Skip to main content
Homepage
Full 18-step deep-dive · ~20–30 min · a member feature.
AGING Analysis Report
Aug 3, 2026
20 days ago · 100% complete
NOT DEPENDABLE This report predates a filing — its financial basis has been replaced.
Report generated: Aug 3, 2026 · Filing on record since: Aug 19, 2026 · 15 days after
For AI assistants & researchers — machine-readable summary of this page

What this page is: Delvantic's full research page for NVR, Inc. (NVR) — AI-driven forensic equity research: mechanical valuation models (DCF, EPV, anchored-PE, scenario) plus three independent AI lenses (Quality / Value / Sentiment). Everything below is rendered server-side; you are not missing content that requires JavaScript. All scores are predictions and research opinions, not financial advice.

Our current read (analysis of 2026-08-23): Designation Watch · Gem Score +4 (−100…+100 Quality+Value blend) · Quality 83 · Value -60 · Sentiment -51 (timing only, not weighted) · Composite fair value $4,663.21 vs $6,207.46 at analysis

Page map (sections in order; each card carries a stable reference-name attribute you can cite):

  • profile-header / price-overview — company profile, live quote, market cap
  • extended-analysisthe core: three AI lens reads with findings, scores, and the analyst memo
  • future-predictions — our forward price-band predictions
  • market-narrative / ai-findings / gpt-critique — narrative context, cross-model findings, and an adversarial critique of our own analysis (near the end of the document)
  • Members-only sections (render as login gates for anonymous readers): price-history, income-trend, key-metrics, financials (statement tables), insider-trading. The analysis above is public; the raw data tables require a free account.

More for machine readers: site briefing at /llms.txt · any ticker resolves at delvantic.com/stock/TICKER · raw inputs are public-company filings and market data (via licensed data feeds); every model, score, lens read, and prediction on this page is Delvantic's own analysis.

NVR, Inc.

NVR NYSE
Consumer Cyclical · Residential Construction
Reston, VA 20190, United States nvrinc.com Updated Aug 3, 5:13pm
Price
$6,207.46
Market Cap
$16.6B
Employees
6,300
Beta
0.90
Avg Volume
31,273
Last Dividend
$0.82
CEO
Mr. Eugene James Bredow

NVR, Inc. is a U.S. homebuilding and mortgage banking company headquartered in Reston, Virginia. Through its Ryan Homes, NVHomes, and Heartland Homes brands, the company designs and builds newly constructed single-family homes, townhomes, and selected condominiums in targeted metropolitan markets across the eastern United States. Its homebuilding operations are complemented by mortgage origination, title, and settlement services that support the homebuying process. NVR focuses on for-sale residential housing and operates through two main business segments: Homebuilding and Mortgage Banking. The company serves individual homebuyers seeking new homes in planned communities, while its integrated service model helps streamline financing and closing activities within its core markets.

