case to respect.
Why this is appearing: this company files quarterly, so its recent trajectory could be measured rather than assumed — the engine matched May 2026 against the same quarter one year earlier and found revenue +10.3% · operating income +2.4% · net income -0.8% year-over-year. That measured heading is what the stress case extends forward. Of those, the stress case extends the worst matched quarter — the one ending Aug 1, 2025 (revenue +1.6%, operating income +0.6% YoY) — not the average. Data measured through May 1, 2026 — this card recalculates automatically when the next quarterly filing is ingested. Companies without quarterly filings (many foreign listings) never show this card: with no measured trajectory, there is nothing honest to repeat.
Narrative Economics
The story the market is telling about this stock — the intangible X-factor (founder mythology, cult dynamics, TAM-of-imagination) that moves price beyond what cash flows alone explain. After Shiller, Narrative Economics.
No narrative profile yet for LOW — it's generated by the pipeline (market-narrative step).
Claude Reading
Independent analyst synthesis · claude-opus-4-7 · generated 2026-08-07 00:30:07
Verdict Modestly overvalued but not the value trap the models claim — fair value $175-$195; wait for sub-$185 or a housing rate catalyst before starting a position.

Starting with the raw tape: TTM revenue is roughly $88.4B (sum of last four quarters: 23.08+20.58+20.81+23.96), up modestly from $83.7B in FY25 but still below the $97B peak in FY23. TTM net income is around $6.65B, essentially flat with FY26 reported. The most recent quarter (May 2026) showed rev of $23.08B vs $20.93B prior-year Q — that's +10.3% YoY, a genuine acceleration, though partly a comp/timing artifact given the Q1 seasonal step-up. Net margin of 7.1% in that quarter is below the 7.8% prior-year Q1, so top-line strength isn't dropping to the bottom. Five-year revenue CAGR is negative and EPS has fallen from an $8.44B peak — this is a company grinding sideways, not compounding.

The balance sheet is the elephant. Negative $9.92B equity, $39.8B debt against $982M cash, current ratio barely above 1. This is buyback-engineered — LOW has retired roughly a third of its share count over the last decade — and it works fine as long as FCF ($7.65B) covers the ~$1.4B dividend and ~$1B interest with room for repurchases. But at 6x debt/EBITDA-ish leverage in a cyclical retailer facing a housing downturn, there's zero cushion for a real earnings hit. ROA of 12.3% flatters the picture because the denominator is compressed by the buybacks. This is not a "fortress" mature earner; it's a levered cash-return vehicle.

On the model stack: the synthesis verdict of $141-$181 fair value strikes me as too punitive. A DCF at $142 essentially assumes LOW re-rates to ~12x earnings on flat cash flows — plausible in a recession but not the base case. Home Depot trades at ~24x forward; LOW at 18.4x is already carrying the "second-place" discount the pre-flight model correctly identifies. The market-forces "value trap sub-$180" call is directionally reasonable but the "structural earnings impairment masked by working capital" framing is overstated — FCF CAGR of +11.3% versus earnings CAGR of -7.2% reflects inventory discipline and lower capex intensity, not accounting sleight of hand. Op cash flow of $9.86B on $6.65B NI is a healthy 1.48x conversion. Where I agree with the bears: the narrative layer nailed it that you're paying peak-cycle multiples on trough-adjacent earnings, and the Q1 margin compression (7.1% vs 7.8%) is a real yellow flag on pricing power.

The contrarian case worth taking seriously: if 30-year mortgage rates break below 6% in the next 12 months, existing home turnover — the single biggest driver of home improvement demand — snaps back and LOW's operating leverage on a fixed store base is enormous. FY22 showed $12.09B operating income on $96B revenue (12.6% op margin) versus $10.15B on $86B today (11.8%). A return to prior-cycle revenue with modest margin recovery gets you to ~$9B net income and, at 18x, a $160B+ market cap — roughly $290/share. That's the bull-case optionality the DCF models understate. Insider activity is uninformative (five small awards, no open-market buys or sales), so no signal there. The "decelerating quarterly trend" flag looks wrong to me — the sequential comparison is contaminated by seasonality; YoY Q1 was +10.3%.

