Homepage
FRESH Analysis Report
Jun 26, 2026
1 day ago · 96% complete · +9 refreshed

QUALCOMM Incorporated

QCOM NASDAQ Categories PDF
Technology · Semiconductors
San Diego, CA 92121-1714, United States IPO 1991 qualcomm.com Updated Jun 26, 12:24am
Price
$204.90
Market Cap
$216.0B
Employees
49,000
Beta
1.60
Avg Volume
20,835,096
CEO
Cristiano Renno Amon
Business Description

QUALCOMM Incorporated is a company dedicated to developing and bringing to market fundamental technologies crucial for the global wireless communication industry. Its operations are structured into three primary segments: Qualcomm CDMA Technologies (QCT), Qualcomm Technology Licensing (QTL), and Qualcomm Strategic Initiatives (QSI). The QCT division specializes in creating and supplying integrated circuits and system software, leveraging 3G, 4G, 5G, and other advanced wireless technologies. These components are essential for a range of products, including those used for wireless voice and data communication, networking, application processing, multimedia, and global positioning. The QTL segment generates revenue by licensing its extensive intellectual property portfolio, which encompasses various patent rights vital for the manufacture and sale of wireless devices, particularly those adhering to standards like CDMA2000, WCDMA, LTE, and OFDMA-based 5G. Through its QSI segment, Qualcomm invests in early-stage companies across diverse sectors such as 5G, artificial intelligence, automotive, consumer electronics, enterprise solutions, cloud computing, and the Internet of Things, aiming to support the introduction of new products and services for both existing and emerging communication applications. Furthermore, the company provides development services and related products to United States government agencies and their contractors. Founded in 1985, QUALCOMM Incorporated maintains its headquarters in San Diego, California.