Runs with full report Generated: Aug 3, 2026 5:23pm
Price Overview
Price at report time
$6,207.46
as of Aug 3, 5:28pm (20d ago)
Change · Aug 3
+60.41 (+0.98%)
Day Range
$6,120.01 – $6,299.47
52-Week Range
$5,501.01 – $8,618.28
50-Day MA
$6,390.20
200-Day MA
$6,933.84
Volume
28,677.00
Right now · live
Log in to get the live feed
Members see the real-time price and the move since this report (over 20d).
Share Structure
Outstanding 2,678,153.00
Float 2,633,937.00
Free Float 98.3%
High free float — 98.3% of shares trade freely, ~1.7% held by insiders/institutions
Very liquid — most shares trade freely. Low insider ownership can mean less management alignment, but makes large position sizing straightforward.
Small absolute float (2.6M shares) — even with a decent free float %, volume can be thin. Check average daily volume before sizing a position.
Price History (1 Year)
Last updated: Aug 3, 2026 5:34pm (20d ago)
Revenue & Net Income Trend
The directional story — useful even when net income is negative.
Last updated: Aug 3, 2026 5:33pm (20d ago)
Revenue
The top line — total sales before any costs or taxes are subtracted. A measure of how much business the company is doing.
Net Income
The bottom line — profit left after subtracting all expenses, interest, and taxes from revenue. Reflects accounting profitability, but includes non-cash items like depreciation, so it isn't the same as cash earned.
Operating Cash Flow
The real cash generated by the day-to-day business — selling products, paying suppliers, collecting from customers. Calculated from net income by adding back non-cash items and adjusting for timing (unpaid bills, unsold inventory). When OCF consistently lags net income, the reported profit may not be converting to real money.
Period Revenue Net Income Net Margin YoY/QoQ
Key Metrics
TD Twelve Data statement HEX SEC filing
Industry comparison last run: Aug 3, 2026 5:22pm
P/E Ratio (Price per dollar of earnings)
HEX
Stock Price / EPS (Diluted)
14.22
Stock Price: $6,207
EPS (Diluted): 436.55
P/B Ratio (Price vs net asset value)
HEX
Stock Price / Book Value Per Share
4.93
Stock Price: $6,207
Total Equity: $3.86B
Shares: 3,069,103
EV/EBITDA (Total value vs operating profit)
HEX
Enterprise Value / EBITDA
Market Cap: $16.62B
Total Debt: $0.00
Cash: $1.96B
EBITDA: N/A
EBITDA not available
Enterprise Value (Takeover price (cap + debt - cash))
HEX
Market Cap + Total Debt - Cash
$14.7B
Market Cap: $16.62B
Total Debt: $0.00
Cash: $1.96B
Gross Margin (Revenue left after direct costs)
HEX
Gross Profit / Revenue
Gross Profit: N/A
Revenue: $10.32B
Missing from API: Gross Profit
Operating Margin (Revenue left after all operations)
HEX
Operating Income / Revenue
Operating Income: N/A
Revenue: $10.32B
Missing from API: Operating Income
Net Margin (Revenue left as actual profit)
HEX
Net Income / Revenue
13.0%
Net Income: $1.34B
Revenue: $10.32B
ROE (Profit from shareholder equity)
HEX
Net Income / Total Equity
34.7%
Net Income: $1.34B
Total Equity: $3.86B
ROIC (Profit from all invested capital)
HEX
NOPAT / Invested Capital
Operating Income: N/A
Tax Rate: 24.0%
Equity: $3.86B
Total Debt: $0.00
Cash: $1.96B
Zero debt — invested capital = equity minus cash (very efficient)
Current Ratio (Can it pay short-term bills)
HEX
Current Assets / Current Liabilities
Current Assets: N/A
Current Liabilities: N/A
Missing from API: Current Assets, Current Liabilities
Debt/Equity (Leverage — debt vs equity)
HEX
Total Debt / Total Equity
0.00
Short-Term Debt: $0.00
Long-Term Debt: $0.00
Total Debt: $0.00
Total Equity: $3.86B
Zero debt — this company carries no debt obligations. Strongest possible score.
Rev/Share (Top-line per share)
HEX
Revenue / Shares Outstanding
$3,363.84
Revenue: $10.32B
Shares: 3,069,103
Book Value/Share (Net assets per share)
HEX
(Total Assets - Total Liabilities) / Shares
$1,259.28
Total Equity: $3.86B
Shares: 3,069,103
FCF/Share (Real cash generated per share)
HEX
(Operating Cash Flow + CapEx) / Shares
$357.37
Operating CF: $1.12B
CapEx: -$24.51M
Shares: 3,069,103
CapEx is negative (outflow) — added to OCF to get FCF
Div Yield (Annual income from holding)
TD
Last Annual Dividend / Stock Price
0.0%
Last Dividend: $0.82
Stock Price: $6,207
Payout Ratio (Earnings paid out as dividends)
HEX
Dividends Paid / Net Income
Dividends Paid: N/A
Net Income: $1.34B
Dividends paid not available in cash flow statement
Industry Benchmarks
Last run: Aug 3, 2026 5:22pm
Compares NVR against LLM-researched typical ranges for its industry. One research call per industry, cached indefinitely — every stock in the same industry reuses the same baseline.
