Skip to main content
Homepage
Full 18-step deep-dive · ~20–30 min · a member feature.
FRESH Analysis Report
Aug 5, 2026
4 days ago · 100% complete
For AI assistants & researchers — machine-readable summary of this page

What this page is: Delvantic's full research page for Shopify Inc. (SHOP) — AI-driven forensic equity research: mechanical valuation models (DCF, EPV, anchored-PE, scenario) plus three independent AI lenses (Quality / Value / Sentiment). Everything below is rendered server-side; you are not missing content that requires JavaScript. All scores are predictions and research opinions, not financial advice.

Our current read (analysis of 2026-08-09): Designation Watch · Cairn score -11 (−100…+100 Quality+Value blend) · Quality 70 · Value -78 · Sentiment 41 (timing only, not weighted) · Composite fair value $20.37 vs $123.30 at analysis

Page map (sections in order; each card carries a stable reference-name attribute you can cite):

  • profile-header / price-overview — company profile, live quote, market cap
  • extended-analysisthe core: three AI lens reads with findings, scores, and the analyst memo
  • future-predictions — our forward price-band predictions
  • market-narrative / ai-findings / gpt-critique — narrative context, cross-model findings, and an adversarial critique of our own analysis (near the end of the document)
  • Members-only sections (render as login gates for anonymous readers): price-history, income-trend, key-metrics, financials (statement tables), insider-trading. The analysis above is public; the raw data tables require a free account.

More for machine readers: site briefing at /llms.txt · any ticker resolves at delvantic.com/stock/TICKER · raw inputs are public-company filings and market data (via licensed data feeds); every model, score, lens read, and prediction on this page is Delvantic's own analysis.

Shopify Inc.

SHOP NASDAQ GICS Category PDF
Technology · Software - Application
Ottawa, ON K2P 2L8, Canada shopify.com Updated Aug 5, 12:31am
Price
$123.30
Market Cap
$160.0B
Employees
7,600
Beta
2.59
Avg Volume
8,667,896
CEO
Mr. Tobias Lutke

Shopify Inc. is a global commerce technology company that provides cloud-based tools for businesses to create, manage, and scale online and offline retail operations. Its core offering is an e-commerce platform that enables merchants to build customizable online stores and sell across multiple channels, including branded websites, mobile apps, physical retail locations, social media platforms, and online marketplaces. Shopify’s subscription solutions give merchants access to store design, content management, inventory tracking, and analytics, while its merchant solutions layer on integrated payments, shipping, financing, and point-of-sale capabilities. These services support small and medium-sized businesses as well as larger brands seeking a unified commerce infrastructure. By consolidating key retail functions into a single platform, Shopify Inc. plays a significant role in the digital commerce ecosystem, helping merchants manage operations, accept payments, and reach customers globally from one centralized environment. The company was founded in 2004 and is headquartered in Ottawa, Canada.

Runs with full report Generated: Aug 5, 2026 12:45am
Earnings Schedule
Checked daily · calendar updated Aug 9
No upcoming print on the calendar yet — companies typically confirm a few weeks ahead. Last print was Aug 5, 2026.
EPS surprise history — vs analyst consensus · 5 prints of vendor history
+5.4%
Jan '26
-5.9%
Feb '26
+9.1%
May '26
-150.0%
Jul '26
+5.0%
Aug '26
Print date EPS est. EPS actual Revenue est. Revenue actual
Aug 5, 2026 $0.40 $0.42 +5.0%
Jul 9, 2026 $0.04 $-0.02 -150.0%
May 5, 2026 $0.33 $0.36 +9.1%
Feb 11, 2026 $0.51 $0.48 -5.9%
Jan 15, 2026 $2.98 $3.14 +5.4%

Green = beat the estimate, red = missed. An earnings print is the fastest way a thesis changes — our designations should be re-read after each one.

Recent SEC Filings
Filed Form Document
Aug 7, 2026 144 View
Aug 6, 2026 144 View
Aug 5, 2026 144 View
Aug 5, 2026 10-Q View
Aug 5, 2026 8-K View
Jul 30, 2026 SCHEDULE 13G View
Jul 28, 2026 144 View
Jul 10, 2026 144 View
Jul 2, 2026 8-K View
Jun 30, 2026 144 View
Jun 22, 2026 144 View
Jun 22, 2026 144 View

Filings link to the SEC’s EDGAR system. Annual/quarterly reports (10-K, 10-Q, 20-F) carry the full story; 8-K/6-K current reports are the fastest signal that something material happened.

Price Overview
Price at report time
$123.30
as of Aug 5, 1:16am (4d ago)
Change · Aug 5
+6.29 (+5.38%)
Day Range
$117.60 – $123.68
52-Week Range
$94.00 – $182.19
50-Day MA
$116.68
200-Day MA
$132.82
Volume
20,781,169.00
Right now · live
loading…
 