My verdict: I partially dissent from the synthesis. Fair value of $141 is too low; it prices in a recession that hasn't happened. But $220 is also demanding — you're paying 18.5x on earnings that have declined for three consecutive fiscal years, with a balance sheet offering no downside protection and a housing cycle that historically overshoots on the way down. Fair value in a normalized band is $175-$195, so the stock is 10-20% overvalued, not 35%. This is a "wait for the pullback" not an "avoid at all costs." I'd want sub-$185 to build a position, and I'd upgrade sharply if mortgage rates break lower or if the pro-contractor mix shows sustained 200+ bps margin expansion. Until then, HD is the better vehicle for the same thesis at a deserved premium.

GPT Reading
Independent reading · gpt-5.4 · generated 2026-08-07 00:30:20
Verdict Overvalued at $219.94 — a strong retailer, but the stock prices in an earnings recovery and balance-sheet risk deserves a discount; fair value looks closer to $180-$190.

At $219.94, Lowe’s is being valued like a resilient compounder when the actual income statement looks more like a high-quality cyclical flatliner. Annual revenue is still below where it was four years ago: $86.29B in FY2026 versus $96.25B in FY2022 and $97.06B in FY2023. Net income has also stepped down from $8.44B in FY2022 and $7.73B in FY2024 to $6.65B in FY2026. The market can forgive a cyclical dip if margins are structurally improving, but that argument is weak here: gross margin was 33.3%-33.5% in both FY2024 and FY2026, while operating margin fell from 13.4% to 11.8%. Quarterly numbers show some stabilization in sales, with the latest quarter up to $23.08B from $20.93B a year earlier, but net income slipped from $1.64B to $1.63B, so the “recovery” is showing up in revenue before it shows up in earnings power. Paying 18.4x earnings and about 16x free cash flow for a business with roughly zero multi-year revenue growth and declining EPS quality does not strike me as attractive.

What stands out most is that Lowe’s remains a very good business but not an obviously growing one, and the balance sheet amplifies that distinction. Free cash flow of $7.65B is solid, and operating cash flow of $9.86B on $6.65B of net income suggests cash conversion remains healthy. But the capital structure is aggressive: $39.82B of debt, just $982M of cash, and negative equity of $9.92B. Negative equity is not automatically alarming for a buyback-heavy retailer, but it does remove balance-sheet flexibility at exactly the point where macro-sensitive demand is not robust. If housing-related demand remains sluggish, Lowe’s doesn’t have the luxury of simply “waiting it out” from a fortress balance sheet. That matters because this is not a software company with recurring revenue; it is a cyclical retailer whose earnings are ultimately tied to turnover, renovation activity, and consumer project confidence.

I also don’t buy the strongest bearish framing that this is a broken business or value trap. The quarterly cadence does not support structural collapse. Revenue in the latest four quarters totaled roughly $88.4B versus about $83.2B in the prior four, and margins, while below prior peaks, are still healthy for big-box retail. A 7.7% annual net margin and 11.8% operating margin remain strong economics, and the dividend payout ratio of 39.6% leaves room for ongoing shareholder returns. The P/S of 1.42x and EV/EBITDA of 13.0x are not absurd for a category leader with durable scale, and the market is right to assign Lowe’s a quality premium to ordinary retailers. If housing activity reaccelerates even modestly, earnings could rebound faster than trailing annual figures imply because this model has real operating leverage.

Still, the smarter bull case leans too heavily on “cyclical trough” without enough evidence that trough earnings are actually trough earnings. FY2026 revenue improved to $86.29B from $83.67B, yet operating income still declined to $10.15B from $10.47B, meaning the company is selling more but keeping less. That is not a great setup for multiple expansion. If this were at 14x earnings or under $190, I’d be more willing to underwrite a normalization story. At $220, investors are already capitalizing a decent rebound while accepting leverage, negative equity, and a business that has not demonstrated sustained top-line growth since the pandemic unwind. For me, that leaves too little margin of safety.