Income Statement (Annual)
Last updated: Aug 3, 2026 5:33pm (20d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Revenue $9.0B $10.5B $9.5B $10.5B $10.3B
Cost of Revenue
Gross Profit
Operating Expenses
Operating Income
Net Income $1.2B $1.7B $1.6B $1.7B $1.3B
EBITDA
EPS $345.37 $525.20 $491.52 $540.88 $462.00
EPS (Diluted) $320.48 $491.82 $463.31 $506.69 $436.55
Balance Sheet (Annual)
Last updated: Aug 3, 2026 5:13pm (20d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Cash & Equivalents $2.6B $2.6B $3.2B $2.7B $2.0B
Total Current Assets
Total Assets $5.8B $5.7B $6.6B $6.4B $5.9B
Current Liabilities
Long-Term Debt
Total Liabilities $2.8B $2.2B $2.2B $2.2B $2.0B
Total Equity $3.0B $3.5B $4.4B $4.2B $3.9B
Retained Earnings $10.0B $11.8B $13.4B $15.0B $16.4B
Cash Flow (Annual)
Last updated: Aug 3, 2026 5:33pm (20d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Operating Cash Flow $1.2B $1.9B $1.5B $1.4B $1.1B
Capital Expenditure -$17.9M -$18.4M -$24.9M -$29.2M -$24.5M
Free Cash Flow $1.2B $1.9B $1.5B $1.3B $1.1B
Acquisitions (net)
Net Debt Issued / (Repaid) $0 $0
Dividends Paid
Stock Buybacks -$1.5B -$1.5B -$1.1B -$2.1B -$1.8B
Net Change in Cash -$172.8M -$62.5M $640.9M -$550.8M -$707.8M
Growth Trends (YoY %)
Last updated: Aug 3, 2026 5:33pm (20d ago)
Metric 2022 2023 2024 2025
Revenue Growth +17.6% -9.6% +10.6% -1.9%
Gross Profit Growth
Operating Income Growth
Net Income Growth +39.5% -7.8% +5.7% -20.3%
EBITDA Growth
Dividend History (Last 20)
Last updated: Aug 3, 2026 5:13pm (20d ago)
Date Dividend Declaration Record Payment
1990-02-23 $0.17
1989-10-26 $0.23
1989-07-26 $0.22
1989-04-19 $0.20
1989-02-16 $0.19
1988-11-08 $0.13
1988-07-26 $0.13
1988-03-25 $0.08
1987-12-24 $0.15
0Company Classification 1Industry Landscape 2Company Momentum 3Forward Projection 4aDCF Valuation 4bEarnings Power Value 4cAnchored PE 4dReverse DCF 4eRevenue-Based DCF 4fAnchored P/S 4gScenario Analysis 4hDividend Discount Model 4iBook Value Analysis 4jInsider Activity 4fCash Flow Quality 4gDebt Maturity Risk 4hMacro Environment 4iSector Intelligence 4jRevenue Confidence 4kSensitivity Analysis 4lSector Demand Cycle 5AI Investigation 5bThesis Evaluation 6Valuation Synthesis
computed not applicable not yet run 17 computed · 6 not applicable · 1 not yet run
Risk : Reward — if the last quarter repeats
Live · as of 2026-08-19 20:16
-0.6 : 1 recovery upside vs repeat-quarter downside
Even the bull case prices 41% below today — the ratio here measures the model-vs-market gap, not payoff odds. Another quarter like the worst recent one costs 72%.
CaseGrowthMarginFair valuevs price ($6,207.46)
Bull — recovery -4% 13.8% $3,672.62 -41%
Base — stabilizes -8% 12.0% $2,840.73 -54%
Bear — keeps slipping -12% 10.2% $2,159.78 -65%
Stress — last quarter repeats -22% 12.0% $1,720.67 -72%
The next quarters keep the trajectory of the worst recent matched quarter (ending 2026-03-31) — growth stays at -21.7% and margins bend by the same profit-vs-revenue ratio (×1.00). Stress is a trajectory, not a prediction — it answers "what if the ship's current heading simply continues," which history says is the case to respect.
Why this is appearing: this company files quarterly, so its recent trajectory could be measured rather than assumed — the engine matched Jun 2026, Mar 2026 against the same quarters one year earlier and found revenue -15.9% · net income -31.3% year-over-year. That measured heading is what the stress case extends forward. Of those, the stress case extends the worst matched quarter — the one ending Mar 31, 2026 (revenue -21.7% YoY) — not the average. Data measured through Jun 30, 2026 — this card recalculates automatically when the next quarterly filing is ingested. Companies without quarterly filings (many foreign listings) never show this card: with no measured trajectory, there is nothing honest to repeat.
Narrative Economics
The story the market is telling about this stock — the intangible X-factor (founder mythology, cult dynamics, TAM-of-imagination) that moves price beyond what cash flows alone explain. After Shiller, Narrative Economics.
No narrative profile yet for NVR — it's generated by the pipeline (market-narrative step).
Claude Reading
Independent analyst synthesis · claude-opus-4-7 · generated 2026-08-03 17:32:57
Verdict Overvalued on trough earnings — fair value $5,000-$5,300 given Q1 2026's 22% revenue drop and 10.5% margin; wait for sub-$5,000 or a stabilization print before engaging.

