For AI assistants & researchers — machine-readable summary of this page
What this page is: Delvantic's full research page for MercadoLibre, Inc. (MELI) — AI-driven forensic equity research: mechanical valuation models (DCF, EPV, anchored-PE, scenario) plus three independent AI lenses (Quality / Value / Sentiment). Everything below is rendered server-side; you are not missing content that requires JavaScript. All scores are predictions and research opinions, not financial advice.
Our current read (analysis of 2026-08-23): Designation Watch · Gem Score +18 (−100…+100 Quality+Value blend) · Quality 76 · Value -30 · Sentiment 44 (timing only, not weighted) · Composite fair value $4,349.07 vs $1,899.03 at analysis
Page map (sections in order; each card carries a stable
reference-name attribute you can cite):
profile-header/price-overview— company profile, live quote, market capextended-analysis— the core: three AI lens reads with findings, scores, and the analyst memofuture-predictions— our forward price-band predictionsmarket-narrative/ai-findings/gpt-critique— narrative context, cross-model findings, and an adversarial critique of our own analysis (near the end of the document)- Members-only sections (render as login gates for anonymous readers):
price-history,income-trend,key-metrics,financials(statement tables),insider-trading. The analysis above is public; the raw data tables require a free account.
More for machine readers: site briefing at
/llms.txt ·
any ticker resolves at delvantic.com/stock/TICKER ·
raw inputs are public-company filings and market data (via licensed data feeds);
every model, score, lens read, and prediction on this page is Delvantic's own analysis.
MercadoLibre, Inc.
MELI NASDAQMercadoLibre, Inc. is Latin America's leading e-commerce and fintech platform, headquartered in Montevideo, Uruguay. Founded in 1999, the company operates an integrated digital ecosystem that connects millions of buyers and sellers across Brazil, Argentina, Mexico, and numerous other countries throughout the region. The platform offers six core services: the MercadoLibre Marketplace for general commerce, Classifieds for specialized listings, MercadoPago for online payments and financial services, MercadoShops for merchant storefronts, MercadoEnvios for logistics and shipping, and advertising solutions. Through its comprehensive suite of services, MercadoLibre facilitates commerce transactions, enables digital payments, provides credit solutions, and supports financial inclusion throughout Latin America. The company serves individual consumers, small businesses, and enterprises, leveraging advanced technology and data analytics to optimize user experiences and streamline transaction efficiency across its diverse marketplace segments.
Price Overview
Price History (1 Year)
Revenue & Net Income Trend
| Period | Revenue | Net Income | Net Margin | YoY/QoQ |
|---|
Key Metrics
EPS (Diluted): 39.40
Total Equity: $6.75B
Shares: 50,697,320
Total Debt: $9.19B
Cash: $3.67B
EBITDA: $4.02B
Total Debt: $9.19B
Cash: $3.67B
Revenue: $28.89B
Revenue: $28.89B
Revenue: $28.89B
Total Equity: $6.75B
Tax Rate: 29.7%
Equity: $6.75B
Total Debt: $9.19B
Cash: $3.67B
Current Liabilities: $28.63B
Long-Term Debt: $9.19B
Total Debt: $9.19B
Total Equity: $6.75B
Shares: 50,697,320
Shares: 50,697,320
CapEx: -$1.34B
Shares: 50,697,320
Stock Price: $1,900
Net Income: $2.00B
Industry Benchmarks
Income Statement (Annual)
Last updated: Aug 3, 2026 5:18pm (20d ago)| Metric | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.1B | $10.8B | $14.5B | $20.8B | $28.9B |