Real-time — the change above is the move since the report (over 4d).
Share Structure
Outstanding 1,300,779,030.00
Float 1,216,979,423.00
Free Float 93.6%
High free float — 93.6% of shares trade freely, ~6.4% held by insiders/institutions
Very liquid — most shares trade freely. Low insider ownership can mean less management alignment, but makes large position sizing straightforward.
Price History (1 Year)
Last updated: Aug 5, 2026 1:16am (4d ago)
Revenue & Net Income Trend
The directional story — useful even when net income is negative.
Last updated: Aug 1, 2026 4:42pm (7d ago)
Revenue
The top line — total sales before any costs or taxes are subtracted. A measure of how much business the company is doing.
Net Income
The bottom line — profit left after subtracting all expenses, interest, and taxes from revenue. Reflects accounting profitability, but includes non-cash items like depreciation, so it isn't the same as cash earned.
Operating Cash Flow
The real cash generated by the day-to-day business — selling products, paying suppliers, collecting from customers. Calculated from net income by adding back non-cash items and adjusting for timing (unpaid bills, unsold inventory). When OCF consistently lags net income, the reported profit may not be converting to real money.
Period Revenue Net Income Net Margin YoY/QoQ
Key Metrics
TD Twelve Data statement HEX SEC filing
Industry comparison last run: Aug 5, 2026 12:42am
P/E Ratio (Price per dollar of earnings)
HEX
Stock Price / EPS (Diluted)
131.17
Stock Price: $123.30
EPS (Diluted): 0.94
P/B Ratio (Price vs net asset value)
HEX
Stock Price / Book Value Per Share
11.94
Stock Price: $123.30
Total Equity: $13.47B
Shares: 1,304,953,255
EV/EBITDA (Total value vs operating profit)
HEX
Enterprise Value / EBITDA
106.18
Market Cap: $160.00B
Total Debt: $0.00
Cash: $1.55B
EBITDA: $1.50B
Enterprise Value (Takeover price (cap + debt - cash))
HEX
Market Cap + Total Debt - Cash
$159.2B
Market Cap: $160.00B
Total Debt: $0.00
Cash: $1.55B
Gross Margin (Revenue left after direct costs)
HEX
Gross Profit / Revenue
48.1%
Gross Profit: $5.56B
Revenue: $11.56B
Operating Margin (Revenue left after all operations)
HEX
Operating Income / Revenue
12.7%
Operating Income: $1.47B
Revenue: $11.56B
Net Margin (Revenue left as actual profit)
HEX
Net Income / Revenue
10.7%
Net Income: $1.23B
Revenue: $11.56B
ROE (Profit from shareholder equity)
HEX
Net Income / Total Equity
9.1%
Net Income: $1.23B
Total Equity: $13.47B
ROIC (Profit from all invested capital)
HEX
NOPAT / Invested Capital
10.0%
Operating Income: $1.47B
Tax Rate: 18.4%
Equity: $13.47B
Total Debt: $0.00
Cash: $1.55B
Zero debt — invested capital = equity minus cash (very efficient)
Current Ratio (Can it pay short-term bills)
HEX
Current Assets / Current Liabilities
5.96
Current Assets: $8.30B
Current Liabilities: $1.39B
Debt/Equity (Leverage — debt vs equity)
HEX
Total Debt / Total Equity
0.00
Short-Term Debt: $0.00
Long-Term Debt: $0.00
Total Debt: $0.00
Total Equity: $13.47B
Zero debt — this company carries no debt obligations. Strongest possible score.
Rev/Share (Top-line per share)
HEX
Revenue / Shares Outstanding
$8.86
Revenue: $11.56B
Shares: 1,304,953,255
Book Value/Share (Net assets per share)
HEX
(Total Assets - Total Liabilities) / Shares
$10.32
Total Equity: $13.47B
Shares: 1,304,953,255
FCF/Share (Real cash generated per share)
HEX
(Operating Cash Flow + CapEx) / Shares
$1.54
Operating CF: $2.03B
CapEx: -$26.00M
Shares: 1,304,953,255
CapEx is negative (outflow) — added to OCF to get FCF
Div Yield (Annual income from holding)
TD
Last Annual Dividend / Stock Price
Last Dividend: $0.00
Stock Price: $123.30
Payout Ratio (Earnings paid out as dividends)
HEX
Dividends Paid / Net Income
Dividends Paid: N/A
Net Income: $1.23B
Dividends paid not available in cash flow statement
Industry Benchmarks
Last run: Aug 5, 2026 12:42am
Compares SHOP against LLM-researched typical ranges for its industry. One research call per industry, cached indefinitely — every stock in the same industry reuses the same baseline.
Income Statement (Annual)
Last updated: Aug 1, 2026 4:42pm (7d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Revenue $5.6B $7.1B $8.9B $11.6B
Cost of Revenue $2.1B $2.8B $3.5B $4.4B $6.0B
Gross Profit $2.5B $2.8B $3.5B $4.5B $5.6B
Operating Expenses $2.2B $3.6B $4.9B $3.4B $4.1B
Operating Income $268.6M -$822.0M -$1.4B $1.1B $1.5B
Net Income $2.9B -$3.5B $132.0M $2.0B $1.2B
EBITDA $335.0M -$729.0M -$1.3B $1.1B $1.5B
EPS $2.34 $-2.73 $0.10 $1.57 $0.95
EPS (Diluted) $2.29 $-2.73 $0.10 $1.55 $0.94
Balance Sheet (Annual)
Last updated: Aug 1, 2026 12:03am (8d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Cash & Equivalents $2.5B $1.6B $1.4B $1.5B $1.5B
Total Current Assets $8.5B $6.1B $6.3B $7.3B $8.3B
Total Assets $13.3B $10.8B $11.3B $13.9B $15.2B
Current Liabilities $702.7M $856.0M $898.0M $2.0B $1.4B
Long-Term Debt
Total Liabilities $2.2B $2.5B $2.2B $2.4B $1.7B
Total Equity $11.1B $8.2B $9.1B $11.6B $13.5B
Retained Earnings $2.9B -$522.0M -$390.0M $1.6B $2.9B
Cash Flow (Annual)
Last updated: Aug 1, 2026 12:03am (8d ago)
Metric 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Operating Cash Flow $504.4M -$136.0M $944.0M $1.6B $2.0B
Capital Expenditure -$50.8M -$50.0M -$39.0M -$19.0M -$26.0M
Free Cash Flow $453.6M -$186.0M $905.0M $1.6B $2.0B
Acquisitions (net) -$59.6M -$1.8B -$31.0M -$30.0M -$56.0M
Net Debt Issued / (Repaid)
Dividends Paid
Stock Buybacks
Net Change in Cash -$200.6M -$854.0M -$236.0M $85.0M $47.0M
Growth Trends (YoY %)
Last updated: Aug 1, 2026 4:42pm (7d ago)
Metric 2022 2023 2024 2025
Revenue Growth +26.1% +25.8% +30.1%
Gross Profit Growth +11.0% +27.6% +27.2% +24.2%
Operating Income Growth -406.0% -72.5% +175.8% +36.6%
Net Income Growth -218.7% +103.8% +1,429.5% -39.0%
EBITDA Growth -317.6% -84.9% +182.4% +34.9%
Deep Analysis
Last run: Aug 5, 2026 1:00:22 am

