For AI assistants & researchers — machine-readable summary of this page
What this page is: Delvantic's full research page for State Street Corp. (STT) — AI-driven forensic equity research: mechanical valuation models (DCF, EPV, anchored-PE, scenario) plus three independent AI lenses (Quality / Value / Sentiment). Everything below is rendered server-side; you are not missing content that requires JavaScript. All scores are predictions and research opinions, not financial advice.
Our current read (analysis of 2026-08-23): Designation Watch · Gem Score +26 (−100…+100 Quality+Value blend) · Quality 35 · Value 18 · Sentiment 8 (timing only, not weighted) · Composite fair value $279.10 vs $191.74 at analysis
Page map (sections in order; each card carries a stable
reference-name attribute you can cite):
profile-header/price-overview— company profile, live quote, market capextended-analysis— the core: three AI lens reads with findings, scores, and the analyst memofuture-predictions— our forward price-band predictionsmarket-narrative/ai-findings/gpt-critique— narrative context, cross-model findings, and an adversarial critique of our own analysis (near the end of the document)- Members-only sections (render as login gates for anonymous readers):
price-history,income-trend,key-metrics,financials(statement tables),insider-trading. The analysis above is public; the raw data tables require a free account.
More for machine readers: site briefing at
/llms.txt ·
any ticker resolves at delvantic.com/stock/TICKER ·
raw inputs are public-company filings and market data (via licensed data feeds);
every model, score, lens read, and prediction on this page is Delvantic's own analysis.
State Street Corp.
STT NYSEState Street Corp. is a global financial services company and bank holding company headquartered in Boston, Massachusetts. The firm specializes in serving institutional investors, providing two core categories of services: investment servicing and investment management. Its investment servicing activities include custody and fund administration, securities lending, foreign exchange trading, performance and risk analytics, and middle-office outsourcing for asset managers, pension funds, insurance companies, endowments, and other large institutions. On the investment management side, State Street Corp. operates through State Street Investment Management, offering index and active strategies, exchange-traded funds, cash management, and multi-asset solutions across major asset classes for institutional clients worldwide. The company plays a significant role in the asset management and asset servicing sectors, supporting the infrastructure of global capital markets through technology-enabled data, reporting, and risk tools that underpin institutional portfolio management and administration. Founded in 1792, State Street Corp. today is recognized as one of the leading providers of investment servicing and management solutions to institutional investors across more than 100 markets.
Price Overview
Price History (1 Year)
Revenue & Net Income Trend
| Period | Revenue | Net Income | Net Margin | YoY/QoQ |
|---|
Key Metrics
EPS (Diluted): 9.40
Total Equity: $27.84B
Shares: 313,297,872
Total Debt: $0.00
Cash: $4.43B
EBITDA: N/A
Total Debt: $0.00
Cash: $4.43B
Revenue: $13.97B
Revenue: $13.97B
Revenue: $13.97B
Total Equity: $27.84B
Tax Rate: 21.1%
Equity: $27.84B
Total Debt: $0.00
Cash: $4.43B
Current Liabilities: N/A
Long-Term Debt: $0.00
Total Debt: $0.00
Total Equity: $27.84B
Shares: 313,297,872
Shares: 313,297,872
CapEx: -$1.06B
Shares: 313,297,872
Stock Price: $191.80
Net Income: $2.95B
Industry Benchmarks
Income Statement (Annual)
Last updated: Aug 16, 2026 12:29am (7d ago)| Metric | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $12.0B | $12.1B | $11.9B | $12.9B | $14.0B |
| Cost of Revenue | — | — | — | — | — |
| Gross Profit | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Expenses | $4.7B | $4.5B | $4.7B | $4.9B | $5.0B |