| Cost of Revenue | $4.1B | $5.6B | $7.3B | $11.2B | $16.0B |
| Gross Profit | $3.0B | $5.2B | $7.2B | $9.6B | $12.9B |
| Operating Expenses | $2.6B | $4.1B | $5.4B | $6.9B | $9.7B |
| Operating Income | $440.7M | $1.0B | $1.8B | $2.6B | $3.2B |
| Net Income | $83.3M | $482.0M | $987.0M | $1.9B | $2.0B |
| EBITDA | $644.6M | $1.4B | $2.3B | $3.2B | $4.0B |
| EPS | $1.67 | $9.57 | $19.64 | $37.69 | $39.40 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $1.67 | $9.53 | $19.46 | $37.69 | $39.40 |
Balance Sheet (Annual)
Last updated: Aug 3, 2026 4:51pm (20d ago)| Metric | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash & Equivalents | $2.6B | $1.9B | $2.6B | $2.6B | $3.7B |
| Total Current Assets | $8.2B | $11.0B | $14.3B | $20.1B | $33.6B |
| Total Assets | $10.1B | $13.7B | $17.6B | $25.2B | $42.7B |
| Current Liabilities | $5.8B | $8.6B | $11.3B | $16.6B | $28.6B |
| Long-Term Debt | $3.5B | $4.8B | $4.5B | $5.7B | $9.2B |
| Total Liabilities | $8.6B | $11.9B | $14.6B | $20.8B | $35.9B |
| Total Equity | $1.5B | $1.8B | $3.1B | $4.4B | $6.7B |
| Retained Earnings | $397.4M | $913.0M | $1.9B | $3.8B | $5.8B |
Cash Flow (Annual)
Last updated: Aug 3, 2026 5:18pm (20d ago)| Metric | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $965.0M | $2.9B | $5.1B | $7.9B | $12.1B |
| Capital Expenditure | — | -$455.0M | -$509.0M | -$860.0M | -$1.3B |
| Free Cash Flow | — | $2.5B | $4.6B | $7.1B | $10.8B |
| Acquisitions (net) | -$50.6M | $0 | $0 | -$6.0M | $0 |
| Net Debt Issued / (Repaid) | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividends Paid | — | — | — | — | — |
| Stock Buybacks | -$485.9M | -$148.0M | -$356.0M | -$1.0M | -$1.0M |
| Net Change in Cash | $1.1B | -$285.0M | $485.0M | $851.0M | $8.8B |
Growth Trends (YoY %)
Last updated: Aug 3, 2026 5:18pm (20d ago)| Metric | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | +52.5% | +34.3% | +43.6% | +39.1% |
| Gross Profit Growth | +71.8% | +39.6% | +32.9% | +34.3% |
| Operating Income Growth | +134.6% | +76.3% | +44.3% | +21.7% |
| Net Income Growth | +478.6% | +104.8% | +93.6% | +4.5% |
| EBITDA Growth | +122.9% | +63.3% | +38.4% | +23.7% |
Dividend History (Last 20)
Last updated: Aug 3, 2026 4:52pm (20d ago)| Date | Dividend | Declaration | Record | Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-12-28 | $0.15 | — | — | — |
| 2017-09-28 | $0.15 | — | — | — |
| 2017-06-28 | $0.15 | — | — | — |
| 2017-03-29 | $0.15 | — | — | — |
| 2016-12-28 | $0.15 | — | — | — |
| 2016-09-28 | $0.15 | — | — | — |
| 2016-06-28 | $0.15 | — | — | — |
| 2016-03-29 | $0.15 | — | — | — |
| 2015-12-29 | $0.10 | — | — | — |
| 2015-09-28 | $0.10 | — | — | — |
| 2015-06-26 | $0.10 | — | — | — |
| 2015-03-27 | $0.10 | — | — | — |
| 2014-12-29 | $0.17 | — | — | — |
| 2014-09-26 | $0.17 | — | — | — |
| 2014-06-26 | $0.17 | — | — | — |
| 2014-03-27 | $0.17 | — | — | — |
| 2013-12-27 | $0.14 | — | — | — |
| 2013-09-26 | $0.14 | — | — | — |
Deep Analysis
Risk : Reward — if the last quarter repeats
Live · as of 2026-08-19 09:07Recovery pays +131%; another quarter like the worst recent one costs 71%. Ratio 1.9:1.
| Case | Growth | Margin | Fair value | vs price ($1,899.03) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bull — recovery | +79% | 12.1% | $4,392.32 | +131% |
| Base — stabilizes | +53% | 10.5% | $2,067.32 | +9% |
| Bear — keeps slipping | +26% | 8.9% | $880.00 | -54% |
| Stress — last quarter repeats | +45% | 3.1% | $558.66 | -71% |
Narrative Economics
market-narrative step).