Pre-flight intelligence scans the company first, then routes to the right analytical methods.

0 Company Classification — What type of company is this?
1 Industry Landscape — Where is the industry headed?
2 Company Momentum — Where is this company trending?
3 Forward Projection — 1Y & 2Y projected metrics (requires Layer 1 + 2)
4a DCF Valuation — Present value of future cash flows
4b Earnings Power Value — Floor value — worth with zero growth
4c Anchored PE — Industry PE adjusted for growth differential
4d Reverse DCF — What growth is the market pricing in?
4e Revenue-Based DCF — For growth/narrative companies (skip if mature earner)
Not applicable for High Growth Profitable companies
4f Anchored P/S — Price-to-Sales peer comparison (skip if mature earner)
Not applicable for High Growth Profitable companies
4g Scenario Analysis — Bull / Base / Bear (skip if mature earner)
Not applicable for High Growth Profitable companies
4h Dividend Discount Model — For dividend/income stocks only
Not applicable for High Growth Profitable companies
4i Book Value Analysis — For deep value / turnaround stocks only
Not applicable for High Growth Profitable companies
4j Insider Activity — Are insiders buying or selling?
4f Cash Flow Quality — How trustworthy is the FCF?
4g Debt Maturity Risk — Can it handle its debt?
4h Macro Environment — Rates, market valuation, volatility
4i Sector Intelligence — How does this company compare within its sector?
4j Revenue Confidence — How reliable is the growth projection?
4k Sensitivity Analysis — How fragile is the fair value estimate?
4l Sector Demand Cycle — Is the sector in a boom, steady state, or contraction?
5 AI Investigation — Adaptive research engine (Claude)
5b Thesis Evaluation — What does the market believe? (narrative/platform stocks only)
Not applicable for High Growth Profitable companies
6 Valuation Synthesis — Weighted verdict from all methods (requires Layer 4)
Narrative Economics
The story the market is telling about this stock — the intangible X-factor (founder mythology, cult dynamics, TAM-of-imagination) that moves price beyond what cash flows alone explain. After Shiller, Narrative Economics.
No narrative profile yet for SHOP — it's generated by the pipeline (market-narrative step).
Claude Reading
Independent analyst synthesis · claude-opus-4-7 · generated 2026-08-05 01:15:11
Verdict Overvalued but the synthesis $20 fair value is nonsense — real intrinsic value is ~$75-90; wait for $85 or a clean Q2 GMV acceleration before buying, and dissent from the "83% overvalued" framing.

Starting with the raw quarterly tape: revenue went $2.05B → $2.16B → $2.81B → $2.36B → $2.68B → $2.84B → $3.67B → $3.17B. The Q4'25 print of $3.67B into a Q1'26 of $3.17B is a normal seasonal step-down, and the YoY on Q1 ($3.17B vs $2.36B) is +34%, actually *accelerating* off the 30% trailing rate. But the net income line is a mess: -$682M, +$906M, +$264M, +$743M, -$581M. That volatility is almost certainly equity-investment mark-to-market (Affirm, Global-E, Klaviyo stakes) rather than operations — the annual op income of $1.47B on $11.56B revenue (12.7% op margin) is the honest number. FCF of $2.01B on $11.56B is a genuine 17.4% FCF margin, and capex of $26M is trivially light — this is a real capital-light software business, not a narrative stock. Balance sheet is pristine: $1.55B cash, zero debt, current ratio 5.96.

So the fundamentals are legitimately excellent — 28% revenue CAGR, 49% FCF CAGR, expanding operating margin, fortress balance sheet. The question is entirely price. At $123 and $160B market cap, EV/revenue is ~13.8x and P/FCF is ~80x on trailing $2.01B FCF. For that to work, FCF needs to compound at ~25-30% for 5+ years to grow into a reasonable 25-30x multiple. Is that plausible? Merchant Solutions take-rate expansion + payments attach + international + Shop Pay give a path, but the synthesis model's $20 fair value is absurd — that implies ~10x FCF for a business growing FCF ~50% with a net cash balance sheet. No mid-cycle software comp trades there. A more defensible DCF using 22% revenue growth tapering to 12%, expanding to 25% FCF margins, and a 10% discount rate gets you to roughly $70-85 fair value, not $20. The synthesis is anchored on a mechanical multiple contraction that ignores growth quality.