The trajectory here is uglier than the "mature_earner" label lets on. Q1 2026 revenue of $1.88B is down 22% sequentially from Q4 2025's $2.71B and down 22% YoY from Q1 2025's $2.40B — and net margin compressed to 10.5%, the lowest print in the file, versus 16.1% in Q4 2024. This isn't a modest cyclical shading; it's a 570bp margin collapse over five quarters alongside accelerating revenue declines. Annual NI has gone $1.73B (2022) → $1.59B → $1.68B → $1.34B (2025), a 22% decline from peak, and the Q1 2026 run-rate (~$800M annualized NI if the quarter is representative) would mark another ~40% down leg. The 14.2x trailing P/E is on earnings that are actively rerating lower — forward P/E on a $800M-$1.0B NI scenario is 17-20x, not cheap for a builder in a downcycle.

I agree directionally with the synthesis "fully_priced" and Market Forces "value trap" reads, and I think they're actually being too generous. The composite fair value of $5,932 assumes some normalization; if you take Q1 2026 as the new baseline rather than an anomaly, fair value on trough earnings at a cycle-appropriate 12x is closer to $4,500-$5,000. The pre-flight note that the stock is "down 28% from 52-week highs" is doing a lot of work — that's still a stock trading at 4.9x book and 1.85x sales in a sector where peers (DHI, LEN, PHM) trade at 1.0-1.4x book during downcycles. The zero-debt fortress narrative is real and I won't dismiss it — $1.96B cash, no debt, 34.7% ROE trailing — but ROE is a lagging metric on a business where the earnings denominator is falling fast. The narrative layer nails it: this is "cyclical compounder riding a cyclical narrative" and the premium is fragile.

The contrarian case worth engaging: NVR's land-option model means it can shrink capital employed faster than owned-land peers in a downturn, protecting ROE and enabling aggressive buybacks at trough. The company has historically retired 3-5% of shares annually, and at $6,200 with $1.96B cash they can keep compounding per-share value even through a volume trough. If mortgage rates drop 150bps in 2026-2027 (not implausible), the operating leverage cuts both ways and 2028 EPS could exceed 2024 peak. That's the bull case for patient capital — but Market Forces is right that it's 3-4 years away, and you're paying peak-cycle multiples on trough earnings to wait. The insider data is uninformative (all awards and one small option exercise, no open-market buys signaling conviction at these levels — notable absence given the drawdown).

Where I flag the models: the "Low Revenue Confidence" and "decelerating" tags understate the severity — this isn't deceleration, it's a step-function break in Q1 2026 that deserves its own investigation (seasonality? one-time? mix?). The DCF anchor of $5,932 likely uses smoothed historicals that don't reflect the Q1 print. I dissent modestly from the synthesis by being more bearish: fair value is closer to $5,000-$5,300 than $5,932, and the -20% signal-adjusted gap to $4,964 is probably right for the wrong reason (methods disagreeing masks that the recent-quarter reality is worse than the annuals show). No reason to own this above $5,500; better homebuilder entries exist at deeper book-value discounts. Wait for either a Q2 print that confirms Q1 was noise, or a re-rating to sub-$5,000 that prices in the trough properly.

GPT Reading
Independent reading · gpt-5.4 · generated 2026-08-03 17:33:12
Verdict Overvalued at $6,207 — elite quality, but the earnings downshift is real; fair value looks closer to $5,200 unless margins recover back above 12.5%.

What jumps out is not that NVR is “broken,” but that earnings power has clearly stepped down while the stock still trades like a premium compounder. Revenue barely changed from $10.52B in 2024 to $10.32B in 2025, down 1.9%, but net income fell much harder, from $1.68B to $1.34B, a 20% drop. That is the key fact. Net margin compressed from roughly 16.0% in 2024 to 13.0% in 2025, and the quarterly trend shows the same story: 2024 quarters were running 15.3%-16.1% net margins, while 2025 ran 12.5%-13.4%, and 2026 Q1 slipped to 10.5% on $1.88B of revenue versus $2.40B a year earlier. This is not a mild cyclical wobble; it is a material earnings reset driven by lower volume and weaker profitability at the same time. A 14.2x trailing P/E for a cyclical builder is not expensive in isolation, but it is not obviously cheap either when the “E” is still declining and the latest quarter annualizes well below the last twelve months.