Claude Reading
The raw trajectory is genuinely impressive but the quarterly data has a problem the models are papering over. Revenue went from $3.77B (Q2'24) → $3.90B → $4.19B → $4.80B → $5.21B → then a reported $14.69B in Q4'25 and $6.07B in Q1'26. That $14.69B print is almost certainly a data artifact (likely a full-year figure mislabeled as quarterly — it matches the $28.89B annual only if you assume it double-counts) because $14.69B would imply ~180% sequential growth followed by a 59% collapse. Strip it out and the real quarterly path is orderly acceleration: 39% YoY on the top line, but net income YoY is only +4.5% and margins have compressed from 14.1% (Q2'24) to 6.9% (Q1'26). That's the story the synthesis model is not telling you — MELI is reinvesting hard, and operating leverage is going the wrong way at the net line even as revenue accelerates.
The $5,270 signal-adjusted fair value (177% upside) is not credible, and the synthesis flag itself concedes "methods disagree." A DCF that produces 2.8x the current price on a name trading at 48x earnings, 25x EBITDA, and 3.3x sales requires heroic assumptions about terminal margins and LatAm penetration. The narrative layer's own bear case is the honest read: at 39% revenue growth and $10.77B FCF, the market's ~3.3x sales / 9x FCF multiple is not pricing "growth is over" — it's pricing normal-to-generous for an EM platform with FX exposure, a $9.19B debt load against $6.75B equity (D/E 1.36), and a credit book that has never been tested through a full LatAm downturn. ROA of 4.7% versus ROE of 29.6% tells you how much of the return is leverage — largely the fintech balance sheet, which is exactly where the credit-cycle risk lives.
Contrarian read the models underweight: net margin compression from ~14% to ~7% in six quarters is not "reinvestment optionality" — it may be the fintech mix genuinely being lower-margin and more capital-intensive than the marketplace, plus rising credit provisions on the MercadoPago book as they push down-market. Earnings CAGR of 42% is backward-looking; the *forward* signal from recent NI YoY (+4.5%) is far more sobering and none of the bull models weight it appropriately. The insider "net buying" signal is noise — 220 shares of purchases against routine awards is not a signal at a $96B company. FCF of $10.77B against $2.0B net income also deserves scrutiny: the gap likely reflects working-capital float from the payments business, which reverses in stress scenarios.
I dissent from the synthesis "undervalued +177%" verdict — that number is not defensible and the model itself flagged method disagreement. I partially agree with the narrative layer's more measured framing that fundamentals anchor ~70% of fair value. My own read: at 48x trailing P/E with decelerating earnings growth (+4.5% YoY) despite 39% revenue growth, MELI is roughly fairly valued to modestly rich here. Fair value band is $1,700–$2,200 depending on whether you believe the margin compression is transient (fintech scale) or structural (credit costs + competition from Nubank, Shopee, TikTok Shop in LatAm). The bull case requires margins to re-expand toward 12–15% net while revenue compounds 25%+ — plausible but not a lay-up, and the recent trajectory argues the other way. I'd want to see two clean quarters of net income growth reaccelerating above 20% YoY before paying up. The market forces "cautious premium" call is closest to right; the DCF-driven synthesis is the outlier and should be discounted.