The prior models are internally contradictory and I side with the market-forces read over the synthesis. Pre-flight correctly identifies this as a scaled profitable platform, not a narrative stock — yet synthesis then applies what looks like a value-stock DCF and spits out an 83% overvaluation. Market Forces ("tailwinds but priced for perfection") and Thesis Evaluation (-8, essentially neutral) are the honest reads. The narrative layer's "498% premium is pure narrative" claim is overreach — it's conflating a legitimate growth premium with cult-stock froth. Cult coefficient "medium" contradicts "narrative intensity strong" and both feel dialed up; SHOP trades on merchant KPIs quarterly, not on Lutke tweets. The genuine bear case worth respecting is the Thesis Evaluation's top bear: Amazon Buy with Prime plus GMV normalization post-COVID. That's real, and consumer discretionary softness (macro headwinds flag) hits SMB GMV first.

The contrarian pushback on my own read: recent earnings YoY is -39%, quarterly revenue trend is flagged decelerating, and the Q1'26 -18% net margin — even if mark-to-market — signals equity-holdings risk that gets ignored in bull cases. The 2.59 beta means a 20% market drawdown mechanically prints $80 on SHOP regardless of fundamentals. ROE of 9.1% and ROIC of 10% are unimpressive for the multiple — much of the equity base is those volatile investment stakes rather than productive operating capital. And "high-growth profitable" at 12.7% GAAP op margin isn't the 30%+ op margin that peer platforms (ADBE, INTU) command at similar multiples — Shopify has to prove margin expansion is real and durable, not a 2024 one-off (op margin went from -20% in 2023 to 12% in 2025, which is stellar, but sustainability at scale is unproven). I dissent from synthesis's $20 but agree directionally with "overvalued" — fair value is meaningfully below $123, just not 83% below.

Net: I'd anchor fair value around $75-90 for a patient DCF, which makes $123 roughly 40-60% overvalued — a real premium, not a bubble. The stock is a high-quality compounder priced for perfection with a legitimate Amazon-competition overhang and a beta that will make any macro wobble punitive. Not a short (compounders kill shorts), not a buy here, and I'd want $85 or a growth re-acceleration proof-point before adding.

GPT Reading
Independent reading · gpt-5.4 · generated 2026-08-05 01:15:27
Verdict Overvalued at $123 — elite business, but the stock already prices in years of 25%+ growth and major margin expansion; fair value looks closer to $85-95.

What jumps out is that Shopify’s business is very good, but the stock is priced for a business even better than the one the financials currently show. Revenue has scaled from $7.06B in 2023 to $8.88B in 2024 and $11.56B in 2025, a two-year increase of 64%, while operating income swung from -$1.42B to +$1.08B to +$1.47B. That is real improvement, not accounting noise. Free cash flow at $2.01B on $11.56B of revenue is a 17.4% FCF margin, and the balance sheet is clean with no debt and a near-6x current ratio. This is not a fragile story stock. But at a $160B market cap, investors are paying about 79x trailing FCF, 13.9x sales, nearly 12x book, and 131x earnings for a company whose 2025 net margin was 10.7% and operating margin 12.7%. Those are healthy numbers, but not remotely the kind of margins that justify that multiple unless you assume years of sustained 25-30% growth plus major margin expansion.

The quarterly pattern reinforces that the valuation is leaning heavily on trajectory rather than current earning power. Revenue growth is strong: $2.05B in 2024 Q2 became $2.68B in 2025 Q2, and $2.16B in 2024 Q3 became $2.84B in 2025 Q3. But profitability is lumpy in a way that makes the headline P/E almost useless. Net income swung from -$682M in 2025 Q1 to +$906M in Q2, then +$264M in Q3, +$743M in Q4, then back to -$581M in 2026 Q1. Even if some of that reflects mark-to-market or non-core items, the core message is that this is not yet a steady high-margin software annuity. Gross margin was 48.1% in 2025, good but not elite SaaS; that fits a commerce infrastructure model increasingly driven by payments and merchant services rather than pure subscription software. Merchant-services-heavy models deserve growth premiums, but usually not “perfection” premiums, because payments revenue is lower-margin, more competitive, and more economically sensitive.

I also think some of the machine output is directionally right but excessively bearish on magnitude. A fair value in the low $20s is not credible against a company already doing $2.0B of annual FCF with no debt and still growing revenue around 30%. Even a demanding but sane framework—say 35-45x FCF or 8-10x sales for a category leader with this growth and balance sheet—gets you nowhere near $20. The issue is not that Shopify is a busted narrative; it’s that the market is capitalizing the next several years of execution in advance. To earn into $123, I think Shopify needs to show a path toward something like $18-20B of revenue with 20%+ operating margins, or at least $4-5B of annual FCF, within a reasonable medium-term window. That is possible, but far from assured. At today’s price, the upside seems to require near-flawless execution, while the downside only requires growth to normalize into the high teens with margins stuck around low teens.