What would change my mind is straightforward: either valuation or proof of earnings recovery. If Lowe’s can post two or three consecutive quarters of both positive sales growth and meaningful EBIT leverage—something like revenue holding above $22B-$24B seasonally with net margin back toward 8.5%-9.5%—then the case for “temporary earnings compression” gets stronger. Alternatively, if the stock fell into roughly the $175-$190 range without a fundamental break, the risk/reward would improve materially because the current free cash flow base could justify that level. Absent one of those two developments, I think the shares are priced for a better business than the current numbers show.

Grok Reading
Independent reading · grok-4.5 · generated 2026-08-07 00:30:59
Verdict Overvalued at $220; fair value closer to $150–180 until housing and comps inflect

The raw numbers describe a post-peak home-improvement retailer grinding through normalization, not a growth story. Annual revenue collapsed from the $96–97B pandemic highs of FY2022–23 into the mid-$80s and has only just stabilized: FY2026 came in at $86.29B (+3.1% y/y) after FY2025’s $83.67B trough. Net income has eroded more steadily—from $8.44B to $6.65B—producing a –7.2% earnings CAGR even as free-cash-flow held up at $7.65B on $9.86B of operating cash. That FCF strength is real and funds a 2.2% dividend at a comfortable 40% payout, but it is being generated against a balance sheet that shows only $982M cash, $39.8B of debt, and negative equity of –$9.92B after years of aggressive buybacks. Quarterly progression is equally uninspiring: the latest print of $23.08B revenue and 7.1% net margin sits below the $23.96B/10% peak of the prior summer quarter and shows no operating-leverage inflection. At 18.4× trailing earnings, 13.0× EV/EBITDA and a 6.2% FCF yield, the market is already capitalizing a tidy mid-cycle recovery that the income statement has not yet delivered.

Gross margin has held a tight 33.5% band and ROA remains a respectable 12.3%, confirming the mature-earner archetype, yet the recent revenue “recovery” is still 11% below the 2023 peak and earnings are still declining year-on-year. The negative equity and thin current ratio (1.08) leave zero balance-sheet cushion if housing starts or big-ticket remodel demand softens further. In short, the cash-flow engine is intact, but it is powering a leveraged, zero-growth retailer whose multiple assumes the worst of the housing cycle is already behind it.

The strongest contrary case is that 18× earnings and 13× EBITDA are not outrageous for a high-ROIC retailer with durable Pro and services mix, especially if the next two housing seasons re-accelerate. Bulls can correctly note that FCF has compounded at 11% even while reported earnings fell, that the dividend is well-covered, and that a simple re-rating back toward Home Depot’s historical premium plus modest volume recovery could justify prices nearer $240–250. They would also argue that negative equity is an accounting artifact of buybacks, not economic distress, and that Lowe’s still generates mid-teens returns on tangible capital. I weigh this less heavily because the same FCF is already fully priced: a 6% free-cash-flow yield on a business with –0.1% revenue CAGR and visible macro headwinds is compensation for risk, not a margin of safety. The 54% premium to the ~$142 DCF anchor is precisely the housing-recovery narrative that has yet to appear in the top line.

I would reverse to a neutral or constructive stance only on two concrete prints: (1) two consecutive quarters of mid-single-digit comparable-sales growth driven by Pro ticket and services mix, lifting operating margin back above 12.5%, or (2) a clear upturn in housing starts/NAHB sentiment that pushes forward FY revenue guidance above $90B with stable margins. Until then the risk-reward is skewed lower.