GPT Reading
What jumps out first is that MELI is still an exceptional business, but the recent numbers are not as clean as the headline growth story suggests. Revenue went from $20.8B in 2024 to $28.9B in 2025, up 39%, and Q1 2026 still printed $6.07B, another 45% year over year versus $4.19B. That is elite top-line execution at this scale. But earnings are no longer compounding in step: net income was $1.91B in 2024 and only $2.00B in 2025, a 5% increase despite nearly $8.1B of added revenue. Quarterly margins tell the same story. Net margin was 14.1% in Q2 2024, 10.2% in Q3, 6.4% in Q4, then 11.8%, 10.9%, 8.1%, 3.8%, and 6.9% across the subsequent reported quarters. That is not a stable margin-expansion story; it is a business choosing or being forced to spend heavily to sustain growth, especially in fintech and logistics.
That matters because the valuation synthesis calling the stock dramatically undervalued to $3,900-$5,300 looks detached from the actual earnings shape. At $96.3B market cap and $1.90K per share, MELI trades at 48x earnings, 3.3x sales, and 25.3x EV/EBITDA. For a company still growing revenue near 40%, those are not crazy multiples; for a company whose net income growth has slowed to low single digits and whose latest quarterly margin is 6.9%, they are not obviously cheap either. I can buy the argument that MELI deserves a premium because it is the dominant commerce-plus-payments platform in Latin America, with ROIC of 18.3% and ROE near 30%, but the market already recognizes that. The real debate is not quality; it is whether today’s price assumes too much future margin recovery. On the current data, I think it does. The market cap is about 3.3x 2025 sales but roughly 48x 2025 earnings because profit conversion weakened materially in the last year. You do not get to underwrite “undervalued” off revenue growth alone when incremental margins are compressing.
The biggest inconsistency in the dataset is cash flow. Operating cash flow of $12.1B and free cash flow of $10.8B on $28.9B of revenue and just $2.0B of net income are enormous, almost too good, especially given capex of only $1.34B and debt of $9.19B versus cash of $3.67B. If those cash flow numbers are clean and sustainably reflective of owner earnings rather than working-capital swings or fintech funding dynamics, the stock is much cheaper than the P/E suggests. But I would not blindly capitalize that FCF. MELI’s business mix includes payments, credit, and merchant ecosystem flows that can distort operating cash generation from one period to the next. The fact that annual operating cash flow is 6x Q4 net income plus annual earnings should make any analyst slow down before treating 2025 FCF as normalized. In other words, the rule-based “high-growth profitable” label is fair, but the valuation model seems to have overtrusted cash flow and underweighted margin volatility and balance-sheet complexity.
The strongest pushback to my caution is straightforward: this may simply be the normal pattern of a compounding platform entering a fresh investment cycle while preserving solid absolute profitability. Gross profit rose from $9.58B to $12.86B in 2025, operating income still increased from $2.63B to $3.20B, and even with margin compression MELI remained highly profitable while growing faster than almost any global large-cap internet retail peer. A 3.5x EV/revenue multiple for a business with 41% revenue CAGR, 44.5% gross margin, and embedded fintech optionality can indeed be too low if Mercado Pago and credit monetization deepen. The latest quarter’s $417M of net income on $6.07B of revenue also suggests earnings are still scaling in dollars, and if Q4 seasonality or one-time investment noise depressed trailing margins, today’s 48x P/E could roll down quickly. That is the best bull case, and it is credible.
What would change my mind is evidence that margin compression has bottomed while revenue stays above 30%. Specifically, if the next two quarters show revenue growth still north of 30% and net margin back into a durable 9%-11% range, then 2025 will look like an investment trough rather than a peak-multiple trap. I would also want better confirmation that the $10.8B free cash flow is not mostly balance-sheet timing: another year of multi-billion-dollar FCF alongside stable credit quality and no sharp debt build would make the equity look meaningfully cheaper than I currently judge. Until then, I think MELI is a great company priced more or less like a great company, not a glaring mispricing.