| Operating Income | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Income | $2.7B | $2.8B | $1.9B | $2.7B | $2.9B |
| EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS | $7.30 | $7.28 | $5.65 | $8.33 | $9.55 |
| EPS (Diluted) | $7.19 | $7.19 | $5.58 | $8.21 | $9.40 |
Balance Sheet (Annual)
Last updated: Aug 16, 2026 12:10am (7d ago)| Metric | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash & Equivalents | $3.6B | $4.0B | $4.0B | $3.1B | $4.4B |
| Total Current Assets | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Assets | $314.6B | $301.5B | $297.3B | $353.2B | $366.0B |
| Current Liabilities | — | — | — | — | — |
| Long-Term Debt | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Liabilities | $287.3B | $276.3B | $273.5B | $327.9B | $338.2B |
| Total Equity | $27.4B | $25.2B | $23.8B | $25.3B | $27.8B |
| Retained Earnings | $25.2B | $27.0B | $28.0B | $29.6B | $31.4B |
Cash Flow (Annual)
Last updated: Aug 16, 2026 12:29am (7d ago)| Metric | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | -$6.7B | $12.0B | $690.0M | -$13.2B | $11.9B |
| Capital Expenditure | -$811.0M | -$734.0M | -$816.0M | -$926.0M | -$1.1B |
| Free Cash Flow | -$7.5B | $11.2B | -$126.0M | -$14.1B | $10.8B |
| Acquisitions (net) | -$346.0M | $0 | -$61.0M | -$194.0M | -$286.0M |
| Net Debt Issued / (Repaid) | -$6.7B | $2.2B | $3.7B | $4.5B | $1.6B |
| Dividends Paid | -$866.0M | -$972.0M | -$970.0M | -$1.0B | -$1.1B |
| Stock Buybacks | -$900.0M | -$1.5B | -$3.8B | -$1.3B | -$1.2B |
| Net Change in Cash | $164.0M | $339.0M | $77.0M | -$902.0M | $1.3B |
Growth Trends (YoY %)
Last updated: Aug 16, 2026 12:29am (7d ago)| Metric | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | +0.8% | -1.5% | +8.2% | +8.1% |
| Gross Profit Growth | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Income Growth | — | — | — | — |
| Net Income Growth | +3.0% | -29.9% | +38.2% | +9.6% |
| EBITDA Growth | — | — | — | — |
Dividend History (Last 20)
Last updated: Aug 11, 2026 12:59pm (12d ago)| Date | Dividend | Declaration | Record | Payment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-01 | $0.84 | — | — | — |
| 2026-04-01 | $0.84 | — | — | — |
| 2026-01-02 | $0.84 | — | — | — |
| 2025-10-01 | $0.84 | — | — | — |
| 2025-07-01 | $0.76 | — | — | — |
| 2025-04-01 | $0.76 | — | — | — |
| 2025-01-02 | $0.76 | — | — | — |
| 2024-10-01 | $0.76 | — | — | — |
| 2024-07-01 | $0.69 | — | — | — |
| 2024-03-28 | $0.69 | — | — | — |
| 2023-12-29 | $0.69 | — | — | — |
| 2023-09-29 | $0.69 | — | — | — |
| 2023-06-30 | $0.63 | — | — | — |
| 2023-03-31 | $0.63 | — | — | — |
| 2022-12-30 | $0.63 | — | — | — |
| 2022-09-30 | $0.63 | — | — | — |
| 2022-06-30 | $0.57 | — | — | — |
| 2022-03-31 | $0.57 | — | — | — |
| 2021-12-31 | $0.57 | — | — | — |
| 2021-09-30 | $0.57 | — | — | — |
Deep Analysis
Narrative Economics
market-narrative step).
AI Lens 4th lens · how AI reaches this business · 5-yr
2026-08-16Servicing revenue is priced on asset value, not on labor hours, so automating exception handling, corporate actions, NAV production, client reporting and regulatory filings drops straight through to pre-tax margin without shrinking the monetized unit.
Custody is a four-to-five player oligopoly bidding for multi-billion-dollar mandates; if every competitor's unit cost falls at once, procurement teams capture the gain through lower bps and the industry's chronic fee compression simply accelerates.
Whether AI-driven productivity shows up as expanding pre-tax servicing margin or as flat margin with faster fee erosion — observable in the gap between headcount/expense trajectory and servicing fee revenue per dollar of assets under custody.
A national bank charter with GSIB supervision, a balance sheet that carries client cash and settlement risk, decades of accepted legal accountability as custodian of record, and market-infrastructure connectivity across hundreds of jurisdictions and sub-custodians.