The best case against my view is straightforward: Shopify has already crossed the hardest bridge, from subscale profits to meaningful cash generation, and the market is correctly looking through noisy GAAP earnings. Revenue growth of 30% on an $11.56B base is exceptional; very few software or platform companies can compound that fast at this scale while generating $2.03B of operating cash flow. If merchant attach keeps deepening, incremental revenue could carry much higher contribution margins than the historical blended numbers suggest. In that world, today’s 17% FCF margin is just a waypoint, not an endpoint, and the lack of debt gives management huge strategic flexibility. A bull can plausibly argue that 13.8x EV/revenue is expensive but not absurd for a dominant commerce platform still taking share, especially if the market is valuing it on 2027-2028 earnings power rather than 2025 earnings.

What would change my mind is evidence that the business is becoming both more durable and more profitable at the same time. Specifically, I’d want to see revenue growth stay above 25% while annual operating margin pushes from 12.7% toward 16-18% and FCF margin stays at or above the current 17% despite mix shifting toward merchant solutions. If Shopify can put up another year like 2025 but with revenue closer to $14B, operating income above $2.2B, and FCF above $2.8B, then the current multiple starts to look much more defensible. Conversely, if growth slips below 20% or quarterly losses keep recurring while the stock still trades around 12-14x sales, the compression risk is substantial.

Grok Reading
Independent reading · grok-4.5 · generated 2026-08-05 01:16:17
Verdict High-quality compounder but overvalued at $123; fair value closer to $80–95 on normalized 40–50× forward FCF

Shopify’s raw numbers describe a genuine compounding machine that has crossed into durable free-cash-flow generation, not a pre-profit story stock. Annual revenue hit $11.56B in 2025, up 30% from $8.88B, with the most recent quarter (ended March 2026) still printing $3.17B—34% year-over-year versus the $2.36B prior-year period. Free cash flow reached $2.01B on just $26M of capex, producing a 17% FCF margin and an operating cash flow conversion that is essentially 100%. Gross margin sits at 48% and operating margin at 12.7%; both are still modest for pure software but expanding as Merchant Solutions (payments, capital, logistics) take a larger share of GMV economics. The balance sheet is fortress-like: $1.55B cash, zero debt, current ratio near 6. Net income remains noisy—swinging from +$743M to –$581M across recent quarters—because of investment mark-to-market and stock-based items, so the clean $2B FCF number is the one that matters. At a $160B enterprise value this equates to roughly 14× sales and 80× trailing FCF. That is the price of perfection for a business whose Rule-of-40 score is solid (~47) but whose absolute margins and capital-light economics still lag elite SaaS peers.

The growth algorithm itself has not broken. Revenue CAGR over the visible window is 28%, recent year-over-year is 30%, and FCF has compounded at nearly 49%. The 2025 operating profit of $1.47B already shows operating leverage after the heavy investment years of 2022–23. Yet the market is capitalizing this trajectory as if 25–30% growth and several hundred basis points of further margin expansion are locked in for half a decade. A simple forward look—$15–16B revenue in 2026 at a mid-teens FCF margin—still leaves the stock at 50–60× forward cash flow. That multiple only works if Shopify becomes the default financial and logistics layer for a large slice of global retail GMV; anything short of that path produces multiple compression that overwhelms the earnings growth.

The strongest counter-argument is that the valuation models calling for a $20–21 fair value are mechanically broken and should be ignored. They appear to apply no-growth or low-terminal multiples to a franchise that is still taking share, expanding take rates, and converting nearly every incremental dollar of revenue into cash. Zero leverage, $2B of annual FCF that can be returned or reinvested at high incremental returns, and a still-fragmented SMB commerce market give the bull case real ballast. If payments penetration and Shopify Plus enterprise momentum continue, operating margins can credibly reach the high teens within two years, turning today’s 80× FCF into something closer to 35–40× on a 2027 basis—still expensive, but no longer absurd for a platform with network effects. The narrative of “infrastructure for the creator/SMB economy” retains cultural force and has repeatedly pulled the multiple higher after every prior growth scare.

What flips the view is concrete evidence on two axes: either GMV growth and take-rate expansion that keep revenue above 28% while operating margin clears 18% on a trailing basis (justifying a re-rating toward $140+), or a clear deceleration of revenue growth into the high teens accompanied by flattish margins (confirming the multiple should compress toward 8–10× sales and $70–85). The next two printings of Merchant Solutions mix, subscription ARPU, and FCF margin will decide which path is live.

Big-3 Panel — where each AI stands
Each AI above independently stated a direction (undervalued, fairly valued, or overvalued) and how strongly it believes it (conviction, 0–5). We combine those into a Bull-Bear Index on a 0–10 scale: 5 is neutral, 10 is maximum bullish (undervalued at full conviction), 0 is maximum bearish. We compute the score ourselves with the same arithmetic for every seat — the models never grade their own bullishness — so the three are directly comparable. Δ shows how far each seat sits from the panel average of 1.7; a large Δ marks the dissenting voice, usually the one worth reading.
Claude claude-opus-4-7 2.0
overvalued · conviction 3/5 · Δ +0.3 vs panel · self: 4.0
GPT gpt-5.4 1.0
overvalued · conviction 4/5 · Δ -0.7 vs panel · self: 3.0
Grok grok-4.5 2.0
overvalued · conviction 3/5 · Δ +0.3 vs panel · self: 3.0
No second round needed — Panel agreed within band (spread 0: Claude: overvalued · GPT: overvalued · Grok: overvalued) — second round not warranted
Advanced Analysis Forensic deep-dive · three lenses
Three separate reads — Company Quality (is it a great business?), Valuation (is it mispriced?), and General Sentiment (how macro + narrative are pushing it), kept deliberately apart · 2026-08-05 01:42:10
Delvantic - Cairn AI
Quality — wait for a dip 8/10
Great business at a rich price with a hot but fragile tailwind — this is a watchlist name, not a buy at $123.
The cruxWhether Q2 delivers enough GMV/margin acceleration to justify a priced-for-perfection multiple, or reveals the 2025 margin wobble was an early crack.
Forensic checks Derived mechanically from SHOP's filed financials — not from the AI lenses
Liquidity & RunwaySelf-Funding
DilutionStable Share Count
Earnings QualityHigh Earnings Quality
The three lensesswitch a tab for its full read — score + evidence
Company Quality
+70
Strong
edge √Σ 143 · risk √Σ 56 · conf 8/10