Big-3 Panel — where each AI stands
Each AI above independently stated a direction (undervalued, fairly valued, or overvalued) and how strongly it believes it (conviction, 0–5). We combine those into a Bull-Bear Index on a 0–10 scale: 5 is neutral, 10 is maximum bullish (undervalued at full conviction), 0 is maximum bearish. We compute the score ourselves with the same arithmetic for every seat — the models never grade their own bullishness — so the three are directly comparable. Δ shows how far each seat sits from the panel average of 1.3; a large Δ marks the dissenting voice, usually the one worth reading.
Claude claude-opus-4-7 2.0
overvalued · conviction 3/5 · Δ +0.7 vs panel · self: 4.0
GPT gpt-5.4 1.0
overvalued · conviction 4/5 · Δ -0.3 vs panel · self: 3.0
Grok grok-4.5 1.0
overvalued · conviction 4/5 · Δ -0.3 vs panel · self: 3.0
Advanced Analysis Forensic deep-dive · separate lenses
Separate reads — Company Quality (is it a great business?), Valuation (is it mispriced?), and General Sentiment (how macro + narrative are pushing it), kept deliberately apart · 2026-08-07 01:03:36
Delvantic - Cairn AI
Quality — wait for a dip 8/10
High-quality compounder (+31) at a full price (-62) with only a whisper of sentiment lift (+4) — great business, wrong entry.
The cruxThe gap between deserved value (~$180 composite, $160 EPV floor) and today's $218 tape is the whole decision; nothing about the business or the tape forces me to pay up now.
Forensic checks Derived mechanically from LOW's filed financials — not from the AI lenses
Liquidity & RunwaySelf-Funding
DilutionShare Count Shrinking
Earnings QualityHigh Earnings Quality
The four lensesswitch a tab for its full read — score + evidence
Company Quality
+31
Strong
edge √Σ 120 · risk √Σ 87 · conf 8/10

Lowe's throws off durable free cash flow (7.65B in the most recent year, and never below 6.18B across the five-year window) on stable gross margins pinned at 33.2-33.5% and operating margins in a tight 10.5-13.4% band. Earnings quality looks solid: OCF/NI of 1.29x, negative accruals (-4.4% of assets), and an Altman Z of 3.12 all point to real cash conversion behind reported profits. The Beneish M flag at 7.25 is worth noting but is inconsistent with the clean accrual and cash-conversion picture, and is more plausibly an artifact of buyback-driven balance-sheet shrinkage than manipulation. Capital return is the standout: diluted shares fell from 699M to 560M in four years (-5.4% CAGR), with buyback-to-SBC at 3319x, so per-share value is being concentrated aggressively while SBC stays trivial at 0.3% of revenue. The soft spot is the top line and the balance sheet. Revenue peaked at 97.06B in 2023 and has since drifted to 86.29B - roughly 11% lower - with a modest bounce in the latest year. Net debt of 38.47B against only 1.35B of liquid cash means the balance sheet is a constraint; the buyback is being funded partly with leverage, which works while FCF holds but leaves less margin for error if a housing-cycle downturn compresses same-store sales further.