Business History
Generated: Jun 26, 2026 3:16am
Price Overview
Last updated: Jun 26, 2026 3:12am (1d ago)
$204.90
+7.49 (+3.79%)
Day Range
$199.83 – $219.00
52-Week Range
$121.99 – $259.92
50-Day MA
$197.60
200-Day MA
$167.77
Volume
34,040,101.00
Analyst Price Targets
Low $120.00
Consensus $216.00
High $300.00
(116 analysts)
Share Structure
Outstanding 1,054,000,000.00
Float 1,051,712,820.00
Free Float 99.8%
High free float — 99.8% of shares trade freely, ~0.2% held by insiders/institutions
Very liquid — most shares trade freely. Low insider ownership can mean less management alignment, but makes large position sizing straightforward.
Price History (1 Year)
Last updated: Jun 26, 2026 3:16am (1d ago)
Revenue & Net Income Trend
The directional story — useful even when net income is negative.
Last updated: Jun 26, 2026 3:16am (1d ago)
Revenue
The top line — total sales before any costs or taxes are subtracted. A measure of how much business the company is doing.
Net Income
The bottom line — profit left after subtracting all expenses, interest, and taxes from revenue. Reflects accounting profitability, but includes non-cash items like depreciation, so it isn't the same as cash earned.
Operating Cash Flow
The real cash generated by the day-to-day business — selling products, paying suppliers, collecting from customers. Calculated from net income by adding back non-cash items and adjusting for timing (unpaid bills, unsold inventory). When OCF consistently lags net income, the reported profit may not be converting to real money.
Period Revenue Net Income Net Margin YoY/QoQ
Key Metrics
API Direct from provider CALC Derived from statements
Industry comparison last run: Jun 26, 2026 3:15am
P/E Ratio (Price per dollar of earnings)
API
Stock Price / EPS (Diluted)
22.01
Stock Price: $204.90
EPS (Diluted): 5.06
P/B Ratio (Price vs net asset value)
API
Stock Price / Book Value Per Share
8.54
Stock Price: $204.90
Total Equity: $21.21B
Shares: 1,105,000,000
EV/EBITDA (Total value vs operating profit)
API
Enterprise Value / EBITDA
15.93
Market Cap: $215.96B
Total Debt: $15.64B
Cash: $7.84B
EBITDA: $14.93B
Enterprise Value (Takeover price (cap + debt - cash))
API
Market Cap + Total Debt - Cash
$189.7B
Market Cap: $215.96B
Total Debt: $15.64B
Cash: $7.84B
Gross Margin (Revenue left after direct costs)
API
Gross Profit / Revenue
55.4%
Gross Profit: $24.55B
Revenue: $44.28B
Operating Margin (Revenue left after all operations)
API
Operating Income / Revenue
27.9%
Operating Income: $12.36B
Revenue: $44.28B
Net Margin (Revenue left as actual profit)
API
Net Income / Revenue
12.5%
Net Income: $5.54B
Revenue: $44.28B
ROE (Profit from shareholder equity)
API
Net Income / Total Equity
40.2%
Net Income: $5.54B
Total Equity: $21.21B
ROIC (Profit from all invested capital)
API
NOPAT / Invested Capital
20.1%
Operating Income: $12.36B
Tax Rate: 56.2%
Equity: $21.21B
Total Debt: $15.64B
Cash: $7.84B
Current Ratio (Can it pay short-term bills)
API
Current Assets / Current Liabilities
2.82
Current Assets: $25.75B
Current Liabilities: $9.14B
Debt/Equity (Leverage — debt vs equity)
CALC
Total Debt / Total Equity
0.74
Short-Term Debt: $102.00M
Long-Term Debt: $15.54B
Total Debt: $15.64B
Total Equity: $21.21B
Rev/Share (Top-line per share)
CALC
Revenue / Shares Outstanding
$40.08
Revenue: $44.28B
Shares: 1,105,000,000
Book Value/Share (Net assets per share)
CALC
(Total Assets - Total Liabilities) / Shares
$19.19
Total Equity: $21.21B
Shares: 1,105,000,000
FCF/Share (Real cash generated per share)
CALC
(Operating Cash Flow + CapEx) / Shares
$11.60
Operating CF: $14.01B
CapEx: -$1.19B
Shares: 1,105,000,000
CapEx is negative (outflow) — added to OCF to get FCF
Div Yield (Annual income from holding)
API
Last Annual Dividend / Stock Price
2.1%
Last Dividend: N/A
Stock Price: $204.90
Payout Ratio (Earnings paid out as dividends)
Dividends Paid / Net Income
Dividends Paid: N/A
Net Income: $5.54B
Dividends paid not available in cash flow statement
Industry Benchmarks
Last run: Jun 26, 2026 3:15am
Compares QCOM against LLM-researched typical ranges for its industry. One research call per industry, cached indefinitely — every stock in the same industry reuses the same baseline.
Advanced Analysis Forensic deep-dive · three lenses
Three separate reads — Company Quality (is it a great business?), Valuation (is it mispriced?), and General Sentiment (how macro + narrative are pushing it), kept deliberately apart · 2026-06-26 03:25:12
Delvantic - Cairn AI
Quality at full price - starter now, scale on a dip 7/10
Strong business (quality 46) at a full price (value -27) but riding a live AI data-center narrative upgrade (sentiment +77) - own a starter here, save real ammo for sub-$165.
The cruxWhether the Investor Day AI data-center pivot with Meta and Microsoft converts into actual revenue toward the $15B target, or fades back into 'mature handset licensor' before the price catches down to fundamentals.
Forensic checks Derived mechanically from QCOM's filed financials — not from the AI lenses
Liquidity & RunwaySelf-Funding
DilutionShare Count Shrinking
Earnings QualityHigh Earnings Quality
The three lensesswitch a tab for its full read — score + evidence
Company Quality
+46
Strong
edge √Σ 134 · risk √Σ 87 · conf 8/10

Qualcomm is a mature, cash-generative semiconductor and IP-licensing business throwing off $12.82B FCF on $44.28B revenue in 2025, with gross margins steady in a 55-58% band and operating margins in the high 20s. Earnings integrity is clean: OCF/NI of 1.43x, accruals of -4.9% of assets, Beneish M of -3.26, and an Altman Z of 7.15 all point to real economics rather than accounting flattery. Capital allocation is shareholder-friendly: diluted shares fell from 1.15B to 1.11B over five years, and buybacks run nearly 2x SBC, so the 6.3% SBC/revenue is being more than soaked up.