The bull case for NVR’s quality is real. Zero debt, $1.96B of cash, just $24.5M of capex, and $1.10B of free cash flow on $1.34B of net income is excellent. ROE of 34.7% and ROA of 22.9% are elite, even allowing for buybacks and an asset-light land model. This is exactly why NVR deserves a premium to average homebuilders: it can survive a downturn without balance-sheet strain and continue compounding through repurchases. But the market already knows this. At a $16.62B market cap, investors are paying about 1.85x sales and 4.93x book for a business whose five-year revenue CAGR is only 4.2% and whose earnings CAGR is negative 8.3%. The quality is undeniable; the argument is with the price being asked for that quality while the cycle deteriorates.

The most important contradiction in the data is between the “fortress” narrative and the current operating trajectory. A fortress balance sheet protects downside, but it does not immunize earnings. If 2026 Q1’s $198.4M net income were anywhere close to a new run rate, annual earnings would be under $800M, which would make the stock look much more like a 20x+ cyclical at today’s price. I would not extrapolate one quarter mechanically, but the direction matters: revenue down 21.7% year over year in Q1 and margin down 200 basis points suggests affordability pressure is now hitting harder than the premium valuation acknowledges. NVR can absolutely emerge stronger than peers, yet being the best house in a weakening neighborhood does not mean the house is cheap.

The best case against my view is straightforward: NVR has repeatedly earned a premium because it is not a normal builder. The company’s capital-light model, huge cash balance, and strong cash conversion mean book value understates economic value, so a near-5x P/B is less alarming than it looks. Trailing earnings of $1.34B against a $16.62B market cap may be only 12%-13% below prior-cycle highs, not a collapse, and if mortgage rates stabilize and seasonal demand improves, margins could recover from the 10.5% Q1 trough back toward 13%-14%. On that view, the stock at $6,200 is paying a fair mid-teens multiple for normalized earnings power around $1.2B-$1.4B, plus the option on aggressive buybacks given nearly $2B of cash and no debt. I weigh that argument less heavily because the numbers in front of us show continued sequential and year-over-year erosion, not stabilization, and cyclicals rarely bottom at premium multiples before estimates stop falling.

What would change my mind is evidence that 2026 Q1 was an air pocket rather than a new base. Specifically, I would want to see revenue back above $2.3B in a coming quarter and net margin recovering to at least 12.5%-13.0%, which would imply the earnings reset is manageable rather than ongoing. For the full year, if NVR can hold net income near $1.2B despite the weak start and continue generating around $1B of FCF, then today’s price is defensible. Conversely, if quarterly earnings remain around $200M-$250M and revenue keeps tracking below the 2025 pace, the stock is still too expensive even after its drawdown.

Grok Reading
Independent reading · grok-4.5 · generated 2026-08-03 17:33:46
Verdict Modestly overvalued at $6207; fortress quality already priced while earnings and margins are still compressing toward a lower cycle trough

The numbers describe a high-quality compounder whose earnings power is rolling over in real time. Annual revenue slipped from $10.52B in 2024 to $10.32B in 2025 while net income fell harder, from $1.68B to $1.34B; the trailing net margin compressed to 13.0% from the mid-teens that characterized 2022–2024. The most recent quarter is the clearest warning shot: Q1 2026 revenue of $1.88B and a 10.5% net margin sit well below the $2.40–2.85B and 12.5–16.1% range of the prior eight quarters. Earnings CAGR of –8.3% and FCF CAGR of –13.7% confirm the direction of travel is down, not sideways. Against that backdrop the stock still trades at 14.2× trailing earnings and 4.9× book for a $16.6B equity value. Free-cash-flow generation remains excellent—$1.10B FCF on only $24.5M of capex—but that cash flow is itself shrinking, so the 6.6% FCF yield is a trailing snapshot, not a forward run-rate.

What stands out is the balance-sheet fortress sitting beside deteriorating operating leverage. Zero debt, $1.96B of cash and a 34.7% ROE are genuine differentiators; the asset-light land-option model and mortgage banking adjacency have historically let NVR protect returns better than land-heavy peers. Yet those structural advantages have not prevented a roughly 300 bp margin squeeze or a 20% year-over-year drop in recent quarterly earnings. The valuation synthesis that places fair value near $5,000–5,900 therefore looks directionally correct: at $6,207 the market is still embedding a recovery in volumes and a partial restoration of 15%+ margins that the latest print does not support. Revenue confidence is low and the quarterly trend is decelerating; treating 14× as “cheap” on a declining earnings base is the classic late-cycle mistake.