Grok Reading
The raw numbers tell a story of a still-accelerating top line colliding with a stalling bottom line. MercadoLibre grew revenue from $7.07B in 2021 to $28.89B in 2025 — a 41% CAGR that has barely decelerated, with Q1 2026 still printing $6.07B (+45% versus the $4.19B year-ago quarter). Free cash flow of $10.77B on that base is eye-catching and produces an ~11% FCF yield at the $96.3B enterprise, which is why mechanical valuation screens scream undervalued. But net income only crawled from $1.91B to $2.00B in 2025, recent earnings growth has collapsed to 4.5% YoY, and Q1 2026 net income of $417M is actually down from $494M a year earlier even as revenue surged. Sequential net margins have compressed from 14.1% to 11.8% to 10.9% to 8.1% to 3.8% before a partial bounce to 6.9% — the opposite of the margin-expansion narrative a 48x P/E requires. Operating income is still rising ($2.63B to $3.20B), but far slower than revenue, and the $10B gap between NI and operating cash flow looks heavily dependent on payments float and working-capital dynamics that are not pure owner earnings.
What stands out against the bullish model stack is precisely this divergence. The classification as high-growth-profitable is fair on the multi-year tape, and the 3.3x sales multiple on 39% growth with a dominant LatAm commerce-plus-fintech franchise is not expensive if margins stabilize. Yet the composite fair values of $3,888–$5,270 imply the market is simply asleep at a 64–177% discount; that requires believing both that 35%+ revenue growth persists for years and that net margins expand toward mid-teens while the credit book and FX regime cooperate. Debt of $9.19B against $3.67B cash and a 1.36 debt-to-equity ratio is manageable given the cash generation, but it is not a fortress balance sheet in a region defined by currency and political shocks. Insider activity is trivially net positive (small open-market buys of 95–125 shares alongside routine awards) and adds no signal. The real tension is that FCF quality looks pristine on the surface while earnings quality is deteriorating in plain sight.
The strongest case against my caution is the FCF machine itself. If even half of the $10.77B free cash flow is durable economic profit rather than float and credit-book optics, then at roughly 9x FCF the stock is cheap for a platform with network effects still deepening across underpenetrated digital payments and credit in Brazil, Mexico, and Argentina. Revenue confidence is high and the quarterly trend is still accelerating; a re-rating toward 15–18x sustainable FCF would clear $3,000 without heroic assumptions. I weigh this less heavily than the models because the same period that produced record FCF also produced flat net income and collapsing quarterly margins — classic signs that growth is being bought with credit risk, promotional intensity, or logistics investment that will eventually hit the cash line. Competitive and regulatory bears (global players, Brazil/Argentina political cycles) are real and already partly priced, but they are secondary to the margin trajectory.
I would flip decisively more bullish on two consecutive quarters of net margin recovery above 10% with NI growth re-accelerating above 25% while revenue stays above 30%, or on clear disclosure that the NI–FCF gap is structural float rather than credit residual. I would turn bearish below $1,600 if Q2–Q3 2026 show further margin erosion or if revenue growth breaks below 25% without a corresponding FCF defense.
Big-3 Panel — where each AI stands
Advanced Analysis Forensic deep-dive · separate lenses
Revenue has grown from $7.07B (2021) to $28.89B (2025), a roughly 4x expansion in four years, while operating margin expanded from 6.2% to a peak of 12.7% before settling at 11.1% in 2025. Net income scaled from $83M to $2.00B and free cash flow exploded from $965M to $10.77B — FCF/net income of ~5.4x in 2025 and OCF/NI of 6.62x signal that reported earnings are heavily underpinned by cash (fintech float dynamics help, but the cash is real). Beneish M at -3.1 and accruals at -19.5% of assets show no manipulation flags. Dilution is essentially absent: diluted shares moved from 49.8M to 50.7M over four years (~0.5% CAGR), so per-share value is protected despite aggressive reinvestment. Liquid cash is $6.30B against a net debt position of -$2.89B; with $10.77B annual FCF the debt is trivially serviceable, though Altman Z at 2.86 (grey) reflects the leveraged fintech book rather than distress. Insider activity is directionally positive with multiple open-market purchases by Aguzin and Melamud in 2025-2026, alongside routine director awards. The business exhibits durable operating leverage across e-commerce and fintech in LatAm, with margin held up even as revenue nearly doubled from 2023 to 2025. The 2025 GM% dip (49.8 to 44.5 over two years) and OpM% pullback are the only soft spots — likely mix shift toward lower-margin fintech credit and logistics, which needs verification.