AI Lens thesis
State Street is hired to hold, account for, and be legally answerable for other people's assets — a need cheap intelligence does not touch, delivered today by a very large, very manual operations workforce that cheap intelligence absolutely does touch. The transmission mechanism is cost, not demand: fee schedules are asset-based, so automation of reconciliation breaks, corporate actions, fund accounting, transfer agency and regulatory reporting converts headcount into margin. No pension fund or insurer wants to own the custody compliance vertical, and no AI-native can conjure a charter, so DIY and entrant risk are low at the custody layer. The genuine risks are second-order: cheaper software arms middle-office challengers and lets large asset managers insource pieces of the stack; front-office platforms own the client interface an agent would talk to; and oligopoly bidding may hand the savings to clients rather than shareholders. SSGA's passive economics are separately compressing for reasons that pre-date AI.
What the market may be underestimating
Upside State Street's cost base has been the perennial complaint; an operations-heavy, offshore-heavy expense structure is exactly the profile where agentic automation can deliver a step-change rather than the 1-2% annual productivity trims management has historically promised.
Downside AI-cheapened fund-accounting and middle-office software lets the largest asset managers insource the higher-fee wrap around custody, leaving State Street with the lowest-margin safekeeping and settlement stub while the value-added servicing revenue migrates in-house.
Outcome range spread 43
Growth Outlook
Analyzed 2026-08-17 16:16The question every valuation on this page silently assumes: is this company likely to grow? Judged forward — the business, its category, the world — against what's already printed.
Claude Reading
Looking at the raw quarterly tape first: revenue has climbed from $3.26B in Q3'24 to $4.05B in Q2'26 — that's ~24% over seven quarters, and the sequential Q1→Q2 2026 jump from $3.80B to $4.05B (+6.6% QoQ) with margin expanding to 26.8% is a genuine standout print, not noise. Net income of $1.08B in a single quarter annualizes to $4.3B against a TTM run rate closer to $3.45B, so Q2'26 is doing real work. But — and this matters — trailing 12-month NI of ~$3.45B on a $52.7B cap is a forward P/E closer to 15x, not the stated 20.4x annual figure, which is stale. ROE at 10.6% is mediocre for a bank/custodian, and ROA of 0.8% is the honest reminder that this is a leveraged balance-sheet business earning a thin spread on a mountain of assets.
The synthesis model's $288–$313 fair value versus $191.8 (a 50–63% upside) strikes me as aggressive and probably anchored to a DCF that extrapolates the recent margin surge. Market Forces is closer to right: the 26.8% Q2 margin reflects NII tailwinds from the rate environment plus fee leverage on record equity markets lifting AUC/A — neither is a permanent gift. If margins normalize back toward the 20–22% range that dominated 2024–early 2025, sustainable NI is more like $3.0–3.2B, putting fair P/E at 17–18x on a mature custodian, which gets you to roughly $180–210 per share. In other words, the stock is trading right on top of a reasonable normalized valuation — not a screaming buy at a 40% discount, and not obviously overvalued either. The synthesis and the market-forces signal are contradicting each other, and the market-forces read is the more defensible one given how much of the recent EPS acceleration is rate-driven.
The contrarian case against my own "fairly valued" read: earnings CAGR of 23% versus revenue CAGR of 8% shows real operating leverage, and if State Street's Alpha platform and front-office tech push through, the fee-based revenue mix could structurally lift ROE toward 12–13%, which would justify a re-rating to 2.5x book (currently 2.16x) — that's $220+. The narrative model's "fallen angel" framing has merit: this is a 350-year-old franchise with sticky custody assets ($46T+ AUC/A) that the market has periodically written off and been wrong about. Insider activity is all sales (four separate sales in July–August 2026 after the stock has run), which is mildly negative but consistent with executives trimming after a good print — not a red flag on its own. The bigger flag is FCF quality being called poor while reported OCF is $11.9B — that's a red flag I can't verify from what's provided, but for a custodian, OCF is notoriously noisy (deposit flows distort it), so I'd discount that signal partially.