Strengths 3
m78
Aggressive per-share concentration
Diluted shares down from 699M to 560M in four years (-5.4% CAGR), buyback/SBC ratio 3319x - shareholders own a materially larger slice of the company each year.
m72
Durable free cash flow
FCF between 6.18B and 8.26B every year, 7.65B latest, with OCF/NI at 1.29x and accruals at -4.4% of assets - reported earnings are backed by cash.
m55
Margin stability through revenue decline
Gross margin held in a 33.2-33.5% band and operating margin 10.5-13.4% even as revenue fell from 97.06B to 83.67B - suggests real pricing power and cost discipline.
Concerns 4
m60
Revenue in multi-year decline
Sales down from 97.06B (2023) to 86.29B (2026), roughly -11%, with only a modest sequential uptick in the latest year; top-line durability is unproven post-housing-boom.
m55
Net debt is the real balance sheet
Net debt of 38.47B against 1.35B liquid cash (cash/mktcap 1.1%) - buybacks are being partially debt-financed, so a sustained FCF hit would tighten flexibility fast.
m25
Beneish M flag
M-score 7.25 well above the -1.78 threshold, but this conflicts with clean accruals and strong OCF/NI; likely a false positive driven by buyback-shrunk equity/asset base, worth verifying not fearing.
m20
No insider open-market buying
Recent tape is entirely A-awards (grants); no P or S transactions - neutral signal, but no insider conviction visible in the data.
This is a high-quality mature retailer running a textbook capital-return playbook: hold margins, generate 7B+ of FCF, buy back a chunk of the float every year. The earnings are real - the Beneish flag looks like a mechanical artifact, not a red flag, given the pristine cash conversion. What keeps me from grading it higher is the combination of a shrinking top line and a levered balance sheet; the buyback is impressive but is being run through debt as much as cash, and if the housing cycle stays soft the per-share compounding story starts leaning on financial engineering rather than operating growth. Solidly Strong, not Fortress.
Verify before trusting this (5)
  • Composition and maturity ladder of the 38B+ debt stack - fixed vs floating, near-term maturities
  • Same-store sales trajectory and Pro vs DIY mix in latest 10-K to gauge whether revenue is stabilizing
  • Whether buyback pace is being funded from FCF alone or continued debt issuance
  • Drivers of the Beneish M flag - likely receivables/gross-margin index moves tied to buyback-shrunk denominators
  • Any goodwill or lease-related off-balance-sheet obligations that would worsen the effective leverage picture
Valuation / Mispricing
-62
Rich
edge √Σ 25 · risk √Σ 97 · conf 7/10
Price $218 vs deserved ~$180 (composite) to ~$160 (EPV floor) - roughly 17-35% above deserved, negative margin of safety. attractive below $170.00

The valuation stack is internally consistent and points the same direction: DCF $191.65, EPV floor $160.60, composite $181.30, signal-adjusted $141.63. Against a $218.40 price, that's roughly 17% above the composite and 35% above the signal-adjusted mark. None of these methods look like a runaway; the EPV floor at $160 is the anchor and it says the steady-state earnings power alone does not justify today's quote. You are paying for growth and mix-shift (pro, services, installation) that has to actually show up.

Cheap signals 1
m25
High earnings quality supports a higher deserved multiple
Clean cash conversion and disciplined buybacks argue for a modest premium to EPV, softening (not erasing) the overvaluation read - deserved value probably sits closer to $180 than $160.
Rich / priced-in 4
m62
Price sits above every fair-value method
$218 exceeds DCF ($192), composite ($181), and EPV floor ($161). Even the most generous input (DCF) implies ~12% downside; the floor implies ~26% downside.
m55
Signal-adjusted FV implies -35% gap
The signal-adjusted $141.63 haircuts for the fundamental drift (declining revenue, leverage). That is a wide gap for a mature retailer priced on steady compounding.
m40
Pro/services optionality already in the multiple
The bull case (pro mix, installation margins) is the consensus narrative. Once a thesis is understood and priced, it stops being an edge - it becomes the hurdle.
m30
Top-line drift undermines the compounder premium
Revenue has been sliding while leverage remains meaningful; a shrinking base makes the premium harder to defend if pro/services growth disappoints.
This is a good business at a full price - the classic reason a valuation lens should say no. Every method I have (DCF, EPV, composite, signal-adjusted) sits below $200, and I'm being asked to pay $218. The quality is real, the buyback is real, but the top line is drifting and I'm not getting paid to wait. I'd want it around $170 or lower - roughly at the composite with a modest margin - before this becomes interesting. Today it's fully valued to modestly rich.
Verify before trusting this (5)
  • Pro segment revenue growth and mix trajectory in the next print
  • Comp sales guidance and any signs of stabilization in DIY
  • FCF conversion and buyback pace vs guided range
  • Housing turnover and mortgage-rate sensitivity commentary on the call
  • Any one-time items inflating recent EBIT margins
General Sentiment
+4
Balanced
tail √Σ 64 · head √Σ 60 · conf 6/10

The macro tape is mildly risk-on (VIX 15, S&P near highs), which is a gentle positive, but LOW's 0.85 beta means it neither benefits much from euphoria nor gets punished hard in stress. The active narrative is a moderate-intensity, moderate-durability steady-compounder story with low cult coefficient - there is no mania here to ride and no crash to fear. Analyst tone leans optimistic (ABR = Buy) and recent price action was strong (+2.84% single session, positive momentum tag), giving a modest tailwind.