Strengths 4
m80
High-quality cash generation
FCF grew from $8.65B (2021) to $12.82B (2025) with OCF/NI at 1.43x and accruals at -4.9% of assets - cash conversion is excellent and earnings look real.
m70
Per-share discipline
Diluted share count down ~1%/yr (1.15B to 1.11B) with buybacks at 192.8% of SBC - per-share value is being concentrated despite a 6.3% SBC/revenue load.
m60
Durable gross margin
GM% held in a tight 55.4-57.8% range across a cyclical revenue swing from $44.2B to $35.8B and back to $44.3B, consistent with pricing power from licensing plus differentiated silicon.
m55
Solvency comfortable
Altman Z 7.15 and $12.48B liquid cash; despite -$3.17B net cash, $12.8B FCF easily services leverage - balance sheet is a constraint, not a threat.
Concerns 4
m55
2025 net income drop versus rising FCF
Net income fell to $5.54B in 2025 from $10.14B in 2024 even as revenue grew to $44.28B and FCF hit a record - implies a sizable non-cash or one-time charge (impairment, tax, or legal) that needs identification.
m50
Cyclical/customer concentration risk
Revenue swung -19% in 2023 ($44.2B to $35.8B) then back up - typical of handset-cycle exposure; OpM% collapsed from 35.9% to 21.7% in that downturn, showing meaningful operating deleverage.
m35
Insider sells, no buys
52 sells totaling $6.6M vs zero open-market buys over 12 months; magnitudes are small and look routine/comp-driven, but there is no insider conviction signal on the upside.
m30
License-renewal and litigation overhang implied by history
Qualcomm's economics historically hinge on QTL licensing terms with major OEMs; not visible in this data but a structural quality risk worth confirming.
This is a genuinely high-quality business - clean accruals, fat and steady gross margins, $12.8B of real cash flow, and management that actually shrinks the share count rather than letting SBC dilute holders. The blemishes are real but manageable: the business is cyclical (2023 showed how fast operating margin compresses), it leans on a licensing model with concentrated customers, and the 2025 net income drop versus record FCF is an unexplained gap I want to dig into. I'd call it Strong rather than Fortress because the durability of the licensing moat depends on contracts and counterparties I can't see in this data, and the handset franchise faces a credible long-term customer-insourcing threat. Capital discipline and earnings integrity are unambiguously good.
Verify before trusting this (6)
  • What drove the 2025 net income decline to $5.54B despite revenue and FCF strength - look for impairments, tax true-ups, or legal charges in the 10-K.
  • Customer concentration disclosure (Apple, Samsung, Chinese OEMs) and status/expiry of key license agreements.
  • Apple modem in-housing timeline and current QCT revenue exposure to Apple.
  • Automotive and IoT segment growth rates and margins versus handset to gauge diversification progress.
  • Litigation reserves and any ongoing antitrust or licensing disputes.
  • Composition of $12.48B liquid cash vs gross debt schedule and maturities.
Valuation / Mispricing
-27
Fairly Valued
edge √Σ 25 · risk √Σ 52 · conf 6/10
Price $205 vs my deserved range ~$180-220; ~0-10% premium to midpoint - essentially fair, no margin of safety. attractive below $165.00

The e2e composite fair value of $62.47 (EPV-floor) implies -69% downside, which is almost certainly a method artifact: an EPV floor on a cyclical semi running a trough-ish 2025 will systematically understate a business throwing off $12.8B of FCF with licensing economics and an Android/AI-on-device option. I won't anchor on $63. On more reasonable inputs - ~$10-11 of normalized EPS, a 17-19x multiple appropriate for a cyclical-but-cash-generative chip franchise with quality score 46 - deserved value lands roughly $180-$220. At $205 the market is paying for the mature licensing cash cow plus a modest sliver of AI-phone/auto optionality, which is reasonable, not heroic. What's priced in: low-single-digit handset growth, auto/IoT scaling, continued buybacks shrinking the count, and the Apple modem relationship eventually tapering without a cliff. That is the consensus base case and it appears largely in the price. There is no obvious gap to exploit - quality is strong but you're paying full freight for it, and the earnings-quality is clean so no haircut is warranted. Bottom line: not rich enough to short the narrative, not cheap enough to underwrite. Fairly valued with cyclical risk skewing the asymmetry slightly to the downside.

Cheap signals 2
m20
Buybacks quietly compounding per-share value
Management is actually shrinking the count rather than papering over SBC, which raises deserved per-share value modestly versus a static model.
m15
High earnings quality - no haircut
Clean accruals and $12.8B real FCF mean reported earnings deserve full credit, supporting the higher end of the deserved range.
Rich / priced-in 3
m35
No margin of safety at full multiple
At ~19-20x trailing EPS the stock prices in continued execution on auto/IoT/AI-phone narrative; any handset cycle wobble or Apple modem step-down compresses both numerator and multiple.
m25
Composite FV $63 implies extreme overvaluation but is unreliable
The EPV-floor anchor of $62.47 ignores licensing durability and diversification optionality; I discount the -69% upside number heavily, but the fact that even generous DCFs struggle to clear $205 is a yellow flag.
m30
Cyclical trough risk not in the price
2023 showed how quickly operating margin compresses in a handset downturn; at $205 you're paying mid-cycle multiples on potentially mid-cycle earnings.
Fully valued, full stop. I don't believe the $63 fair value - that's an EPV floor doing what EPV floors do to cyclicals with optionality - but I also can't get to a deserved price meaningfully above $205 without leaning on the AI-phone narrative the bears are right to question. Strong business, clean books, disciplined capital return, but I'm paying for all of it. I'd need this ~20% lower (sub-$165) before the risk/reward shifts in my favor, ideally on a handset cycle scare that doesn't break the licensing thesis.
Verify before trusting this (4)
  • Apple internal modem transition timeline and revenue contribution glide path
  • Automotive segment run-rate and design-win backlog conversion
  • Licensing (QTL) renewal cadence with Chinese OEMs and royalty rate stability
  • Normalized through-cycle operating margin vs current quarter
General Sentiment
+77
Strong Tailwind
tail √Σ 133 · head √Σ 56 · conf 8/10