Where the data is thin: no debt figure and D/E of 0 is nonsense for a bank holding company — StreetState carries substantial long-term debt and deposits, and the "no leverage" framing corrupts EV-based multiples. The 2026 quarterly dates should be treated with the usual caution about forward-dated data in the file. And the $288 DCF composite depends heavily on terminal margin assumptions that Market Forces explicitly flagged as unsustainable — I'd trust the signal-flagger over the DCF here. Net: I dissent from the synthesis's implied strong undervaluation but agree the stock isn't overvalued. It's roughly fair with a modest upward skew if the tech investments actually re-rate the multiple. Not a table-pound; a hold-to-nibble at these levels, add aggressively only below $170 where the margin-of-safety to normalized earnings genuinely opens up.
GPT Reading
The data say State Street is a good bank-like utility, not a cheap one. The business has clearly improved: revenue rose from $11.95B in 2023 to $12.92B in 2024 and $13.97B in 2025, and the quarterly run-rate has stepped up again in 2026, with $7.85B in first-half revenue versus $6.73B in first-half 2025, a clean 16.6% increase. Earnings have followed, from $1.94B in 2023 to $2.69B in 2024 and $2.95B in 2025; first-half 2026 net income of $1.84B is already 37.5% above first-half 2025’s $1.34B. Margins are also moving the right way, from roughly 20% in early 2025 to 26.8% in the latest quarter. On raw operating trajectory, this is the strongest State Street has looked in several years.
But the valuation already reflects a lot of that recovery. At $191.8, the stock trades at 20.4x earnings and 2.16x book on a business generating 10.6% ROE and a 1.75% dividend yield. That multiple would be easier to defend if ROE were in the mid-teens or if growth were structurally double-digit; the reported numbers don’t yet prove either. Even annualized off the strong first half of 2026, you get something like $3.7B of net income, which would bring the forward P/E down, but not to a distressed or obviously mispriced level. A $52.7B market cap against $27.8B of equity means investors are paying a meaningful premium to book for a custody/servicing franchise that still looks more cyclical and rate-sensitive than the “stable compounder” label implies. The market is not missing the improvement; it has capitalized it.
The biggest issue in the briefing is cash flow quality. A reported $10.84B of free cash flow on $2.95B of net income is not an economic cash gusher in the usual industrial sense; for financial firms, operating cash flow is often noisy and balance-sheet-driven, which is why the “poor cash flow quality” flag matters. I would not underwrite value off that FCF figure. So the bullish DCF-style outputs that land near $289-$314 look overconfident because they probably treat accounting cash generation too literally. For a custody bank/asset manager, earnings power, fee durability, and returns on equity matter more than optical FCF. On those metrics, State Street looks healthy but not exceptional. Recent insider selling is small and not a thesis by itself, but it also does nothing to support the idea that the stock is obviously cheap here.
The best counterargument is straightforward: the market may still be underestimating how much earnings power has reset upward. If first-half 2026 is not a peak but a new base, then a company that earned $1.08B in the latest quarter on 26.8% margin could be heading toward a $4B annual earnings level, and 20x trailing would quickly compress into a more reasonable mid-teens forward multiple. Revenue has been consistently stair-stepping higher every quarter from $3.26B in 2024-09 to $4.05B in 2026-06, and net income has mostly done the same. If that reflects more than temporary NII support—if servicing fees, operating leverage, and expense discipline are all genuinely improving—then paying 2.2x book for a sticky franchise is not outrageous. A smart bull would also point out that 2023 earnings at $1.94B were likely depressed, so the multi-year recovery is larger than the simple 2024-2025 numbers show.
What would change my mind is evidence that the latest quarter is repeatable without help from temporary tailwinds. If the next two quarters hold revenue around $4.0B+ and net income around $950M-$1.1B, sustaining margins above 24% and pushing full-year ROE materially above 12%, I would concede the stock can justify $200+ and likely deserves more. Conversely, if revenue slips back toward the $3.6B-$3.7B range and margins retreat toward 20%-22%, then today’s 20x earnings and 2.2x book will look rich for a mature financial infrastructure business. Right now I see a solid franchise priced for a cleaner, more durable recovery than the data have fully earned.