Tailwinds 3
m35
Risk-on tape, low-beta lift
Regime score +46 with a calm VIX supports consumer cyclicals broadly, but LOW's 0.85 beta and defensive-ish home-improvement profile mean the tailwind is real yet modest.
m40
Analyst chorus tilts Buy
Recent coverage flags the ABR as a Buy and a Zacks-style 'laps the market' piece - analyst tone is a persistent low-grade tailwind on the name.
m35
Positive price momentum
Strong-positive momentum score, healthy cash-flow trajectory framing, and a +2.84% session close reinforce a 'nothing broken' tape read that keeps buyers engaged.
Headwinds 3
m45
Housing-rollover narrative overhang
The bear framing - peak-cycle housing, strained consumer, pro-mix story topping out - is the durable counter-narrative and the DCF-vs-price commentary in the news feed keeps it in circulation.
m30
Rates and rich market PE
10y at 4.63% and market PE 27.7 pressure housing-adjacent multiples; LOW is not the epicenter but it is exposed enough that the rate backdrop caps re-rating.
m25
No story to ride
Moderate intensity, low cult - LOW lacks a hot narrative (AI, GLP-1, reshoring) to attract flows, so it drifts on fundamentals rather than being pushed by sentiment.
Net-net this is a Balanced read leaning very slightly positive. The tape is calm, analysts are constructive, and momentum is intact - all mild tailwinds. But there is no narrative engine here: it's a moderate steady-compounder story with a real housing-rollover bear case circulating in the news flow, and rates plus a rich market PE quietly cap enthusiasm. On a 0.85-beta name in a risk-on tape, the sentiment pressure is genuinely mixed rather than one-sided, so I'd call it a wash with a whisper of tailwind.
Verify before trusting this (5)
  • Housing starts and existing-home-sales prints - a further rollover would activate the bear narrative
  • HD earnings/tape as a read-through - HD sentiment tends to drag LOW
  • Any downgrade or target cut that would crack the Buy consensus
  • 10y yield break above 4.75% which would pressure the whole housing complex
  • Pro-contractor mix commentary at next print - the linchpin of the bull story
The market-wide tape + this name's exposure to it (beta / sector / narrative durability). Context on the non-fundamental pressure — not a call on the business or the price. processId: detail-general-sentiment
Growth Outlook
not run

This lens hasn't been run for this ticker yet.

The forward growth verdict — is the business itself likely to grow (next 2 quarters / year 1 / years 2–3), judged against its category and against printed expectations. The full horizon ladder + creme renders on the Growth Outlook card above. Not a call on the price (Valuation owns that) or the tape (Sentiment owns that).
Please log in to view trade setups
The Augustus trade-setup read is a members feature.
Log in
Lenses kept deliberately separate — Company Quality (price-agnostic), Valuation (price-conditional), General Sentiment (non-fundamental macro/narrative pressure), and Growth Outlook (the forward growth verdict). The scores are not blended. Filing-level items (convertibles, lock-ups, customer concentration) are v2 — see each lens's "verify."
Price Prediction
Lower -6.6% v0.6.0 View full prediction →

When we made this prediction on Aug 7, 2026, LOW was $218.40. We expect it to be $204.00 by Feb 2027, and we consider it great value under $170.00. This is an early model (v0.6.0) — the direction is more reliable than the exact price. Made Aug 7, 2026.

Price when predicted$218.40
Our estimate for Feb 2027$204.00-6.6%
Great value below$170.00
Price history shown (6 Months)

Blue is our prediction, starting the day we made it. Grey is a slower route to the same place — the same destination, taking longer. Black is the actual price, so you can see how we are doing.

Community AI Feedback
No community reviews yet for LOW. Be the first — hit How to Contribute, have any AI review this page, and paste its take back here.
My Notes personal — only you see this
v1.1.562 · 9b2927c4 · 2026-08-22 16:52:06