The non-fundamental pressure on QCOM right now is decisively positive and idiosyncratic. Investor Day just rewrote the story from 'mature smartphone licensing cash cow' to 'AI data-center growth engine' with Meta and Microsoft as named customers and a 15B revenue target. That is the exact narrative upgrade the bull case needed, and the tape responded with a 4%+ pop on the day plus a wave of supportive coverage ('next big growth engine', 'multibillion-dollar data center plan'). Analyst tone is backward-looking and lukewarm (Hold, 34 holds vs 30 buys, target only 216), but 11 revisions this month at an average 227 show the sell side is chasing - a classic bullish divergence between stale consensus and a live, strengthening narrative. Macro is a mild offset, not a killer. The tape is neutral with VIX 18.9 and S&P only 3.3% off highs; the bigger risk is the overnight Asia headline about traders locking in AI gains, which at beta 1.6 means QCOM will feel any AI-cohort profit-taking harder than the index. But QCOM is now early in its AI re-rating, not late, so it screens as a rotation beneficiary within the AI trade rather than a crowded long. Net: narrative momentum and news flow dominate; macro is a minor headwind that only matters for sizing, not direction.

Tailwinds 4
m88
Narrative pivot to AI data center
Investor Day reframed QCOM from handset licensor to AI compute player with a 15B target and Meta + Microsoft as anchor customers. This is the single biggest non-fundamental force on the stock and it is fresh, not priced in over years.
m70
Hyperscaler validation breaks the 'just phones' frame
Two Mag-7 names publicly on board gives the story credibility the bear case (Apple/Samsung steal margin, NVDA owns AI) cannot easily rebut in the short term. Cult coefficient on AI names rewards exactly this kind of validation.
m55
Analyst revisions running ahead of stale consensus
11 revisions this month averaging 227 vs a 216 consensus and Hold rating signals upgrade pressure building. Backward-looking tone is a contrarian tailwind here.
m45
Momentum confirmation
Recent 17.8% earnings gap plus today's 4%+ pop shows the tape is willing to pay up for the new story. Positive price action begets positive flow in narrative-driven names.
Headwinds 3
m40
AI profit-taking risk with beta 1.6
Asia overnight sold AI winners to lock in gains; if that rotation hits the US tape, QCOM's 1.6 beta and now-AI-coded identity make it a target for fast-money de-risking even though the company-specific story is intact.
m30
Macro backdrop slightly hostile
10y at 4.4% and stretched market PE pressure all high-multiple growth stories. The 225% premium to fundamentals the bear case flags becomes more vulnerable in any risk-off spasm.
m25
Narrative durability is only moderate
Platform-monopoly archetype is strong but AI data center pivot is unproven execution; any slip in hitting milestones could flip the story fast given the cult is only medium, not high.
Net read: this is a clear tailwind setup. QCOM just executed the narrative upgrade that bulls needed - from mature licensing tax to credible AI compute story with named hyperscaler customers - and the analyst community is visibly behind the curve with stale Holds and rising targets. The macro tape is neutral and the AI-cohort profit-taking risk is real given beta 1.6, but those are sizing concerns, not direction concerns. Until the data-center story gets a concrete miss or NVDA-led AI rotation breaks, the non-fundamental pressure on this name is firmly to the upside.
Verify before trusting this (5)
  • Whether the Asia AI profit-taking spreads into US AI semis in the next 1-2 sessions
  • Speed and magnitude of analyst upgrades to Buy following Investor Day
  • Any follow-on hyperscaler customer announcements that harden the 15B target
  • NVDA tape action as a proxy for AI-cohort sentiment
  • Whether smartphone unit commentary stays neutral or deteriorates and steals the spotlight
The market-wide tape + this name's exposure to it (beta / sector / narrative durability). Context on the non-fundamental pressure — not a call on the business or the price. processId: detail-general-sentiment
Please log in to view trade setups
The Augustus trade-setup read is a members feature.
Log in
Three lenses kept deliberately separate — Company Quality (price-agnostic), Valuation (price-conditional), and General Sentiment (non-fundamental macro/narrative pressure). The scores are not blended. Filing-level items (convertibles, lock-ups, customer concentration) are v2 — see each lens's "verify."
Deep Analysis
Last run: Jun 26, 2026 3:18:10 am