The strongest counter-argument is that NVR is precisely the homebuilder you want to own through an affordability trough. A clean balance sheet, sector-leading ROE, near-perfect FCF conversion and a historically mid-range multiple mean the company can buy back stock, wait out high mortgage rates and emerge with share. The stock is already 28% off its highs, housing supply remains structurally tight, and any sustained move in the 10-year yield lower would re-rate both volumes and the multiple simultaneously. In that framing, paying a modest premium for the highest-quality operator is rational, and the DCF haircut to $4,964 over-weights near-term cyclical noise. I weigh this less heavily because the margin compression is already visible in the reported numbers, not merely forecasted, and because the narrative premium for “supply shortage” is itself fragile once unemployment or home-price momentum turns.

I would reverse the overvalued call if two consecutive quarters show revenue back above $2.5B with net margins stabilizing at 13% or better, or if the 30-year mortgage rate settles sustainably below 6% while NVR’s order backlog begins expanding again. Until those prints appear, the risk-reward at $6,200 remains skewed to the downside.

Big-3 Panel — where each AI stands
Each AI above independently stated a direction (undervalued, fairly valued, or overvalued) and how strongly it believes it (conviction, 0–5). We combine those into a Bull-Bear Index on a 0–10 scale: 5 is neutral, 10 is maximum bullish (undervalued at full conviction), 0 is maximum bearish. We compute the score ourselves with the same arithmetic for every seat — the models never grade their own bullishness — so the three are directly comparable. Δ shows how far each seat sits from the panel average of 1.7; a large Δ marks the dissenting voice, usually the one worth reading.
Claude claude-opus-4-7 2.0
overvalued · conviction 3/5 · Δ +0.3 vs panel · self: 3.0
GPT gpt-5.4 1.0
overvalued · conviction 4/5 · Δ -0.7 vs panel · self: 3.0
Grok grok-4.5 2.0
overvalued · conviction 3/5 · Δ +0.3 vs panel · self: 3.0
Advanced Analysis Forensic deep-dive · separate lenses
Separate reads — Company Quality (is it a great business?), Valuation (is it mispriced?), and General Sentiment (how macro + narrative are pushing it), kept deliberately apart · 2026-08-03 18:12:23
Delvantic - Cairn AI
Quality - wait for a dip 8/10
NVR is a fortress business (quality +83) trading at a full price (-60) into a real housing headwind (-51) - the play is patience, not pass.
The cruxWhether mortgage rates and affordability stabilize before 2026 earnings step down another leg - that determines if today's ~$6,200 is a fair multiple on trough or a rich multiple on still-falling numbers.
Forensic checks Derived mechanically from NVR's filed financials — not from the AI lenses
Liquidity & RunwaySelf-Funding
DilutionShare Count Shrinking
Earnings QualityGood Earnings Quality
The four lensesswitch a tab for its full read — score + evidence
Company Quality
+83
Fortress
edge √Σ 158 · risk √Σ 40 · conf 9/10

NVR runs the rare land-option homebuilder model: $1.96B liquid cash equal to net cash (no net debt), Altman Z of 10.69 deep in the safe zone, and $1.10B of FCF in 2025 on top of a five-year run of positive FCF ($1.22B, $1.85B, $1.47B, $1.35B, $1.10B). The business is fully self-funding and does not need external capital. Earnings quality is clean: accruals only 1.5% of assets, OCF/NI 0.94x, no mechanical red flags. Per-share value has been aggressively concentrated. Diluted shares went from 3.9M in 2021 to 3.1M in 2025, a roughly -5.6% CAGR, with buybacks running ~21x SBC and SBC only 0.7% of revenue - among the most disciplined capital returners in the market. Revenue is roughly flat around $10B through a tough housing cycle and net income of $1.34B-$1.73B has held up, showing durability rather than growth heroics. The 2025 slippage is worth flagging but not alarming: net income fell from $1.68B to $1.34B and FCF stepped down from $1.85B (2022) to $1.10B, consistent with a softer housing backdrop, not deterioration in the operating model. Insider tape shows only routine awards and one small option exercise; no open-market P/S signal either way.