The trajectory is genuinely impressive: revenue scaled from $5.6B (2022) to $11.56B (2025), a ~2x in three years, while gross margin held steady around 48-50% and operating margin swung from -20.1% in 2023 to +12.7% in 2025. FCF followed the same arc: -$186M (2022) to +$2.01B (2025), and OCF/NI of 1.96x with accruals at -4.5% of assets says the earnings are backed by real cash, not accounting stretch. Beneish M of -2.19 and Altman Z of 57.83 corroborate clean quality. Balance sheet is a fortress: $5.78B net cash, zero net debt drag, and FCF alone funds the business. Dilution discipline is notable for a tech platform of this size: diluted shares moved from 1.27B to 1.30B over four years, a ~0.6% CAGR, so per-share value is not being quietly eroded by SBC. The 2021 net income of $2.91B is a legacy mark-to-market artifact (equity investment gains) rather than operating earnings, so the real operating turnaround is 2022-2025. What holds this back from a higher tier is durability evidence I cannot see in the data: gross margin actually ticked down from 50.4% to 48.1% in the most recent year, net income fell from $2.02B to $1.23B even as revenue grew, and moat/customer-concentration/take-rate dynamics are not in the raw numbers. The business is clearly healthy and improving, but the most recent year shows some margin give-back worth watching.

Strengths 4
m78
Operating leverage inflected hard
Operating margin went from -20.1% (2023) to +12.1% (2024) to +12.7% (2025) on revenue growing from $7.06B to $11.56B — real operating leverage, not a one-off.
m72
Cash conversion is real
FCF of $2.01B in 2025 vs net income of $1.23B (OCF/NI 1.96x, accruals -4.5% of assets) — earnings are backed by cash, not accruals.
m70
Fortress balance sheet
$5.78B liquid cash, $5.78B net cash, Altman Z of 57.83 — survival is a non-question and no external capital is needed.
m65
Dilution discipline unusual for tech at this scale
Diluted share CAGR of 0.6% (1.27B to 1.30B over four years) means per-share value is being protected despite heavy SBC-culture peers.
Concerns 3
m38
Net income declined YoY despite revenue growth
Net income fell from $2.02B (2024) to $1.23B (2025) even as revenue grew 30% — suggests either non-operating items reversing or rising costs; needs unpacking.
m32
Gross margin gave back ground
GM slipped from 50.4% (2024) to 48.1% (2025) — small but the wrong direction for a scaling platform and worth watching for mix or competitive pressure.
m25
SBC magnitude opaque here
SBC % of revenue shown as n/a; low share-count growth is reassuring but SBC could still be a large real expense masked by buybacks not visible in this data.
This is a genuinely good business that has earned its stripes over the last three years — the burn-to-cash-machine pivot is real, the balance sheet is untouchable, and management has not diluted shareholders to fund the growth, which is rare at this scale. What keeps me from grading it higher is the 2025 wobble: gross margin ticked down and net income fell despite big revenue growth, which could be nothing (mix, tax) or could be early evidence that the operating leverage story is bumpier than the headline suggests. I would want to see one more year of clean margin expansion before calling this a fortress. As a business state today: Strong, improving, with one yellow flag on the most recent print.
Verify before trusting this (5)
  • Actual SBC expense as % of revenue and how much buyback is absorbing dilution
  • Why net income fell from $2.02B to $1.23B while revenue grew 30% — non-operating items, tax, or opex?
  • Gross margin mix: Merchant Solutions vs Subscription Solutions and whether the 2025 GM dip is payments mix or pricing pressure
  • Merchant concentration and GMV retention cohorts — is the moat widening or just riding e-commerce tailwind?
  • Insider selling pace and 10b5-1 patterns from founder/CEO
Valuation / Mispricing
-78
Overvalued
edge √Σ 25 · risk √Σ 129 · conf 7/10
price $123 vs a generously quality-adjusted deserved value of roughly $50-$70 - a ~45-60% premium, not a bargain. attractive below $70.00

Price is $123.30 against an e2e composite fair value of $20.37 and a signal-adjusted $20.63, implying -83% downside. I discount the raw output - an EPV floor of $2.75 is clearly a runaway method for a growing, cash-generative platform and the DCF at $23.57 looks conservative on terminal assumptions. But even generously re-rating for the Strong quality grade, self-funded growth, fortress balance sheet, and payments/financing mix shift, a defensible deserved value lands somewhere in the $45-$70 range on realistic 20%+ FCF growth for a decade. That still leaves the market paying roughly 2x deserved value. What is priced in at $123 (~$160B market cap) is continued 20%+ top-line compounding, sustained take-rate expansion, and no meaningful margin compression from TikTok Shop, Amazon Buy with Prime, or SMB churn - a heroic bundle. The 2025 gross margin tick-down and net income decline despite revenue growth is exactly the kind of early crack that a priced-for-perfection multiple cannot absorb. Margin of safety is negative; this is a great business at a full-to-rich price, which is the textbook zero-edge setup.