Pre-flight intelligence scans the company first, then routes to the right analytical methods.

0 Company Classification — What type of company is this?
1 Industry Landscape — Where is the industry headed?
2 Company Momentum — Where is this company trending?
3 Forward Projection — 1Y & 2Y projected metrics (requires Layer 1 + 2)
4a DCF Valuation — Present value of future cash flows
4b Earnings Power Value — Floor value — worth with zero growth
4c Anchored PE — Industry PE adjusted for growth differential
4d Reverse DCF — What growth is the market pricing in?
4e Revenue-Based DCF — For growth/narrative companies (skip if mature earner)
Not applicable for Mature Earner companies
4f Anchored P/S — Price-to-Sales peer comparison (skip if mature earner)
Not applicable for Mature Earner companies
4g Scenario Analysis — Bull / Base / Bear (skip if mature earner)
Not applicable for Mature Earner companies
4h Dividend Discount Model — For dividend/income stocks only
Not applicable for Mature Earner companies
4i Book Value Analysis — For deep value / turnaround stocks only
Not applicable for Mature Earner companies
4j Insider Activity — Are insiders buying or selling?
4f Cash Flow Quality — How trustworthy is the FCF?
4g Debt Maturity Risk — Can it handle its debt?
4h Macro Environment — Rates, market valuation, volatility
4i Sector Intelligence — How does this company compare within its sector?
4j Revenue Confidence — How reliable is the growth projection?
4k Sensitivity Analysis — How fragile is the fair value estimate?
4l Sector Demand Cycle — Is the sector in a boom, steady state, or contraction?
5 AI Investigation — Adaptive research engine (Claude)
5b Thesis Evaluation — What does the market believe? (narrative/platform stocks only)
Not applicable for Mature Earner companies
6 Valuation Synthesis — Weighted verdict from all methods (requires Layer 4)
Income Statement (Annual)
Last updated: Jun 26, 2026 3:16am (1d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Revenue $33.6B $44.2B $35.8B $39.0B $44.3B
Cost of Revenue $14.3B $18.6B $15.9B $17.1B $19.7B
Gross Profit $19.3B $25.6B $20.0B $21.9B $24.5B
Operating Expenses $9.5B $9.7B $12.2B $11.8B $12.2B
Operating Income $9.8B $15.9B $7.8B $10.1B $12.4B
Net Income $9.0B $12.9B $7.2B $10.1B $5.5B
EBITDA $12.4B $17.3B $9.9B $12.7B $14.9B
EPS $8.00 $11.52 $6.47 $9.09 $5.06
EPS (Diluted)
Balance Sheet (Annual)
Last updated: Jun 26, 2026 3:12am (1d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Cash & Equivalents $7.1B $2.8B $8.5B $7.8B $7.8B
Total Current Assets $20.1B $20.7B $22.5B $25.2B $25.8B
Total Assets $41.2B $49.0B $51.0B $55.2B $50.1B
Current Liabilities $12.0B $11.9B $9.6B $10.5B $9.1B
Long-Term Debt $13.7B $13.5B $14.5B $13.3B $15.5B
Total Liabilities $31.3B $31.0B $29.5B $28.9B $28.9B
Total Equity $10.0B $18.0B $21.6B $26.3B $21.2B