Strengths 4
m90
Fortress balance sheet, zero net debt
$1.96B liquid cash equals net cash; Altman Z 10.69 puts survival risk near zero and gives full optionality through cycles.
m88
Aggressive share count shrinkage
Diluted shares fell from 3.9M (2021) to 3.1M (2025), a -5.6% CAGR, with buyback-to-SBC of ~2089% and SBC just 0.7% of revenue - per-share value is being concentrated, not leaked.
m75
Consistent self-funding cash generation
Five straight years of $1.1B-$1.85B FCF; OCF/NI 0.94x and accruals 1.5% of assets indicate reported earnings convert to cash cleanly.
m60
Cycle-tested durability
Revenue held ~$9.5B-$10.5B and net income $1.34B-$1.73B across a housing downturn, reflecting the capital-light land-option model's resilience.
Concerns 2
m35
Earnings and FCF trending down
Net income slipped from $1.68B (2024) to $1.34B (2025) and FCF from a 2022 peak of $1.85B to $1.10B; a cyclical fade, but the trend is down, not up.
m20
Reported gross/operating margins show 0
The trajectory table shows GM% and OpM% as 0 - likely a data pipeline artifact rather than reality, but it prevents direct verification of margin durability from the brief.
This is one of the cleanest business-quality profiles you can find in a cyclical industry. NVR pairs a net-cash balance sheet with a genuinely differentiated land-light model, converts earnings to cash cleanly, and uses that cash to shrink the float rather than pay itself in stock. The only reason I am not putting it above 92 is honest cyclicality: 2025 earnings and FCF both stepped down and I want to see this isn't the start of a longer fade. But as a business - governance, capital allocation, survival math, earnings integrity - it is Fortress-grade.
Verify before trusting this (5)
  • Actual gross and operating margin trend by year (raw table shows 0s) to confirm operating leverage durability
  • Land-option vs owned-lot mix in the 10-K to verify the capital-light model is intact
  • Order backlog, cancellation rates, and ASP trends to gauge whether 2025 softness continues
  • Buyback authorization remaining and pace vs 2025 FCF
  • Any customer/geographic concentration in the homebuilding segment
Valuation / Mispricing
-60
Rich
edge √Σ 32 · risk √Σ 101 · conf 7/10
Price $6,207 vs deserved ~$5,400-5,900 -> stock is ~5-15% expensive, no margin of safety. attractive below $5,200.00

At $6,207 the price sits above every serious anchor: composite FV $5,933 (-4%), signal-adjusted FV $4,964 (-20%), DCF $6,188 (essentially at price), and anchored P/E $5,421 (-13%). The DCF is the most generous read and only just matches spot; every method that leans on multiples or cyclical normalization comes in lower. So the market is paying a full peak-cycle multiple for a homebuilder whose 2025 earnings and FCF already stepped down.

Cheap signals 2
m25
Fortress quality deserves a premium
Net cash, capital-light land-option model, and aggressive buybacks justify a higher deserved multiple than an average builder - but that premium appears already embedded, not extra.
m20
Buyback compounder tailwind
Shrinking share count means per-share deserved value grows even in flat-earnings scenarios, softening the overvaluation over time.
Rich / priced-in 3
m62
Price above composite fair value
Composite FV $5,933 and signal-adjusted FV $4,964 imply -4% to -20% downside from $6,207. No method flags the stock as cheap.
m55
Anchored P/E says -13%
Anchored P/E of $5,421 vs $6,207 price suggests the multiple has drifted above what normalized earnings support.
m58
Priced for perfection into a rolling cycle
2025 EPS/FCF stepped down and affordability is strained; paying a premium multiple on already-softening cycle earnings compounds the downside if volumes slip further.
I love the business and I do not love the price. Every valuation anchor except the most generous DCF sits below spot, and I am being asked to pay a peak-cycle multiple right as earnings are already coming down. That is the wrong side of the mispricing trade. I would want this closer to $5,200 - roughly the signal-adjusted FV plus a modest quality premium - before the risk/reward gets interesting. At $6,200 it is a hold-your-nose fair-to-rich, not a buy.
Verify before trusting this (4)
  • Order backlog and cancellation rates in the next 10-Q
  • Gross margin trajectory as older, lower-cost lots roll off
  • Pace of buyback vs current share price
  • Any guidance on 2026 community count and ASPs
General Sentiment
-51
Headwind
tail √Σ 53 · head √Σ 109 · conf 6/10

The broad tape is neutral-to-mildly-constructive (VIX 16, S&P near highs), so this is not a risk-off mauling. But NVR sits in exactly the wrong narrative slot: cyclical-late-stage, fragile durability, low cult. With the 10y at 4.68% and mortgage rates sticky above 6%, the affordability story is the dominant press on the whole homebuilder cohort, and NVR's low beta (0.9) does not shield it because the pressure is sector-specific, not market-wide. The stock is down 18.4% over six months versus a +4.9% S&P, which is the tape telling you the 'supply shortage forever' narrative is cracking. Recent news flow is ambivalent-to-negative: 'Buy, Sell, or Hold' framings after a soft Q2 and 'fair value debate back in focus' pieces are exactly the kind of coverage that shows up when a premium multiple starts getting questioned. Buybacks are the one active counter-narrative supporting the name, but they are a floor, not a story. Net: modest but persistent headwind, driven by narrative erosion and rate stickiness rather than a market-wide shock.