Cheap signals 1
m25
Quality and balance sheet deserve a premium
Strong quality grade, self-funded FCF, minimal dilution, and fortress balance sheet legitimately raise deserved value well above the $20 composite - but not to $123.
Rich / priced-in 4
m78
Price is multiples of every fair-value method
$123.30 vs DCF $23.57 and composite $20.37. Even discounting the EPV floor as too punitive, no method in the stack supports the current quote without heroic re-assumptions.
m70
Priced for perfection on a wobbling margin
2025 saw gross margin decline and net income fall despite strong revenue growth. A ~$160B cap on a business showing early margin pressure requires flawless execution from here.
m60
Competitive encroachment not in the price
TikTok Shop, Amazon Buy with Prime, and platform-native commerce are eating edges the bull case assumes are moated. At this multiple any take-rate slippage compounds badly.
m45
Cash-flow multiple stretched
Even on generous forward FCF, the implied multiple embeds a decade of 20%+ compounding with no margin give - historically a low-probability outcome for platforms at this scale.
This is a good business at a bad price. The quality lens is right that Shopify has earned its stripes, but at $123 I am paying for a decade of near-flawless compounding with zero margin of safety - and the 2025 margin wobble tells me the market has not yet priced any friction. I need this materially lower, around $70 or below, before the risk-reward tilts my way. Until then it is a watch, not a buy.
Verify before trusting this (5)
  • Take-rate trajectory and payments attach rate in next two quarters
  • Gross margin bridge - is the 2025 dip mix or structural
  • GMV growth by geography and merchant cohort (mature Western saturation risk)
  • Any guidance on operating leverage vs reinvestment in AI/logistics
  • Impact of TikTok Shop and Amazon Buy with Prime on merchant retention
General Sentiment
+41
Tailwind
tail √Σ 110 · head √Σ 66 · conf 7/10

The pressure on SHOP right now is net positive and story-driven. The active narrative has swung back to the bullish 'platform-monopoly' frame: a 13x surge in AI-referred orders, B2B GMV strength, Shop Pay traction, and a wave of pre-earnings analyst upgrades are giving the tape a clean bull thesis to chase into the Q2 print. Headlines are explicitly framing the name as undervalued and 'redefining its moat through AI' - that is exactly the kind of coverage that draws momentum flows into a cult-adjacent, high-beta software name. With beta 2.59 and a risk-on tape (VIX 16.5, S&P at highs, software catching an AI-M&A bid), the macro amplification is working FOR the stock, not against it. Offsetting that: durability is only moderate, the May 5 -17% guide-down gap is a fresh scar in memory, and rates at 4.7% with a 26.9x market PE keep a lid on how far a 2-3x sales narrative can extend. The setup is asymmetric into earnings - a strong narrative running hot into a binary event, which is a tailwind now but fragile. Net: pressure is pushing up, but it is the kind of pressure that can reverse violently on one guidance sentence.

Tailwinds 3
m72
AI-payments narrative reaccelerating
13-fold AI-referred order surge and 'AI-powered moat' framing plug SHOP directly into the dominant market story. For a platform-monopoly archetype with medium cult, this is the exact narrative fuel that drives multiple expansion regardless of fundamentals.
m62
Analyst upgrades stacking pre-print
Multiple pre-earnings upgrade and 'undervalued' notes are hitting the tape into Q2. Sell-side tone shifting positive before a catalyst is one of the cleanest short-term sentiment tailwinds and shapes the reaction function.
m55
Risk-on tape amplified by 2.59 beta
With regime score +37, VIX 16.5, and software catching an AI/M&A bid, a 2.59-beta name gets outsized lift. The same tape barely moves a defensive; here it is a real push.
Headwinds 3
m45
Fresh May-5 guide-down scar
The 17% single-day gap on soft Q2 guidance is still recent memory. It caps how aggressively fast money will press longs into the print and creates a hair-trigger reaction if guidance disappoints again.
m38
Rates and market PE pressure long-duration story
10y at 4.7% and market PE 26.9 are structural crosswinds for a name whose story requires perpetual 30%+ growth to justify the multiple. Not decisive today, but it caps upside on the narrative.
m30
Narrative durability only moderate
TikTok Shop, Amazon Buy with Prime, and platform competition mean the bull story has to keep re-earning belief every quarter. Any crack lands hard on a high-beta multiple.
Net pressure leans tailwind. The AI-payments narrative has fresh oxygen, analysts are upgrading into the print, and a risk-on tape is amplifying a 2.59-beta software name in exactly the right direction. But this is momentum riding on a story with only moderate durability and a fresh guide-down scar three months back - it is a hot tailwind, not a stable one. I would call it Tailwind with confidence 7, knowing the sign could flip in a single earnings sentence.
Verify before trusting this (4)
  • Q2 print reaction - beat-and-raise confirms the tailwind, any guide softness re-opens the May-5 wound
  • Whether AI-referred order growth is disclosed as a hard KPI or stays anecdotal
  • Sector rotation - if software AI-M&A bid fades, a 2.59-beta name loses its amplifier fast
  • 10y yield direction; a move back above 4.8-5.0% pressures long-duration platform stories disproportionately
The market-wide tape + this name's exposure to it (beta / sector / narrative durability). Context on the non-fundamental pressure — not a call on the business or the price. processId: detail-general-sentiment
Please log in to view trade setups
The Augustus trade-setup read is a members feature.
Log in
Three lenses kept deliberately separate — Company Quality (price-agnostic), Valuation (price-conditional), and General Sentiment (non-fundamental macro/narrative pressure). The scores are not blended. Filing-level items (convertibles, lock-ups, customer concentration) are v2 — see each lens's "verify."
Character & Durability Scorecard
Ten long-horizon business-character traits the Quality / Value / Sentiment lenses don’t break out, scored 1–10.
Scored Aug 5, 2026 1:44am
Survivability 8/10