Grok Reading
State Street’s numbers tell a story of a custody-and-servicing franchise that has finally escaped the 2023 earnings trough and is compounding again. Annual revenue climbed from $11.95B in 2023 to $13.00B in 2024 and $13.94B in 2025; the most recent quarter annualizes still higher at roughly $16B if the $4.05B print holds. Net income has accelerated faster—$1.94B to $2.69B to $2.95B on the annual line, with the last four quarters already summing to about $3.45B and the June 2026 quarter alone delivering $1.08B at a 26.8% net margin. That margin expansion (from the high-teens/low-20s range) plus free-cash-flow conversion of $10.84B against $2.95B of reported earnings is the standout feature: the business is throwing off far more cash than GAAP earnings imply, while the payout ratio sits at a comfortable 38% and the dividend yield is only 1.75%. With a stated debt-to-equity of zero and $4.43B of cash against $27.84B of equity, the balance sheet is clean enough to support buybacks or further capital return without stress.
At $191.74 the stock trades at 20.4× trailing earnings, 2.0× book and 4.0× sales. A 10.6% ROE does not, on its face, justify two times book under a normal cost of equity, and the 0.8% ROA reminds everyone that this remains a low-return, high-asset business. Yet the market is clearly capitalizing the earnings recovery and the fee-based durability of the custody franchise rather than the static ROE. The acceleration in both top-line and margins, coupled with cash generation that dwarfs net income, makes the multiple less egregious than a simple screen suggests; on a run-rate $3.5–4.0B earnings base the forward multiple compresses into the mid-teens, which is closer to fair for a high-quality asset servicer with secular ETF and custody tailwinds.
The strongest counter-argument is valuation gravity. A P/B of 2.0× on a mid-teens ROE has historically marked the upper end of State Street’s range, and any mean-reversion in fee rates, a sharp drop in equity-market AUM, or a sustained compression of net interest income could erase the recent margin gains and leave the stock looking expensive at 20×. The 2022–2023 experience—when revenue stalled near $12B and net income fell below $2B—shows how quickly the earnings power can reverse when markets and rates move against the firm. A skeptic would also note that the reported debt-to-equity of zero may understate wholesale funding and deposit dynamics typical of a custody bank, so leverage risk is not entirely absent. Those points keep conviction from running higher; the stock is priced for continued execution, not for a soft landing in markets or rates.
What would flip the view is straightforward: two consecutive quarters of revenue below $3.7B or net margins falling back through 20% would signal the recovery has stalled and justify a move to overvalued. Conversely, a sustained $4.0B+ quarterly revenue run-rate with margins holding above 24% and a clear step-up in buybacks would push the stock toward a higher multiple and a more aggressive undervalued call.
Big-3 Panel — where each AI stands
Advanced Analysis Forensic deep-dive · separate lenses
State Street is a large trust/custody bank with revenue climbing from $12.03B in 2021 to $13.97B in 2025 (roughly 4% CAGR, with acceleration in the last two years) and net income recovering from a $1.94B trough in 2023 to $2.95B in 2025. Diluted share count has fallen from 374.5M to 313.3M, a -4.4% CAGR, meaning per-share earnings are compounding faster than headline net income — a clear sign of disciplined capital return. Liquid cash of $4.43B against a net-cash position and reported $10.84B of FCF in 2025 point to an entity that funds itself.
Verify before trusting this (7)
- CET1 ratio, SLR, and regulatory capital cushion vs. minimums
- Assets under custody/administration trend and fee rate per AUC
- Client and revenue concentration in asset servicing
- Composition of the $10.84B 2025 FCF — how much is core operating vs. securities portfolio
- Whether the 4 insider sales were 10b5-1 pre-planned
- Net interest income sensitivity and deposit beta
- Buyback authorization size and pace vs. SBC issuance
The e2e composite pins fair value at $288.70 (signal-adjusted $313.82), implying ~50-64% upside from $191.74. That gap is anchored on an anchored-PE method, which for a custody bank tends to run hot because it treats bank earnings like industrial earnings without haircutting for leverage, regulatory capital drag, and fee compression. I trust the direction (cheap) more than the magnitude. A more sober deserved value on a Solid-quality custody franchise at ~11-13x normalized EPS lands closer to $220-$250, still above $191.74 but with a much thinner margin of safety in the 15-25% range.