Retained Earnings $9.8B $17.8B $20.7B $25.7B $20.6B
Cash Flow (Annual)
Last updated: Jun 22, 2026 3:04am (5d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Operating Cash Flow $10.5B $9.1B $11.3B $12.2B $14.0B
Capital Expenditure -$1.9B -$2.3B -$1.5B -$1.0B -$1.2B
Free Cash Flow $8.6B $6.8B $9.8B $11.2B $12.8B
Acquisitions (net) -$1.4B -$4.9B -$235.0M -$254.0M -$743.0M
Debt Repayment
Dividends Paid
Stock Buybacks -$3.4B -$3.1B -$3.0B -$4.1B -$8.8B
Net Change in Cash $409.0M -$4.0B $5.4B -$678.0M -$6.0M
Analyst Estimates (Annual)
Last updated: Jun 26, 2026 3:12am (1d ago)
Metric 2026 2027 2028 2029
Revenue $42.6B
$41.9B – $43.5B
$42.8B
$40.6B – $47.2B
$46.8B
$46.6B – $46.9B
$52.9B
$50.8B – $56.5B
EBITDA $14.5B
$14.3B – $14.8B
$14.6B
$13.8B – $16.1B
$15.9B
$15.9B – $16.0B
$18.0B
$17.3B – $19.2B
Net Income $12.1B
$11.6B – $12.6B
$12.2B
$10.6B – $13.7B
$10.3B
$10.3B – $15.3B
$16.1B
$15.2B – $17.5B
EPS
Growth Trends (YoY %)
Last updated: Jun 26, 2026 3:16am (1d ago)
Metric 2022 2023 2024 2025
Revenue Growth +31.7% -19.0% +8.8% +13.7%
Gross Profit Growth +32.4% -22.0% +9.8% +12.1%
Operating Income Growth +62.0% -50.9% +29.3% +22.7%
Net Income Growth +43.0% -44.1% +40.2% -45.4%
EBITDA Growth +38.9% -42.3% +28.1% +17.2%
Insider Trading (Recent)
Last updated: Jun 26, 2026 3:16am (1d ago)
Type codes PPurchase SSale AAward / grant MOption exercise FIn-kind (tax) CConversion GGift DReturn to issuer
All SEC Form 4 codes
Open market
P Purchase
Open-market or private purchase of shares.
S Sale
Open-market or private sale of shares.
Compensation (Rule 16b-3)
A Award / grant
Grant or award of securities (RSUs, options, etc.) under Rule 16b-3.
D Return to issuer
Securities disposed back to the company under Rule 16b-3.
F In-kind (tax)
Shares withheld or delivered to pay the option-exercise price or tax — not an open-market sale.
I Discretionary
Discretionary transaction under an employee plan — Rule 16b-3(f).
M Option exercise
Exercise or conversion of a derivative (option/RSU) into shares — exempt.
Derivatives
C Conversion
Conversion of a derivative security into the underlying shares.
E Short expiration
Expiration of a short derivative position.
H Long expiration
Expiration or cancellation of a long derivative position with value received.
O OTM exercise
Exercise of an out-of-the-money derivative.
X ITM exercise
Exercise of an in-the-money or at-the-money derivative.
Other exempt
G Gift
Bona fide gift of securities.
L Small acquisition
Small acquisition under Rule 16a-6.
W Inheritance
Acquisition or disposition by will or the laws of descent.
Z Voting trust
Deposit into or withdrawal from a voting trust.
Other
J Other
Other acquisition or disposition (explained in a Form 4 footnote).
K Equity swap
Transaction in an equity swap or similar instrument.
U Tender / buyout
Disposition via tender of shares in a change-of-control transaction.