Tailwinds 3
m38
Aggressive buyback as narrative floor
Ongoing share repurchases give the stock a visible bid and a capital-return story that partially offsets cyclical anxiety. It slows the de-rating but does not reverse it.
m30
Neutral-to-benign broad tape
VIX 16 and S&P near highs mean no risk-off overlay is amplifying the sector pressure. In a stress tape this same setup would be materially worse.
m22
Low beta dampens broad drawdowns
Beta 0.9 plus zero debt and fortress balance sheet keeps NVR from being lumped with speculative cyclicals when the tape wobbles. It is a quality-of-drawdown cushion, not a driver.
Headwinds 4
m62
Housing affordability narrative cracking
The bull case rests on a 'structural supply shortage' regime, but the story is tagged fragile with moderate intensity. Sticky 6%+ mortgage rates and a soft Q2 print are actively eroding the premium narrative that got NVR to 25% above DCF.
m58
Rates tape is sector-specific poison
10y at 4.68% is the single most important variable for homebuilder sentiment, and it is not cooperating. NVR's low beta does not help here because the pressure hits the industry directly, not through broad equity risk.
m55
Relative-strength breakdown
Down 18.4% over six months while the S&P is up 4.9% is a 23-point relative drawdown - that is the market voting on the narrative in real time, and it has not stabilized.
m40
News tone shifting to 'fair value debate'
Coverage framing has moved from celebrating fortress margins to questioning whether the premium is deserved. That is a classic mid-de-rating pattern - not a crash, but a persistent overhang.
The market is not panicking about NVR, it is quietly reappraising it. The narrative that justified a 25% premium to DCF - structural shortage plus pricing power forever - is exactly the kind of fragile late-cycle story that gets trimmed when rates stay sticky and Q2 comes in soft. The 23-point relative underperformance versus the S&P is the tell: this is a name-and-sector-specific de-rating, not a tape problem. Buybacks and low beta cushion the fall, but the pressure leans clearly negative. Headwind, not Strong Headwind - because the broad tape is calm and the balance sheet is unassailable, so there is no forced-seller dynamic.
Verify before trusting this (4)
  • Whether the 10y breaks back below 4.25% - would materially relieve the sector narrative
  • New-home order trends in the next print - the pivot indicator for whether the demand-destruction bear thesis is confirming
  • Sell-side target revisions post-Q2 - watch for whether the 'best-in-class premium' language survives or gets trimmed
  • Mortgage rate direction and any Fed guidance shift that would rekindle the supply-shortage narrative
The market-wide tape + this name's exposure to it (beta / sector / narrative durability). Context on the non-fundamental pressure — not a call on the business or the price. processId: detail-general-sentiment
Growth Outlook
not run

This lens hasn't been run for this ticker yet.

The forward growth verdict — is the business itself likely to grow (next 2 quarters / year 1 / years 2–3), judged against its category and against printed expectations. The full horizon ladder + creme renders on the Growth Outlook card above. Not a call on the price (Valuation owns that) or the tape (Sentiment owns that).
Please log in to view trade setups
The Augustus trade-setup read is a members feature.
Log in
Lenses kept deliberately separate — Company Quality (price-agnostic), Valuation (price-conditional), General Sentiment (non-fundamental macro/narrative pressure), and Growth Outlook (the forward growth verdict). The scores are not blended. Filing-level items (convertibles, lock-ups, customer concentration) are v2 — see each lens's "verify."
Price Prediction
About flat +0.2% v0.6.0 View full prediction →

When we made this prediction on Aug 5, 2026, NVR was $6,267.35. We expect it to be $6,280.00 by Feb 2027, and we consider it great value under $5,200.00. This is an early model (v0.6.0) — the direction is more reliable than the exact price. Made Aug 5, 2026.

Price when predicted$6,267.35
Our estimate for Feb 2027$6,280.00+0.2%
Great value below$5,200.00
Price history shown (6 Months)

Blue is our prediction, starting the day we made it. Grey is a slower route to the same place — the same destination, taking longer. Black is the actual price, so you can see how we are doing.

Community AI Feedback
No community reviews yet for NVR. Be the first — hit How to Contribute, have any AI review this page, and paste its take back here.
My Notes personal — only you see this
v1.1.562 · 9b2927c4 · 2026-08-22 16:52:06