Verify before trusting this (5)
- custody fee rate trend and AUC/A growth in latest 10-Q
- normalized EPS ex one-time regulatory/litigation charges
- NII sensitivity and deposit beta guidance
- buyback pace and remaining authorization
- capital return payout ratio vs CET1 headroom
The macro tape is mildly supportive: VIX at 14, S&P near highs, and an established risk-on regime. With a 1.42 beta, STT should mechanically catch bid in this environment, and the recent Bloomberg piece on rotation from AI high-flyers into banks is exactly the kind of flow that helps a boring financial plumbing name. That is the clearest active tailwind here. Against that, the narrative is a moderate-intensity fallen-angel story with low cult coefficient - nobody is excited to own STT, and the bear frame (fee compression, custody disruption, regulatory tail) is the durable market meme. News flow is benign but uninspiring: a $500M preferred issuance (mildly dilutive optics, neutral-to-slight negative), ETF product commentary that treats STT as pipes rather than a story, and a Latam acquisition that got a mixed tape response (up one day, down the next). Analyst tone is not screaming either way. Net: gentle upward pressure from the regime and bank rotation, offset by a tired narrative and no catalyst to force a re-rating.
Verify before trusting this (4)
- Whether the bank/financials rotation persists or fades if AI names stabilize
- Any target-price revisions or upgrades that would validate the stabilization thesis
- Fee-rate commentary at the next print - a crack in the fee-compression narrative would be a re-rating catalyst
- Regulatory or litigation headlines that could reinforce the fallen-angel frame
State Street is hired to hold, account for, and be legally answerable for other people's assets — a need cheap intelligence does not touch, delivered today by a very large, very manual operations workforce that cheap intelligence absolutely does touch. The transmission mechanism is cost, not demand: fee schedules are asset-based, so automation of reconciliation breaks, corporate actions, fund accounting, transfer agency and regulatory reporting converts headcount into margin. No pension fund or insurer wants to own the custody compliance vertical, and no AI-native can conjure a charter, so DIY and entrant risk are low at the custody layer. The genuine risks are second-order: cheaper software arms middle-office challengers and lets large asset managers insource pieces of the stack; front-office platforms own the client interface an agent would talk to; and oligopoly bidding may hand the savings to clients rather than shareholders. SSGA's passive economics are separately compressing for reasons that pre-date AI.
None surfaced.
Verify before trusting this (8)
- Pre-tax servicing margin trajectory
- Fee compression rate on renewals
- Expense growth versus revenue growth gap
- NAV error and compensation events
- Regulatory consent orders or fines
- Client indemnification terms in mandates
- Global AUC/A growth versus market appreciation
- Regulatory changes to asset segregation rules
The world's institutional asset pool keeps growing and it all needs custody, administration, collateral and FX plumbing — a toll on financial assets that grows with the stock of assets rather than with GDP. The offset is that the toll rate itself keeps falling as capital migrates to passive vehicles priced in single-digit basis points and as large clients demand renewal discounts. So the structural shape is rising volume, falling price. On top of that, elevated long rates and a positive curve currently pay State Street twice — once on client balances, once on reinvestment — which is a cyclical, not permanent, gift. Fintech disruption of core custody remains more rhetoric than mechanism: settlement, regulatory reporting and fiduciary asset segregation are licence- and trust-gated, and the incumbents are the ones building the tokenised-settlement rails. The credible threat is margin, not displacement.
When we made this prediction on Aug 16, 2026, STT was $191.74. We expect it to be $225.00 by Feb 2027, and we consider it great value under $175.00. This is an early model (v0.6.0) — the direction is more reliable than the exact price. Made Aug 16, 2026.
Blue is our prediction, starting the day we made it. Grey is a slower route to the same place — the same destination, taking longer. Black is the actual price, so you can see how we are doing.