Compensation-plan codes (A, D, F, M) are routine and rarely directional. Open-market P (buy) and S (sale) carry the most signal.

Date Insider Type Shares Price Value
2026-06-11 Palkhiwala Akash J. S-Sale 294.00 $193.81 $56,979
2026-06-11 Palkhiwala Akash J. S-Sale 750.00 $194.65 $145,989
2026-06-11 Palkhiwala Akash J. S-Sale 343.00 $195.48 $67,051
2026-06-11 Palkhiwala Akash J. S-Sale 48.00 $196.43 $9,428
2026-06-11 Palkhiwala Akash J. S-Sale 120.00 $197.78 $23,733
2026-06-11 Palkhiwala Akash J. S-Sale 102.00 $198.54 $20,251
2026-06-11 Palkhiwala Akash J. S-Sale 177.00 $199.71 $35,348
2026-06-11 Palkhiwala Akash J. S-Sale 180.00 $200.54 $36,097
2026-06-11 Palkhiwala Akash J. S-Sale 108.00 $201.69 $21,783
2026-06-11 Palkhiwala Akash J. S-Sale 215.00 $202.75 $43,591
2026-06-11 Palkhiwala Akash J. S-Sale 163.00 $203.25 $33,130
2026-05-20 Grech Patricia Y M-Exempt 44.53 $0.00 $0
2026-05-20 Grech Patricia Y M-Exempt 314.72 $0.00 $0
2026-05-20 Grech Patricia Y M-Exempt 316.50 $0.00 $0
2026-05-20 Grech Patricia Y M-Exempt 171.02 $0.00 $0
2026-05-20 Grech Patricia Y M-Exempt 314.00 $0.00 $0
2026-05-20 Grech Patricia Y M-Exempt 171.00 $0.00 $0
2026-05-20 Grech Patricia Y M-Exempt 424.89 $0.00 $0
2026-05-20 Grech Patricia Y F-InKind 440.00 $202.51 $89,104
2026-05-20 Grech Patricia Y M-Exempt 44.00 $0.00 $0
Dividend History (Last 20)
Last updated: Jun 20, 2026 1:35am (7d ago)
Date Dividend Declaration Record Payment
2026-06-04 $0.92 2026-04-01 2026-06-04 2026-06-25
2026-03-05 $0.89 2026-01-12 2026-03-05 2026-03-26
2025-12-04 $0.89 2025-10-06 2025-12-04 2025-12-18
2025-09-04 $0.89 2025-07-07 2025-09-04 2025-09-25
2025-06-05 $0.89 2025-04-09 2025-06-05 2025-06-26
2025-03-06 $0.85 2025-01-17 2025-03-06 2025-03-27
2024-12-05 $0.85 2024-10-07 2024-12-05 2024-12-19
2024-09-05 $0.85 2024-07-17 2024-09-05 2024-09-26
2024-05-30 $0.85 2024-04-12 2024-05-30 2024-06-20
2024-02-28 $0.80 2024-01-19 2024-02-29 2024-03-21
2023-11-29 $0.80 2023-10-13 2023-11-30 2023-12-14
2023-08-30 $0.80 2023-07-14 2023-08-31 2023-09-21
2023-05-31 $0.80 2023-04-12 2023-06-01 2023-06-22
2023-03-01 $0.75 2023-01-18 2023-03-02 2023-03-23
2022-11-30 $0.75 2022-10-14 2022-12-01 2022-12-15
2022-08-31 $0.75 2022-07-15 2022-09-01 2022-09-22
2022-06-01 $0.75 2022-04-13 2022-06-02 2022-06-23
2022-03-02 $0.75 2022-01-18 2022-03-03 2022-03-24
2021-12-01 $0.68 2021-10-13 2021-12-02 2021-12-16
2021-09-01 $0.68 2021-07-14 2021-09-02 2021-09-23
Narrative Economics
The story the market is telling about this stock — the intangible X-factor (founder mythology, cult dynamics, TAM-of-imagination) that moves price beyond what cash flows alone explain. After Shiller, Narrative Economics.
No narrative profile yet for QCOM — it's generated by the pipeline (market-narrative step).
Delvantic AI Findings
Independent analyst synthesis · Delvantic - Cairn AI · generated 2026-06-26 03:18:47
Reviews the pipeline's own verdicts
Verdict Modestly overvalued, not catastrophically so — fair value $180-195 vs $205; the synthesis model's $63 anchor is a GAAP-noise artifact, real risk is Apple modem cliff in FY27, not bubble valuation.

Looking at the raw quarterly tape first: QCOM ran $9.39B → $11.67B revenue from mid-2024 through year-end, then plateaued in the $10.4-12.3B range. The most recent quarter (March 2026) shows $10.60B revenue with a $7.37B net income and 69.5% margin — that is not an operating reality, that is a one-time gain (likely a tax benefit, legal settlement, or divestiture mark). Strip it out and underlying NI is probably $2.5-3.0B, consistent with the prior four quarters. The Sept 2025 quarter posted a $3.12B *loss* on $11.27B revenue — again, a charge (impairment or litigation), because surrounding quarters print ~25% net margins. So the "real" run-rate is roughly $44-46B revenue and $11-13B normalized NI. At $216B market cap, that's ~17-19x normalized earnings, not the 22x TTM headline. Annual FY25 NI of $5.54B vs FY24's $10.14B confirms a sizable non-cash hit landed in fiscal 2025.

The synthesis verdict of $63 fair value vs $205 — a 69% overvaluation call — is, frankly, indefensible as written. $12.8B in FCF on a $216B market cap is a 5.9% FCF yield; this is not a stock priced for hypergrowth. If you DCF $12-13B FCF growing at 4-5% with a 9% discount rate, you get something north of $150, not $63. The narrative model parrots the same $63 anchor and then constructs a "225% premium = pure AI speculation" story to rationalize it. That's backwards reasoning from a broken model output. I suspect the DCF is choking on the FY25 GAAP NI collapse and extrapolating it. The pre-flight and market-forces takes are far more grounded: this is a hybrid licensing/chip business going through a diversification reset, fairly priced with optionality, not a 3x bubble.