Strong balance sheet with substantial net cash and ability to generate FCF through challenging period demonstrates robust survivability, though lacks multi-recession track record for elite score.

  • Net cash position of $5.78B with no debt provides fortress balance sheet
  • Maintained positive FCF through 2023-2025 period despite 2022 loss, demonstrating resilience
confidence: high · from our data
Adaptability 9/10

Demonstrated major strategic pivots including expansion beyond online-only commerce and operational restructuring to return to profitability shows elite adaptability.

  • Successfully pivoted from pure e-commerce enabler to omnichannel commerce platform adding point-of-sale and logistics
  • Navigated post-pandemic normalization by restructuring cost base and achieving profitability after 2022-2023 losses
confidence: high · general knowledge
Moat Trajectory 8/10

Expanding platform with embedded payments, fulfillment, and app ecosystem creates growing switching costs and network effects, though faces competition from Amazon and Adobe.

  • Revenue grew 106% from 2022 to 2025 while improving margins (OpM from -14.7% to 12.7%), indicating strengthening competitive position
  • Platform ecosystem creates switching costs as merchants build entire business infrastructure on Shopify
confidence: high · data + knowledge
Capital Allocation 7/10

Disciplined on dilution and restructured for profitability, but large cash balance suggests capital deployment could be more shareholder-focused with buybacks or strategic investments.

  • Maintained disciplined share count with only 0.6% CAGR dilution despite being high-growth tech company
  • Holding $5.78B net cash (3.6% of market cap) provides optionality but could be deployed more aggressively
confidence: medium · data + knowledge
Pricing Power 7/10

Stable gross margins and expanding operating leverage demonstrate solid pricing power, though take-rate model ties pricing to merchant success rather than pure pricing strength.

  • Gross margins stable 48-50% range through 2021-2025 despite competitive pressures
  • Operating margins improved dramatically from -20.1% to 12.7% (2023-2025) showing ability to expand profitability
confidence: medium · from our data
Management Alignment 8/10

Founder-led with significant insider ownership and demonstrated execution through profitability turnaround shows strong alignment, though SBC data not provided for full assessment.

  • Founder-CEO Tobi Lutke maintains significant ownership and long-term orientation
  • Executed disciplined turnaround from -20% operating margins to +12% profitability in two years shows strong execution
confidence: medium · general knowledge
Demand Durability 8/10

Strong secular tailwind from ongoing e-commerce adoption and merchant digitization, though post-pandemic normalization showed some demand moderation in 2022-2023.

  • E-commerce penetration continues secular shift from physical retail globally
  • SMB and direct-to-consumer digitization remains multi-year tailwind as traditional retail continues evolving
confidence: high · general knowledge
Growth Consistency 6/10

Revenue growth is strong but earnings highly volatile through pandemic boom-bust cycle, demonstrating solid but uneven delivery rather than steady compounding.

  • Revenue trajectory shows strong growth but uneven: $5.60B (2022) to $11.56B (2025), but with profit volatility
  • Net income swung wildly: $2.91B (2021) to -$3.46B (2022) to $2.02B (2024), showing cyclical lumpiness
confidence: high · from our data
Optionality / Runway 9/10

Substantial runway with low single-digit penetration of global commerce, plus multiple embedded options in payments, logistics, B2B, and enterprise creates significant optionality.

  • Large TAM expansion opportunities in B2B commerce, international markets, and enterprise segment
  • Multiple growth vectors including Shopify Payments penetration, fulfillment network, and platform services attach rates
confidence: high · general knowledge
Concentration / Key-Person Risk 8/10

Well-diversified customer base across millions of merchants and geographies mitigates concentration, though some founder-dependence exists given Tobi Lutke's central role.

  • Platform serves over 2 million merchants across diverse industries and geographies
  • Founder-CEO dependent but experienced management team in place
confidence: medium · general knowledge
Scorecard v1 · 10 = most favorable for a long-term owner (incl. lower concentration risk). Some attributes draw on general knowledge where our data is thin — see each row's source tag.
Community AI Feedback
No community reviews yet for SHOP. Be the first — hit How to Contribute, have any AI review this page, and paste its take back here.
My Notes personal — only you see this
Data via Financial Modeling Prep · Cached for performance · twelvedata
v1.1.515 · 9f7cac68 · 2026-08-08 13:09:58