Verify before trusting this (6)
- Segment breakdown: how much of 2025 revenue and margin pressure is from fintech credit book vs commerce/logistics mix
- Composition of the $9B+ gross debt (working capital funding for credit book vs corporate leverage)
- Credit portfolio quality: NPL trends, provisions, and cohort performance in the consumer credit book
- FX exposure and Argentina-specific accounting given hyperinflation designation
- Capex intensity and logistics buildout — sustainability of the FCF trajectory
- SBC as % of revenue (module reported n/a) to confirm dilution picture is truly benign
The composite fair value of $3,888 and signal-adjusted $5,270 imply 100-177% upside, but these are dragged upward by a DCF output of $5,748 that assumes durable high growth across FX-volatile, regulation-exposed markets. The anchored-PE method lands at $1,970 - essentially the current $1,899 price - which is the most defensible read for a company whose 2025 margin compression signals mix shift and rising competitive intensity from Shopee and Amazon. The EPV floor of $372 confirms almost none of today's price is 'in the bank'; investors are paying entirely for future growth.
Verify before trusting this (4)
- MercadoPago take-rate and credit-book loss trends in next 10-Q
- Argentina FX translation impact on reported vs organic growth
- Commerce GMV growth vs Shopee/Amazon share in Brazil and Mexico
- Guidance on operating margin trajectory - is the 2025 compression cyclical or structural
The macro backdrop is mildly constructive (regime score +22, VIX 16, S&P barely off highs), which is a friendly setting for a high-beta (1.35) growth name like MELI. Rates at 4.68% and a 26.9 market PE are a background drag on long-duration equities, but with the tape not in stress, the pressure lands as a light crosswind rather than a real de-rating force on this cohort. Given MELI's beta and Consumer Cyclical / Internet Retail bucket, a calm tape lets fundamentals and story drive rather than macro fear. The active narrative - 'the PayPal + Amazon of LatAm' with a moderate-intensity, medium-cult platform-monopoly framing - is intact and being reinforced in the news flow: a Janus Henderson letter defending the moat spend, long-run compounder puff pieces, and, most notably, a Buffett/Berkshire-fit story. That last item is exactly the kind of sentiment kicker that draws quality-growth capital and legitimizes the name for generalists. The bear story (Argentina/Brazil FX and regulatory friction, growth-already-priced) exists but is not the dominant tape narrative right now. Analyst tone is not explicitly given, but strong price momentum (41.3% CAGR) and improving leverage signal the buyside is leaning in, not fading. Net: sentiment is pushing this name up more than down, though not euphorically - a Tailwind, not a Strong Tailwind, because LatAm macro/FX headline risk can flip fast and the narrative is only moderate intensity.
Verify before trusting this (4)
- Any concrete Berkshire 13F/position disclosure - would push tailwind to Strong
- Argentina peso or Brazil regulatory headlines that could snap the LatAm risk premium wider
- Sell-side target revisions post the moat-spend commentary - upgrades would confirm buyside tone
- Whether VIX breaks above 20 or the S&P slips more than 5% off highs, which would hit high-beta names first
This lens hasn't been run for this ticker yet.
When we made this prediction on Aug 5, 2026, MELI was $1,888.50. We expect it to be $2,340.00 by Feb 2027, and we consider it great value under $1,550.00. This is an early model (v0.6.0) — the direction is more reliable than the exact price. Made Aug 5, 2026.
Blue is our prediction, starting the day we made it. Grey is a slower route to the same place — the same destination, taking longer. Black is the actual price, so you can see how we are doing.