The genuine bear case isn't valuation — it's Apple. Apple's C1 modem in the iPhone 16e and the path to full in-house modems by 2027 removes what has historically been ~20% of QCT revenue and a chunk of QTL royalties. MediaTek continues taking Android share at the low/mid end. Auto and IoT (combined ~$5B run-rate) are growing nicely but can't replace a $7-8B Apple hole on the timeline the market needs. The recent_earnings_yoy of -45.4% and decelerating quarterly trend are warning signs that the smartphone cycle peaked in late 2024. Revenue CAGR of 11.2% is flattered by the FY23 trough comp; FY22 revenue was $44.2B and FY25 is $44.3B — three years of zero organic growth in the actual business. That's the contrarian read: not overvaluation, but stagnation dressed up as cyclicality.

Insider activity is noise — small share counts, no buying, no large sales. Macro headwinds and lagging sector peers signal correctly: QCOM trades at ~17x normalized earnings while NVDA, AVGO, and even AMD command 25-40x because they own the AI compute narrative. QCOM's edge-AI story is real (Snapdragon X, on-device LLMs) but it's a 2027+ revenue event, and the market is rightly skeptical until it shows up in the print. I dissent strongly from the $63 synthesis fair value — that's a model artifact from the GAAP NI noise. I land closer to $180-195 fair value: roughly 15x normalized earnings of $12B, discounted for the Apple modem cliff and lack of organic growth, with a small premium for the licensing annuity. At $205, the stock is 5-10% above fair, not 225% above. The right action is hold/trim, not short, and certainly not "wait for a 70% drawdown to buy." The catalyst that matters is the FY27 guide once Apple modem impact is quantified; revisit then.

GPT Critique
Second-opinion review · gpt-4o · generated 2026-06-26 03:18:54
Reviews the Opus findings above
Verdict I agree with Opus — modestly overvalued at $204.90, fair value closer to $180-195. The $63 synthesis is an anomaly, but insider sales and stagnant growth warrant caution.

In reviewing Qualcomm’s financials, I see a company that has shown notable revenue stability, hovering consistently around the $10-12 billion range each quarter. The recent spike in net income to $7.37 billion with a margin of 69.5% in Q1 2026 appears anomalous, likely due to a one-time event rather than operational improvements. This aligns with Opus's assessment that the high net margin is not sustainable. The annual revenue for FY2025 was $44.28 billion, a marginal increase from FY2022, indicating stagnant growth in core operations. The cash flow remains robust, with a free cash flow of $12.82 billion, suggesting solid cash generation capability despite revenue stagnation. Qualcomm's valuation ratios, notably a P/E of 22 and a price-to-sales of 4.09, suggest a mature company rather than one in a hypergrowth phase, somewhat justifying the current price level given the sector's typical valuation metrics.

Opus argues that the synthesis model's $63 fair value is a GAAP-noise artifact, asserting that the real risk lies in Apple's potential modem shift. I concur with this view. The synthesis model likely overreacts to fiscal anomalies, such as the FY2025 net income dip, which can distort long-term valuation models. The market's skepticism about Qualcomm’s diversification into automotive and IoT is reasonable, given the slow materialization of these segments' revenues. I agree with Opus that Qualcomm's fair value is closer to $180-195, reflecting a more realistic assessment of its cash flow and earnings potential, and that the current market price is moderately overvalued.

Disagreeing with Opus, I find the insider activity potentially more telling than he suggests. While the transactions are small, the consistent pattern of sales could indicate insiders' lack of confidence in the stock's near-term prospects, especially in the face of macro headwinds and competitive pressures. Additionally, while Opus downplays the $63 valuation as a model error, I believe it serves as a cautionary signal about investor expectations being overly buoyant, especially in judging Qualcomm's AI and automotive ambitions.

A careful skeptic might argue that both our analyses overly discount Qualcomm's potential for a successful pivot to AI and automotive markets. They could posit that the company’s foundational IP positions it uniquely to capitalize on emerging trends, justifying a premium valuation. However, such a view must contend with the lack of substantial revenue growth evidence from these segments thus far and the formidable competition in AI chipmaking.

Community AI Feedback
No community reviews yet for QCOM. Be the first — hit How to Contribute, have any AI review this page, and paste its take back here.
My Notes personal — only you see this
Data via Financial Modeling Prep · Cached for performance · fmp
v1.1.352 · d1100787 · 2026-06-26 11:39:30